Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2012; 4(5): 94-102
Published online May 15, 2012. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v4.i5.94
Multiple cells of origin in cholangiocarcinoma underlie biological, epidemiological and clinical heterogeneity
Vincenzo Cardinale, Guido Carpino, Lola Reid, Eugenio Gaudio, Domenico Alvaro
Vincenzo Cardinale, Domenico Alvaro, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University of Rome, 00137 Rome, Italy
Guido Carpino, Eugenio Gaudio, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 000137 Rome, Italy
Guido Carpino, Department of Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 000135 Rome, Italy
Lola Reid, Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, Biomedical Engineering, Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States
Domenico Alvaro, Eleonora Lorillard Spencer-Cenci Foundation, 00156 Rome, Italy
Author contributions: Cardinale V, Carpino G, Reid L, Gaudio E and Alvaro D provided substantial contributions to the conception and design, drafting the article and revising the final approval of the version to be published.
Supported by Research Project Grant from the University “Sapienza” of Rome and FIRB grant No. RBAP10Z7FS_001, PRIN grant No. 2009X84L84_001 (to Gaudio E); FIRB grant No. RBAP10Z7FS_004, PRIN grant No. 2009X84L84_002 (to Alvaro D); Consorzio Interuniversitario Trapianti d’Organo, Rome, Italy
Correspondence to: Domenico Alvaro, Professor, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Polo Pontino, Fondazione Eleonora Lorillard Spencer Cenci, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Universita 37, 00185 Rome, Italy. domenico.alvaro@uniroma1.it
Telephone: +39-64-9972023 Fax: +39-64-453319
Received: September 21, 2011
Revised: January 7, 2012
Accepted: January 15, 2012
Published online: May 15, 2012

Abstract

Recent histological and molecular characterization of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) highlights the heterogeneity of this cancer that may emerge at different sites of the biliary tree and with different macroscopic or morphological features. Furthermore, different stem cell niches have been recently described in the liver and biliary tree, suggesting this as the basis of the heterogeneity of intrahepatic (IH)- and extrahepatic (EH)-CCAs, which are two largely different tumors from both biological and epidemiological points of view. The complexity of the organization of the liver stem cell compartments could underlie the CCA clinical-pathological heterogeneity and the criticisms in classifying primitive liver tumors. These recent advances highlight a possible new classification of CCAs based on cells of origin and this responds to the need of generating homogenous diagnostic, prognostic and, hopefully, therapeutic categories of IH- and EH-CCAs.

Key Words: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma classification, Cholangiolocarcinoma, Cells of origin, Cancer stem cells, Peribiliary glands, Biliary tree stem/progenitor cells, Human hepatic stem cells, Risk factors, Targeted therapies


Citation: Cardinale V, Carpino G, Reid L, Gaudio E, Alvaro D. Multiple cells of origin in cholangiocarcinoma underlie biological, epidemiological and clinical heterogeneity. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 4(5): 94-102
INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an extremely heterogeneous cancer from a topographical, morphological, biological and clinical point of view[1-8]. The two main forms, intrahepatic (IH)- and extrahepatic (EH)-CCAs, showed, in the last decades, opposite epidemiological behavior, with incidence and mortality progressively increasing for the IH form but stable or slightly decreasing for the EH form[6-8]. This suggests different risk factors and, indeed, evidence exists that IH- and EH-CCAs may emerge from a different pathological background[8]. A large body of recent literature deals with the role of stem cells in carcinogenesis[9,10]. In this regard, different stem cell niches have been recently identified in the liver and biliary tree with new implications of the origin of primitive liver cancers[11-15]. The complexity of the organization of the liver stem cell compartments could underlie the CCA clinical-pathological heterogeneity and well justifies the difficulties in clinical-pathological classification of primitive liver tumors[16-18]. Another point of great consideration is the relationship between chronic liver damage and the development of primitive liver tumors. Indeed, the chronically injured liver and biliary tree could be considered a classic model of stem cell derived carcinogenesis where the activation and proliferation of the stem cell compartment in response to tissue injury represent the first step of the carcinogenetic process[19-21]. In light of these recent advances, histological and morphological classification of primitive liver cancer is currently under revision, taking into consideration the potential cells of origin[17,18]. Histological characterization of CCAs based on cell of origin responds to the need of generating homogenous diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic categories or classes for IH- and EH-CCAs. The cells of origin of CCAs also represent the cell targets of the hepatic and biliary diseases associated with the development of CCAs and this could explain the association of determined hepatic and biliary pathologies with each category of CCA, other than the differences in terms of epidemiological, behavioral and risk factors.

IH AND EH STEM CELL NICHES

CCA arises from the lining epithelium and peribiliary glands (PBGs) of the IH and EH biliary tree and shows variable degree of differentiation[1-5]. It has been recently elucidated how stem cells are particularly prone to be involved in the carcinogenic process due to their particular biological features[9,10]. Stem cell niches have been firstly identified within the adult liver in the canals of Hering, remnants of the ductal plate of fetal and neonatal livers[11-13]. Human hepatic stem cells (hHpSCs) residing in the canals of Hering can differentiate into hepatocytes and cholangiocytes lining the small bile ducts, which in turn can give rise to tumors with a whole range of phenotypes, with varying hepatocellular and biliary differentiation characteristics[5]. More recently, additional stem cell niches have been identified in PBGs[14,15]. PBGs are mucin-producing glandular elements located in the wall of the EH and large IH bile duct. Within PBGs, stem/progenitor cell niche composed of multipotent stem/progenitor cells of endodermal origin (biliary tree stem/progenitor cells: BTSCs) has been described, which represent the only cells potentially underlying the mucin-producing cells lineage within the liver[14,15]. PBGs are distributed along the biliary tree starting intrahepatically at the level of septal-segmental bile ducts and ending at the hepato-pancreatic common duct near the duodenum. PBGs are particularly high in density at the level of the cystic duct, hilum and periampular region, sites where EH-CCAs typically emerge[14,15]. The IH PBGs are indistinguishable from the EH ones[22]. For decades, the heterogeneity of IH and EH bile ducts has been the object of extensive investigations and the embryological origin of the biliary tree furnishes the basis for this topic[23,24]. From an embryological point of view, indeed, the medium-large IH and the EH bile ducts recognize a unique origin and represent the result of the proliferation of the primitive endoderm at porta hepatis[23,24]. The interlobular bile ducts, in contrast, derive from SOX (SRY (sex determining region Y)-box) 9 positive progenitors following the re-organization of the ductal plate[23,25]. Septal ducts (medium size), segmental ducts, larger IH bile ducts and EH bile ducts share unique histological features characterized by a discrete duct with a well defined wall constituted of connective tissue supporting the lining epithelia[22]. Another unique feature joining the large IH bile ducts and the EH bile ducts is the presence in the duct wall of the PBGs[22]. Furthermore, the large segments of the biliary tree share with EH bile ducts similar characteristic expression of cell markers both in physiological and pathological conditions that largely differ with respect to those observed in the interlobular bile ducts[26]. Specifically, pancreatic α-amylase, trypsin and pancreatic lipase are expressed in biliary cells lining the PBGs in immature ducts in fetal livers and in mature large bile ducts in postnatal livers[26]. Differently, these phenotypical markers disappear quickly when hHpSCs derived lineage restrict towards mature hepatocyte or cholangiocyte fates (9-25 wk of gestation) and interestingly expression is not found in developing peripheral IH bile ducts[26]. Recently, we demonstrated[14,15] that PBGs are stem cell niches in human EH bile ducts and that the maturation lineage progresses from the stem cells located in the deeper part of the wall, within the PBGs, to mature cells lining the surface epithelia[15]. We also observed an increased mucin production with the maturation in the duct wall[15]. The individuation of a stem cell niche within the bile ducts[14,15] opens the possibility that BTSCs within PBGs and their descendent cells could be further considered as cells-of-origin of mucin-producing CCAs (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the cell-lineages-of-origin and relative cells-of-origin within and of the related cholangiocarcinoma subtypes. Cells belonging from human hepatic stem cell (hHpSC) lineage or from biliary tree stem/progenitor cell (BTSC) lineage are retained cells of origin of different intrahepatic (IH)- and extrahepatic (EH)-cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) subtypes recently described[17,18,58]. Histology, grossly, the main clinical features and the associated diseases of the CCAs arising within the two cell lineages are showed respectively. HCC: Hepatocarcinoma; CLC: Cholangiolocarcinoma.
CANCER STEM CELLS AND CANCER CELLS OF ORIGIN: DEFINITIONS

The definition “cancer stem cell (CSC)” indicates the cellular subset within the tumor that uniquely sustains malignant growth. Differently, the term “cell-of-origin” defines the normal cell that acquires the first cancer-initiating mutation(s)[27]. Although the terms “cell-of-origin” and CSC have been used interchangeably, they are distinct concepts referring to cancer-initiating cells and cancer-propagating cells, respectively[27,28]. The cancer-initiating cell denotes the cell-of-origin. It is important to note that the cell-of-origin is not necessarily related to the CSC and its phenotype may be substantially different[27]. The cancer cell-of-origin has great importance in tumor cell fate and pathology; the activation of the same genetic/epigenetic mutation in different maturational phases within a cellular lineage of a given organ may have profound implication, either in malignant potential or in cancer morphology and phenotype (intratumoral heterogeneity)[29]. This is the case in a transgenic mouse model which showed how the mutation of Hras targeted to the hair follicle region (earlier cells within the lineage) highly predisposed mice to squamous carcinomas, whereas the targeting to interfollicular or suprabasal cells (more differentiated cells) resulted in papillomas with low malignant potential[30,31].

LIVER CANCER STEM CELLS AND NEW CANCER THERAPEUTIC TARGETS

Many years of investigations and daily clinical practice suggest an alternative model of carcinogenesis where only a subset of CSCs has the ability to proliferate extensively and form new tumors[9,10]. Signalling pathways associated with oncogenesis, including the Notch, Sonic hedgehog and Wnt signalling, play a major role in regulating stem cell self-renewal. The machinery for self-renewal is already activated in CSCs, thus fewer mutations may be required to maintain self-renewal than to activate it ectopically. Stem cells often persist for long periods of time, increasing the probability of mutations. CSCs tend to be more resistant to chemotherapeutics due to high levels of expression of multidrug resistance genes[9]. As far as liver is concerned, intermediate carcinoma may be a distinct type of primary liver carcinoma, morphologically and phenotypically intermediate between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and CCA, which originates from transformed hepatic progenitor cells[32]. Moreover HCCs expressing biliary cell markers, such as keratin(K)7 and K19, have been demonstrated to carry a significantly poorer prognosis and have a higher recurrence rate after surgical resection and liver transplantation[5]. A number of cell surface markers have been proved to be useful for the isolation of CSC enriched fractions in liver malignancies, including CD133 (also known as Prominin-1), CD44, CD24, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), α-fetoprotein, Thy-1 and ATP-binding cassette B5, as well as Hoechst33342 exclusion by the side population cells[28]. Indeed, recently, it has been described that a poor prognosis characterizes HCCs expressing stem markers such as EpCAM and CD133[33,34]. A correlation between the stage of hepatic differentiation and clinical manifestation, notably vascular invasion, metastatic spread and patient survival, was also established[10,33-35]. Primary liver tumors might arise from impairment of the normal liver differentiation program associated with excessive Wnt/β-catenin signaling[10]. Recently, EpCAM was identified as a direct transcriptional target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in HCC[36]. A number of EpCAM-regulated target genes have been identified, including c-myc and cyclins, and additional genes involved in cell growth and proliferation, cell cycle and cell death[10]. These findings indicate that expression of EpCAM is strongly linked with proliferation of stem cells and that cancer development from CSCs may occur after aberrant EpCAM re-expression. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the induction of terminal differentiation of HCC CSCs by using oncostatin M is associated with a marked reduction of the proliferative properties of the cells and with enhanced sensibility to chemotherapy[34]. Finally, a subset of highly chemoresistant and invasive HCC CSCs with aberrant expressions of IL-6 and the transcription factor Twist has been recently described. This subset of CSCs displays regulated let-7 and miR-181 miRNA family members, where modulation of both miRNA dependent pathways can impact significantly on their biology[35]. Thus, the modulation of aberrantly expressed miRNA in HCC CSCs may be a useful strategy to limit CSC differentiation and invasion or improve responses to cytotoxic therapies. In different cancers, recent studies addressed potential strategies of treatment based on selective target of specific CSCs[10]. Various therapeutic drugs that directly modulate CSCs have been examined in vivo and in vitro. However, CSCs clearly have a complex pathogenesis, with a considerable crosstalk and redundancy in signaling pathways, and hence targeting single molecules or pathways may have a limited benefit for treatment. Many of the key signaling molecules are shared by both CSCs and normal stem cells, which add further challenges for designing molecularly targeted strategies specific to CSCs. In addition to the direct control of CSCs, many other factors that are needed for the maintenance of CSCs, such as angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, invasion and migration, hypoxia, immune evasion, multiple drug resistance and radioresistance, should be taken into consideration when designing therapeutic strategies[10]. In CCA, these studies are only at the beginning and the heterogeneity of this cancer further hampers advancement. To this latter regard, obtaining clinical-pathological information capable of driving the diagnostic setting or the accurate realization of basic science studies pass through the mandatory acquisition of CCA tissue[37].

CCA CELLS OF ORIGIN AND NEW CCA CLASSIFICATION PROPOSALS

CCA is the primary malignancy of the biliary tract[38]. This cancer has been classified as either IH or EH, with the second-order bile ducts acting as the separation point[4]. Classically, EH-CCA has been divided into perihilar and distal CCA. According to the American Joint Cancer Committee/Union for International Cancer Control perihilar CCA is proximally separated from IH-CCA by the second-order bile ducts and distally separated from distal EH-CCA by the insertion of the cystic duct into the EH biliary tree[39]. CCA arises from the lining epithelium and peribiliary PBGs of the IH and EH biliary tree[18]. Recent studies further stressed the concept of CCA heterogeneity. The accurate comparison of lineage markers between normal and neoplastic cells can lead to individuate the cell-of-origin in different tumor subtypes arising within a given organ, even if tumor cells show phenotypical plasticity or dedifferentiate during neoplastic progression (Table 1). Therefore, lineage markers and molecular signatures of tumor cells may not precisely reflect the true cell-of-origin in normal tissue. The individuation of a stem cell niche within the bile ducts opens the possibility that BTSCs within PBGs could be further considered as cells-of-origin of mucin-producing CCA[14,15] (Figure 1). Indeed, BTSCs represent the only cells potentially underlying the mucin-producing cells lineage within the liver. Strict similarities between the pathologies of biliary tract and pancreas have been recently suggested[18]; in response to injury, pancreatic duct glands undergo a mucinous metaplasia and have been indicated as a possible cell of origin of pancreatic cancer[18]. An unresolved question regarding CCA is which cell have to be considered as cells-of-origin (Figure 1). The involvement of different cells-of-origin could underlie CCA heterogeneity[27]. The most primitive cells, stem cells, are candidates for targets of transformation because of their self-renewal and longevity, which would allow the sequential accumulation of genetic or epigenetic mutations[27]. Two stem cell niches have been described within the liver: the Canals of Hering containing hHpSCs[13] and IH PBGs composed of BTSCs[14,15]. Nakanuma et al[18] recently proposed a new classification of CCA taking into consideration the heterogeneity of hepatic stem/progenitor cells and the pathological similarities between biliary and pancreatic neoplasms. The authors classified IH-CCA into: (1) bile ductular type or cholangiolocarcinoma (CLC); (2) intraductal neoplasm type; (3) conventional (bile duct) type and; and (4) rare variants[18]. CLC is thought to originate from canals of Hering/bile ductules where hHpSCs are located. Komuta et al[17,40] showed that this subtype of CCA is mainly composed of CLC areas showing small monotonous and/or anastomosing glands, strongly positive for K7 and K19, with tumor boundary being characterized by a HCC-like trabecular area and with some cases expressing CCA areas with scarce mucin production. A comparison between CLC with K19-positive HCC and with combined HCC-CCA indicated a high homology[17,40]. The clear origin of CCL from hHpSCs or immediate descendent cells deserves high attention and the accurate histological observation of transitional zones within the tumor and the phenotype characterization are strongly recommended for a proper diagnosis. Following the maturation arrest theory, one could speculate that CCL represents the result of a carcinogenetic process involving cells within the lineage derived from the hHpSCs and that the differentiation grade of the tumor reflects the grade of maturation of the cells primarily involved in the carcinogenesis process (Figure 1). In this view, the CCAs arising from the interlobular bile duct (small bile duct type CCAs) could be considered a tumor arising from differentiated cells belonging to the hHpSC-derived lineage (Figure 1). The evidence that IH-CCA and EH-CCA may be dissimilar tumors is supported by the recent discovery that, in vitro, they express diverse cellular proteins and have different cellular shape, doubling time, chromosome karyotype and chemosensitivity[41]. Similarly, researchers from France showed that hilar CCAs express higher levels of MUC5AC (60% vs 22%), Akt2 (64% vs 36%), K8 (98% vs 82%), annexin (56% vs 44%) and less vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) (22% vs 78%) as compared to IH-CCAs[42]. Moreover, prognostic markers were differentially expressed, as hilar CCAs carried out stronger perineural invasion (83% vs 42%) than peripheral CCAs[42]. The different biological and molecular features strongly support the concept that IH-CCA and EH-CCA arise from different carcinogenetic processes and different cells-of-origin. Particularly relevant in the view of future clinical trials is the lower expression of VEGF in EH-CCA with respect to the IH-CCA, which could affect the response to anti-angiogenic based therapy. Relevant advantages in the way to a physio-pathological classification of the CCAs have been recently achieved by Komuta et al[17], who carried out a study aiming to investigate the CCA histological diversity in relationship to the heterogeneity of cholangiocytes lining the biliary tree: hilar mucin producing cells vs peripheral cuboidal ductular cells or hHpSCs. They investigated the clinical-pathological and molecular features of 79 resected CCAs and their relationship with hHpSCs and compared the spectrum of CCAs with respect to K19-positive or negative HCCs. According to this study, 52% of the IH-CCAs were pure mucin producing, whereas 48% showed mixed differentiation features, including focal hepatocytic differentiation and CCL features. CCAs with mixed features (mixed-CCAs) showed peripheral location, larger tumor size, less microvascular invasion, less lymph node involvement compared to pure mucin producing CCAs which showed perihilar location, smaller tumor size, more microvascular invasion and more lymph node involvement. S100p expression was seen only in pure mucin-producing CCAs, while NCAM expression was only present in mixed-CCAs and particularly in CLC. Molecular profiling showed high homology between mixed-CCAs and K19-positive HCCs (considered of hHpSCs origin). The authors concluded that mixed-CCAs and K19-positive HCCs have a similar molecular profile as the most peripheral ductules containing hHpSCs, while mucin producing CCAs have a similar profile to mucin producing large IH and EH bile ducts, possibly reflecting the different cells-of-origin[17]. Differences in clinical-pathological features between CCAs arising from small (interlobular bile ducts) or medium-large IH bile ducts are under investigations. Responding to the need for classifying IH-CCA in relationship to the hetereogenity of the small vs the medium-large IH bile ducts, recently Nakanuma et al[18] proposed to separately consider a small bile duct type (peripheral type) and a large bile duct type (perihilar type). The former is mainly described as a tubular or micropapillary adenocarcinoma while the latter involves the IH large bile ducts. In accordance with phenotypic differences between interlobular and medium-large bile ducts, Aishima et al[43] investigated 87 cases of IH-CCA smaller than 5 cm in diameter. They considered a hilar type IH-CCA, showing IH large bile duct involvement within the tumor, and a peripherla type IH-CCA contained preserved architecture of the portal triad. They demonstrated that the frequency of perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, IH metastasis and EH recurrence of IH-CCA from large ducts was significantly higher than that of IH-CCA from small ducts[43]. The survival of patients with IH-CCA from large ducts was worse than that of patients with IH-CCA from small ducts[43]. In our hypothesis, the clinical-pathological differences observed among CCAs arising from small bile ducts and large bile ducts reflect the different lineage of origin, with the former arising from cells of the hHpSC-derived lineage and the latter arising from BTSC-derived lineage (Table 1, Figure 1). Also, the multiple lineages of origin could determine differences in signaling pathways or epigenetic mechanisms associated with the early phase of tumor development in the course of the hepatic and biliary diseases. By considering the process of maturation from the two different stem cell niches (canals of Hering and PBGs), one could expect that some IH-CCAs originate from cells within the lineage, starting in the canals of Hering (hHpSC-derived lineage), while other IH-CCAs and the EH-CCAs could originate from cells within the lineage starting in the PBGs (BTSC-derived lineage) of the medium-large IH and EH bile ducts (Figure 1). The former could be constituted, on the basis of the grade of maturation of the cell-of-origin (maturation arrest), by combined HCC-CCA, CCL and CCA of the small bile ducts (interlobular), while the latter by CCA of the large bile ducts with variable degree of mucin production (Figure 1).

Table 1 Phenotype markers of candidate cholangiocarcinoma cells of origin.
MarkerMature cholangiocyteshHpSCs in canals of HeringBTSC in peribiliary glands
Nanog, OCT4--+
CXCR4--+
FoxA ½--+
PDX1, NGN3--+
AFP-++
Sox 9/17-++
Prominin-1 (CD133)-++
EpCAM+/-++
NCAM-++
Thy-++
CK7/19+++
Secretin Receptor+--
γGT++/-+/-
RISK FACTOR AND ASSOCIATED PATHOLOGIES: HOW THEY FIT WITH THE RECENT CLASSIFICATION OF CCAS BASED ON CELLS OF ORIGIN

Actually, the role of hHpSC in normal turnover of hepatocyte and cholangiocyte is debated[44,45]. In contrast, numerous evidences indicate the activation of resident stem cell compartment in the majority of acute and chronic liver diseases. In chronic hepatic diseases, hHpSCs highly proliferate and give rise to newly derived EpCAM positive hepatocytes in correlation with hepatocyte senescence[46,47]. More recently, an additional stem cell niche has been identified in the PBGs[14,15]. PBGs are particularly high in density at the level of cystic duct, hilum and periampular region, sites where CCAs typically emerge[48]. Within PBGs, stem cell niche has been recently described which is composed by multipotent stem/progenitor cells of endodermal origin (BTSCs) and potentially supplies the renewal of the surface epithelium of large IH bile duct and EH biliary tree[14,15]. During pathological conditions of large bile ducts PBG cells proliferate potentially underlie the increased turnover of mature cells. The existence of two different stem cell niches, the canals of Hering and the PBGs, involved in the cell turnover of IH and EH biliary tree in adult life and activated in pathological conditions, has been recently put in relationship with CCA clinical-pathological heterogeneity as well as with differences in risk factors between IH- and EH-CCA[8,18,49]. We recently revised the literature dealing with risk factors and pathologies associated with IH- and EH-CCA[8]. It is clearly evident from the literature that there are pathologies exclusively associated with IH-CCA or EH-CCA and pathologies associated with both. Choledochal cysts, cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), secondary biliary cirrhosis, choledocholithiasis, cholecystitis and liver flukes are pathological conditions primarily affecting large intra-hepatic bile ducts and/or extra-hepatic bile ducts. In keeping, these pathological conditions are risk factors for both IH- and EH-CCA. Differently, parenchymal liver diseases, including chronic viral and non-viral liver diseases and schistosomiasis, exclusively target interlobular bile ducts, bile ductules and the canals of Hering and, consistently, these pathologies are exclusively associated with development of IH-CCA. These pathologies are characterized by a strong ductular reaction, a phenomenon involving interlobular bile ducts, bile ductules and canals of Hering, which is currently considered the morphological expression of the activation of the stem/progenitor cell compartment aimed to repair liver injury[50]. From the other side, pathologies of the large IH and EH bile ducts, such as liver flukes, cholangitis, PSC, choledochal cysts, secondary biliary cirrhosis, choledocholithiasis, hepatholithiasis and cholecystitis, are characterized by the involvement of PBGs where cells proliferate and acquire the expression of stem cells and neuroendocrine markers (C-met, c-erbB-2, argirophil granules, chromogranin A)[51-54]. On the basis of these recent observations, we hypothesize that early cells within PBGs are the sites of origin of malignancies associated with chronic diseases or pathological conditions of the IH medium-large and EH bile ducts[8]. Differently, parenchymal liver diseases, including chronic viral and non-viral liver diseases and especially the liver cirrhosis, could be recognized as the associated diseases of the CCAs arising from the hHpSC derived lineage[8]. In complete agreement with this hypothesis, it has been recently demonstrated that viral hepatitis is associated with IH-CCA with cholangiolocellular differentiation and N-cadherin expression[55]. We strongly believe that a lineage based classification of the CCAs could reveal the real strength of association of determined hepatic or biliary diseases with each class of CCA or resolve the bias of the spurious associations. Further studies are needed to corroborate these hypotheses which could explain the large different epidemiological profile of IH- and EH-CCA[8,49].

NEW INSIGHTS INTO LIVER STEM CELLS ORGANIZATION AND CCA DEVELOPMENT

Although the role of hHpSC in normal turnover of hepatocyte and cholangiocyte is still debated[44,45], the role of the stem cells during hepatic and biliary development has been recently better elucidated. Specifically, it was shown that interlobular bile ducts, during the early phase of embryological development, derive from the differentiation of hepatoblasts located closely to the forming portal tract (ductal plate) and is driven by the expression of SOX9[25]. Recently, Carpentier et al[44] came to the innovative result that the cells of the canals of Hering would be in direct communication and hierarchically derived from cells originating from the ductal plate. Ductal plate derived lineage should supply the epithelium of the inter- and intralobular bile ducts and passing through the canals of Hering should give rise to the periportal hepatocytes. In this way, the development of the biliary tree and liver should proceed from the hilum to the periphery. Large IH bile ducts and EH bile ducts are very similar in terms of histology, cell phenotype and share common stem cells constituted by the BTSCs of the PBGs[14,15]. This is in keeping with their common embryological origin from a pancreatic-biliary progenitor [SOX17+/pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1(PDX1)+], representing the result of the organization of the proliferation of the primitive endoderm at the porta hepatis. Recently, we demonstrated that remnants of these multipotent stem cells deriving from ventral endoderm are still present in the adult biliary tree, especially within PBGs[14,15]. The phenotype of the cells lining the large IH and the EH bile ducts or the PBGs in adult and fetal life[15] and the recent insights supporting the hilum-to-periphery development of the biliary tree[25,44], suggest that cells of the forming large IH bile ducts and EH bile ducts are precursors of the ductal plate cells in the fetal life. The new insights into liver stem cells niches organization further complicate the picture in relationship to the clinical-pathological classification of the primary liver cancers. Indeed, according to the innovative explanation of the liver organogenesis, the classical organization of the hepatic parenchyma stem cell niche, the canals of Hering, and the cell differentiation hierarchy within, are under debate. On the basis of these recent advances and analyzing the phenotype of the hHpSCs and of BTSCs (Table 1), an emerging hypothesis is that the BTSCs are precursors of the hHpSCs. This new scenario opens further perspectives in CCA classification. Indeed, based on this concept, the CCAs arising from the BTSC-derived lineage should be composed of tumor cells with earlier and endodermal-like phenotype with respect to hHpSC-derived CCAs. In this view, the anatomical localization of the CCAs, other than reflecting a different cell-of-origin, could be associated with different prognostic CCA classes. Indeed, it has been already demonstrated by different groups how the EH-CCAs (mostly hilar CCAs)[17,42] and the IH-CCAs involving the large IH bile ducts are associated with the worst prognostic markers in comparison to the peripheral IH-CCAs involving the small bile ducts[17,42,43]. However, very recently, Andersen et al[56] showed that discrete homogenous molecular profiles of both hilar and peripheral-type CCAs were associated with different prognostic classes, suggesting that a similar molecular pathogenesis rather than the anatomical location defines the overall prognosis. However, IH-CCA could arise either from interlobular bile ducts/canals of Hering or from large IH bile ducts (segmental and septal), thus recognizing different cells-of-origin. Some of these cells-of-origin, the ones belonging to the BTSC-derived lineage, are the same for IH- and EH-CCA, while others, the ones derived from the hHpSCs, are specific for the IH-CCA (Figure 1). In our opinion, the different cells-of-origin potentially underlying the development of different IH-CCA subtypes should be taken into adequate consideration in defining prognostic classes of CCA (Figure 1). A gross classification based only on the anatomical localization and that considers all the IH-CCAs as a homogenous entity, does not reflect the complex biology of this cancer and could result in biases and criticisms.

CONCLUSION

The new scenario created by recent advances on liver stem cells suggests a physio-pathological classification of CCAs based on the cell-lineage-of-origin. Following the process of maturation from the two different stem cell niches, one could hypothesize that some IH-CCAs originate from cells within the hHpSC-derived lineage starting in the canals of Hering, while other IH-CCAs and the EH-CCAs could originate from the BTSC-derived lineage within the medium-large IH and EH bile ducts. The former could be classified on the basis of the grade of maturation of the cell-of-origin, in: (1) combined HCC-CCA (hHpSCs); (2) CCL or ductular type CCA (immature cholangiocytes); and (3) CCA of the small bile ducts or mixed-CCA (mature cholangiocytes of the interlobular bile ducts) (Figure 1). The latter could be classified in mucin-producing CCA of large bile ducts recognizing as cells-of-origin the ones within the BTSC-derived lineages (i.e., BTSCs in PBGs, cholangiocytes of large IH and EH bile ducts and goblet cells) (Figure 1). These observations are also supported by the similarities between the neoplastic pathologies of biliary tract and pancreas[57]. Indeed, most biliary and pancreatic neoplasias are of ductal lineage, characterized by tubule (gland), papillary structure formation and different degree of mucin production and expression of mucin-related glycoproteins[57]. Classification of CCAs based on cells-of-origin needs definitive cells markers able to distinguish the CCA subtypes and thus it remains a challenge for future studies[58]. Meanwhile, however, it can be noted that the available diagnostic tools (imaging, clinical, histology) can suggest the presumptive cell-lineage-of-origin of the single CCA. Indeed, CCAs of the small bile ducts or mixed-CCAs, the hHpSC-lineage derived CCAs, usually show a peripheral localization and a mass forming growing pattern, while IH-CCAs of the large bile ducts, the BTSC-lineage derived CCAs, usually show a peri-ductal infiltrating and/or mass forming growth pattern and are hilar or peri-hilar and usually associated with IH bile duct dilatation and jaundice. From a histological point of view, CCAs of the small bile ducts or mixed-CCAs showed mixed differentiation features, including focal hepatocytic differentiation, ductular features and NCAM expression, while differently IH-CCAs of the large bile ducts are characterized by the involvement within the tumor of large bile ducts and of PBGs, mucin production and S100p expression. Taking into consideration this tentative of classsification, risk factors and underlying pathologies associated with CCA development should be regarded in a new light. Parenchymal liver diseases, including chronic viral and non-viral liver diseases and liver cirrhosis, should be considered as risk factors for development of mixed-CCAs arising from the hHpSC-derived lineage, activated and expanded in the course of these pathologies. In contrast, chronic biliary diseases or pathologies and conditions affecting the IH medium-large and EH bile ducts are risk factors for CCAs of the large bile ducts since in these pathologies, stem cell niches located in the PBGs are activated. A physio-pathological classification of the CCAs according the cell-lineages-of-origin could have, in the future, important clinical implications with the definition of different prognostic classes or specific therapeutic targets. Given the differences in biology and clinical-pathology[59], IH-CCA with mixed features (mixed-CCAs or small bile ducts type) and mucin producing IH-CCA (large bile ducts type) should be considered separately (Figure 1).

Footnotes

Peer reviewers: Maria Gazouli, PhD, Department of Biology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Michalakopoulou 176, Athens 11527, Greece; Xiao-Chun Xu, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1360, Houston, TX 77030, United States

S- Editor Wang JL L- Editor Roemmele A E- Editor Zheng XM

References
1.  Callea F, Sergi C, Fabbretti G, Brisigotti M, Cozzutto C, Medicina D. Precancerous lesions of the biliary tree. J Surg Oncol Suppl. 1993;3:131-133.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Nakanuma Y, Minato H, Kida T, Terada T. Pathology of cholangiocellular carcinoma. Primary liver cancer in Japan. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag; 1992;39-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med. 1965;38:241-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Nakanuma Y, Sripa B, Vatanasapt V, Leong ASY, Ponchon T, Ishak KG. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World Health Organization classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000;173-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Roskams T. Liver stem cells and their implication in hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Oncogene. 2006;25:3818-3822.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Welzel TM, McGlynn KA, Hsing AW, O'Brien TR, Pfeiffer RM. Impact of classification of hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) on the incidence of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:873-875.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Alvaro D, Crocetti E, Ferretti S, Bragazzi MC, Capocaccia R. Descriptive epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma in Italy. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:490-495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice A, Gatto M, Napoli C, Bragazzi MC, Gentile R, Alvaro D. Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: New insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2:407-416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414:105-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Oishi N, Wang XW. Novel therapeutic strategies for targeting liver cancer stem cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2011;7:517-535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Theise ND, Saxena R, Portmann BC, Thung SN, Yee H, Chiriboga L, Kumar A, Crawford JM. The canals of Hering and hepatic stem cells in humans. Hepatology. 1999;30:1425-1433.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Kuwahara R, Kofman AV, Landis CS, Swenson ES, Barendswaard E, Theise ND. The hepatic stem cell niche: identification by label-retaining cell assay. Hepatology. 2008;47:1994-2002.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Schmelzer E, Zhang L, Bruce A, Wauthier E, Ludlow J, Yao HL, Moss N, Melhem A, McClelland R, Turner W. Human hepatic stem cells from fetal and postnatal donors. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1973-1987.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, Cui CB, Gatto M, Rossi M, Berloco PB, Cantafora A, Wauthier E, Furth ME. Multipotent stem/progenitor cells in human biliary tree give rise to hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, and pancreatic islets. Hepatology. 2011;54:2159-2172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Carpino G, Cardinale V, Onori P, Franchitto A, Berloco PB, Rossi M, Wang Y, Semeraro R, Anceschi M, Brunelli R. Biliary tree stem/progenitor cells in glands of extrahepatic and intraheptic bile ducts: an anatomical in situ study yielding evidence of maturational lineages. J Anat. 2012;220:186-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Turner R, Lozoya O, Wang Y, Cardinale V, Gaudio E, Alpini G, Mendel G, Wauthier E, Barbier C, Alvaro D. Human hepatic stem cell and maturational liver lineage biology. Hepatology. 2011;53:1035-1045.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Komuta M, Govaere O, Vander Borght S, De Vos R, Vandecaveye V, Verslype C, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, Pirenne J, Topal B. Histological diversity in cholangiocellular carcinoma suggesting different cells of origin: intrahepatic progenitor cells versus hilar mucin producing cells. J Hepatol. 2011;54:S37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Nakanuma Y, Sato Y, Harada K, Sasaki M, Xu J, Ikeda H. Pathological classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a new concept. World J Hepatol. 2010;2:419-427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Alison MR. Liver stem cells: implications for hepatocarcinogenesis. Stem Cell Rev. 2005;1:253-260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Cardinale V, Wang Y, Carpino G, Cui CB, Gatto M, Rossi M, Berloco PB, Cantafora A, Wauthier E, Furth ME. Multipotent stem/progenitor cells in human biliary tree give rise to hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, and pancreatic islets. Hepatology. 2011;54:2159-2172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Alison MR, Islam S, Lim S. Stem cells in liver regeneration, fibrosis and cancer: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Pathol. 2009;217:282-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Nakanuma Y, Hoso M, Sanzen T, Sasaki M. Microstructure and development of the normal and pathologic biliary tract in humans, including blood supply. Microsc Res Tech. 1997;38:552-570.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Roskams T, Desmet V. Embryology of extra- and intrahepatic bile ducts, the ductal plate. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008;291:628-635.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Tan CE, Moscoso GJ. The developing human biliary system at the porta hepatis level between 11 and 25 weeks of gestation: a way to understanding biliary atresia. Part 2. Pathol Int. 1994;44:600-610.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Cordi S, Zong Y, Tronche F, Stanger BZ, Jacquemin P, Pierreux CE, Clotman F, Lemaigre FP. Intrahepatic bile ducts develop according to a new mode of tubulogenesis regulated by the transcription factor SOX9. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2325-2333.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Terada T, Nakanuma Y. Expression of pancreatic enzymes (alpha-amylase, trypsinogen, and lipase) during human liver development and maturation. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1236-1245.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Visvader JE. Cells of origin in cancer. Nature. 2011;469:314-322.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:755-768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med. 1997;3:730-737.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Bailleul B, Surani MA, White S, Barton SC, Brown K, Blessing M, Jorcano J, Balmain A. Skin hyperkeratosis and papilloma formation in transgenic mice expressing a ras oncogene from a suprabasal keratin promoter. Cell. 1990;62:697-708.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Brown K, Strathdee D, Bryson S, Lambie W, Balmain A. The malignant capacity of skin tumours induced by expression of a mutant H-ras transgene depends on the cell type targeted. Curr Biol. 1998;8:516-524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Kim H, Park C, Han KH, Choi J, Kim YB, Kim JK, Park YN. Primary liver carcinoma of intermediate (hepatocyte-cholangiocyte) phenotype. J Hepatol. 2004;40:298-304.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Yamashita T, Ji J, Budhu A, Forgues M, Yang W, Wang HY, Jia H, Ye Q, Qin LX, Wauthier E. EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1012-1024.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Yamashita T, Honda M, Nio K, Nakamoto Y, Yamashita T, Takamura H, Tani T, Zen Y, Kaneko S. Oncostatin m renders epithelial cell adhesion molecule-positive liver cancer stem cells sensitive to 5-Fluorouracil by inducing hepatocytic differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4687-4697.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Meng F, Glaser SS, Francis H, DeMorrow S, Han Y, Passarini JD, Stokes A, Cleary JP, Liu X, Venter J. Functional analysis of microRNAs in human hepatocellular cancer stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:160-173.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Yamashita T, Budhu A, Forgues M, Wang XW. Activation of hepatic stem cell marker EpCAM by Wnt-beta-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:10831-10839.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Schirmacher P, Bedossa P, Roskams T, Tiniakos DG, Brunt EM, Zucman-Rossi J, Manns MP, Galle PR. Fighting the bushfire in HCC trials. J Hepatol. 2011;55:276-277.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Blechacz B, Komuta M, Roskams T, Gores GJ. Clinical diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:512-522.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Farges O, Fuks D, Le Treut YP, Azoulay D, Laurent A, Bachellier P, Nuzzo G, Belghiti J, Pruvot FR, Regimbeau JM. AJCC 7th edition of TNM staging accurately discriminates outcomes of patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: By the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Cancer. 2011;117:2170-2177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Komuta M, Spee B, Vander Borght S, De Vos R, Verslype C, Aerts R, Yano H, Suzuki T, Matsuda M, Fujii H. Clinicopathological study on cholangiolocellular carcinoma suggesting hepatic progenitor cell origin. Hepatology. 2008;47:1544-1556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  He XR, Wu XP. Difference in biological characteristics and sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy between intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells in vitro. Chin Med Sci J. 2008;23:54-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Guedj N, Zhan Q, Perigny M, Rautou PE, Degos F, Belghiti J, Farges O, Bedossa P, Paradis V. Comparative protein expression profiles of hilar and peripheral hepatic cholangiocarcinomas. J Hepatol. 2009;51:93-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  Aishima S, Kuroda Y, Nishihara Y, Iguchi T, Taguchi K, Taketomi A, Maehara Y, Tsuneyoshi M. Proposal of progression model for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathologic differences between hilar type and peripheral type. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1059-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Carpentier R, Suñer RE, van Hul N, Kopp JL, Beaudry JB, Cordi S, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Lepreux S, Jacquemin P. Embryonic ductal plate cells give rise to cholangiocytes, periportal hepatocytes, and adult liver progenitor cells. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1432-1438, 1438.e1-1438.e4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Furuyama K, Kawaguchi Y, Akiyama H, Horiguchi M, Kodama S, Kuhara T, Hosokawa S, Elbahrawy A, Soeda T, Koizumi M. Continuous cell supply from a Sox9-expressing progenitor zone in adult liver, exocrine pancreas and intestine. Nat Genet. 2011;43:34-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Yoon SM, Gerasimidou D, Kuwahara R, Hytiroglou P, Yoo JE, Park YN, Theise ND. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) marks hepatocytes newly derived from stem/progenitor cells in humans. Hepatology. 2011;53:964-973.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Heo J, Factor VM, Uren T, Takahama Y, Lee JS, Major M, Feinstone SM, Thorgeirsson SS. Hepatic precursors derived from murine embryonic stem cells contribute to regeneration of injured liver. Hepatology. 2006;44:1478-1486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Kimura W, Futakawa N, Zhao B. Neoplastic diseases of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004;11:223-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Tyson GL, El-Serag HB. Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2011;54:173-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Gaudio E, Carpino G, Cardinale V, Franchitto A, Onori P, Alvaro D. New insights into liver stem cells. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:455-462.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  Terada T, Nakanuma Y. Pathological observations of intrahepatic peribiliary glands in 1,000 consecutive autopsy livers. III. Survey of necroinflammation and cystic dilatation. Hepatology. 1990;12:1229-1233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Terada T, Nakanuma Y. Pathologic observations of intrahepatic peribiliary glands in 1,000 consecutive autopsy livers: IV. Hyperplasia of intramural and extramural glands. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:483-490.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Terada T, Ashida K, Endo K, Horie S, Maeta H, Matsunaga Y, Takashima K, Ohta T, Kitamura Y. c-erbB-2 protein is expressed in hepatolithiasis and cholangiocarcinoma. Histopathology. 1998;33:325-331.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Terada T, Nakanuma Y, Sirica AE. Immunohistochemical demonstration of MET overexpression in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and in hepatolithiasis. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:175-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
55.  Yu TH, Yuan RH, Chen YL, Yang WC, Hsu HC, Jeng YM. Viral hepatitis is associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with cholangiolar differentiation and N-cadherin expression. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:810-819.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
56.  Andersen JB, Spee B, Blechacz BR, Avital I, Komuta M, Barbour A, Conner EA, Gillen MC, Roskams T, Roberts LR. Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1021-1031.e15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
57.  Nakanuma Y. A novel approach to biliary tract pathology based on similarities to pancreatic counterparts: is the biliary tract an incomplete pancreas. Pathol Int. 2010;60:419-429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
58.  Carpino G, Cardinale V, Reid L, Alvaro D, Gaudio E. Cells of origin and cancer stem cells in cholangiocarcinoma. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;1:33-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
59.  Fava G, Marzioni M, Benedetti A, Glaser S, DeMorrow S, Francis H, Alpini G. Molecular pathology of biliary tract cancers. Cancer Lett. 2007;250:155-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]