Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Role of STIM1 in neurodegeneration
Carlos Pascual-Caro, Noelia Espinosa-Bermejo, Eulalia Pozo-Guisado, Francisco Javier Martin-Romero
Carlos Pascual-Caro, Noelia Espinosa-Bermejo, Francisco Javier Martin-Romero, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, University of Extremadura, Badajoz 06006, Spain
Eulalia Pozo-Guisado, Department of Cell Biology, School of Medicine and Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, University of Extremadura, Badajoz 06006, Spain
Supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, No. BFU2017-82716-P.
Author contributions: Martin-Romero FJ wrote the initial draft; Pascual-Caro C, Espinosa-Bermejo N and Pozo-Guisado E revised and reformatted the final version of the manuscript, together with Martin-Romero FJ; all authors approved the version to be published.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Francisco Javier Martin-Romero, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Life Sciences and Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, University of Extremadura, Avenida de Elvas s/n, Badajoz 06006, Spain. fjmartin@unex.es
Telephone: +34-92-4489971
Received: August 15, 2018
Peer-review started: August 17, 2018
First decision: September 11, 2018
Revised: October 8, 2018
Accepted: October 23, 2018
Article in press: October 23, 2018
Published online: November 16, 2018
STIM1 AND CALCIUM MOBILIZATION
STIM1 (stromal interaction molecule 1) is a type I transmembrane protein located mainly in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), with a significant pool of approximately 20% at the plasma membrane. Due to its Ca2+-sensitive EF-hand domain close to the N-terminus, STIM1 acts as an ER-intraluminal Ca2+ sensor[1,2]. This EF-hand domain shows an apparent dissociation constant for Ca2+ of 250 μmol/L[3]. The decrease of the ER-intraluminal Ca2+ concentration, with the subsequent dissociation of Ca2+ from the EF-hand domain, triggers the oligomerization and the conformational change of STIM1. These two events are critical for STIM1 activation.
The rapid decrease of the ER-intraluminal Ca2+ concentration is a common event in cells under diverse stimuli, such as the activation of growth factor receptors or the activation of G protein-coupled receptors. In both cases, phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to generate inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol. The generation of IP3 activates its receptor at the ER, with the subsequent release of Ca2+ through this channel/receptor and the rise of cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c). As mentioned above, the emptying of intracellular Ca2+ stores (mainly the ER) activates STIM1, which is then able to bind and activate STIM1-dependent Ca2+ channels[4], such as ORAI1[5]. The activation of ORAI1 leads to the transient increase of Ca2+ influx and to the rise of [Ca2+]c, which is required for the refilling of the ER and for the sustainability of this system in successive stimulations. Thus, STIM1 protein and STIM1-dependent Ca2+ channels ensure Ca2+ mobilization and the stimulation of Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways by activating the “store-operated Ca2+ entry” (SOCE), i.e., the Ca2+ influx pathway activated by the decrease of the ER-intraluminal Ca2+ level.
The activation of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels by STIM1 is carried out in ER-plasma membrane contact sites (ER-PM junctions)[6], where STIM1 relocalizes in response to Ca2+ store depletion. When the ER-intraluminal Ca2+ concentration is high, STIM1 remains bound to the growing tip of microtubules and moves freely on the ER surface[7]. However, activated STIM1 becomes phosphorylated at three ERK1/2-target sites (Ser575, Ser608, and Ser621) and this phosphorylation is critical for enhancing the dissociation from microtubules[8,9]. Oligomers of active STIM1 are less mobile and phospho-STIM1 is found at the cell periphery[10], close to the plasma membrane, where it binds ORAI1. Because STIM1 and ORAI1 are ubiquitous, they are involved in a wide range of signaling pathways that regulate many cellular functions[11]. However, the number of studies about the role of STIM1 in neuronal tissue is much more limited.
STIM1 EXPRESSION AND FUNCTION IN NEURONAL CELLS
STIM1 is widely expressed in the brain according to databases such as Expression Atlas (from the European Bioinformatics Institute, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa) or UniGene (from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, https://http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/unigene). Indeed, it is well known that STIM1 becomes activated upon depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores in the brain in a similar fashion to that found in any other cell or tissue[12,13]. The role of STIM1 in neuronal function was initially suggested in Drosophila melanogaster neurons. Shortly after the description of STIM1 as the main regulator of SOCE, it was proved that STIM1 was required for normal flight and associated patterns of rhythmic firing of the flight motoneurons[14], and that SOCE regulates spatial and temporal Ca2+ mobilization in vertebrate photoreceptor cones, suggesting a role in the generation of excitatory signals across the retinal synapse[15].
A key finding was reported in 2010 by Ricardo Dolmetsch’s and Donald L. Gill’s labs. They found that STIM1 directly suppresses depolarization-induced opening of the voltage-operated Ca2+ channel (VOCC) CaV1.2[16,17]. What was striking was the fact that STIM1 binds to CaV1.2 through the same domain that activates ORAI1, the Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ activation domain, and also triggers the internalization of the channel from the membrane. These findings provided the molecular explanation for the shared control of Ca2+ entry through ORAI1 and CaV1.2, making it possible for them to operate independently. In HEK293 cells, it was later reported that Homer proteins are required for the binding between STIM1 and CaV1.2 channels upon Ca2+ store-depletion conditions triggered by thapsigargin[18], an inhibitor of the ER-Ca2+ pump.
T-type VOCCs, such as CaV3.1, are also modulated by STIM1. This was first observed not in neurons but in cardiomyocytes, where it was reported that STIM1 co-precipitated with CaV1.3 channels, and that the knocking-down of STIM1 expression increased CaV1.3 surface expression and the current density of T-type VOCCs[19].
Given the abundance of STIM1 and STIM2 in neuronal tissues and their role in Ca2+ mobilization, it is not surprising to learn that they have a direct impact on cognitive functions. In mice with conditional deletion of Stim1 or Stim2 genes in the forebrain (conditional knock-outs or cKO), the analysis of spatial reference memory revealed a mild learning delay in Stim1 cKO mice, no effect in Stim2 cKO mice, and a deep impairment in spatial learning in the double cKO[20]. This striking effect was explained by the regulation of the phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor subunit GluA1, the transcriptional regulator CREB and the CaV1.2 on protein kinase A-target sites, leading to the proposal that the upregulation of cAMP/PKA signaling impairs the development of spatial memory[20]. Kuznicki’s lab reported that STIM1 protein in neurons can control AMPA-induced Ca2+ entry, based on the inhibition of Ca2+ entry observed with AMPA receptors (AMPAR) inhibitors and the finding that STIM1 physically binds GluA1/GluA2 AMPAR[21].
On the other hand, in transgenic mice overexpressing STIM1 in neurons it was reported a reduction of long-term depression in hippocampal slices, as well as a decrease in anxiety-like behavior and an increase in contextual learning improvement[22]. All of this further confirms the role of STIM1 in the modulation of synaptic strength and memory formation.
Closely related to the above statement, the control of L-type VOCCs by STIM1 has functional consequences that were reported for dendritic spine structural plasticity. In hippocampal neurons, depolarization by the neurotransmitter glutamate activates postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and L-type VOCC-dependent Ca2+ influx, as well as the release of Ca2+ from the ER. The consequent activation of STIM1 inhibits VOCCs, an event that leads to the enlargement of ER content in spines, which is believed to help in the stabilization of mushroom spines that have become enlarged during long-term potentiation[23].
STIM1 IN NEURONAL CELL DEATH
There are some examples of the involvement of STIM1 and SOCE in neuronal injury. For instance, cell death due to diffuse axonal injury is preceded by an increase of STIM1 expression in neurons of the rat cerebral cortex after lateral head rotational injury[24]. In this regard, STIM1 expression was significantly increased in a traumatic brain injury model, and STIM1 knock-down inhibited apoptotic cell death after traumatic injury by decreasing the upregulation of mGluR1-dependent Ca2+ signaling[25]. However, Berna-Erro et al[26] demonstrated that STIM2, but not STIM1, was essential for ischemia-induced cytosolic Ca2+ accumulation in neurons using hypoxic conditions for culturing neurons from wild-type and Stim2-/- mice, hippocampal slice preparations, as well as in Stim2-/- mice subjected to focal cerebral ischemia.
Oxytosis, a type of cell death characterized by an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and augmented Ca2+ influx, can be triggered in neurons in culture by depleting reduced glutathione content. Henke et al[27], reported that the Ca2+-influx pathway in this cell death could be mediated by ORAI1, the CRAC channel activated by STIM1. Similarly, in PC12 cells exposed to 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), an experimental model to trigger ROS-dependent cell death, the knockdown of STIM1 was able to attenuate apoptotic cell death by limiting the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake induced by 6-OHDA. This resulted in the protection of PC12 cells against the oxidative stress generated by ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction[28]. On the other hand, the inhibition of SOCE or the knock-down of STIM1 limited ROS production and the activation of apoptosis in PC12 cells exposed to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium or MPP+[29], the toxic metabolite of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine), a well-known inducer of Parkinsonism. These studies revealed that oxidative stress induces an increase of [Ca2+]i mediated by the activation of SOCE. Indeed, STIM1 is a redox-sensitive protein, and it is known that Cys56 becomes S-glutathionylated during oxidative stress[30], a residue located near its luminal EF-hand domain. Hawkins et al[30], demonstrated that S-glutathionylation lowered the affinity of STIM1 for Ca2+, thereby activating STIM1 in a store-independent fashion. Similarly, ORAI1 is a redox sensor through the Cys195 located in the second extracellular loop. Although it was initially shown that the oxidation of this Cys residue inhibited Ca2+ current through this channel[31], other researchers found that exposure to H2O2 increased influx through ORAI1[32], suggesting that ROS has multiple redox-sensitive targets in the SOCE machinery.
Mitochondrial dysfunction is an early event in neurotoxicity triggered by massive Ca2+ influx, as observed during glutamate neurotoxicity[33]. Following acute increase in [Ca2+]i, Ca2+ uptake by mitochondria contributes to the protection against cell death. However, Ca2+ overload in mitochondria triggers the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), an event that led to cell death in different neuronal cell types[34,35]. It is accepted that the overproduction of ROS modulates the opening of the mPTP, but it has also been shown this opening at physiological levels of ROS. Recently, Agarwal et al[36], reported that astrocytes show transient cytosolic Ca2+ spikes generated by the Ca2+ release from mitochondria when the mPTP opens by a mechanism that involves ROS generated during the electron transfer in the respiratory systems. Electron transport rates are strongly dependent on the availability of NADH, and therefore dependent on the Krebs cycle status, which is tightly controlled by the mitochondrial [Ca2+]. Therefore, there is a strong correlation between dysregulation of Ca2+ entry through ORAI1, mitochondrial Ca2+ overload, ROS generation, mPTP opening and cell death.
STIM1 IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
Alzheimer’s disease
Taking into consideration the information summarized above, it should not be surprising that the dysregulation of STIM1 could underlie the pathogenesis of some of the most frequent neurodegenerative diseases. In 1907 Alzheimer[37] described a disease in a 51-year-old woman with presenile dementia who displayed diffuse cortical atrophy, nerve cell loss, plaques, and tangles. Nowadays, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients are classified within 3 groups: Early-onset AD (up to 5% of all patients with AD), late-onset or sporadic AD (the most common form of the disease), and familial AD (FAD, less than 1% of AD patients). FAD is linked to known genes, such as the amyloid beta precursor protein gene (APP), the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE), presenilin1/2 genes (PSEN1, PSEN2), or the alpha-2-macroglobulin gene (A2M), and most early-onset AD patients are FAD patients. There is no significant pathological difference between sporadic AD and FAD, but symptoms progress more rapidly in FAD[38].
The major risk for sporadic AD is aging, which increases the difficulty of finding a suitable model animal that recapitulates all the hallmarks of the human disease in the absence of mutated genes as in FAD. However, there is a growing consensus regarding the hypothesis that Ca2+ dysregulation is in the pathogenesis of AD[39-42]. This hypothesis is supported by evidence that revealed how diverse Ca2+ mobilization systems are impaired in AD, including VOCCs, IP3 receptors, store-operated Ca2+ channels (SOCs), and mitochondrial Ca2+ transporters[43].
Regarding STIM1 and SOCE, it is known that SOCE is reduced and that STIM1 and ORAI1 expression are downregulated in long-term cultures of hippocampal neurons, an experimental approach intended to mimic in vivo neuronal aging[44]. Also, reduced expression of STIM2 was observed in hippocampal neurons from the presenilin-1 M146V knock-in mouse model of FAD. As it is assumed that STIM2 and the activation of the calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) mediates the stabilization of mushroom spines, this decrease in STIM2 levels could explain the loss of dendritic spines and the defects in the development of long-term potentiation LTP and memory development in AD patients[45]. In this regard, it is known that the gamma-secretase protein complex interacts with STIM1 in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, skin fibroblasts from FAD patients, and in mouse primary cortical neurons[46]. Tong et al[46], also reported that cultured hippocampal neurons expressing the mutant PSEN1 M146L, showed reduced dendritic spines, together with diminished SOCE. Because the wild-type phenotype was rescued by overexpressing STIM1, or by inhibiting gamma-secretase activity, they hypothesized that STIM1 could be a substrate for the gamma-secretase complex. Finally, they proved that the transmembrane domain of STIM1 shows a target domain for the proteolytic activity of the gamma-secretase complex and that the reduced SOCE in PSEN1-mutant neurons was due to the higher rates of STIM1 proteolysis. Although this proteolysis needs to be studied further to confirm cleavage sites on STIM1, this data fits well with the recent observation that there is a sharp decline of STIM1 protein levels in brain tissue from non-familial (sporadic) AD patients[47]. This is supporting evidence for a common hallmark in sporadic AD and FAD, i.e., reduced STIM1 could be severely affecting Ca2+ mobilization in neurons in both groups of patients. Thus, it is necessary to study the consequences of the reduced STIM1 expression in neurons in order to understand how neuronal cell physiology develops in the absence of STIM1 and to find possible targets for clinical interventions. An approach to studying the patho-physiological consequences of a limited level of STIM1 in neurons has been recently reported by our group[47]. In this report, we modified STIM1 gene locus using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing techniques, and we found that the differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells to neuronal-like cells was not impaired by the absence of STIM1. However, the loss of STIM1 triggered significant cell death due to the impairment of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, and to reduced mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration. These two events led to high levels of senescence. STIM1-KO cells showed potentiation of Ca2+ entry through L-type VOCCs[47], further confirming earlier observations that demonstrated the inhibitory role of STIM1 on CaV1.2 channels[16,17]. Consequently, the knocking-down of CACNA1C gene transcripts (for CaV1.2 channel) rescued the wild-type phenotype, confirming that the upregulation of Ca2+ entry through CaV1.2 channels was deleterious in STIM1-deficient cells[47] (Figure 1). In this regard, higher Ca2+ entry through VOCCs had been recorded in CA1 pyramidal neurons from the hippocampus in aged rats[48], an effect that resulted in the down-regulation of short-term neuronal plasticity.
Figure 1 Deficiency of STIM1 and neurodegeneration.
Neurons expressing the mutant PSEN1 M146L showed higher rates of STIM1 proteolysis, reduced levels of STIM1, reduced store-operated Ca2+ entry and diminished dendritic spines[46]. Deficiency of STIM1 has been observed in non-familial (sporadic) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and can be mimicked by genome edition of STIM1 locus in SH-SY5Y cells[47]. Because STIM1 is a negative regulator of CaV1.2 channels, this deficiency triggered the upregulation of Ca2+ entry through CaV1.2 channels which was responsible for the loss of inner mitochondrial membrane polarization, senescence, and cell death[47]. This higher rate of Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 channels has also been monitored in 3xTgAD mice[51]. The long-term treatment with dihydropyridines, known blockers of CaV1.2, reduced sporadic dementia by 55% during aging[52], pointing out the decrease of STIM1 as a possible mechanism to explain neurodegeneration in sporadic and familial AD.
Accumulation of beta amyloid peptides (Aβ) begins earlier than most of the clinical symptoms associated with FAD. However, clinical interventions to prevent this accumulation have been inconclusive so far. Accumulation of Aβ directly affects Ca2+ mobilization, and the possibility that an increase of PKA-dependent phosphorylation of CaV1.2 channels could underlie the upregulation of Ca2+ influx through these channels has been discussed[49,50]. Therefore, an alternative clinical intervention is the blocking of excessive Ca2+ entry in neurons. Transgenic mice have been designed to accumulate Aβ and hyperphosphorylation of tau protein in CA1 pyramidal neurons, as an experimental approach to mimic some clinical features of FAD patients. Using these mice (known as 3xTgAD mice) it has been shown that Ca2+ current through L-type VOCCs became higher in these hippocampal neurons, supporting the possible role of VOCCs in neuronal degeneration in FAD patients[51]. In addition, the long-term treatment of subjects receiving active treatment with L-type VOCCs blockers (nitrendipine) reduced sporadic dementia by 55% during aging[52], suggesting that the enhanced Ca2+ entry through VOCCs could be in the pathogenesis of sporadic AD. Protection against the loss of working memory has also been monitored in rats treated with the VOCC blocker nimodipine, a treatment that reduced Ca2+ current through CaV1.3 in CA1 neurons[53]. Finally, isradipine, another dihydropyridine, attenuated Aβ accumulation toxicity by reducing CaV1.2 expression and Ca2+ influx in MC65 neuroblastoma cells[54]. Interestingly, isradipine also showed a neuroprotective effect in models of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and stroke[50,55].
Whereas a decline in STIM1 level is deleterious, in part due to the upregulation of VOCCs, high levels of STIM1 and SOCE might be protective, as suggested by the reduced Aβ secretion observed in cells expressing a constitutively activated STIM1 mutant (D76A)[56]. On the other hand, Aβ seems to affect STIM1-dependent Ca2+ entry because knocking-down APP transcripts delayed the binding of STIM1 to ORAI1 in response to store depletion[57], and SOCE was largely reduced in cultured astrocytes from APP-KO mice[58], confirming the crosstalk between SOCE and APP.
PD
A recent report showed that neurotoxins that trigger PD symptoms targeted TRPC1 expression and increased Ca2+ influx through CaV1.3 channels (L-type VOCC) which led to degeneration of dopaminergic (DA) neurons[59]. Because of the key role of CaV1.3 in the regulation of basal single-spike firing in DA neurons[60], the reported inhibition of CaV1.3 by the STIM1-TRPC1 complex[59] could explain the disruption of neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis in PD patients. Indeed, in mice treated with MPTP, the expression of CaV1.2 and CaV1.3 in the substantia nigra increased after 2 wk of treatment, and isradipine (L-type VOCC blocker) prevented this upregulation and the loss of DA neurons[61]. Similarly, nimodipine prevented cell death triggered by MPP+ in SH-SY5Y cell in culture and Parkinsonism in MPTP-treated mice[62]. Because dihydropyridines are not highly selective in discriminating between CaV1.2 and CaV1.3, Wang et al[61], reported a high-throughput screening that led to 1-(3-chlorophenethyl)-3-cyclopentylpyrimidine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione as the first potent and highly selective CaV1.3 antagonist with potential utility in clinical approaches. However, Ortner et al[63], reported later that this specific compound showed inhibitory activity of CaV1.3 only in a minority of cells.
On the other hand, antagonists of SOCE and depletion of STIM1 by siRNA increased cell viability, reduced intracellular ROS production as well as lipid peroxidation and prevented mitochondrial dysfunction in MPP+-treated PC12 cells[29], supporting the hypothesis that augmented Ca2+ entry through STIM1-activated channels mediates toxicity of MPP+. This result, however, is in conflict with the observation that treatment with this neurotoxin decreased TRPC1 expression, TRPC1 interaction with STIM1, and Ca2+ entry in SH-SY5Y cells[64], making further study necessary to discover the role of STIM1, SOCE, and VOCCs in the pathogenesis of PD.
CONCLUSION
Neurodegenerative diseases are devastating for the elderly population and no fully efficient therapies are available to treat some of them, particularly AD. However, a growing body of evidence supports a role for excessive Ca2+ entry through VOCCs in neurodegeneration. Recent reports proposed that the specific loss of STIM1 in neuronal tissue fully explains the observed Ca2+ homeostasis disruption in neurons during sporadic AD and FAD. In this regard, STIM1 deficiency triggered upregulation of Ca2+ entry through CaV1.2 in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, which can be explained by the role of STIM1 in the inhibitory control of CaV1.2. This augmented Ca2+ influx led to the inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I activity, mitochondrial inner membrane depolarization, reduced mitochondrial free Ca2+ concentration, and to higher levels of senescence and cell death. All these effects were prevented by silencing CaV1.2 expression, emphasizing the upregulation of these channels as a major cause of neuronal cell death (Figure 1).
Manuscript source: Invited manuscript
Specialty type: Biochemistry and molecular biology
Country of origin: Spain
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): D
Grade E (Poor): 0
P- Reviewer: Nesci S, Utkin YN S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Yin SY