BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Nov 15, 2026; 17(11): 123436
Published online Nov 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.123436
Table 1 Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores of gestational diabetes mellitus patients, mean ± SD
Group
n
SAS
SDS
Comorbidity group3857.39 ± 4.8858.50 ± 4.23
Control group20041.84 ± 4.7344.64 ± 4.65
t value18.48918.230
P value< 0.001< 0.001
Table 2 Comparison of clinical and laboratory data between the two groups, mean ± SD
Factor
Comorbidity group (n = 38)
Control group (n = 200)
χ2/t value
P value
Age (years)30.24 ± 2.3128.60 ± 2.494.809< 0.001
Gestational age (weeks)25.92 ± 2.7626.55 ± 2.19-1.552 0.122
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2)22.21 ± 1.8422.02 ± 2.080.520 0.604
Pregnancy times (times)3.31 ± 1.003.51 ± 1.10-1.022 0.308
Number of births (times)1.45 ± 0.391.54 ± 0.42-1.186 0.237
Early pregnancy symptoms (n)Yes181040.2740.601
No2096
Family history of diabetes (n)Yes7400.0500.823
No31160
Other pregnancy syndrome (n)Yes10361.4160.234
No28164
Previous abortion (n)Yes153016.617< 0.001
No23170
Educational level (n)Junior high school and below214911.8190.001
High school and above17151
Monthly household income (yuan) (n)≤ 30004141.5650.457
3001-60001460
> 600020126
Occupational type (n)Mental work291380.8160.366
Physical work962
place of residence (n)Towns17840.0980.754
Village21116
Planned pregnancy (n)Yes161021.0110.315
No2298
Social support (n)Low/moderate267512.489< 0.001
Satisfaction12125
FBG (mmol/L)5.58 ± 1.235.27 ± 0.981.691 0.092
HbA1c (%)7.36 ± 2.427.01 ± 1.530.858 0.396
UA (mmol/L)282.25 ± 55.11279.46 ± 54.570.289 0.773
Cr (μmol/L)96.81 ± 9.5494.97 ± 9.691.077 0.283
BNP (pg/mL)100.38 ± 22.4496.52 ± 21.211.020 0.309
TG (mmol/L)1.50 ± 0.251.45 ± 0.201.0660.292
TC (mmol/L)4.21 ± 0.834.43 ± 0.72-1.668 0.097
HDL-C (mmol/L)1.32 ± 0.351.29 ± 0.370.4290.668
LDL-C (mmol/L)2.88 ± 0.512.75 ± 0.501.412 0.159
IR2.23 ± 0.402.17 ± 0.470.7590.449
Table 3 Single-factor screening of gestational diabetes mellitus patients with anxiety and depression disorder
Item
c
SE
Wald χ2
P value
OR (95%CI)
Age0.3750.08718.646< 0.0011.455 (1.227-1.726)
Previous abortion 1.5180.39514.794< 0.0014.565 (2.106-9.897)
Educational level1.4770.36816.090< 0.0014.380 (2.128-9.013)
Social support1.3920.37913.482< 0.0014.024 (1.914-8.460)
Table 4 Group assignment of participants
Variable
Name
Assignment
Dependent variableGroup1 = comorbidity group, 0 = control group (reference)
Independent variableAgeMeasurement data are included according to actual value
Previous abortion1 = yes (risk factor), 2 = no (reference)
Educational level1 = junior high school and below (risk factor), 2 = high school and above(reference)
Social support1 = low/moderate social support (risk factor); 0 = satisfactory social support (reference)
Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of comorbid anxiety and depression in gestational diabetes mellitus patients
Item
β
SE
Wald χ2
P value
OR (95%CI)
Age0.3380.09313.166< 0.0011.403 (1.168-1.684)
Previous abortion 1.6210.46911.9270.0015.057 (2.016-12.686)
Educational level1.3910.42710.6260.0014.018 (1.741-9.272)
Social support1.3580.4309.9550.0023.889 (1.673-9.042)
Table 6 Predictive value of receiver operating characteristics analysis
Test variable
AUC
SE
P value
95%CI
Cut-off value
Youden index
Sensitivity
Specificity
Age0.7180.046< 0.0010.629-0.80830.5000.3540.5790.775
Previous abortion 0.6350.0540.0080.530-0.7401.5000.2700.3950.875
Educational level0.6660.0510.0010.566-0.7661.5000.3330.5530.780
Social support0.6670.0480.0010.573-0.7611.5000.3340.6840.650
Joint prediction0.8530.033< 0.0010.789-0.9170.8590.6010.8160.785


Write to the Help Desk