Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2016; 7(20): 605-614
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.605
Table 1 Comparison of percentage recovery yield, extraction time and volume of solvent used for the different extraction methods for the two plants
Vernonia amygdalina
Ocimum gratissimum
ParameterMAESoxhletMacerationMAESoxhletMaceration
Sample (g)505050505050
Solvent volume (mL)250500900250500900
Extraction time (min)392654320392554320
Recovery yield (g)10.45 ± 0.53b7.88 ± 0.35a7.18 ± 0.14a9.55 ± 0.84b5.63 ± 0.21a5.08 ± 0.32a
Percentage recovered (%)20.90 ± 1.05b15.75 ± 0.71a14.35 ± 0.28a19.10 ± 1.67b11.25 ± 0.24a10.15 ± 0.65a
Table 2 Calculated percentage differences in recovery yield of extracts between the extraction methods
Vernonia amygdalinaOcimum gratissimum
MAESoxhletMaceration
MAE41.05%46.81%
Soxhlet24.59%9.77%
Maceration31.29%8.88%
Table 3 Comparison of some qualitative phytochemicals obtained with the three extraction methods for the two plants
S/NConstituentsMaceration
Soxhlet
Microwave
VAOGVAOGVAOG
1Carbohydrates++++++
2Anthraquinones------
3Glycosides++++++
4Cardiac glycosides++++++
5Saponins++++++
6Steroids++++++
7Triterpenes++++++
8Tannins++++++
9Flavonoids++++++
10Alkaloid++++++
Table 4 Comparison of the quantitative phytochemicals obtained with the three extraction methods for the two plants
Vernonia amygdalina (mg/100 g)
Ocimum gratissimum (mg/100 g)
MAESoxhletMacerationMAESoxhletMaceration
Alkaloid4.0 ± 0.65a7.0 ± 0.57b5.0 ± 0.46a6.5 ± 0.75b7.0 ± 0.15b5.0 ± 0.90a
Flavonoid13.0 ± 0.35b9.0 ± 0.50a15.0 ± 0.21c10.0 ± 0.35b8.0 ± 0.18a12.0 ± 0.25c
Phenolic17.5 ± 0.25c15.0 ± 0.21b12.0 ± 0.70a15.0 ± 0.22c14.0 ± 0.21b11.0 ± 0.65a
Saponin4.5 ± 0.45b3.0 ± 0.30a2.0 ± 0.75a6.1 ± 0.75b4.0 ± 0.92a5.0 ± 0.20a
Tannin14.0 ± 0.55b13.0 ± 0.50b10.0 ± 0.25a12.0 ± 0.18b9.0 ± 0.24a9.1 ± 0.25a
Table 5 Effect of the extract from the different extraction methods on blood glucose in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
GroupBefore induction7 d after inductionDays after treatment
7th14th21st
CME79.4 ± 4.5344.6 ± 10.3282.8 ± 17.6195.8 ± 18.3106.5 ± 6.7
SEE85.3 ± 3.2396.8 ± 15.7342.5 ± 14.7264.9 ± 16.8121.1 ± 10.2
MAE82.7 ± 5.1373.3 ± 13.6331.3 ± 11.4237.1 ± 8.9102.4 ± 7.6
PC91.6 ± 4.5389.4 ± 11.9359.0 ± 12.6266.3 ± 13.297.3 ± 5.8
NC80.6 ± 3.8365.5 ± 9.8395.1 ± 16.3419.6 ± 10.2448.4 ± 17.4
HC83.2 ± 6.284.8 ± 4.783.9 ± 7.884.7 ± 6.584.2 ± 7.1
Table 6 Calculated percentage change in blood glucose after treatment with the extracts in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
GroupInitial blood glucose on day 0 (mg/dL)Percentage change after treatment (%)
Day 7Day 14Day 21
CME344.6 ± 10.318.0 ± 2.66e43.3 ± 3.62e69.1 ± 1.03c
SEE396.8 ± 15.713.7 ± 0.29d33.3 ± 1.60c,d69.5 ± 0.71c
MAE373.3 ± 13.611.2 ± 0.18c,d36.5 ± 0.08d72.6 ± 1.03d
PC389.4 ± 11.97.8 ± 0.42c31.6 ± 1.30c75.0 ± 0.73d
NC365.5 ± 9.8-8.1 ± 1.57a-14.8 ± 0.29a-22.7 ± 1.47a
HC84.8 ± 4.71.4 ± 3.96b0.1 ± 2.12b0.7 ± 2.88b