Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104043
Revised: February 14, 2025
Accepted: March 12, 2025
Published online: May 27, 2025
Processing time: 158 Days and 23.7 Hours
Despite advancements, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) poses challenges, including the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and difficulty of biliary cannulation.
To compare dome and tapered tip sphincterotomes, focusing on their efficacy in achieving successful biliary cannulation and reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
In this prospective, single-blind, randomized pilot study conducted at Inha Uni
The success rates of selective biliary cannulation were 74.4% and 85.7% in the dome and tapered tip groups, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.20). Similarly, the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis did not differ significantly between the groups (5 cases in the tapered tip group vs 6 in the dome tip group, P = 0.72). However, difficult cannulation was significantly more common in the dome tip group than in the tapered tip group (P = 0.05). Selective biliary cannula
This study indicated that the sphincterotome tip type does not markedly affect biliary cannulation success or post-ERCP pancreatitis rates. However, cannulation duration is a key risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis. These findings provide preliminary insights that highlight the importance of refining ERCP practices, including sphincterotome selection, while underscoring the need for larger multicenter studies to improve procedure time and patient safety.
Core Tip: This pilot study compared dome and tapered tip sphincterotomes in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with focus on selective biliary cannulation success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Although cannulation success and pancreatitis rates did not differ significantly between the two tip types, a prolonged cannulation time was a key predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The tapered tip group encountered fewer cannulation difficulties, suggesting a maneuverability advantage. These findings underscore the importance of minimizing cannulation time and support the need for larger multicenter studies to refine ERCP practices and improve patient safety.