Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2026; 18(9): 125072
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125072
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125072
Table 1 Study characteristics in the final 128-study analysis set, n (%)
| Characteristic | Finding |
| Included studies | 128 |
| Publication years | 2017-2026 |
| Published in 2020 or later | 101 studies (78.9) |
| Leading data-source countries or regions | United States 32 (25.0); China 32 (25.0); multinational or international 12 (9.4); Türkiye 9 (7.0) |
| Most common design | Single-center retrospective study: 70 (54.7) |
| Other designs | Multicenter retrospective 14 (10.9); national or administrative database 12 (9.4); case series 10 (7.8); prospective, randomized, or prospective database 6 (4.7) |
| Extractable sample size | 127 studies; median 66 (IQR: 31-147; range, 1-1124) |
| Extractable ERCP volume | 123 studies; median 68 (IQR: 30-150; range, 1-1124) |
Table 2 Study-level classification of indications and interventions, n (%)
| Category | Studies |
| Pancreatitis or pancreatic-duct disease | 82 (64.1) |
| Choledocholithiasis or common bile duct stones | 81 (63.3) |
| Congenital biliary dilatation, choledochal cyst, or pancreaticobiliary maljunction | 26 (20.3) |
| Biliary stricture or post-transplant biliary disease | 26 (20.3) |
| Sphincterotomy or papillotomy | 72 (56.3) |
| Stent placement or removal | 69 (53.9) |
| Stone extraction, lithotripsy, or duct clearance | 52 (40.6) |
| Balloon dilation or sweeping | 33 (25.8) |
| Biliary or nasobiliary drainage | 23 (18.0) |
Table 3 Endpoint-specific outcome summaries
| Endpoint | Usable studies (n) | Study-level summary |
| Technical success | 49 | Median 94.7% (IQR: 89.8%-97.2%; range, 24%-100%) |
| PEP | 39 | Median 5.2% (IQR: 3.0%-9.5%; range, 0%-20%) |
| Overall complications or adverse events | 89 | Median 8.9% (IQR: 3.2%-14.2%; range, 0%-50%) |
Table 4 Pediatric-adult comparison and reporting boundaries
| Domain | Pediatric evidence | Adult comparison and interpretation |
| Indications | Pancreatitis or pancreatic-duct disease appeared in 82/128 studies (64.1%), choledocholithiasis in 81/128 (63.3%), and congenital biliary disease or post-transplant/stricture disease in 26/128 each (20.3%); malignant indications were uncommon | Adult ERCP includes a greater malignant-obstruction burden. Differences in case mix affect procedural intent, repeat intervention, and interpretation of adverse-event rates |
| Anesthesia, sedation, and analgesia | A complexity-matched study used general anesthesia in 84% of pediatric vs 54% of adult ERCPs. Drug-level doses were rarely reported; one 7-child transplant cohort used midazolam 5 mg plus pethidine 50 mg, with occasional fentanyl | The isolated fixed-dose regimen is not a general pediatric dosing recommendation. The available literature does not support a pooled sedative or analgesic dose |
| Radiation exposure | Median fluoroscopy time was 120 seconds (IQR: 60-240) in 1073 pediatric ERCPs and 4.85 minutes in a separate 385-procedure cohort; lower operator volume predicted longer exposure | Fluoroscopy time, kerma-area product, cumulative air kerma, and image count are not interchangeable. ALARA, low-dose pulsed fluoroscopy, collimation, and dose-metric documentation are appropriate safeguards |
| Procedure duration | One 186-procedure series reported 119 procedures (64%) lasting < 60 minutes and 67 (36%) lasting ≥ 60 minutes. Another cohort reported a mean duration of 54.2 minutes (SD = 18.7) | Definitions varied among procedure time, anesthesia time, cannulation time, and combined operative time; a pooled pediatric-adult duration comparison would therefore be invalid |
| PEP prophylaxis | Reported pediatric regimens included rectal indomethacin 50 mg below 30 kg and 100 mg above 30 kg (PEP 3.0% vs 9.5% without treatment), intravenous ibuprofen 10 mg/kg (maximum 800 mg), and intravenous ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg (maximum 30 mg) | Adult guidance uses a fixed 100-mg rectal NSAID dose. Pediatric evidence is weight-sensitive and study-specific; a universal pediatric regimen cannot yet be inferred |
| Adverse events and PEP severity | Review medians were 5.2% for PEP (39 studies) and 8.9% for overall adverse events (89 studies). In the matched study, pediatric vs adult PEP was 5.2% vs 6.9% and adverse events were 6.1% vs 10.0%. Severe PEP was approximately 1.0%-1.2% of procedures in cohorts that graded severity | Severe PEP was uncommon in reporting cohorts, but no dataset-wide incidence was calculated because severity definitions, denominators, and follow-up windows were inconsistent; unreported events were not treated as zero |
- Citation: Shu J, Yang J. Pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of indications, technical success, adverse events, and complication prevention. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(9): 125072
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i9/125072.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.125072