Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Biol Chem. Aug 26, 2015; 6(3): 65-70
Published online Aug 26, 2015. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i3.65
Topographic patterns of vascular disease: HOX proteins as determining factors?
Richard P Visconti, Alexander Awgulewitsch, Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
Alexander Awgulewitsch, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
Author contributions: Both authors contributed to this manuscript.
Supported by The National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health, No. P20GM109040, No.P20GM103444, and No.P30GM103342; by RII grant from the NSF (EPS-0903795), a Beginning Grant in Aid from the American Heart Association (2BGIA 11720004) and a South Carolina EPSCoR grant for Exploratory Academic Research (15-2843).
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Alexander Awgulewitsch, PhD, Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, STE 816, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. awgulewa@musc.edu
Telephone: +1-843-7928946
Received: February 5, 2015
Peer-review started: February 7, 2015
First decision: March 20, 2015
Revised: April 23, 2015
Accepted: May 7, 2015
Article in press: May 8, 2015
Published online: August 26, 2015

Abstract

Steadily increasing evidence supports the idea that genetic diversities in the vascular bed are, in addition to hemodynamic influences, a major contributing factor in determining region-specific cardiovascular disease susceptibility. Members of the phylogenetically highly conserved Hox gene family of developmental regulators have to be viewed as prime candidates for determining these regional genetic differences in the vasculature. During embryonic patterning, the regionally distinct and precisely choreographed expression patterns of HOX transcription factors are essential for the correct specification of positional identities. Apparently, these topographic patterns are to some degree retained in certain adult tissues, including the circulatory system. While an understanding of the functional significance of these localized Hox activities in adult blood vessels is only beginning to emerge, an argument can be made for a role of Hox genes in the maintenance of vessel wall homeostasis and functional integrity on the one hand, and in regulating the development and progression of regionally restricted vascular pathologies, on the other. Initial functional studies in animal models, as well as data from clinical studies provide some level of support for this view. The data suggest that putative genetic regulatory networks of Hox-dependent cardiovascular disease processes include genes of diverse functional categories (extracellular matrix remodeling, transmembrane signaling, cell cycle control, inflammatory response, transcriptional control, etc.), as potential targets in both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells, as well as cell populations residing in the adventitia.

Key Words: Hox, Blood vessel, Cardiovascular disease, Positional identity, Endothelial cell, Vascular smooth muscle cell

Core tip: Accumulating evidence indicates regionally restricted HOX expression patterns in the adult arterial tree that may reflect a topographic vascular HOX code for specifying positional identities in various cell types of the circulatory system. We propose that this positional information is critical for maintaining local vessel wall homeostasis and that its disruption plays an important role in the development of vascular diseases with distinct topographic preferences. This editorial discusses emerging molecular data in support of this novel concept.



INTRODUCTION

According to epidemiological data from the World Health Organization (WHO), diseases of the circulatory system, collectively known as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death world-wide (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en), and a great number of resources have been committed to study the pathophysiology of CVDs with the goal of improving therapeutic interventions. The most common forms of CVD include atherosclerosis of various segments of the arterial tree (coronary, carotid, and cerebral arteries, aortic arch, abdominal artery), aneurysms of the thoracic and abdominal aorta, as well as cerebral arterial aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and venous insufficiency.

Although certain types of CVDs share some of the same pathogenic characteristics (e.g., neointima and atherosclerotic plaque formation as a result of chronic inflammation in atherosclerosis, medial degeneration in aortic aneurysms), they usually develop at distinct anatomic locations. As the most prevalent CVD risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol, lack of physical activity, obesity, high blood cholesterol and triglycerides, and stress are all systemic, regional genetic differences in the vascular bed are likely to be critical for these topographic disease patterns, as they cannot be attributed to hemodynamic differences alone. This view is underscored by aortic homograft transplant experiments in canines, in which atherosclerosis- susceptible segments of the abdominal aorta were transplanted into the atherosclerosis-resistent thoracic aorta and vice versa[1]. Examination of transplanted vessel segments subsequent to keeping the animals on an atherogenic diet revealed that the abdominal segments readily developed atherosclerotic lesions in their thoracic host environment, whereas the thoracic aortic segments continued to be free from lesion formation in the abdominal aorta. These results are consistent with data from a large-scale clinical study involving approximately 12000 patients that were treated surgically for atherosclerotic occlusive disease with a follow-up of over 25 years[2]. In this study the arterial bed was divided into four anatomical categories for analysis including the coronary arterial bed, the major branches of the aortic arch, the visceral branches of the abdominal aorta and the terminal abdominal aorta with its major branches. The data showed that the response to systemic risk factors is distinctly different in each of the four categories[2].

A search for potential determinants underlying these inherent differences in the response to systemic pathogenic triggers will have to consider the circumstance that vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) residing in distinct segments of the arterial tree originate from different sources depending on their anatomic location. Lineage-mapping involving chick-quail chimera identified at least seven different sources including proepicardium, secondary heart field, neural crest, mesangioblasts, somites, splanchnic mesoderm and mesothelium that contribute to defined arterial segments, in addition to various types of progenitor cells residing primarily in either the media or adventitia with a more universal distribution[3]. Overall, this fate map reveals a segmented pattern of the arterial tree that seems to reflect the metameric patterning of the vertebrate embryo. As segment identities, and therefore diversities, are specified by members of the phylogenetically highly conserved family of Hox transcriptional regulators, these genes have to be viewed as prime candidates for determining different positional identities in the vascular bed that reflect regional differences in CVD susceptibility.

HOX-SPECIFIED POSITIONAL IDENTITIES IN THE CIRCULATORY SYSTEM

The conserved Hox gene family constitutes a genetic system of unique properties that is utilized initially during embryonic patterning for specifying positional identities along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis[4,5]. The mouse and human genome harbor 39 Hox genes that are organized into four separate clusters designated Hoxa, -b, -c, and -d. Alignment of these transcriptionally unipolar clusters based on sequence similarities reveals 13 paralogous groups of Hox genes that are activated sequentially in distinct A-P embryonic domains such that genes of groups 1 and 2 are expressed first in the most anterior regions, whereas group 13 Hox genes are activated last by following the A-P morphogenetic progression. This modus of activation generates unique domains of combinatorial Hox activities at any given location of the embryo that has been referred to as the Hox code in analogy to the postal zip code for specifying positional identities[6]. Data obtained by large-scale gene expression profiling of adult fibroblasts derived from different anatomic regions in humans suggest that this embryonically established topographic Hox code is, at least to some degree, retained in the adult[7], where it is believed to be critical for maintaining positional identities by regulating local differentiation and signaling events.

Initial evidence for the existence of a topographic Hox code in the circulatory system came from LacZ reporter gene studies in transgenic mice that revealed remarkable regionally restricted expression patterns for Hoxc10, Hoxc11, and Hoxa3 in subpopulations of VSMCs of the media, as well as in endothelial cells (ECs) within distinct segments of the vascular bed of young adult (6 wk), as well as 1 year old mice[8]. Apparently, this presumptive vascular Hox code is instrumental in maintaining vessel wall integrity and homeostasis as indicated by the region-specific vascular remodeling events upon its interruption. Specifically, this was demonstrated by inducing changes in the vascular Hoxc11 expression pattern that is normally restricted to the distal limb vasculature of adult mice (Figure 1). By utilizing an integrated tetracycline regulatory system and Transgelin (Tagln) promoter elements that drive expression universally in VSMCs of TetOn(Tagln-Hoxc11) transgenic mice upon doxycycline (dox) induction, these mice developed severe vessel wall defects (medial thinning, elastic laminae fragmentation, intimal lesion formation) in arterial segments where Hoxc11 is normally not expressed (carotid artery, aortic arch, thoracic aorta), whereas overexpression of Hoxc11 in its natural vascular domain of activity, including the lower femoral artery, resulted in a drastic increase in vessel diameter but without the structural defects observed upon ectopic expression[9]. Furthermore, human HOX transcriptome analysis of vascular ECs derived from different anatomic locations revealed specific HOX expression signatures that are believed to determine positional identities and regulate endothelial differentiation[10].

Figure 1
Figure 1 Map of Hox functional domains in the arterial tree. The schematic shows a rough outline of the main human arterial segments. Localization of vascular defects associated either with mutated human HOX or mouse Hox alleles as indicated at the right were used to generate a cursory map of HOX/Hox activity domains (grey shading) assuming that the defects observed in the mouse map to roughly equivalent anatomic positions in humans. The demarcation of the HOXA4 activity domain is based on down-regulation of HOXA4 expression associated with AAA. The Hoxa9 domain in the thoracic aorta signifies an atherosclerosis-resistant segment.

Compared to gene expression profiling, an alternative approach to consider for mapping Hox activities in the circulatory system is to determine Hox functional domains by mutational analysis in mice and by linking human congenital vascular defects to mutant HOX alleles. The Hoxa3tm1Mrc mutant is perhaps the first case in which disruption of a Hox gene has been linked to severe cardiovascular defects in mice that include absence of the right carotid artery and stenosis of the aortic valves, in addition to abnormalities of the cardiac chambers, as well as other developmental defects[11]. In humans and mice, a homozygous HOXA1/Hoxa1 mutation was linked to a complex syndrome that includes malformations of the cerebral vasculature, the internal carotid arteries, and the cardiac outflow tract in addition to neuronal defects[12-14]. Mice homozygous for the Hoxc11tm1Mrc targeted allele developed greatly enlarged femoral arteries that were phenotypically very similar to the enlarged vessels seen upon induced overexpression of Hoxc11 in the distal hindlimb vasculature[9]. Furthermore, and of potential clinical relevance is the downregulation of HOXA4 expression associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms[15]. Interestingly, HOXA4 exhibits an A-P gradient in expression levels along the aorta (ibid) that might overlap with a gradient for Hoxa9 expression, for which highest levels were found in the thoracic aorta of mice[16] as discussed below.

HOX-REGULATED GENETIC PATHWAYS IN THE VASCULATURE - POTENTIAL CVD RELEVANCE

The vascular functions of Hox genes have perhaps been studied most extensively in cells of endothelial lineage within the context of angiogenesis as observed in normal physiological scenarios (e.g., wound healing) and under pathological conditions (e.g., tumorigenesis). This work has yielded useful insight into Hox-dependent pathways regulating EC phenotypic properties. Accordingly, all HOX genes of paralogous group 3 were found to stimulate angiogenesis albeit through different pathways[17]. HOXD3 promotes expression of integrinα5 and β3 subunit genes in response to FGF2[18-20]; heterodimers of these subunits with other subunits generate fibronectin receptors α5β1 and ανβ3 that facilitate adhesion and migration through fibronectin-rich granulation tissue during wound healing[17]. Consistent with this is the HOXD3-regulated increase in expression of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) gene[18]. The human HOXD3 paralogs HOXA3 and HOXB3 also promote angiogenesis although through different pathways that involve increased EC migration and expression of Mmp14 and uPAR (HOXA3) and enhanced expression of the angiogenic ligand Ephrin A1 (HOXB3)[17]. Increased EC migration in tissue culture was also observed for HOXA9 through direct transcriptional activation of the Ephrin receptor B4 (EPHB4) gene[21]. HOXD10, on the other hand, was found to be inactive during angiogenesis but expressed in quiescent vascular endothelium, and pro-angiogenic factors (β4 and α3 integrins, MMP14, uPAR and cyclin D1) were downregulated in HOXD10-transfected ECs[22]. Likewise, HOXA5 is reportedly inactive in angiogenic endothelium but expressed in quiescent ECs where VEGFR2, ephrin A1, HIF1α, and COX2 were downregulated upon transfection with HOXA5[23].

As most of these Hox expression data and functional correlations have been obtained in cell culture systems, some of these results may not reflect the vascular patterns and functions observed in vivo. For example, Hoxa3 expression is induced together with Hoxd3 during cutaneous healing of excisional wounds in mouse[24]. However, the same gene was found to be abundantly expressed in VSMCs of major blood vessels in addition to ECs but in a topographically restricted manner[8].

As pointed out above, induction of ectopic Hoxc11 expression in VSMCs of TetOn (Tagln-Hoxc11) transgenic mice on an FVB/NTac background resulted in severe vascular defects. Consequently, these mice offer an opportunity to start defining Hoxc11-regulated pathways of pathological vessel wall remodeling. Preliminary results showed induction of the apoptotic marker CASP3, as well as matrix protein metalloproteinase MMP2 and MMP9 expression in medial VSMCs of the thoracic aorta following doxycycline (dox)-induced HOXC11 expression[9]. Both MMP2 and MMP9 are involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) breakdown and restructuring of the vessel wall, as well as breakdown of the basement membrane and cell migration[25,26], i.e., events that are consistent with the formation of the type of lesion formation observed in the thoracic aorta of these mice. Interestingly, in the lower femoral artery, where Hoxc11 overexpression resulted in an enlargement of an otherwise structurally normal vessel, only MMP2 was induced upon dox-treatment. Accordingly, the differential histological changes observed in response to Hoxc11 ectopic vs overexpression were mirrored by distinct differences in molecular responses, in this case MMP9 expression, that is usually associated only with injury and inflammatory responses[25]. Furthermore, data from chromatin immune-precipitation (ChIP) and transient co-transfection assays suggested that Mmp2 and Mmp9 are transcriptionally regulated by HOXC11, thus linking Hoxc11 directly to the regulation of vascular remodeling pathways involving these MMPs.

In a separate study, a search for factors that contribute to the commonly greater susceptibility to atherosclerosis in the aortic arch vs the thoracic aorta found that members of Hox paralogous groups 6-10 exhibit higher expression levels in the former across various mammalian species including mouse, rat, and porcine[16]. Remarkably, essentially the same differential Hox expression profiles were observed in human embryonic stem cells that were differentiated in vitro either along the neuroectoderm pathway into aortic arch-like VSMCs or along the paraxial mesoderm pathway into thoracic aorta-like VSMCs. These data suggest that Hox-specified positional identities of VSMCs established during development are retained in adulthood. Apparently this positional diversity is reflected by differential responses to inflammatory stimuli that are critical for the progression of vascular diseases such as atherosclerosis. This was illustrated by the greater activity and binding to DNA of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB in aortic arch vs thoracic aorta VSMCs. Moreover, this NF-κB pattern apparently is, at least in part, due to a reciprocal regulatory relationship with Hoxa9 such that the higher levels of HOXA9 expression in the thoracic aorta repress NF-κB transcriptional activity, whereas the high levels of NF-κB actitivity in the arch repress Hoxa9 expression[16,27].

As mentioned before, downregulation of already low HOXA4 expression levels in the abdominal aorta was associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs)[15] that are much more prevalent than thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs), which themselves occur primarily in the ascending aorta, i.e., the proximal region of the aortic arch[28]. While there exist many differences in the etiology, histology, and genetics of the two diseases, it is perhaps noteworthy that both develop predominantly in vessel segments that are situated at the low ends of Hox expression gradients with a greater pro-inflammatory predisposition in both cases, even though the inflammatory component in TAAs is lower than in AAAs[28]. This raises the intriguing question whether high levels of Hoxa9 and Hoxa4 expression may protect against the development of both aneurysms and atherosclerosis in the descending aorta, aka thoracic aorta. In that case, the further reduced HOXA4 levels clinically associated with AAA are likely the consequence of inflammatory stimuli, a view supported by in vitro data showing reduced HOXA4 expression in cultured human VSMCs and ECs treated with inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ[15].

Recent in vitro silencing experiments of HOX activities (HOXB7, HOXC6, HOXC8) in multipotent stem cells isolated from the adventitia of the human thoracic aorta provided evidence for Hox-dependent differentiation into VSMCs involving epigenetic mechanisms[29]. This raises the interesting possibility that Hox genes may be critical regulators of vascular cell populations that drive phenotype switching between homeostatic/regenerative vs pathological remodeling in vascular tissues in a region-specific manner.

CONCLUSION

Their persistent topographic expression patterns in post-natal vascular tissues suggest that Hox genes play a critical role in maintaining vessel wall homeostasis in a region-specific manner. Consequently, the idea that Hox-linked genetic polymorphisms affecting either their functional quality or expression levels may underlie CVD susceptibility in discrete portions of the vascular tree is a valid proposition. Albeit limited, the currently available in vivo data derived from analyses of Hox knockout and conditional Hox gain-of-function mutant mice, as well as from clinical studies support that view. Initial efforts of defining the genetic regulatory networks of Hox-dependent CVD processes implicate genes of diverse functional categories (ECM remodeling, transmembrane signaling, cell cycle control, inflammatory response, transcriptional control, etc.), as potential targets. The finding of region-specific reciprocal interactions of a Hox gene with a pro-inflammatory factor (NF-κB) is intriguing and might be of universal relevance in the search for therapeutic approaches. Within this context, defining the epigenetic mechanisms controlling Hox activities in blood vessels will be critical as indicated by data that associate hypomethylation of CpG islands within the HOXC11/HOXC9 genomic interval with the ectopic activation of HOXC10 and -9 in atherosclerotic coronary arteries[30].

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Chawla M, Lyerly Jr J, Su H S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wang CH

References
1.  Haimovici H, Maier N. Fate of aortic homografts in canine atherosclerosis. 3. study of fresh abdominal and thoracic aortic implants into thoracic aorta: role of tissue susceptibility in atherogenesis. Arch Surg. 1964;89:961-969.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  DeBakey ME, Glaeser DH. Patterns of atherosclerosis: effect of risk factors on recurrence and survival-analysis of 11,890 cases with more than 25-year follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1045-1053.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Majesky MW. Developmental basis of vascular smooth muscle diversity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:1248-1258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 1992;68:283-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Mallo M, Wellik DM, Deschamps J. Hox genes and regional patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Dev Biol. 2010;344:7-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 361]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 336]  [Article Influence: 24.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kessel M, Gruss P. Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of Hox codes induced by retinoic acid. Cell. 1991;67:89-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Rinn JL, Bondre C, Gladstone HB, Brown PO, Chang HY. Anatomic demarcation by positional variation in fibroblast gene expression programs. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Pruett ND, Visconti RP, Jacobs DF, Scholz D, McQuinn T, Sundberg JP, Awgulewitsch A. Evidence for Hox-specified positional identities in adult vasculature. BMC Dev Biol. 2008;8:93.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Pruett ND, Hajdu Z, Zhang J, Visconti RP, Kern MJ, Wellik DM, Majesky MW, Awgulewitsch A. Changing topographic Hox expression in blood vessels results in regionally distinct vessel wall remodeling. Biol Open. 2012;1:430-435.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Toshner M, Dunmore BJ, McKinney EF, Southwood M, Caruso P, Upton PD, Waters JP, Ormiston ML, Skepper JN, Nash G. Transcript analysis reveals a specific HOX signature associated with positional identity of human endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91334.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Chisaka O, Capecchi MR. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature. 1991;350:473-479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Tischfield MA, Bosley TM, Salih MA, Alorainy IA, Sener EC, Nester MJ, Oystreck DT, Chan WM, Andrews C, Erickson RP. Homozygous HOXA1 mutations disrupt human brainstem, inner ear, cardiovascular and cognitive development. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1035-1037.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Bosley TM, Alorainy IA, Salih MA, Aldhalaan HM, Abu-Amero KK, Oystreck DT, Tischfield MA, Engle EC, Erickson RP. The clinical spectrum of homozygous HOXA1 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:1235-1240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Makki N, Capecchi MR. Cardiovascular defects in a mouse model of HOXA1 syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:26-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lillvis JH, Erdman R, Schworer CM, Golden A, Derr K, Gatalica Z, Cox LA, Shen J, Vander Heide RS, Lenk GM. Regional expression of HOXA4 along the aorta and its potential role in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. BMC Physiol. 2011;11:9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Trigueros-Motos L, González-Granado JM, Cheung C, Fernández P, Sánchez-Cabo F, Dopazo A, Sinha S, Andrés V. Embryological-origin-dependent differences in homeobox expression in adult aorta: role in regional phenotypic variability and regulation of NF-κB activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1248-1256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Kachgal S, Mace KA, Boudreau NJ. The dual roles of homeobox genes in vascularization and wound healing. Cell Adh Migr. 2012;6:457-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Boudreau N, Andrews C, Srebrow A, Ravanpay A, Cheresh DA. Induction of the angiogenic phenotype by Hox D3. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:257-264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Boudreau NJ, Varner JA. The homeobox transcription factor Hox D3 promotes integrin alpha5beta1 expression and function during angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:4862-4868.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Charboneau A, East L, Mulholland N, Rohde M, Boudreau N. Pbx1 is required for Hox D3-mediated angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2005;8:289-296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Bruhl T, Urbich C, Aicher D, Acker-Palmer A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Homeobox A9 transcriptionally regulates the EphB4 receptor to modulate endothelial cell migration and tube formation. Circ Res. 2004;94:743-751.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Myers C, Charboneau A, Cheung I, Hanks D, Boudreau N. Sustained expression of homeobox D10 inhibits angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:2099-2109.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Rhoads K, Arderiu G, Charboneau A, Hansen SL, Hoffman W, Boudreau N. A role for Hox A5 in regulating angiogenesis and vascular patterning. Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3:240-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Mace KA, Hansen SL, Myers C, Young DM, Boudreau N. HOXA3 induces cell migration in endothelial and epithelial cells promoting angiogenesis and wound repair. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:2567-2577.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Whatling C, McPheat W, Hurt-Camejo E. Matrix management: assigning different roles for MMP-2 and MMP-9 in vascular remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:10-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Raffetto JD, Khalil RA. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in vascular remodeling and vascular disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:346-359.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Awgulewitsch A, Majesky MW. Interpreting inflammation: smooth muscle positional identity and nuclear factor-κB signaling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1113-1115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Lindsay ME, Dietz HC. Lessons on the pathogenesis of aneurysm from heritable conditions. Nature. 2011;473:308-316.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 340]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 332]  [Article Influence: 25.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Klein D, Benchellal M, Kleff V, Jakob HG, Ergün S. Hox genes are involved in vascular wall-resident multipotent stem cell differentiation into smooth muscle cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Castillo-Díaz SA, Garay-Sevilla ME, Hernández-González MA, Solís-Martínez MO, Zaina S. Extensive demethylation of normally hypermethylated CpG islands occurs in human atherosclerotic arteries. Int J Mol Med. 2010;26:691-700.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]