Comparative outcomes of robotic surgery vs conventional sternotomy for cardiac myxoma excision: A meta-analysis

doi:10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.111159

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (0)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-2)

Tables (1-1)

Sum=0

Aug 26, 2025 (publication date) through Aug 21, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Cardiology

ISSN

1949-8462

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2025; 17(8): 111159
Published online Aug 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.111159

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart depicting the literature screening process.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plots. A-F: Comparing of cardiopulmonary bypass time (A); cross clamp time (B); ventilation time (C); hospitalization time (D); atrial arrhythmia (E); red blood cell transfusion (F) between robotic surgery and conventional sternotomy. RBC: Red blood cell.

Citation: Khawar MMH, Ejaz H, Jaffar MS, Kashif M, Habib M, Mukhtar A, Riaz H, Shah SA, Muhammad A, Ali U, Saeed H, Buhadur Ali MK, Chhetri R. Comparative outcomes of robotic surgery vs conventional sternotomy for cardiac myxoma excision: A meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(8): 111159
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v17/i8/111159.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i8.111159