Randomized Controlled Trial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 100428
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.100428
Construction and application of composite insulation scheme in the perioperative period of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
Ling-Jun Du, Yan-Guang Su, Zhu-Hua Shen, Yan-Li Zhang, Operating Room, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
Yong-Yi Ma, Department of Nursing, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
ORCID number: Ling-Jun Du (0009-0000-8502-3049).
Author contributions: Du LJ made significant contributions to research design, specific experimental process management, data analysis, and manuscript writing; Du LJ, Su YG and Shen ZH made significant contributions to research design and data analysis; Zhang YL and Ma YY made significant contributions to experimental technical support and results section; Du LJ, Su YG and Ma YY contributed to experimental operation and data collection; Du LJ, Shen ZH and Zhang YL made significant contributions to research design and manuscript review process; All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Supported by the Medical and Health Research Project of Zhejiang Province, No. 2023RC276.
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Huzhou Central Hospital (No. 202209014-01). All methods were carried out in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.
Clinical trial registration statement: Trial registration: No. ChiCTR2400088729 (www.chictr.org.cn), 2024/08/26. Retrospectively registered.
Informed consent statement: All the authors confirming that written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CONSORT 2010 statement: The authors have read the CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement.
Data sharing statement: The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ling-Jun Du, BMed, Associate Chief Nurse, Operating Room, Huzhou Central Hospital, No. 1558 North Sanhuan Road, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China. dlj5084@126.com
Received: August 16, 2024
Revised: January 25, 2025
Accepted: April 16, 2025
Published online: May 27, 2025
Processing time: 280 Days and 5 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery are at high risk for hypothermia-related complications. This study explores the efficacy of perioperative composite insulation interventions in maintaining normothermia and reducing postoperative risks in this vulnerable group.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative composite insulation in older patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

We selected 100 older patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at Huzhou Central Hospital from September 2023 to April 2024. Using a random number table, patients were divided into a control group and intervention group of 50 patients each. After returning to the regular ward, the conventional group received traditional insulation intervention measures, while the intervention group received composite insulation nursing intervention. We observed and recorded postoperative blood pressure and heart rate changes, as well as postoperative anesthesia recovery time and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

The statistical results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in heart rate changes and systolic blood pressure between the two groups. There was a significant change in heart rate between the groups immediately after surgery and at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery (P < 0.05). The heart rate and systolic blood pressure of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 15 and 30 minutes after surgery (P < 0.05). The rewarming time of the intervention group was shorter than that of the control group, and the overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, a composite insulation intervention during the perioperative period can maintain body temperature, reduce postoperative stress, and significantly reduce the incidence of hypothermia and related complications.

Key Words: Laparoscopic surgery; Composite insulation scheme; Colorectal cancer; Elderly patients; Perioperative care; Hypothermia prevention

Core Tip: This study investigated the effects of perioperative composite insulation in older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. The intervention group received composite insulation nursing, resulting in significantly lower heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and postoperative complication rates compared to the control group. The composite insulation strategy effectively maintained body temperature and reduced postoperative stress response, improving surgical safety and postoperative recovery in older patients.



INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic surgery has become important in modern medicine, especially in the treatment of colorectal cancer[1-3]. Its minimally invasive and efficient characteristics have benefited many patients. However, with the increasing aging population, older patients have gradually become the main group undergoing laparoscopic surgery[4]. Due to the decline in physical function and increased sensitivity to external stimuli, perioperative management and care are particularly important for this group of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery[5-7]. This study investigated perioperative hypothermia in older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, as well as the construction and application of composite insulation nursing interventions. We aimed to provide a reference for improving the surgical safety and postoperative recovery of older patients. The perioperative period for older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery is a complex and critical process, involving multiple stages such as preoperative preparation, surgical procedures, and postoperative rehabilitation[8,9]. During this period, older patients face various challenges, and one of the most important issues is perioperative hypothermia and related complications. Low body temperature affects the surgical outcome of patients and increases their postoperative risk, such as cardiovascular events, and infections, further prolonging their hospital stay and reducing their quality of life. Therefore, how to effectively prevent and respond to perioperative hypothermia and its related complications has become one of the keys aims of perioperative management of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Perioperative hypothermia refers to the body temperature falling below the normal range (usually < 36 °C) during surgery or postoperative recovery[10]. In older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, the incidence of hypothermia is high, which is mainly related to the following factors. As people age, the central function of temperature regulation gradually decreases, and their ability to adapt to changes in the external environment weakens, and they are prone to hypothermia. Both general and regional anesthesia can inhibit the function of the temperature regulatory center, leading to a decrease in body temperature. During surgery, patients are exposed to a lower temperature environment, coupled with tissue damage and bleeding caused by the operation, resulting in increased heat dissipation and decreased body temperature. Some drugs used during surgery, such as antibiotics and analgesics, may also affect temperature regulation[11-14].

The impact of hypothermia on older patients postoperatively is multifaceted. Firstly, hypothermia can have a profound effect on surgical outcomes. For instance, it can lead to increased bleeding and prolonged operating time, which in turn reduces the success rate. This is especially concerning in older patients due to their often reduced physiological reserves and comorbidities, making them more susceptible to the adverse effects of hypothermia. Secondly, hypothermia significantly increases the postoperative risks for older patients. Cardiovascular events such as arrhythmia and myocardial infarction are more likely to occur. These events may be exacerbated in older patients due to decreased myocardial contractility and the induction of arrhythmias caused by hypothermia. Thirdly, the risk of postoperative infection is heightened in older patients due to hypothermia-related decreases in immune function and delayed wound healing. The immune system in older people is already compromised, and hypothermia further weakens it, making them more prone to infections[15]. Hypothermia can lead to a prolonged length of hospital stay for older patients, which not only increases medical expenses but also significantly lowers their quality of life. The extended hospitalization can be attributed to the need for additional monitoring and treatment of complications arising from hypothermia, such as infections and cardiovascular issues. In summary, the clinical hazards of postoperative hypothermia in older patients are substantial, affecting their immediate surgical outcomes and their long-term recovery and quality of life. It is crucial to implement effective measures to prevent and manage hypothermia in this vulnerable patient population to mitigate these risks[16].

In response to the issue of perioperative hypothermia in older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, composite insulation nursing intervention has gradually become a new trend in perioperative insulation[17]. Composite insulation nursing intervention refers to the comprehensive use of multiple methods on the basis of traditional insulation measures to more effectively maintain body temperature and reduce hypothermia and related complications. In the preoperative preparation stage, in addition to routine preoperative evaluation and preparation, special attention should be paid to the central function of temperature regulation. For patients with temperature regulation disorders, intervention measures should be taken in advance, such as adjusting indoor temperature and adding warm clothing. At the same time, medical staff should also provide detailed explanations of the surgical process and possible situations to patients and their families, eliminate the patient’s nervousness, and reduce temperature regulation abnormalities caused by anxiety. During surgery, in addition to maintaining appropriate temperature and humidity in the operating room, the following measures can also be taken to reduce patient heat loss and maintain patient body temperature. Insulation blanket preheating: Before entering the operating room, the inflatable insulation blanket is used to preheat the patient to increase their body temperature. The temperature of the inflatable insulation blanket should be adjusted according to the actual situation of the patient to avoid being too high or too low. Self-made warming and warming head cover: during surgery, the patient’s head is exposed to the air, making it easy to dissipate heat. Therefore, a homemade warming headband can be made to cover the patient’s head to reduce the loss of head heat. The material of the headband should be soft, warm, and breathable to ensure patient comfort and safety. Infusion heating: during surgery, a large amount of liquid needs to be injected, which is usually cold. Therefore, an infusion heater can be used to heat the liquid, making it close to body temperature before entering the body. Using insulation blankets or pads: During surgery, insulation blankets or pads can be used to cover the patient’s body to reduce heat loss. These insulation devices should have good insulation performance without causing compression or discomfort to patients. In the postoperative rehabilitation stage, in addition to continuing to take the above insulation measures, it is also necessary to strengthen the patient’s nutritional support and psychological counseling. Nutritional support is an important part of postoperative recovery, and personalized dietary plans should be developed based on the patient’s actual situation to ensure that they receive sufficient nutritional support. At the same time, medical staff should also pay attention to the psychological status of patients, provide timely psychological counseling and comfort, help patients alleviate negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, and promote their recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient enrollment

We enrolled 100 older patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at Huzhou Central Hospital between September 2023 and April 2024. Patients were randomly assigned to a conventional insulation care group (n = 50) or a composite insulation care intervention group (n = 50) using a double-blind design. Randomization was performed using a random number table method, and the allocation sequence was concealed from both patients and healthcare providers until the intervention was implemented. The conventional group comprised 50.7% males and 49.3% females, with an age range of 65-85 years and a mean age of 71.62 ± 4.39 years. The intervention group included 52% males and 48% females, with an age range of 67-86 years and a mean age of 70.32 ± 8.76 years. No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics such as gender and age between the two groups (P > 0.05), ensuring comparability.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Huzhou Central Hospital (No. 202209014-01) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer eligible for laparoscopic surgery, receiving intravenous combined inhalation anesthesia, with a normal preoperative body temperature (defined as axillary temperature ≥ 36.5 °C), and who provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with severe illness or life-threatening conditions; (2) Those with significant organ dysfunction or coagulopathy (defined as an international normalized ratio > 1.5 or partial thromboplastin time > 40 seconds); (3) Patients with a history of central temperature dysregulation (defined as episodes of hypothermia or hyperthermia within the past 6 months); (4) Individuals with blood, immune, or central nervous system disorders; and (5) Those with cognitive impairment (defined as a mini-mental state examination score < 24), psychiatric illness, or related conditions.

Nursing methods

All patients underwent standard preoperative assessments, including vital sign examination, routine urinalysis, and complete blood count. Surgery was performed by the same professional team. Interventions in the two groups were as follows.

Conventional group: The operating room temperature was set at 25 °C preoperatively and 22 °C postoperatively, with a humidity level of 45%. Disinfectant, infusion, and irrigation solutions were warmed to 37 °C. Patients were covered with a cotton quilt for insulation during surgery.

Composite insulation group: In the composite insulation group, patients underwent a comprehensive warming protocol designed to maintain their body temperature throughout the surgical process. Preoperatively, patients were warmed with an inflatable heating blanket set at 40 °C for 30 minutes. This blanket uses forced-air technology to circulate warm air through a perforated surface, creating a warm air layer over the patient’s body to prevent heat loss. The operating room environment was carefully controlled, with the temperature set at 25 °C before surgery and adjusted to 22 °C after surgery, and the humidity maintained at 45%. A temperature-regulated blanket was placed on the operating table before surgery and preheated to 35 °C. All disinfectant, infusion, and irrigation solutions were heated to 37 °C before use. During surgery, an inflatable heating blanket covered the patient’s chest and abdomen for at least 20 minutes before anesthesia and remained in place throughout the procedure. Additionally, carbon dioxide gas was heated to 37 °C during laparoscopic surgery to prevent heat loss. Postoperatively, patients were rewarmed using an inflatable heating blanket set at 40 °C for 30 minutes during the recovery phase.

To maintain patient compliance with warming measures during lengthy surgeries, patients were educated on their importance and encouraged to voice any discomfort. They were positioned comfortably with pillows and supports to prevent pressure points, allowing warming devices to function effectively. Healthcare providers continuously monitored patient comfort and warming device placement, making necessary adjustments. Clear communication was maintained to address concerns and ensure cooperation, thereby sustaining both patient comfort and effective warming throughout the procedure.

Observation indicators

The primary outcomes measured were heart rate and systolic blood pressure immediately after surgery, and at 15 and 30 minutes postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included patient rewarming time, recovery time, and the incidence of postoperative complications. Hypothermia was defined as axillary temperature ≤ 36 °C.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SD, with intergroup and intragroup comparisons made using t-tests and repeated measures analysis of variance. Numerical data are expressed as frequencies and percentages, with intergroup comparisons conducted using the χ² test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The results showed that all data were normally distributed (the Shapiro-Wilk test statistic for the primary outcome was W = 0.985, P = 0.234). Sensitivity analyses were performed using multiple imputation methods to handle missing data and robust regression models to confirm the stability of the results. The sensitivity analysis confirmed that the primary findings remained consistent across different analytical approaches.

RESULTS
Comparison of heart rate and systolic blood pressure at all times postoperatively between the two groups

Comprehensive analysis revealed significant differences in the time trend, intergroup differences, and interaction effects of heart rate changes between the two groups, with F values of 32.321, 7.289, and 2.345, respectively, and P < 0.001 (Table 1). Similarly, significant differences were observed in the time trend, intergroup differences, and interaction effects of systolic blood pressure changes between the two groups, with F values of 1.238, 23.349, and 3.756, respectively, and P < 0.005. Further detailed comparisons showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in heart rate changes immediately after surgery and at 15 and 30 minutes post-surgery between the conventional and intervention groups. Specifically, the intervention group had a heart rate of 63.20 ± 14.39 bpm and systolic blood pressure of 122.58 ± 22.66 mmHg at 15 minutes post-surgery; and heart rate of 61.78 ± 11.67 bpm and systolic blood pressure of 126.48 ± 20.85 mmHg at 30 minutes post-surgery; both of which were lower than those in the conventional group at the same times. These differences were also significant (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Comparison of heart rate and systolic blood pressure at all times postoperatively between the two groups, mean ± SD.
Groups
Cases
Heart rate (bpm)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Conventional group50
Immediate postoperative67.56 ± 5.32119.34 ± 12.76
15 minutes postoperative76.23 ± 16.45a,1123.24 ± 19.34a,1
30 minutes postoperative63.45 ± 16.45a,1,2142.30 ± 20.63a,1,2
Intervention group50
Immediate postoperative57.94 ± 7.61116.18 ± 17.10
15 minutes postoperative63.20 ± 14.39a,3122.58 ± 22.66a,3
30 minutes postoperative61.78 ± 11.67a,3126.48 ± 20.85a,3
Ftime, Ptime33.483, < 0.0012.358, < 0.05
Finter group, Pinter group7.876, < 0.00124.437, < 0.001
Ftime × inter group, Ptime × inter group3.987, < 0.0014.136, < 0.001
Comparison of postoperative rewarming time and intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups

In the intervention group, the recovery time was 50.30 ± 69.40 minutes, rewarming time was 100.60 ± 89.21 minutes, and incidence of complications was 30.0% (15 cases) (Table 2). These values were significantly lower than those in the conventional group, where the recovery time was 98.24 ± 71.41 minutes, rewarming time 163.80 ± 221.52 minutes, and the of complications was 47.27% (P < 0.001). The shorter rewarming time in the intervention group may be attributed to the composite insulation protocol, which included preheating with an inflatable insulation blanket and a homemade warming headband. These measures effectively reduced heat loss and maintained stable body temperature, thereby reducing the incidence of hypothermia and related complications. The lower incidence of postoperative complications in the intervention group further supports the effectiveness of the composite insulation scheme in improving the surgical safety and postoperative recovery of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Table 2 Comparison of postoperative rewarming time and intraoperative and postoperative complications between the two groups, mean ± SD/n (%).
Groups
Cases
Rewarming time (minute)
Recovery time (minute)
Complications
Conventional group5095.21 ± 65.86156.25 ± 76.3426 (52.0)
Intervention group5050.30 ± 69.40100.60 ± 89.2115 (30.0)
χ2 value65.34225.58720.653
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
DISCUSSION

Older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery often face a decline in their ability to regulate body temperature due to natural decline in physical function. The weakening of this ability to regulate body temperature is particularly significant during the perioperative period, which can easily lead to hypothermia[18-20]. Low body temperature has a negative impact on patient comfort, and more importantly, it may increase surgical risk, affect surgical outcomes, and increase the risk of postoperative complications such as cardiovascular events, and infection[21,22]. Therefore, for older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, it is important to take effective insulation measures to maintain their body temperature stability. Composite insulation scheme, as a comprehensive temperature management measure, has been widely used in perioperative management of older patients in recent years. This aims to provide patients with comprehensive insulation support by integrating various insulation methods, such as preheating with inflatable insulation blankets and self-made rewarming headbands, effectively reducing heat loss and maintaining stable body temperature[23-25].

Firstly, preheating of inflatable insulation blankets is an important part of composite insulation schemes. Before the patient enters the operating room, using an insulation blanket to preheat the operating table can significantly increase initial body temperature, laying a good foundation for stabilizing temperature during surgery. The preheating temperature and timing of the insulation blanket should be adjusted according to the specific situation of the patient to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Secondly, homemade warming headbands are also an important component of composite insulation schemes. Due to the weaker ability of older patients to regulate body temperature, the head often becomes an important area for heat loss. A homemade warming headband can effectively reduce the loss of heat through the head, thereby maintaining stability of the patient’s body temperature. The material used for making the headbands should be soft, comfortable, and have good breathability to ensure patient comfort. In addition to the two insulation measures mentioned above, the composite insulation scheme also includes various other means, such as covering with insulation blankets during surgery, and controlling the temperature and humidity inside the operating room. These measures work together to form a comprehensive insulation system for patients, providing effective temperature protection.

The results of this study showed that the intervention group using a composite insulation scheme outperformed the conventional group in postoperative heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and rewarming time. This result indicates that the composite insulation scheme can more effectively maintain the patient’s body temperature, reduce heat loss, and thus reduce the incidence of hypothermia and related complications. The enhanced effectiveness of the composite insulation scheme compared to traditional measures may be attributed to its multifaceted physiological impacts. For instance, it could optimize blood hemodynamics by maintaining a more stable core body temperature, thereby ensuring adequate blood flow to vital organs and tissues. Additionally, it might modulate the inflammatory response, as stable body temperature is crucial for the proper functioning of the immune system, potentially reducing the severity of postoperative inflammation and associated complications. Meanwhile, the postoperative stress response of the intervention group patients was also relatively mild, and the safety and quality of postoperative recovery were significantly improved. However, when implementing a composite insulation scheme, we also need to pay attention to the following nursing points. Firstly, a comprehensive evaluation of the patient’s temperature regulation ability should be conducted before surgery. For patients with temperature regulation disorders, such as advanced age, malnutrition, chronic diseases, etc., intervention measures should be taken in advance, such as increasing the preheating time of insulation blankets, and adjusting the material and size of warming headbands. This can ensure that patients receive more effective insulation support during surgery. Secondly, during surgery, it is important to ensure that the temperature and humidity in the operating room are appropriate[26-29]. The temperature in the operating room, whether too low or too high, may affect the patient’s ability to regulate body temperature, leading to adverse reactions such as hypothermia or hyperthermia. At the same time, the humidity in the operating room should also be controlled within an appropriate range to avoid discomfort for patients due to dry skin. In addition, measures such as preheating the electric blanket and homemade warming headbands should be adjusted according to the actual situation of the patient. The temperature regulation ability and comfort perception of different patients may vary, so when using these insulation measures, adjustments should be made according to the specific situation of the patient to ensure their safety and effectiveness. At the same time, nurses should also closely monitor changes in the patient’s body temperature, and promptly detect and handle abnormal conditions such as hypothermia. Finally, close observation of the patient’s temperature changes should continue after surgery. Postoperative patients may experience temperature fluctuations due to factors such as surgical trauma and residual anesthetic drugs. Therefore, nurses should regularly monitor the patient’s temperature and take appropriate insulation measures as needed. At the same time, nurses should also strengthen psychological support and counseling for patients, help them establish confidence in overcoming the disease, and promote postoperative recovery[30-32]. It is also worth noting that our findings align with and extend upon the existing body of literature, for example, which also explored the benefits of advanced thermal management strategies in surgical settings, further substantiating the clinical significance and innovation of our composite insulation scheme.

With the continuous advancement of medical technology and the updating of nursing concepts, the application of composite insulation schemes in perioperative management of older patients will become increasingly widespread. In the future, we can further explore the effects of composite insulation schemes in more types of surgical patients, as well as their combined application with other nursing measures. For example, a composite insulation scheme can be combined with measures such as pain management and nutritional support to form a more comprehensive perioperative management system, providing patients with more comprehensive and meticulous nursing services. We can further optimize the implementation details and nursing points of the composite insulation scheme by conducting in-depth research on the physiological characteristics and pathological changes of patients. For example, personalized insulation plans can be developed based on factors such as the patient’s temperature regulation ability and surgical site. The clinical application value of composite insulation schemes can be further enhanced by improving insulation materials and enhancing insulation effects[33-35]. With the development of intelligent and precise medical technology, composite insulation solutions will also move towards a more intelligent and precise direction. This project adopts the wireless body temperature sensor iThermonitor®[36] and the thermal insulation blanket linkage, real-time monitoring of patient body temperature changes can be achieved, and insulation measures can be automatically adjusted as needed[37-39]. The clinical effectiveness of composite insulation schemes can be more accurately evaluated and optimized through technical means such as big data analysis. These intelligent and precise applications will provide more powerful guarantees for the surgical safety and postoperative recovery quality of older patients[40,41].

In summary, the composite insulation scheme has significant clinical effects in the perioperative period of older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. By integrating multiple insulation methods, this plan can effectively maintain patient temperature stability, reduce heat loss, and lower the incidence of hypothermia and related complications. In the implementation process, we need to pay attention to nursing points to ensure the comfort and safety of patients. In the future, with the continuous progress of medical technology and the updating of nursing concepts, the application of composite insulation schemes will be more widespread, providing more powerful guarantees for the surgical safety and postoperative recovery quality of older patients.

This study had some limitations. Firstly, the limited sample size may affect the generality and reliability of the results. Although there were 100 participants, we did not perform a power analysis to determine if this sample size was sufficient to support the conclusions. We acknowledge this as a potential limitation and suggest it as a direction for future research. Secondly, the study was conducted in only one hospital, so the sample may lack representativeness. Thirdly, although this study focused on older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, it is unclear whether the results are applicable to other types of cancer patients. Lastly, this study may not have considered other potential confounding factors, such as patients' baseline body temperature and surgical duration, which may also have an impact on the results. In addition, although standardized measurement protocols were used to reduce bias, there may still be observer bias. We suggest that in future research, different researchers could be involved in measuring body temperature and other physiological indicators.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that implementing a comprehensive warming care protocol during the perioperative period for older patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery can effectively maintain body temperature stability, reduce postoperative stress responses, and significantly decrease incidence of hypothermia and related complications. This protocol demonstrated significant clinical value in postoperative temperature management, recovery speed, and prevention of postoperative complications in older patients. However, the study also has certain limitations, including a limited sample size, insufficient representativeness of the sample from a single hospital, and uncontrolled potential confounding factors. Future research can further explore the application of the comprehensive warming care protocol in patients undergoing different types of surgery, as well as its combined application effects with other nursing measures such as pain management and nutritional support. Through these studies, we can provide more comprehensive and detailed perioperative management strategi for the patients.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Meng JH; Tantinam T S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu ZH

References
1.  Monson JR, Hill AD, Darzi A. Laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 1995;82:150-157.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in RCA: 45]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kuipers EJ, Grady WM, Lieberman D, Seufferlein T, Sung JJ, Boelens PG, van de Velde CJ, Watanabe T. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15065.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1014]  [Cited by in RCA: 1099]  [Article Influence: 109.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Grosek J, Ales Kosir J, Sever P, Erculj V, Tomazic A. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Radiol Oncol. 2021;55:433-438.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Rueda Esteban RJ, López-McCormick JS, Rodríguez-Bermeo AS, Andrade M, Hernández Restrepo JD, Targarona Soler EM. Face, Content, and Construct Validity Evaluation of Simulation Models in General Surgery Laparoscopic Training and Education: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov. 2023;30:251-260.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Oti C, Mahendran M, Sabir N. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016;77:24-28.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56:474-481.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Senft JD, Brück BB, Poß-Doering R, Bruckner T, Szecsenyi J, Müller-Stich BP, Laux G. Need for nursing care after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery: a claims data analysis in German primary care. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407:2937-2944.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A, Frigerio A, Galli F, Scandroglio I. Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. JSLS. 2011;15:315-321.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ugolini G, Ghignone F, Zattoni D, Veronese G, Montroni I. Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3762-3777.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 41]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Chen HY, Su LJ, Wu HZ, Zou H, Yang R, Zhu YX. Risk factors for inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0257816.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Cumin D, Fogarin J, Mitchell SJ, Windsor JA. Perioperative hypothermia in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92:1125-1131.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Wang M, Jiang Y, Han W, Jiang L, Mao C. Summary of the best evidence for the prevention of intraoperative unplanned hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Gland Surg. 2021;10:2790-2798.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Ott DE. Laparoscopic hypothermia. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:127-131.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in RCA: 70]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Balayssac D, Pereira B, Bazin JE, Le Roy B, Pezet D, Gagnière J. Warmed and humidified carbon dioxide for abdominal laparoscopic surgery: meta-analysis of the current literature. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1-12.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Akers JL, Dupnick AC, Hillman EL, Bauer AG, Kinker LM, Hagedorn Wonder A. Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia Risks and Postoperative Complications: A Retrospective Study. AORN J. 2019;109:741-747.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Rauch S, Miller C, Bräuer A, Wallner B, Bock M, Paal P. Perioperative Hypothermia-A Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 66]  [Article Influence: 16.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Shen Y, Zhong X. Related factors of perioperative low body temperature and incidence of postoperative shivering in patients undergoing complex percutaneous nephrolithotomy and the effect analysis of composite insulation nursing intervention. Heliyon. 2024;10:e32126.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Torossian A, Bräuer A, Höcker J, Bein B, Wulf H, Horn EP. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:166-172.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 74]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Garceau C, Cosgrove MS, Gonzalez K. Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia. AANA J. 2023;91:303-309.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Interventions for Treating Inadvertent Postoperative Hypothermia. J Perioper Pract. 2016;26:158-159.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Yang F, Wang J, Cui J, Zhuan J, Hu X, Chen S. An Overview of the Implications for Perianesthesia Nurses in terms of Intraoperative Changes in Temperature and Factors Associated with Unintentional Postoperative Hypothermia. J Healthc Eng. 2022;2022:6955870.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Xiong Z, Zhu J, Li Q, Li Y. The effectiveness of warming approaches in preventing perioperative hypothermia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Pract. 2023;29:e13100.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Stuart CM, Dyas AR, Bronsert MR, Abrams BA, Kelleher AD, Colborn KL, Randhawa SK, David EA, Mitchell JD, Meguid RA. Perioperative hypothermia in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and associations with postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;167:1979-1989.e1.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Chen YC, Cherng YG, Romadlon DS, Chang KM, Huang CJ, Tsai PS, Chen CY, Chiu HY. Comparative effects of warming systems applied to different parts of the body on hypothermia in adults undergoing abdominal surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2023;89:111190.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Witkowski W, Maj J. [Pathophysiology and management of perioperative hypothermia]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2006;20:629-634.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Xu R, Hu X, Sun Z, Zhu X, Tang Y. Incidence of postoperative hypothermia and shivering and risk factors in patients undergoing malignant tumor surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23:31.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Cho CK, Chang M, Sung TY, Jee YS. Incidence of postoperative hypothermia and its risk factors in adults undergoing orthopedic surgery under brachial plexus block: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18:2197-2203.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Yoo JH, Ok SY, Kim SH, Chung JW, Park SY, Kim MG, Cho HB, Song SH, Cho CY, Oh HC. Efficacy of active forced air warming during induction of anesthesia to prevent inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in intraoperative warming patients: Comparison with passive warming, a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e25235.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Mason SE, Kinross JM, Hendricks J, Arulampalam TH. Postoperative hypothermia and surgical site infection following peritoneal insufflation with warm, humidified carbon dioxide during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a cohort study with cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1923-1929.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Chen S, Qian W, Feng J, Yu X, Zhang P. Thermal insulation during recovery from anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:11394-11402.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Chen X, He L, Yu X, Bo Y, Yu L, Chen Q, Zhao Z. Effects of Thermal Insulation on Recovery and Comfort of Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e942836.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Zhang J, Deng L, Wang X, Song F, Hou H, Qiu Y. Effect of Forced-Air Warming Blanket on Perioperative Hypothermia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2022;12:68-73.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Zhuang H, Li W, Xue X, Wang H, Li S, Zhong Y. The Impact of Comprehensive Nursing and Warming Measures on Emergence Agitation and Maternal-Neonatal Safety in Women Undergoing General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Altern Ther Health Med. 2024;30:90-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Dai J, Li Y. Effect of Nursing in Operating Room Combined with Intraoperative Heat Preservation Intervention on Prevention of Incision Infection and Improvement of Hemodynamics in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction under Knee Arthroscopy. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:2915157.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Podsiadło P, Kosiński S, Darocha T, Zerebiec K, Wolak P, Kielczewski S, Plewa S, Głuszek S. Diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic hypothermia in hospitals - a pilot study. Pol Przegl Chir. 2019;91:25-29.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Dai Y, Luo M, Liu F, Feng X, Nie H. Temperature measurements of a wearable and wireless axillary sensor iThermonitor but not a bladder probe represents the core temperature during laparoscopic rectal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023;37:303-309.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Moola S, Lockwood C. The effectiveness of strategies for the management and/or prevention of hypothermia within the adult perioperative environment: systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2010;8:752-792.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Zhang Y, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Du Y, Liu M, Zhu J, Wang G. Effect of Aggressive Warming versus Routine Thermal Management on the Incidence of Perioperative Hypothermia in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024;20:207-216.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Bräuer A, Weyland W, Kazmaier S, Trostdorf U, Textor Z, Hellige G, Braun U. Efficacy of postoperative rewarming after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;10:171-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Brandes IF, Müller C, Perl T, Russo SG, Bauer M, Bräuer A. [Efficacy of a novel warming blanket: prospective randomized trial]. Anaesthesist. 2013;62:137-142.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Guzman C, Forrester JA, Fuchshuber PR, Eakin JL. Estimating the Incidence of Stray Energy Burns during Laparoscopic Surgery based on Two Statewide Databases and Retrospective Rates: An Opportunity to Improve Patient Safety. Surg Technol Int. 2019;34:30-34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]