Editorial
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2010; 2(7): 237-243
Published online Jul 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i7.237
Table 1 Second generation contrast agents currently available
Contrast agentShell componentsGasMechanical index
Definity®PhospholipidPerfluoropropaneLow
Imagent®PhospholipidPerfluorohexaneLow
SonoVue®PhospholipidSulfur hexafluorideLow
Sonavist®PolymerSulfur hexafluorideLow
Sonazoid®LipidPerfluorocarbonLow
Optison®AlbuminPerfluoropropaneLow
Sonogen®SurfactantPerfluoropentaneLow
Levovist®Galactose/Palmitic acidAirHigh
Albunex®AlbuminAirHigh
Table 2 Effect of mechanical index on second generation microbubbles
Mechanical indexEffect on microbubble oscillationRelationship between emitted sound waves and detected signal
Low (< 0.1)SymmetricalLinear
Moderate (0.1-0.6)AsymmetricalNon-linear
High (> 0.6)DestructionN/A
Table 3 Accuracy of contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound versus other imaging modalities
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)
Pancreatic neoplasm
CEUS[31-35,60]~ 91~ 93~ 92
EUS +/- FNA[8,47,60-70]85-9867-9191-95
CT[61,63,64,71-73]77-8664-9366
MRI[61,64,73-75]85-9960-9579-81
Lymphadenopathy
CEUS[54,60,76]609182-92
EUS +/- FNA[52,77-83]688675-99
CT[52,78,81-83]337551-74