Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2021; 13(4): 82-94
Published online Apr 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i4.82
Figure 1
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment of included studies using risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions tool.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plots comparing dabigatran with warfarin regarding hazard ratios of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plots comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin regarding hazard ratio of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plots comparing apixaban with warfarin regarding hazard ratio of ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval.