Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2025; 17(6): 105790
Published online Jun 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.105790
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of the patients enrolled in the final study cohorts. VTE: Venous thromboembolism; TNM: Tumor-node-metastasis; DCA: Decision curve analysis; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of venous thromboembolism risk factors in the training cohort. KPS: Karnofsky Performance Scale; TNM: Tumor-node-metastasis; WBC: White blood cell count; Hb: Hemoglobin; FIB: Fibrinogen; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Construction and validation of the model. A: Nomogram for predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients; B: Receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk in the training cohort and validation cohort; C: Training cohorts’ risk of venous thromboembolism nomogram correction chart; D: Validation cohorts’ risk.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Decision curve analysis curve of the graph model. A: Training cohort; B: Validation cohort; C: Training cohort. Comparison of the nomogram model with Khorana; D: Validation cohort. VTE: Venous thromboembolism; AUC: Area under the curve.