Published online Feb 27, 2018. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v10.i2.6
Peer-review started: November 2, 2017
First decision: November 28, 2017
Revised: January 25, 2018
Accepted: January 29, 2018
Article in press: January 29, 2018
Published online: February 27, 2018
The objective of this review is to examine whether a redundant colon gives rise to symptoms like constipation and volvulus. In 1820, Monterossi made drawings of colons with displacements and elongation of the colon found during autopsy. In 1912, Kienböeck first visualized a redundant colon using bismuth, and Lardennois and Auborg named the anatomic variant dolichocolon in 1914. The criteria were later: A sigmoid loop rising over the line between the iliac crests, a transverse colon below the same line and extra loops at the flexures. The incidence of dolichocolon is 1.9%-28.5%. Dolichocolon seems to be congenital, as fetuses, newborns, and infants exhibit colonic redundancies. Studies have identified a triade of constipation, abdominal pain, and distension. Colon transit time was recently shown to increase significantly with increased number of redundancies, which increases abdominal pain, bloating and infrequent defecation. The diagnosis of dolichocolon is established by barium enema or CT-colonography. Treatment is conservative, or surgical in case of volvulus or refractory constipation.
Core tip: Dolichocolon is an inborn anatomic variant, where redundancies may be located in the right, middle and left part of the colon and at the flexures. This review investigated the literature on dolichocolon. The prevalence is not known. The incidence is 1.9%-28.5% in patient series. The dominating symptoms of dolichocolon are constipation, abdominal pain and volvulus. Colon transit time is prolonged and increases significantly with increased number of redundancies, which increases abdominal pain, bloating and infrequent defecation. The diagnosis is established by a barium enema or CT-colonography. Treatment is conservative, or surgical in case of volvulus or refractory constipation.
- Citation: Raahave D. Dolichocolon revisited: An inborn anatomic variant with redundancies causing constipation and volvulus. World J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 10(2): 6-12
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v10/i2/6.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v10.i2.6
The redundant colon represents an unusually lengthened large bowel folded up upon itself, forming extra loops, tortuosities and kinks. The redundancy may involve the entire colon or it may be limited to certain areas as the hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, but the distal colon especially the region of the sigmoid is the most commonly affected. There has long been a debate about whether a redundant colon gives rise to symptoms like constipation and volvulus. The objective of this review is to critically examine this issue.
The development of the midgut in the embryo is characterized by a rapid elongation of the gut and its mesentery, resulting in formation of the primary intestinal loop. The cephalic limb of the loop develops into the distal part of the duodenum, the jejunum, and part of the ileum. The caudal limb becomes the lower portion of the ileum, the caecum, the appendix, the ascending colon and the proximal two-thirds of the transverse colon. In adults, the junction of the cranial and caudal limb can only be recognized if a portion of the vitelline duct persists as a Meckel's diverticulum. Coinciding with the growth in length, the primitive intestinal loop rotates around an axis formed by the superior mesenteric artery. Subsequently, elongation of the small intestinal loop continues, forming coiled loops. Similarly, the large intestine grows considerably in length, but fails to participate in the coiling phenomenon. At the end of the third month, the intestinal loops return to the abdominal cavity from the extra-embryonic coelom. The caecal bud is temporarily located in the right upper quadrant below the liver before it descends into the right iliac fossa, thereby forming the ascending colon and hepatic flexure. The distal end of the caecal swelling forms a narrow diverticulum, the appendix. As the intestine returns to the abdominal cavity, their mesenteries are pressed against the posterior abdominal wall where they fuse with the parietal peritoneum, fixing the right and left colon. The colon is now as it is in the adult.
In 1820, Monterossi noted from autopsies an increased length of the colon, which was depicted in handmade drawings showing sigmoid loops and duplication of the right and left colonic flexure (Figure 1). Treves dissected the bodies of patients who died from reasons other than abdominal diseases. He was convinced that the length of the bowel was independent of age, height, and weight. In the full-term fetus, he found that the length of the intestine, and especially the colon, was significantly constant. Shober reported 18 cases selected from different investigators between 1826 and 1896 in which the sigmoid flexure was found on the right side of the pelvis. Various other abnormalities were reported, including a caecum in the right hypochondriac region with extensive mesentery. It seems that the colon was likely to vary in length and in mode of disposition more than any other part of the intestinal canal. This was further demonstrated by Black in a series of drawings from textbooks and journal papers between 1836 and 1911, showing a multitude of displacement and elongation of the left colon. The hepatic and splenic flexures were permanently in place.
Bryant measured the intestines after removed from the body. His data showed that Treves was incorrect in stating that all children start life with practically the same length of intestine. He found great variations in the small intestine and colon before the fifth month of fetal life. At the age of 10 years, the child has a length of colon considered normal for the adult. He also found that the colon varied in length from 1.25 to 2.00 m, with an average length of 1.52 m. Furthermore, he reported that the length of the colon increased about 20 cm between 20 and 80 years of age.
Phillips et al reported colon length from several studies of cadavers, using laparotomy, barium enema or CT-colonography, between 1955 and 2015. The mean length of the colon varied between 109.0 cm and 169.0 cm. A redundant colon with loops was not mentioned. In their own study, they found a significant proportion of colons had mobility of the ascending and descending segments, with the length of the latter being highly variable. This may indicate loose redundancies.
By combining a bismuth meal and a bismuth clysma, Kienböck was the first to visualize a redundant colon. An extremely long mobile descending colon and sigmoid ran from the left flexure through the abdomen up under the liver and then distally superimposed to the ascending colon and caecum, before joining the rectum. A few years later, Lardennois and Aubourg using the same technique demonstrated various redundancies in all parts of the colon, in both adults and children. These investigators named the anatomic variant dolichocolon (dolicho-, Greek: long). During the following years, many case-series with all positions of colonic redundancies were published, using this new X-ray technique[11-14]. The colon length or that of the redundancies was not measured. Years later, the redundant colon was characterized by the following criteria: a sigmoid loop rising over the line between the iliac crests, a transverse colon below the same line and extra loops at the hepatic and splenic flexure. A fully developed dolichocolon occurs when all redundancies are present simultaneously[15-17] (Figures 2 and 3).
A long colon may result in an incomplete colonoscopy, as demonstrated in a study in which the colorectal length was 45 cm longer than the length in a group who underwent complete colonoscopy.
Redundancy of the colon is a far from seldom variant. In 1934, Kantor reported 258 cases from 1614 patients who underwent roentgenography, an incidence of 16.0%. However, Moeller found redundant colon in 18 out of 744 cases, an incidence of 2.4%. A high incidence of 28.5% was found among 562 cases reported by Larimore, and in 116 newborn infants, he found redundancy with the same frequency and variation as in adults. In cadavers, Bryant reported an incidence of 14% among 242 subjects. Thus, redundancy seems to occur at any age, in either sex, and without special preference to any habitus.
For the next half century, the interest in redundant colon seemed to wane. The prevalence of dolichocolon in a population is not known, because healthy people have not been investigated for that purpose. The closest to such an evaluation is a study by Brumer in which 53 patients had a barium enema for reasons other than constipation; one patient (1.9%) had a redundant colon. In 2009, Raahave et al published a study of 236 patients with constipation disorders, finding high frequencies of colonic redundancies.
The question for many authors has been whether dolichocolon is a congenital anatomic variant, an abnormal growth, or pathological stretching. Treves and Bryant assumed that colon growth is associated with activity and function depending on the diet. Very recently, the large bowel was shown in mice to undergo substantial changes in length, as it fills with fecal matter, and that the stretching of longitudinal muscles results in slow colonic transit. However, using barium enema, several authors have shown that fetuses, newborns, and infants exhibit colonic redundancies[10,12,23]. Recently, colonic elongation has been shown in children by nuclear transit scintigraphy. A familiar occurrence of dolichocolon has also been observed. In general, there are great variations in the frequency and positions of redundancies. Most investigators have found them to occur in the middle and left side of the colon[11,12,17,23].
Thus, dolichocolon is mainly congenital, but function and fecal transport may also promote some changes.
The dominating symptom of dolichocolon is constipation[4,6,9,13,14,19,23,25,26], and patients have died from it. In 1962, Brumer examined 106 patients with chronic constipation using barium enema and found 32 (30.2%) had a redundant colon. Among 53 controls, only one (1.9%) had a colon with redundancies. He concluded that a causal connection must exist between this anomaly and constipation. The most common related cause of constipation after anorectal myectomy was later found to be a redundant colon. When evaluating patients with slow transit constipation, the cause was always associated with dolichocolon. Recently, a high proportion of patients with constipation disorders was shown to have redundant colon.
Pain sometimes cramp-like, often occurs in the lower abdomen[4,11,13,17,19,23,25], where a tender mass may sometimes be felt[6,17,19]. Constipation and pain are often followed with distension, and many cases demonstrate how much these patients have suffered.
Non-specific symptoms have also been linked to redundant colon, such as general weakness, headache, and mild fever attacks suggested to be caused by a toxic condition because of fecal stasis[4,10,23,29]. In the beginning of the 20th century, a theory of autointoxication was formulated, but then discredited among little proof of bacterial toxin production. However, immune activation is detected in constipated patients based on levels of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD25+ T-cells and by spontaneous proliferation of lymphocytes. T-cell activation, elevated levels of antibacterial antibodies, and a tendency towards elevated concentrations of IgG, IgM, and circulating immune complexes, provide evidence of the stimulation of systemic cellular and humoral immunity in chronic constipation.
An elongated colon is often associated with a failure of agglutination of the mesentery with the parietal peritoneum. Consequently, the elongated colon is not fixed to the dorsal wall and can swing free on a long mesentery (Figure 4), and loose redundant loops have a potential risk of volvulus.
Information to the function of a redundant colon is scarce. Atony and a weak muscular tone may be limited to the site of the redundancy or dysfunction may be the result of derangement of the autonomous intestinal nervous system. Kantor suggested that constipation varies directly with colon length, and Metcalf et al later stated that transit is largely proportional to the length and volume of a colon segment. In an overview, Müller-Lissner et al stated that, although a long colon could prolong stool residence time, no studies have correlated colonic transit time with colon length. Subsequently, Raahave et al demonstrated that the mean colon transit time was 36.26 h in patients without redundancies, 43.80 h in those with one redundancy, 41.65 h in those with two redundancies, and 52.27 h in those with three to four redundancies. The mean colon transit time of 44 controls was 24.75 h. The difference in colon transit time between the four levels of redundancies was significant. Abdominal pain, bloating, and infrequent defecation increased significantly with an increased number of redundancies. A separate analysis found a significant positive correlation between colon transit time and fecal load and a redundant sigmoid colon.
In studies of patients undergoing subtotal colectomy for slow transit constipation, the majority of colon specimens were significantly redundant[35-38]. Colon transit time is meant to be a measure of the speed of fecal propulsion through the colon, and an even distribution of radiopaque markers suggests the same function of all parts of the colon, including redundancies. Possible reasons for dysmotility are disorders of the enteric nervous system, neuroendocrine system or brain-gut axis, including lack of interstitial cells of Cajal.
A redundant colon should be suspected in patients with constipation, abdominal pain, distension and seldom defecation, especially when symptoms have been present from childhood. However, these symptoms may also come from pure functional colonic disorders, which is why many patients with dolichocolon have not received a diagnosis. A colon transit study and a barium enema or CT-colonography is needed to confirm the diagnosis. This is essential in guiding therapy.
From the very beginning, chronic constipation was suggested to be treated with enemas, mineral oil, other laxatives, abdominal massage, a supporting corset, and eventually sedatives[4,10,11]. Murray focused on diet and advocated cereals containing husk, as well as the use of salads, raw fruits and vegetables, that grow above the ground. Large quantities of water must be taken, and moderate use of weak tea and coffee is allowed, but no alcoholic beverages. The colonic content was lubricated with oil and a tincture of belladonna given three times a day to increase the intestinal tone. In addition, abdominal electrotherapy was used over the abdomen, just as an afternoon siesta took place since the patients tire very easily. Short walks were advised as exercise. A mild sedative was eventually added. The intervention was discontinued, when the function of the colon was restored, except the retention enema with oil and high residue diet may be more or less a permanent part of the regimen. The majority of patients with a redundant colon who are given this treatment will then return to a state of approximate well-being. In the subsequent years, most authors agreed with these principles[23,29,32,41]. A gap of interest in redundant colon then followed for nearly half a century. In general, redundancy of the colon was regarded as an unimportant observation.
Redundant colon is not mentioned in a European Perspective of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Constipation or in the current American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on Constipation. This is a surprise, considering existing knowledge. Patients with constipation disorders and a redundant colon have had improvements in their quality of life by a fiber-rich diet supplemented with husk, sufficient water intake, a prokinetic drug, and physical activity. Apart from the prokinetic drug, current treatment resembles the regimen of a hundred years ago.
Immediate surgery was advocated when a sigmoid loop is twisted (volvulus)[11,20,23,29,41]. In this context, it is notable that sigmoid volvulus accounts for a disproportionally high number of cases of intestinal obstruction in developing countries such as Africa (20%-45%) compared to developed countries (1%-7%). In addition, sigmoid volvulus occurs in much younger patients. Today, it will first be tried to straighten out the twisted loop by an endoscopic maneuver. If this fails, acute surgery is necessary.
Most authors advise against surgery for dolichocolon[11,19,23,32,41]. Lane introduced colectomy for chronic constipation with a death rate of 20.5%, but without giving any information with regard to colon anatomy among 39 patients. Subtotal colectomy for a redundant colon was mentioned as a possibility in 1914. However, resection of colonic segments was performed with satisfactory results in five cases and without improvement in three cases. In 1960, Davis presented the results of 14 children operated on for symptomatic dolichocolon resistant to conservative treatment. No failures occurred, and the results were excellent in eight patients, good in three, and fair in three. Hollender reported good functional results after various colonic resections in 11 patients with dolichocolon. In other studies of patients who underwent subtotal colectomy for slow transit constipation, the majority of colon specimens were significantly redundant[35-37].
In 15 patients, the cause of constipation was slow colonic transit, which was associated with dolichocolon. After hemicolectomy or colectomy, the patients received daily evacuations and experienced less pain. Recently 31 patients with slow transit constipation and a dolichocolon underwent colectomy. At follow-up, most patients reported daily defecation and no uncontrolled diarrhea. Abdominal pain was very seldom and patient satisfaction high.
The prevalence of dolichocolon is not known, because population based investigations have not been made. However, in projects with colonoscopic screening for cancer it may be possible to estimate the number and localization of colonic redundancies. Colorectal length may be determined by magnetic resonance imaging or by tracking the progression of an electromagnetic capsule. It will hopefully then be possible to determine the prevalence of dolichocolon and a causal relationship to constipation and volvulus.
Dolichocolon is an anatomic variant with redundancies of the colonic segments and flexures. The diagnosis is established by barium enema or CT-colonography. Accumulating data from 200 years shows dolichocolon is congenital and causes constipation. Treatment is conservative, and only patients refractive to this therapy may undergo a subtotal colectomy. A redundant loop may cause volvulus, requiring an endoscopic maneuver or surgery. Future research has to show the prevalence of dolichocolon in a population and to determine whether it always gives rise to constipation.
The author is thankful to Jette Meelby, librarian, The Library of Health Sciences, Hilleroed Hospital for retrieving ancient articles, which made the study possible.
Manuscript source: Invited manuscript
Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of origin: Denmark
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): A
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): D
Grade E (Poor): 0
P- Reviewer: Maric I, Shah OJ, Sukocheva OA S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Yan JL
|1.||Langman J. Medical embryology. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Company 1975; . [Cited in This Article: ]|
|2.||Monterossi P. Uber widernatürlische Biegungen des Dickdarms als Uhrfache des Todes neugeborener Kinder. Deutsch Arch Physiol. 1820;6:556-571. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|3.||Treves F. Lectures on the Anatomy of the Intestinal Canal and Peritoneum in Man. Br Med J. 1885;1:415-419. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 51] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|4.||Shober JB. Anomalous positions of the colon. Am J Med Sci. 1898;116:405-419. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]|
|5.||Buchanan A. Fatal cases of the obstruction and enormous distension of the belly. London Med Gazette. 1839;2:639-644. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|6.||Black CE. XI. Displacements of the Colon. Ann Surg. 1912;56:888-899. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]|
|7.||Bryant J. Observations upon the growth and length of the human intestine. Am J Med Sci. 1924;167:499-520. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 72] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|8.||Phillips M, Patel A, Meredith P, Will O, Brassett C. Segmental colonic length and mobility. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97:439-444. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|9.||Kienböck R. Ueber das Sigma elongatum mobile (Röntgenbefund). Muench Med Wochen. 1913;60:68-70. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|10.||Lardennois G, Aubourg P. Allongements segmentaires du gros intestin les dolichocolies. Jour Radiol Electrol. 1914;1:65-74. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|12.||Larimore JW. The human large intestine in the newborn and in the adult. Ann Clin Med. 1926;5:439-463. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|13.||Moeller PF. The redundant colon. Acta Radiol. 1926;6:432-457. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]|
|14.||Gauss H. Redundant colon. Arch Surg. 1927;15:560-579. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]|
|15.||Kantor JL. Anomalies of the colon: Their roentgen diagnosis and clinical significance. Radiology. 1934;23:651-662. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|16.||Caffey J. Pediatric X-ray diagnosis. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers 1961; . [Cited in This Article: ]|
|17.||Raahave D, Christensen E, Loud FB, Knudsen LL. Correlation of bowel symptoms with colonic transit, length, and faecal load in functional faecal retention. Dan Med Bull. 2009;56:83-88. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ]|
|18.||Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:774-779. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|19.||Kantor JL. Common anomalies of the duodenum and colon: Their practical significance. JAMA. 1931;97:1785-1790. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ]|
|20.||Galambos A, Galambos WM. Redundancy of the colon. Am J Dig Dis. 1946;13:87-101. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|21.||Brumer P, Seppälä P, Wegelius U. Redundant colon as a cause of constipation. Gut. 1962;3:140-141. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|22.||Heredia DJ, Dickson EJ, Bayguinov PO, Hennig GW, Smith TK. Colonic elongation inhibits pellet propulsion and migrating motor complexes in the murine large bowel. J Physiol. 2010;588:2919-2934. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|23.||Friedenwald J, Feldman M. Clinical observations on the redundant colon (dolichocolon). South Med J. 1934;27:147-154. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]|
|24.||Yik YI, Cook DJ, Veysey DM, Tudball CF, Cain TM, Southwell BR, Hutson JM. How common is colonic elongation in children with slow-transit constipation or anorectal retention? J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:1414-1420. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|25.||Hollender LF, Muller AM, Viville C, Santizo G. [Dolichocolon in adults: surgical indications]. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1965;28:550-567. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ]|
|26.||Kantor JL. A clinical study of common anatomical abnormalities of the colon. I. The redundant colon. Am J Roentgenol Soc. 1924;12:414-430. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|27.||Tomita R, Howard ER. Clinical studies on anorectal myectomy for chronically constipated patients with outlet obstruction in childhood. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1600-1605. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ]|
|28.||Ripetti V, Caputo D, Greco S, Alloni R, Coppola R. Is total colectomy the right choice in intractable slow-transit constipation? Surgery. 2006;140:435-440. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|29.||White FW. Studies of the redundant colon. N Engl J Med. 1928;198:783-787. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|30.||Lane WA. Remarks on the results of the operative treatment of chronic constipation. Br Med J. 1908;1:126-130. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65] [Article Influence: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|31.||Khalif IL, Quigley EM, Konovitch EA, Maximova ID. Alterations in the colonic flora and intestinal permeability and evidence of immune activation in chronic constipation. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37:838-849. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 210] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 214] [Article Influence: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|32.||LaRochelle FD, Smith EE. The dolichocolon. Radiology. 1932;18:1111-1114. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]|
|33.||Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolf BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:40-47. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 728] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 735] [Article Influence: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|34.||Müller-Lissner SA, Kamm MA, Scarpignato C, Wald A. Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:232-242. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 346] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 358] [Article Influence: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]|
|35.||Lux N, Athanasiadis S, Fischbach N, Meyer B. Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach subtotaler und partieller colektomie bei der therapiresistenten chronischen obstipation. Chirurg. 1992;68:739-747. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|36.||Webster C, Dayton M. Results after colectomy for colonic inertia: a sixteen-year experience. Amer J Surg. 2001;182:639-644. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|37.||Lundin E, Karlbom U, Påhlman L, Graf W. Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1270-1274. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 63] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|38.||Raahave D, Loud FB, Christensen E, Knudsen LL. Colectomy for refractory constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:592-602. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|39.||Raahave D. Faecal retention: a common cause in functional bowel disorders, appendicitis and haemorrhoids--with medical and surgical therapy. Dan Med J. 2015;62:pii B5031. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ]|
|41.||Kantor JL. The common affections of the colon, their origin and their management. Bull NY Acad Med. 1928;4:757-788. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|42.||Tack J, Müller-Lissner S, Stanghellini V, Boeckxstaens G, Kamm MA, Simren M, Galmiche JP, Fried M. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation--a European perspective. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:697-710. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|43.||American Gastroenterological Association, Bharucha AE, Dorn SD, Lembo A, Pressman A. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:211-217. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 278] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 287] [Article Influence: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|44.||Madiba TE, Haffajee MR. Sigmoid colon morphology in the population groups of Durban, South Africa, with special reference to sigmoid volvulus. Clin Anat. 2011;24:441-453. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|
|45.||Slesinger EG. Elongation of the pelvic colon and its surgical treatment. Lancet. 1926;2:274-275. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|46.||Davis DA. A new concept in the treatment of symptomatic redundant colon or dolichocolon. West J Surg Gynecol. 1960;68:101-106. [Cited in This Article: ]|
|47.||Mark EB, Poulsen JL, Haase AM, Frøkjaer JB, Schlageter V, Scott SM, Krogh K, Drewes AM. Assessment of colorectal length using the electromagnetic capsule tracking system: a comparative validation study in healthy subjects. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:O350-O357. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]|