The present study was conducted to clarify predictive factors related to procedure time for closure of a mucosal defect following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

To prevent complications following a colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure, closure of the resultant mucosal defect is considered to be most effective. However, closure after colorectal ESD is challenging, and technical difficulties can lead to a longer procedure time. Although it is important to clarify predictive factors related to the time needed for effective treatment planning, no such validated data obtained prior to the present study have been reported.

Overall, 61 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal ESD for a colorectal neoplasm sized greater than 20 mm were enrolled. Immediately after performing colorectal ESD, closure of the mucosal defect was implemented using a loop clip closure method. Factors with influence on closure procedure time were evaluated using multiple linear regression analyses.

Results obtained with a multiple linear regression model demonstrated that resected specimen size (β = 0.690, p < 0.01) and colon site (β = -0.209, p = 0.027) were factors with influence on the closure procedure. Those results were considered relevant to explain the 50.5% variance in time until completion of closure; thus, goodness of fit was considered to be high.

Findings obtained in this study were helpful to clarify predictive factors with influence on procedure time. The fit of the model was good, thus allowing for closure performance based on outcome prediction.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used to treat gastrointestinal mucosal and submucosal lesions. However, it may cause bleeding, perforation, and stricture. Although these complications can be avoided by introducing materials such as polyglycolic acid and carboxymethyl cellulose sheets, such approaches are expensive and time-consuming. Herein, we report a hydrogel prepared by combining a colloidal solution composed of konjac glucomannan (KGM) and sodium alginate (SA) and a fixative solution containing ε-poly-l-lysine (ε-PLL) and calcium chloride. The two solutions were mixed on the wound surface to form the KGM/SA/ε-PLL hydrogel through hydrogen bonds, coordination bonds, and electrostatic attraction. The effectiveness and convenience of applying the KGM/SA/ε-PLL hydrogel to promote wound healing in the esophagus and colon were assessed in vitro and in vivo. We found that the hydrogel stimulated epithelial proliferation, reduced inflammation, promoted recapillarization, and inhibited fibrosis in the esophagus and colon. Therefore, the KGM/SA/ε-PLL hydrogel is an effective and convenient agent that can promote post-ESD wound healing and is recommended for ulcer bed protection in daily clinical practice.

In this editorial, we provide commentary on a recently published study by Zhao et al in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. The study discusses the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic resection for gastric cancers. We feel it is important to engage our endoscopy community in a discussion on the current evidence in the literature on the necessary number of cases for training in endoluminal surgery techniques, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection. This includes the latest recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, as well as a summary of key studies on the learning curve for these techniques. Additionally, we explore the impact of an endoscopist's specialty on endoscopy outcomes, drawing from current evidence in the literature to shape our perspective in this evolving field.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a standard treatment for superficial colorectal neoplasms worldwide. However, challenges remain in achieving dissection at the precise layer. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a novel ESD technique involving natural traction, referred to as the bridge formation method (BFM).

The two main features of the BFM are creating a large mucosal flap and leaving normal mucosa on both sides of the lesion until the bridge is made at the end of the procedure. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with 2647 colorectal lesions resected by ESD from September 2003 to December 2023. We divided them into the BFM group and the non-BFM group and conducted propensity score matching.After propensity score matching, 1648 cases were enrolled (824 cases in each group). The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the BFM than non-BFM group (99.6% vs. 96.7%, p < 0.01). The R0 resection rate and the average dissection speed (㎟/min) were significantly higher in the BFM than non-BFM group (98.8% vs. 96.4%, p < 0.01, and 18.9 vs. 18.0, p = 0.03). The occurrence rates of perforation and delayed bleeding showed no significant difference between the non-BFM and BFM groups (2.8% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.40, and 1.1% vs. 1.0%, p = 1.00).

The BFM is a suitable method for colorectal ESD as it enables rapid dissection and improves both en bloc resection and R0 resection rates.

Recently, the application of double band ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR-DL) in the resection of rectal endocrine tumors ≤ 10 mm has shown promising prospects. However, the use of ESMR-DL has not been reported for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs). In this study, we aimed to compare the application of modified ESMR-DL with ESD in gGISTs (≤ 1.5 cm).

Data were retrospectively collected from 472 patients who underwent modified ESMR-DL or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of gGISTs (≤ 1.5 cm). To overcome selection bias, a propensity score matching method was applied using four covariates for 1:1 matching: sex, age, tumor size, and tumor location. Clinical data, surgical status, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Of the 472 patients, 78 (16.5%) received modified ESMR-DL and 394 (83.5%) received ESD; after matching, there were 78 patients in each group. There was no statistical difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups after matching (p > 0.05). Compared to ESD, modified ESMR-DL resulted in shorter operation time, time to a liquid diet and postoperative hospitalization time, but had a higher incidence of intraoperative perforation (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate of tumors, incidence of postoperative complications, and average hospitalization costs between the two groups after matching (p > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the maximum dimension of the lesion (7 mm increments) and the surgical method were factors affecting procedure time, and the maximum dimension of the lesion (7 mm increments) and operator (novice vs instructor) were factors affecting intraoperative perforation in modified ESMR-DL (P < 0.05). During the follow-up, there were no recurrences or metastases of gGISTs in either group.

Modified ESMR-DL is noninferior to ESD with a similar complete resection rate. In addition, modified ESMR-DL had shorter procedure time and hospitalization time.

Fever is a complication after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The objective of this study was to explore the incidence and risk factors of fever after colorectal ESD and establish a predictive nomogram model. This retrospective analysis encompassed patients with colorectal lesions who underwent ESD between June 2008 and December 2021 in our center. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors of fever after colorectal ESD based on univariate analysis, and derived predictive nomogram model was constructed. The performance of nomogram model was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC). Among the 1096 enrolled patients with colorectal lesions, fever after colorectal ESD occurred in 204 (18.6%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that tumor size (P < 0.001), ESD procedure time > 30 min (P < 0.001), injury to muscle layer (P < 0.001) and intraoperative perforation (P = 0.046) were estimated to be independent risk factors of fever after colorectal ESD. A predictive nomogram model, incorporating these four predictors, were established and performed well in both training and validation groups. Both DCA and CIC showed this nomogram model had a good potential for clinical practicability.

Thermal damage may lead to inflammation of the peeled mucosal surface during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

To determine the effect of Joule heat on the onset of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS).

In this prospective study, PECS was characterized by in-hospital fever (white blood cell count: ≥ 10000 μ/L or body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C) and abdominal pain (visual analog scale score ≥ 30 mm during hospitalization or increased by ≥ 20 mm from baseline at admission). High Joule heat was defined as 15390 J. Between April 2020 and April 2024, 209 patients underwent colorectal ESD; those with intraoperative perforation or penetration were excluded. The remaining 202 patients were divided into the PECS and non-PECS groups.

PECS occurred in 30 (14.9%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed high Joule heat as an independent factor associated with PECS (odds ratio = 7.96; 95% confidence interval: 2.91-21.8, P < 0.01). The procedure time and presence of lesions in the right colon were not associated with PECS.

Accumulated thermal damage on the peeled mucosal surface should be considered during PECS onset. This thermal damage is likely a major component of the mechanism underlying PECS.

Background and study aims Although deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are major postoperative complications, risk of DVT/PE after endoscopic procedures remains unknown. This study aimed to identify risks of DVT/PE after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and double-balloon endoscopy (DBE). Patients and methods Patients who were scheduled to undergo DBE and colorectal ESD were prospectively enrolled in this study. Before enrollment, all patients were confirmed to have no DVT on whole-leg ultrasonography (US) or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). All patients routinely underwent whole-leg US after ESD or DBE. The primary endpoint was incidence of DVT after colorectal ESD and DBE. The preplanned sample size was 170 patients in the colorectal ESD group and 75 in the DBE group. Results Between September 2020 and June 2022, 170 patients who had colorectal ESD and 75 who had DBE were recruited for this study; however, 238 patients (ESD, n = 167; DBE, n = 71) were analyzed. Of these 238 patients, DVT occurred in only one patient after colorectal ESD and incidence of DVT was 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-1.2) in total, including 0.6% (95% CI 0-1.8) after colorectal ESD and 0% after DBE. Conversely, no PE occurred in the entire cohort. Conclusions This prospective study demonstrated that risk of DVT/PE following highly invasive endoscopic procedures including colorectal ESD and DBE is very low.

Background and study aims The MANTIS Clip (Boston Scientific) is a novel anchor pronged clip designed to enhance tissue grasping and facilitate the closure of defects in the gastrointestinal tract. This study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the MANTIS Clip for closing mucosal defects following colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). Patients and methods A retrospective single-center study was conducted on patients who underwent C-ESD with MANTIS Clip closure from May 2023 to April 2024. The primary outcome measured was the complete closure success rate. Secondary outcomes included defect size, sustained closure rate, closure time, number of clips used, adverse events (AEs), and hospital stay duration. Results The MANTIS Clip was used in 52 cases. The complete closure rate was 98.1% (51/52), with a sustained closure rate of 96.1% (49/51). The median closed defect size was 32 mm, with the largest being 62 mm. The median closure time was 8 minutes. Typically, one MANTIS Clip per defect was used, with only one lesion requiring two clips. The median number of additional clips used was seven. AEs included one case of bleeding (1.9%) and one case of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (1.9%), both managed without extending hospital stays. The median C-reactive protein level on the first day post-ESD was 0.35 mg/dL and the median hospital stay was 5 days. Conclusions The MANTIS Clip is effective and practical for mucosal defect closure post-C-ESD, demonstrating high success and sustained closure rates with minimal complications. Future multicenter randomized trials are needed to further assess its efficacy and safety.

Despite its growing popularity, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms is still technically challenging. The factors contributing to the failure of ESD are not yet comprehensively elucidated. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to explore the potential risk factors associated with unsuccessful colorectal ESD.

A comprehensive search of Medline and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant publications from inception until March 14, 2023. Unsuccessful ESD was defined as cases involving incomplete resection or the occurrence of adverse events, such as perforation and delayed bleeding.

Among the 2067 citations initially identified, a total of 23 cohort studies and 16 case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. Following meta-analyses, several significant risk factors for incomplete resection were identified, including lesion diameter ≥40 or 50 mm, right-side colonic location, deeper submucosal invasion, and severe fibrosis. Similarly, lesion diameter ≥40 or 50 mm and severe fibrosis emerged as risk factors for perforation. However, no individual factor was found to be statistically associated with delayed bleeding.

This meta-analysis identified risk factors correlated with incomplete resection and adverse events following ESD. The findings provide valuable insights that can guide clinical decision-making, aiding gastroenterologists in accurately identifying high-risk individuals.

Colorectal neoplasms are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the safety and efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are not well understood. This retrospective analysis included ESD procedures performed in 1266 patients with CKD across five tertiary medical institutions from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients were categorized based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which ranged from CKD1 to CKD5 (including those on dialysis). We found that en bloc resection rates remained high across all CKD stages, affirming the procedural efficacy of ESD. Notably, the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus, significantly increased with an advancing CKD stage, with a corresponding increase in the Charlson Comorbidity Index, highlighting the complexity of managing these patients. Despite these challenges, the complete resection rate was lower in the CKD5 group (50%) than in the CKD1 group (83.4%); however, procedural complications, such as perforation and bleeding, did not significantly differ among the groups. The predictive models for complete resection and major complications showed no significant changes with a decreasing eGFR. These findings underscore that ESD is a feasible and safe treatment for colorectal neoplasms in patients with CKD, successfully balancing the inherent procedural risks with clinical benefits.

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is an uncommon complication after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to explore the risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions based on the latest and consistent diagnostic criteria and to establish a predictive nomogram model.

This retrospective analysis included patients with superficial colorectal lesions who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between June 2008 and December 2021 in our center. The independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression analysis, as well as univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression, and derived predictive nomogram model was constructed.

Among the 555 patients with superficial colorectal lesions enrolled, PEECS occurred in 45 (8.1%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female sex (OR 3.94, P < 0.001), age > 50 years (OR 4.28, P = 0.02), injury to muscle layer (OR 10.38, P < 0.001), non-lifting sign (OR 2.20, P = 0.04) and inadequate bowel preparation (OR 5.61, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions. A predictive nomogram model was constructed based on the above five predictors. For this model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.855, the calibration curve exhibited good consistency between the prediction and the actual observation, and the C-index was confirmed as 0.843 by bootstrap method.

Female sex, age > 50 years, injury to muscle layer, non-lifting sign and inadequate bowel preparation were independent risk factors of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions. The proposed nomogram could accurately predict the risk of PEECS for superficial colorectal lesions.

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising but challenging procedure. It is not widely performed due to its technical difficulty. We aimed to find the predictive factors associated with technical difficulty in colorectal ESD before the procedure. Clinical data from patients who underwent ESD for colorectal tumors in 5 hospitals in Honam province of South Korea between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Technically difficult colorectal ESD procedure was defined in 3 points. Long procedure time (longer than 60 minutes), occurrence of perforation, and failure of en bloc resection. Factors associated with technically difficult ESD were included as main outcome measure. 1446 patients were identified and their data were analyzed. Median procedure time was 30.0 minutes and median long axis of the tumor was 20.1 mm. Technically difficult procedures including long procedure time were 231 cases (16.0%), perforation occurred in 34 cases (2.3%), and en bloc resection was done in 1292 cases (89.3%). Tumor size larger than 35 mm (odd ratio [OR]: 1.474, P = .047), central depression or ulceration in the lesion (OR: 1.474, P = .013), previous endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or polypectomy procedure (OR: 2.428, P = .020) were associated with technically difficult ESD. Descending colon-located tumor (OR: 5.355, P < .001), and use of IT knife (OR: 4.157, P = .003) were associated with perforation. Recognizing factors associated with technically difficult ESD can help in planning the ESD procedure beforehand.

Endoscopic submucosa dissection (ESD) has been applied extensively in the treatment of large intestine tumours due to its high total excision ratio. Nevertheless, there is a high incidence of adverse reactions in colon ESD, and the efficacy of prophylactic ESD following ESD in prevention of postoperative haemorrhage is still disputed. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis of wound closure in large intestine ESD after operation. For eligibility, we looked through three databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Heterogenity was measured by means of a chi-square method of Q-statistic and an I2 test. Fixed or random effects models were used for data processing. Based on the retrieval policy, we found a total of 1286 papers, and then we collected nine papers to extract the data. Regarding postoperative haemorrhage, there was a significant reduction in the risk of wound haemorrhage in the wound closure group than in the control group (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.19-0.44 p < 0.0001). No statistical significance was found in the incidence of perforation in the wound closure and the control group (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.19-1.03 p = 0.06). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperation fever among those in the wound closure group than in the control group (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.93 p = 0.04). Preventive endoscopic closure decreased the rate of ESD in colon disease, but did not significantly decrease the rate of postoperation perforation and postoperative fever. Future research will be required to clarify the risk factors and classify high-risk individuals in order to formulate a cost-effective prevention strategy.

When total submucosal dissection is difficult to achieve during conventional colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD), the lesion can be resected by final snaring through salvage hybrid ESD (SH-ESD). This study aimed to examine the outcomes of SH-ESD and identify its indications that could achieve en bloc resection.

We recruited 1039 consecutive patients with colorectal lesions that underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. C-ESD was attempted thoroughly in 924 lesions (C-ESD group, including 9 lesions in which ESD was discontinued), and SH-ESD was performed owing to some difficulties in 115 lesions (SH-ESD group). Risk factors for incomplete resection by SH-ESD and ESD discontinuation were evaluated using multivariate analysis. The outcomes were compared between cases with remaining undissected submucosa of < 20 mm in diameter in the SH-ESD and C-ESD groups, using propensity score matching.

Multivariate analysis revealed that a procedure time > 80 min and remaining undissected submucosa ≥ 20 mm in diameter were significant risk factors for incomplete resection after SH-ESD and ESD discontinuation. By propensity score matching analysis, procedure time was significantly shorter in the SH-ESD group with remaining undissected submucosa < 20 mm in diameter than in the C-ESD group (71 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.0053), although no significant difference was found in the en bloc resection rate (94% vs. 87%, p = 0.0914).

SH-ESD can be an alternative surgical method when conventional ESD is difficult to continue in cases in which the remaining undissected submucosa is < 20 mm in diameter.

Tumor depth evaluation is essential for pathological tumor staging because it affects clinical management as an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancers. However, poor interobserver variability of invasion depth has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of desmin immunostaining in the histological diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Overall, 63 sets of slides of colorectal cancer stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and desmin were prepared and independently reviewed by four examiners. After reviewing the desmin-stained slides, the interobserver variability of H&E slides alone was significantly improved for all examiners. For the assessment of Tis vs. T1, the sensitivity and accuracy were significantly improved for all examiners by combining H&E and desmin immunostaining. For the diagnosis of T1b vs. Tis or T1a, specificity and accuracy were significantly improved by adding desmin immunostaining. Ancillary desmin staining to assess submucosal invasion in colorectal cancers significantly improved interobserver agreement, led to efficient screening of T1 cancers, and reduced excessive T1b diagnoses. The combination of desmin immunostaining and H&E staining is highly recommended for diagnosing invasive colorectal cancer.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for the removal of benign and early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of a novel high-pressure waterjet-assisted ESD knife in colorectal applications. Six female German Landrace pigs with an average weight of 62 kg (range 60-65 kg) were used in this prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Twenty-four ESDs were performed by three endoscopists: Twelve each with the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex T-Type (HK-T) and the Olympus DualKnife® J (DK-J), including six rectal and six colonic ESDs per instrument. The order of performance was randomized regarding anatomic position and instrument. As the primary endpoint, ESD knife performance characteristics were combined and rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 Likert points (LP) representing the best response (5 = very good). The HK-T was rated significantly better than the DK-J (4.7 LP versus 4.4 LP, p = 0.0295), mainly because of HK-T injection ability (5 LP versus 3 LP, p < 0.0001) and hemostasis (5 LP versus 4 LP, p = 0.0452). There was no difference in procedure time (HK-T: 35 min versus DK-J: 34 min, p = 0.8005), resection diameter (3.1 cm versus 2.8 cm, p = 0.3492), injection volume (41 mL versus 46 mL, p = 0.5633), and complication rates. HK-T is as effective as DK-J in colorectal ESD in terms of dissection quality but has better injection and hemostatic properties. The impact of these technical advantages on the ESD treatment of patients with large superficial colorectal lesions remains to be clinically verified.

Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at "challenging sites" such as the cecum, ascending colon, and colonic flexures could be difficult even for expert endoscopists due to poor endoscope stability/maneuverability, steep angles, and thinner wall thickness. A double-balloon endoluminal intervention platform (EIP) has been introduced in the market to fasten and facilitate ESD, particularly when located at difficult sites. Here, we report our initial experience with an EIP comparing the outcomes of an EIP versus standard ESD (S-ESD) at "challenging sites".

We retrospectively collected data on consecutive patients with colonic lesions located in the right colon and at flexures who underwent ESD in our tertiary referral center between March 2019 and May 2023. Endoscopic and clinical outcomes (technical success, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, procedure time, time to reach the lesion, and adverse events) and 6-month follow-up outcomes were analyzed.

Overall, 139 consecutive patients with lesions located at these challenging sites were enrolled (EIP: 31 and S-ESD: 108). Demographic characteristics did not differ between groups. En bloc resection was achieved in 92.3% and 93.5% of patients, respectively, in the EIP and S-ESD groups. Both groups showed a comparable R0 resection rate (EIP vs. S-ESD: 92.3% vs. 97.2%). In patients undergoing EIP-assisted ESD, the total procedure time was shorter (96.1 [30.6] vs. 113.6 [42.3] minutes, p = 0.01), and the mean size of the resected lesions was smaller (46.2 ± 12.7 vs. 55.7 ± 17.6 mm, p = 0.003). The time to reach the lesion was significantly shorter in the EIP group (1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 8.2 ± 2.7 min, p ≤ 0.01). Procedure speed was comparable between groups (14.9 vs. 16.6 mm2/min, p = 0.29). Lower adverse events were observed in the EIP patients (3.8 vs. 10.2%, p = 0.31).

EIP allows results that do not differ from S-ESD in the resection of colorectal superficial neoplasms localized in "challenging sites" in terms of efficacy and safety. EIP reduces the time to reach the lesions and may more safely facilitate endoscopic resection.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of 21-30 mm colonic polyps.

We conducted a single-center RCT. Patients diagnosed with suspected colorectal intramucosal carcinoma (21-30 mm and adaptable for both UEMR and ESD) were randomly assigned to the UEMR and ESD groups at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. We independently performed one-sample tests against the set threshold for each treatment. The significance level was set at p = 0.224.

Eleven polyps each in the UEMR and ESD groups, respectively, were analyzed. The R0 resection rate (%) was 36 (95% confidence interval 11-69) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.002). The p-value against the set threshold for UEMR was 0.743, whereas that for ESD was < 0.001 (one-sample binomial test). The en bloc resection rates (%) were 82 (48-97) and 100 (72-100) for UEMR and ESD, respectively; however, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.167). The mean treatment time (min) was significantly shorter in the UEMR group (8 ± 6) than in the ESD group (48 ± 29) (p = 0.001).

ESD could achieve a high R0 resection rate, while the en bloc resection rate was comparable between the two treatment techniques with less burden on patients undergoing UEMR for 21-30-mm colorectal polyps.

The study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial as jRCT1030210015 and jRCT1030210177.

In recent years, studies have demonstrated that magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection (MAG-ESD) is feasible and safe and may facilitate the treatment of all difficult lesions. However, the major problem with MAG-ESD is the inability to deliver the magnetic anchor to the gastrointestinal tract without withdrawal or reinsertion of the endoscope. Therefore, our team developed a magnetic anchor that could be easily inserted through the biopsy channel, facilitating ESD traction and evaluated its effectiveness and safety.

The study was conducted between October 2020 and June 2021 at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China. One hundred and twelve patients with colorectal tumors treated with ESD were divided into two groups for historical control comparison. A channel-placed magnetic anchor (CPMAG) group and a control group consisting of patients who had conventional ESD without adjuvant traction. The rate of en bloc resection and resection with tumor-free lateral/basal margins (R0 resection), dissection speeds, procedure time, intraoperative bleeding and perforation complications, and postoperative follow-up were compared between the two groups, so as to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of the new magnetic anchor.

The en bloc resection and R0 resection rate with CPMAG-ESD were slightly higher than with conventional ESD but this was not statistically significant. The median dissection speeds with CPMAG-ESD were higher than with conventional ESD, but the difference was not statistically significant. Intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications with the CPMAG-ESD were less than with conventional ESD, but this was not statistically significant. The median operating time was shorter with CPMAG- ESD than with conventional ESD (24.5 min [range 15.8-66.5 min] vs 39 min [range 29-58 min], p = 0.024), and this difference was statistically significant.

The new magnetic anchor-guided ESD technique appears to be a feasible and safe method for treating early colorectal tumors with en bloc resection, with improvement of the submucosal visual field, and less adverse events.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established method for complete resection of large and early gastrointestinal tumors. However, methods to reduce bleeding, perforation, and other adverse events after endoscopic resection (ER) have not yet been defined. Mucosal defect closure is often performed endoscopically with a clip. Recently, reopenable clips and large-teeth clips have also been developed. The over-the-scope clip enables complete defect closure by withdrawing the endoscope once and attaching the clip. Other methods involve attaching the clip-line or a ring with an anchor to appose the edges of the mucosal defect, followed by the use of an additional clip for defect closure. Since clips are limited by their grasping force and size, other methods, such as endoloop closure, endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure, and the reopenable clip over-the-line method, have been developed. In recent years, techniques often utilized for full-thickness ER of submucosal tumors have been widely used in full-thickness defect closure. Specialized devices and techniques for defect closure have also been developed, including the curved needle and line, stitches, and an endoscopic tack and suture device. These clips and suture devices are applied for defect closure in emergency endoscopy, accidental perforations, and acute and chronic fistulas. Although endoscopic defect closure with clips has a high success rate, endoscopists need to simplify and promote endoscopic closure techniques to prevent adverse events after ER.

Developing effective gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding animal models is necessary to advance endoscopic hemostasis methods and train endoscopists on their use. Our aim, therefore, was to develop an effective and safe porcine GI bleeding model in the stomach and colon of large and small-sized oozing-type ulcers.

Gastric and colonic bleeding ulcers were created using either a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique or a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C) technique in 14 pigs. Prior to ulcer creation, animals were treated with either oral apixaban or intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin anticoagulation in combination with clopidogrel and aspirin. The primary outcome was the technical success of inducing oozing-type Forrest Ib bleeding ulcers. Secondary outcomes included ulcer diameter, number, creation time and the number of complications associated with each technique.

Using hybrid ESD and IV heparin anticoagulation, bleeding was observed in 21/23 (91.3%) gastric ulcers and 6/7 (85.7%) colonic ulcers created. The mean diameter and ulcer creation time were 2.3 ± 0.3 cm and 5.3 ± 0.5 min, respectively, for gastric ulcers and 2.2 ± 0.4 cm and 4.06 ± 0.6 min, respectively, for colonic ulcers. Using EMR-C and IV heparin anticoagulation, bleeding was observed in 14/15 (93.3%) gastric ulcers and 6/6 (100%) colonic ulcers created. The mean diameter and ulcer creation time were 0.8 ± 0.2 cm and 2.1 ± 0.5 min, respectively, for gastric ulcers and 0.7 ± 0.2 cm and 1.7 ± 0.3 min, respectively, for colonic ulcers. None of the ulcers created in animals anticoagulated with apixaban developed bleeding. None of the 14 pigs developed any complications.

We have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of a porcine GI bleeding model utilizing IV heparin anticoagulation and either hybrid ESD or EMR-C techniques to create oozing-type bleeding ulcers in the stomach and colon with customizable size.

In colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) has been recognized as one of the major complications. There are no reports on the relationships between ESD findings and PECS. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors for PECS, including ESD findings such as muscularis propria exposure.

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2017 and December 2021 in Japan. The grade of injury to the muscle layer caused by ESD was categorized as follows: Grade 0, no exposure of muscularis propria; Grade 1, muscularis propria exposure; Grade 2, torn muscularis propria; and Grade 3, colon perforation. The risk factors for PECS, including injury to the muscle layer, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Out of 314 patients who underwent colorectal ESD, PECS occurred in 28 patients (8.9%). The multivariate analysis showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.233; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.264-8.265, P = 0.014), large specimen size (≥ 40 mm) (OR 6.138; 95% CI: 1.317-28.596, P = 0.021), long procedure time (≥ 90 min) (OR 2.664; 95% CI: 1.053-6.742, P = 0.039), and Grade 1 or 2 injury to the muscle layer (OR 3.850; 95% CI: 1.090-13.61, P = 0.036) were independent risk factors for PECS.

Injury to the muscle layer, such as exposure or tear, was identified as a novel independent risk factor for PECS. We should perform colorectal ESD carefully to avoid injuring the muscle layers.

Multimodal assessment of colorectal polyps is needed before decision-making for endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Assessment should include morphology according to Paris classification, magnification endoscopy for vascular pattern, and Kudo pit pattern analysis. ESD should be offered to patients that have Vi pit pattern, lateral spreading tumors (LST) granular multinodular and LST nongranular, lesions with fibrosis and those in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A defined strategy for resection and planning is crucial for successful and efficient resection with a clear audit of outcomes aiming for a perforation and bleeding rate of less than 1% and R0 resection greater than 90%.

To determine the long-term outcomes after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), we conducted a large, multicenter, prospective cohort trial with a 5-year observation period.

Between February 2013 and January 2015, we consecutively enrolled 1740 patients with 1814 colorectal epithelial neoplasms ≥20 mm who underwent ESD. Patients with noncurative resection (non-CR) lesions underwent additional radical surgery, as needed. After the initial treatment, intensive 5-year follow-up with planned multiple colonoscopies was conducted to identify metastatic and/or local recurrences. Primary outcomes were overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates. The rates of local recurrence and metachronous invasive cancer were evaluated as the secondary outcomes.

The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, and intestinal preservation rates were 93.6%, 99.6%, and 88.6%, respectively. Patients with CR lesions had no metastatic occurrence, and patients with non-CR lesions had 4 metastatic occurrences. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly higher in patients with CR lesions than in those with non-CR lesions (P > .001 and P = .009, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in only 8 lesions (0.5%), which were successfully resected by subsequent endoscopic treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that piecemeal resection (hazard ratio, 8.19; 95% CI, 1.47-45.7; P = .02) and margin-positive resection (hazard ratio, 8.06; 95% CI, 1.76-37.0; P = .007) were significant independent predictors of local recurrence after colorectal ESD. Fifteen metachronous invasive cancers (1.0%) were identified during surveillance colonoscopy, most of which required surgical resection.

A favorable long-term prognosis indicates that ESD can be the standard treatment for large colorectal epithelial neoplasms.

UMIN000010136.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced minimally invasive technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions, which is drawn an increasing attention from its emergence. This bibliometric analysis is to evaluate the origin, current hotspots, and research trends on ESD.

A total of 2,131 publications on ESD from 2006 to 2020 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Bibliometric visualization analyses of countries/regions, institutes, authors, journals, references and keywords were performed by CiteSpace V.5.8.R3.

The quantity of publications on ESD increased significantly during the past 15 years. Japan occupied the leading position in terms of research power. Professor Yutaka Saito, together with the institute he belongs, the Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, were the most productive author and institute, respectively. Colorectal ESD led the main thematic concentrations in ESD research. The most prolific journal was Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. European ESD Guideline was the most frequently co-cited reference. Guideline, meta-analysis, endoscopic resection, poly-glycolic acid sheet, Barrett's esophagus, fibrin glue, risk and colorectal neoplasm will be the active research hotspots in the future.

These findings provide the trends and frontiers in the field of ESD, as well as valuable information for clinicians and scientists to discover the future perspectives with potential collaborators.

The 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System (5th edition) introduced the term "sessile serrated lesion" (SSL) to replace the term "sessile serrated adenoma/polyp" (SSA/P). SSLs are early precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway that result in colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations, methylation for DNA repair genes, a CpG island methylator phenotype, and high levels of microsatellite instability. Some of these lesions can rapidly become dysplastic or invasive carcinomas that exhibit high lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis potential. The 2019 WHO classification noted that dysplasia arising in an SSL most likely is an advanced polyp, regardless of the morphologic grade of the dysplasia. Detecting SSLs with or without dysplasia is critical; however, detection of SSLs is challenging, and their identification by endoscopists and pathologists is inconsistent. Furthermore, indications for their endoscopic treatment have not been established. Moreover, SSLs are considered to contribute to the development of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers. Herein, the clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics of SSLs, including features determined using white light and image-enhanced endoscopy, therapeutic indications, therapeutic methods, and surveillance are reviewed based on the literature. This information may lead to more intensive research to improve detection, diagnosis, and rates of complete resection of these lesions and reduce post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rates.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are currently the two most popular methods for resecting large rectal adenomas en bloc. However, damage to the mesorectum in the case of TEM, plus the technical challenges and long procedure times of flexible ESD, are major disadvantages of these procedures. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD) is a new technique, combining the ergonomic features of TEM with the minimally invasive approach of ESD. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and safety of TEM-ESD for resection of large rectal adenomas.

We retrospectively analyzed all TEM-ESD procedures performed in Karlsruhe Municipal Hospital between 2012 and 2019, isolated all cases of adenomas, and analyzed the perioperative and follow-up data of the patients.

We identified 145 cases matching our criteria. The median size of the lesions was 4.2 cm, and the median operating time was 45 min. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the complete en bloc resection rate was 78.6%. The overall morbidity rate was 6.9%. In a median follow-up period of 24 months, there was a local recurrence in 4.8% of the cases.

TEM-ESD is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for resecting large rectal adenomas, offering high en bloc resection and low recurrence rates combined with short operating time and low morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT04870931.

Many knives have been developed to improve the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of scissor-type knives for colorectal ESD compared with needle-type knives.

We performed a post-hoc propensity score-matched analysis in an 11-facility study between August 2013 and December 2018. A total of 2330 patients (2498 lesions) who underwent colorectal ESD were divided into needle-type (1923 patients, 2067 lesions) and scissor-type (407 patients, 431 lesions) knife groups. Short-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

Two-to-one propensity score-matched analysis identified 814 (709 patients) and 407 (386 patients) lesions in the needle- and scissor-type knife groups, respectively. The median resection speed was significantly faster in the needle-type group (18.3 mm²/min) than in the scissor-type group (13.2 mm²/min, P < .0001), whereas en-bloc and histologic complete resection rates were not significantly different between the needle- and scissor-type groups (96.8% [788/814] vs 98.3% [400/407], P = .1888 and 95.1% [774/814] vs 95.6% [389/407], P = .7763, respectively). The rate of lesions resected using a single knife was significantly higher in the scissor-type group (98.5% [401/407]) than in the needle-type group (43.9% [357/814], P < .0001). Rates of intraoperative perforation and delayed bleeding were significantly lower in the scissor-type group than in the needle-type group (.7% [3/407] vs 2.5% [20/814], P = .0431 for each).

Scissor-type knives are safer for colorectal ESD. However, they are associated with slower resection speeds compared with needle-type knives. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000016197.).

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the gold standard for the treatment of noninvasive large colorectal lesions, despite challenges associated with nonlifting lesions and a high rate of local recurrence. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers the possibility of overcoming these EMR limitations. However, a higher risk of complications and longer procedure time prevented its dissemination. As ESD now provides more stable results because of standardized techniques compared with those used earlier, this study aimed to quantify the rates of en bloc and curative resections, as well as ESD complications, in the present situation.

A multicenter, large-scale, prospective cohort trial of ESD was conducted at 20 institutions in Japan. Consecutive patients scheduled for ESD were enrolled from February 2013 to January 2015.

ESD was performed for 1883 patients (1965 lesions). The mean procedure time was 80.6 min; en bloc and curative resections were achieved in 1759 (97.0%) and 1640 (90.4%) lesions, respectively, in epithelial lesions ≥20 mm. Intra- and postprocedural perforations occurred in 51 (2.6%) and 12 (0.6%) lesions, respectively, and emergency surgery for adverse events was performed in nine patients (0.5%).

This trial conducted after the standardization of the ESD technique throughout Japan revealed a higher curability, shorter procedure time, and lower risk of complications than those reported previously. Considering that the target lesions of ESD are more advanced than those of EMR, ESD can be a first-line treatment for large colorectal lesions with acceptable risk and procedure time. (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000010136).

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely accepted treatment method for colorectal tumors; however, there are some persistent problems. This multi-center study aimed to characterize the risk factors for incomplete resection and perforation in standardized colorectal ESD procedures.

This study included 2423 consecutive patients who underwent ESD for 2592 colorectal tumors between August 2013 and December 2018 at 11 institutions (1 academic hospital and 10 affiliated hospitals) from the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. We evaluated the risk factors for interruption, piecemeal resection, and perforation of standardized colorectal ESD in relation to clinicopathologic and endoscopic characteristics.

The incidences of interruption, piecemeal resection, and perforation were 0.7%, 2.9%, and 3.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for interruption: perforation during the procedure, deep submucosal invasion (> 1000 μm), poor scope operability, and severe submucosal fibrosis. The risk factors for piecemeal resection included poor scope operability, severe submucosal fibrosis, and procedure time (≥ 85 min). The risk factors for perforation during the procedure were severe submucosal fibrosis, poor scope operability, procedure time (≥ 85 min), and tumor size (≥ 40 mm). Independent risk factors for severe submucosal fibrosis included a history of biopsy and lesions located on the fold or flexure.

Severe submucosal fibrosis and poor scope operability are the common risk factors for interruption, piecemeal resection, and perforation in standardized colorectal ESD.

Background and study aims  Snare devices play an important role in treatment of intestinal polyps. However, there are no objective measurements for the characteristics of the various types of snare devices. Materials and methods  Seven types of snare devices from four manufacturers were evaluated based on original measurements. The evaluated factors were stiffness, cutting quality, and change in force required for cutting depending on sheath shape. The latter two factors were evaluated by measuring the force required to cut 20 % gelatin cylinders, which simulated intestinal polyps. The cutting sharpness was evaluated by observing the sectional surface of cut gelatin cylinders using a stereomicroscope. The correlations between these measurements and characteristics of the snare devices were investigated. Results  A strong positive correlation, with an R 2 value of 0.863, was shown between the force required to cut gelatin cylinders and loop wire diameter. Loop wire diameter also had a strong correlation, with an R 2 value of 0.7997, with the change in force required for cutting gelatin cylinders depending on sheath shape. No correlations were detected between loop stiffness and characteristics of snare devices. The edge-enhanced image revealed that the rougher surfaces of the gelatin cylinders were cut by snares with a thicker diameter. Conclusions  Thinner loop wire may provide higher performance in cold snare polypectomy in an experimental model.