Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2017; 8(2): 66-73
Published online Feb 15, 2017. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i2.66
Table 1 The baseline demographic and biochemical parameters in various study groups
VariablesNG (n = 100)DM (n = 100)DM-CRD (n = 100)
Age (yr)46.0 ± 4.056.40 ± 3.555.7 ± 4.2
Sex ratio (male/female)52/4854/4652/48
Duration of DM (yr)-12.7 ± 1.58.1 ± 2.3d
BMI (kg/m2)20.1 ± 1.721.1 ± 2.121.6 ± 3.4
SBP (mmHg)118.1 ± 0.5138.0 ± 2.1b137.7 ± 2.8b
DBP (mmHg)75.2 ± 1.081.6 ± 1.9b82.8 ± 0.0b
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)82.4 ± 3.1153.5 ± 3.5b184.3 ± 9.2bd
Postprandial glucose (mg/dL)118.2 ± 2.4201.7 ± 10.1b261.1 ± 12.2bd
HbA1c (%)5.11 ± 0.467.10 ± 0.25b9.16 ± 0.16bd
Urea (mg/dL)31.5 ± 5.530.7 ± 5.893.2 ± 4.8bd
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.83 ± 0.230.90 ± 0.203.7 ± 1.5bd
Uric acid (mg/dL)4.2 ± 0.84.9 ± 0.69.1 ± 0.8bd
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)99.1 ± 0.796.4 ± 0.651.2 ± 0.9d
Urinary albumin/creatinine--0.42 ± 0.35
Table 2 The genotype and allele frequencies of NFKB1 gene for -94 insertion/deletion ATTG polymorphism in different study groups
NG (n = 100) n (%)DM (n = 100) n (%)DM-CRD (n = 100) n (%)
ins/ins41 (41)38 (38)61 (61)
ins/del49 ( 49)48 (48)33 (33)
del/del10 (10)14 (14)06b (06)
ins allele131 (65.5)124 (62)155 (77.5)
del allele69 (34.5)76 (38)45 (22.5)
Table 3 Interaction analysis of -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism with inflammatory markers
Inflammatory markerGroupsNG (n = 100)DM (n = 100)DM-CRD (n = 100)P value
uMCP-1 (pg/mg creatinine)Total130.00 ± 42.22271.00 ± 120.015632.70 ± 1007.20ab
del/del85.1 ± 9.2200.6 ± 66.54609.9 ± 900.6P = 0.026
ins/del110.9 ± 15.6278.9 ± 105.95879.9 ± 1016.3
ins/ins166.8 ± 26.8302.2 ± 100.16405.1 ± 1550.6
Plasma TNF-α (pg/mL)Total15.55 ± 2.2216.51 ± 3.7521.38 ± 3.67ab
del/del8.27 ± 1.0610.21 ± 1.3217.31 ± 1.17P = 0.030
ins/del11.55 ± 0.0514.05 ± 0.1819.31 ± 0.44
ins/ins15.08 ± 1.1516.36 ± 1.2023.12 ± 0.70
Table 4 Association between -94 ins/del ATTG polymorphism in the NFKB1 gene and diabetic nephropathy at the genotype level
GenotypeOR95%CIP value
DM vs NG ref1.040.607-4.9870.887
DM-CRD vs NG ref1.951.101-3.4670.022
DM-CRD vs DM ref1.911.080-3.3860.025