Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 25, 2016; 8(4): 239-243
Published online Feb 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i4.239
Table 1 Summary of reports describing use of endoscopic suturing systems for transoral outlet reduction in patients with weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Ref.GenderMean age (yr)Time since bypass (yr)Avg. pre-procedure BMIAvg. weight gain (kg) post RYGB nadirAvg. preintervention pouch length (cm)Avg. preintervention anastomotic diameter (mm)Type of equipmentAvg. number of interrupted stitchesAvg. post intervention anastomotic diameter (mm)Avg. procedure time (min)Avg. weight loss (kg) at 3-4 mo postOverall post procedure BMIMajor complicationsTechnical success (%)
Thompson et al[17] 2006, Boston, United StatesF × 846 (41-54)640.524 (8.6 - 53.6)5.7 (3-8)25 (17-25)EndoCinch suturing system (CR Bard, Murray Hill, NJ)2 (1-3)10 (5-15)98 (50-164)10 (1.4-19.5)37.7None100 (8/8)
Mullady et al[18] 2009, Boston, United StatesF × 19 M × 148 (36-62)5.25 (2-9.75)36.7 (28.4-48.8)13.3 (0.9-34.6)7 (4-14)25 (8-35)EOS (USGI Medical, San Clemente, Calif)Pouch: 1.7 (0-6) GJA: 3.4 (0-7)16 (0-26)103 (50-154)8.8Not reportedNone85 (17/20)
Fernández- Esparrach et al[20] 2010, Boston, United StatesF × 645 (33-63)Not reported34.5 (27.5-41.5)Not reported5 (4-6)23 (18.5-27.5)EndoCinch suturing system (CR Bard, Murray Hill, NJ)38 (7.6-8.4)Not reportedNot reported33None100 (6/6)
Jirapinyo et al[19] 2013, Boston, United StatesF × 18 M × 748 (34-69)6 (2-10)4324 (1.4-59)5.3 (2-9)26.4 (18-40)Overstitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery)GJA: 3 (1-7) Pouch: 2 (1-5)6 (3-10)Anastomosis: 27 (7-80) Pouch: 15 (4-30)11.5Not reported3/25100 (25/25)