Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2026; 18(10): 121749
Published online Oct 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.121749
Published online Oct 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.121749
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, n (%) or mean ± SD
| Project | Category | Control group (n = 50) | Observation group (n = 50) | t/χ2 value | P value |
| Age (year) | 58.20 ± 10.45 | 57.62 ± 11.34 | 0.266 | 0.791 | |
| Gender | Male | 32 (64.00) | 28 (56.00) | 0.667 | 0.414 |
| Female | 18 (36.00) | 22 (44.00) | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.80 ± 3.49 | 27.10 ± 3.20 | -0.445 | 0.657 | |
| Severity of the condition | Mild cases | 10 (20.00) | 11 (22.00) | -0.162 | 0.922 |
| Moderate to severe | 28 (56.00) | 26 (52.00) | |||
| Severe | 12 (24.00) | 13 (26.00) | |||
| Pathological nature | Benign | 15 (30.00) | 17 (34.00) | 0.184 | 0.668 |
| Malignant | 35 (70.00) | 33 (66.00) | |||
| Diabetes | No | 32 (64.00) | 30 (60.00) | 0.170 | 0.680 |
| Yes | 18 (36.00) | 20 (40.00) |
Table 2 Comparison of triglyceride levels before and after intervention in the two groups (n = 50), mean ± SD
Table 3 Comparison of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels before and after intervention in the two groups (n = 50), mean ± SD
| Group | TC (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | |
| Control group | Before nutritional support | 3.38 ± 0.59 | 0.72 ± 0.19 | 2.41 ± 0.54 |
| Day 3 after nutritional support | 3.44 ± 0.51 | 0.64 ± 0.22 | 2.17 ± 0.47a | |
| Day 7 after nutritional support | 3.86 ± 0.56a,b | 0.96 ± 0.32a,b | 2.84 ± 0.49a,b | |
| Observation group | Before nutritional support | 3.27 ± 0.50 | 0.75 ± 0.23 | 2.56 ± 0.42 |
| Day 3 after nutritional support | 3.54 ± 0.46a | 0.87 ± 0.25a,c | 2.38 ± 0.35a,c | |
| Day 7 after nutritional support | 4.19 ± 0.54a,b,c | 1.28 ± 0.37a,b,c | 3.27 ± 0.42a,b,c | |
Table 4 Comparison of arm muscle circumference, albumin, prealbumin and transferrin levels before and after intervention in the two groups (n = 50), mean ± SD
| Group | ALB (g/L) | PA (mg/L) | TRF (g/L) | AMC (cm) | |
| Control group | Before nutritional support | 31.52 ± 3.27 | 180.46 ± 23.66 | 1.68 ± 0.31 | 20.84 ± 2.52 |
| Day 3 after nutritional support | 32.26 ± 2.93 | 192.53 ± 24.06a | 1.70 ± 0.25a | 20.68 ± 2.75 | |
| Day 7 after nutritional support | 35.28 ± 2.68a,b | 228.15 ± 27.43a,b | 1.86 ± 0.26a,b | 21.14 ± 2.30 | |
| Observation group | Before nutritional support | 30.85 ± 3.54 | 181.52 ± 26.77 | 1.65 ± 0.28 | 21.21 ± 1.98 |
| Day 3 after nutritional support | 33.86 ± 3.06a,c | 214.37 ± 27.93a,c | 1.76 ± 0.24a,c | 21.61 ± 2.15 | |
| Day 7 after nutritional support | 38.26 ± 2.83a,b,c | 251.74 ± 31.65a,b,c | 2.14 ± 0.28a,b,c | 22.29 ± 2.36c | |
Table 5 Comparison of clinical symptom improvement before and after intervention in the two groups (n = 50), mean ± SD
| Group | Abdominal pain relief time (day) | Time to relief of abdominal bloating symptoms (day) | Length of hospital stay (day) |
| Control group | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 6.6 ± 1.5 | 14.6 ± 3.7 |
| Observation group | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 12.4 ± 2.6 |
| t value | 6.685 | 6.406 | 3.437 |
| P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Total | Malnutrition | Diarrhea | Infect | Enterocutaneous fistula | Total occurrence |
| Control group | 50 | 6 (12.00) | 4 (8.00) | 6 (12.00) | 2 (4.00) | 18 (36.00) |
| Observation group | 50 | 0 | 2 (4.00) | 3 (6.00) | 1 (2.00) | 6 (12.00) |
| χ2 value | 7.895 | |||||
| P value | 0.005 |
- Citation: Chen P, Dai XC, Qin HM. Effects of stepwise lipid-controlled enteral nutrition on lipids and nutrition in hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis with colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(10): 121749
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i10/121749.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.121749