Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2019; 11(6): 499-508
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i6.499
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between two groups of patients with celiac artery variation and without vascular variation
Clinicopathological featuresAbnormal vessel group, n = 110Normal vessel group, n = 311χ2P value
Gender
male742322.1960.138
female3679
Agein yr
≤4523540.8810.644
46-6046143
>6041114
Tumor stage
I24662.8480.241
II2287
III64158
Tumor location
Proximal stomach13380.9770.802
Gastric body1445
Gastric antrum73208
Whole stomach1020
Pathology classification
Adenocarcinoma992702.4890.477
Mucous carcinoma510
Signet ring cell carcinoma213
Undifferentiated carcinoma418
Borrmann classification
I8113.8300.280
II3175
III53164
IV1861
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes792170.1630.687
No3194
Complication
Yes18294.0590.044
No92282
Lymph node clearance20.391 ± 0.69323.707 ± 0.5873.6510.000
Lymph node clearance in different stages
I13.917 ± 0.55820.470 ± 1.0103.8220.000
II17.863 ± 0.72823.402 ± 1.0954.2310.000
III23.688 ± 0.93225.228 ± 0.8711.2070.229
Table 2 The relationship between the number of lymph nodes dissection and the clinicopathological features of radical D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer
Influence factorsnmean ± SSSMSt or F valueP value
Gender
Male30622.869 ± 0.573--0.0970.922
Female11522.765 ± 0.839
Agein yr
≤ 457723.091 ± 1.31315.5367.7680.0810.922
46-6018922.937 ± 0.625
> 6015522.600 ± 0.817
Variation of celiac artery
Yes11020.391 ± 0.693--3.6510.000
No31123.707 ± 0.587
Tumor stage
I9018.722 ± 0.814--13.3650.000
II10922.284 ± 0.910
III22224.784 ± 0.676
Tumor location
Proximal stomach5121.588 ± 1.273510.539170.1801.8010.146
Gastric body5921.509 ± 1.199
Gastric antrum28123.000 ± 0.576
Whole stomach3026.100 ± 2.207
Pathology classification
Adenocarcinoma36922.846 ± 0.51154.37618.1250.1900.903
Mucous carcinoma1524.333 ± 2.656
Signet ring cell carcinoma1521.733 ± 1.963
Undifferentiated carcinoma2222.500 ± 2.123
Borrmann classification
I1917.053 ± 1.7332492.710830.9039.2610.000
II10520.171 ± 0.842
III21823.303 ± 0.655
IV7926.506 ± 1.165
Table 3 The results of univariate Cox regression analysis in gastric cancer
Clinicopathological featuresBSEWaldOR (95%CI)P value
Age0.2040.1043.8201.227(0.999-1.505)0.051
Gender0.1040.1590.4291.110(0.812-1.517)0.512
Tumor stage1.0040.12465.4812.728(2.140-3.479)0.000
Tumor location-0.2650.0888.9580.767 (0.645-0.913)0.003
Pathology classification0.0200.0890.0501.020 (0.857-1.214)0.823
Borrmann classification0.6050.09837.8221.832 (1.511-2.222)0.000
Celiac artery variation0.0380.1630.0551.039 (0.755-1.430)0.815
Operation time0.0020.0018.2701.002 (1.001-1.003)0.004
Intraoperative bleeding0.0010.00021.2161.001 (1.000-1.001)0.000
No. of lymph nodes metastases0.0710.00890.0751.074 (1.058-1.090)0.000
No. of lymph nodes0.0180.0076.0831.018 (1.004-1.032)0.014
Positive lymph node ratio2.4910.242106.05712.072 (7.514-19.393)0.000
Table 4 The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis
VariablesBSEWaldOR (95%CI)P value
Comprehensive staging0.6260.14518.4941.870 (1.406-2.486)0.000
Intraoperative bleeding0.0010.00010.5751.001 (1.000-1.001)0.001
Positive lymph node ratio1.4660.31821.2064.330 (2.320-8.079)0.000