Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2019; 11(4): 322-334
Published online Apr 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i4.322
Figure 1
Figure 1 Method of total risk score development. AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2 ROC curve for scoring system in the training set. ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Risk stratification model in the training set. AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; LT: Liver transplantation; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Performance of risk stratification model in relation to recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in the training set. ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Risk stratification models with corresponding hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rates in the training set. AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Comparison of the areas under ROC curve between the current scoring system, the alpha fetoprotein model, and the RETREAT score in the validation set. AFP: Alpha fetoprotein; LT: Liver transplantation; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic; RETREAT: Risk estimation of tumor recurrence after transplant.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Risk stratification model with corresponding hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rates in the validation set. ROC: Receiver-operating characteristic.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Diagram showing discrepancy between the expected and observed hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rates.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Disease-free survival of patients in different risk strata. DFS: Disease-free survival.