BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2026; 18(9): 125072
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125072
Table 1 Study characteristics in the final 128-study analysis set, n (%)
Characteristic
Finding
Included studies128
Publication years2017-2026
Published in 2020 or later101 studies (78.9)
Leading data-source countries or regionsUnited States 32 (25.0); China 32 (25.0); multinational or international 12 (9.4); Türkiye 9 (7.0)
Most common designSingle-center retrospective study: 70 (54.7)
Other designsMulticenter retrospective 14 (10.9); national or administrative database 12 (9.4); case series 10 (7.8); prospective, randomized, or prospective database 6 (4.7)
Extractable sample size127 studies; median 66 (IQR: 31-147; range, 1-1124)
Extractable ERCP volume123 studies; median 68 (IQR: 30-150; range, 1-1124)
Table 2 Study-level classification of indications and interventions, n (%)
Category
Studies
Pancreatitis or pancreatic-duct disease82 (64.1)
Choledocholithiasis or common bile duct stones81 (63.3)
Congenital biliary dilatation, choledochal cyst, or pancreaticobiliary maljunction26 (20.3)
Biliary stricture or post-transplant biliary disease26 (20.3)
Sphincterotomy or papillotomy72 (56.3)
Stent placement or removal69 (53.9)
Stone extraction, lithotripsy, or duct clearance52 (40.6)
Balloon dilation or sweeping33 (25.8)
Biliary or nasobiliary drainage23 (18.0)
Table 3 Endpoint-specific outcome summaries
Endpoint
Usable studies (n)
Study-level summary
Technical success49Median 94.7% (IQR: 89.8%-97.2%; range, 24%-100%)
PEP39Median 5.2% (IQR: 3.0%-9.5%; range, 0%-20%)
Overall complications or adverse events89Median 8.9% (IQR: 3.2%-14.2%; range, 0%-50%)
Table 4 Pediatric-adult comparison and reporting boundaries
Domain
Pediatric evidence
Adult comparison and interpretation
IndicationsPancreatitis or pancreatic-duct disease appeared in 82/128 studies (64.1%), choledocholithiasis in 81/128 (63.3%), and congenital biliary disease or post-transplant/stricture disease in 26/128 each (20.3%); malignant indications were uncommonAdult ERCP includes a greater malignant-obstruction burden. Differences in case mix affect procedural intent, repeat intervention, and interpretation of adverse-event rates
Anesthesia, sedation, and analgesiaA complexity-matched study used general anesthesia in 84% of pediatric vs 54% of adult ERCPs. Drug-level doses were rarely reported; one 7-child transplant cohort used midazolam 5 mg plus pethidine 50 mg, with occasional fentanylThe isolated fixed-dose regimen is not a general pediatric dosing recommendation. The available literature does not support a pooled sedative or analgesic dose
Radiation exposureMedian fluoroscopy time was 120 seconds (IQR: 60-240) in 1073 pediatric ERCPs and 4.85 minutes in a separate 385-procedure cohort; lower operator volume predicted longer exposureFluoroscopy time, kerma-area product, cumulative air kerma, and image count are not interchangeable. ALARA, low-dose pulsed fluoroscopy, collimation, and dose-metric documentation are appropriate safeguards
Procedure durationOne 186-procedure series reported 119 procedures (64%) lasting < 60 minutes and 67 (36%) lasting ≥ 60 minutes. Another cohort reported a mean duration of 54.2 minutes (SD = 18.7)Definitions varied among procedure time, anesthesia time, cannulation time, and combined operative time; a pooled pediatric-adult duration comparison would therefore be invalid
PEP prophylaxisReported pediatric regimens included rectal indomethacin 50 mg below 30 kg and 100 mg above 30 kg (PEP 3.0% vs 9.5% without treatment), intravenous ibuprofen 10 mg/kg (maximum 800 mg), and intravenous ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg (maximum 30 mg)Adult guidance uses a fixed 100-mg rectal NSAID dose. Pediatric evidence is weight-sensitive and study-specific; a universal pediatric regimen cannot yet be inferred
Adverse events and PEP severityReview medians were 5.2% for PEP (39 studies) and 8.9% for overall adverse events (89 studies). In the matched study, pediatric vs adult PEP was 5.2% vs 6.9% and adverse events were 6.1% vs 10.0%. Severe PEP was approximately 1.0%-1.2% of procedures in cohorts that graded severitySevere PEP was uncommon in reporting cohorts, but no dataset-wide incidence was calculated because severity definitions, denominators, and follow-up windows were inconsistent; unreported events were not treated as zero


Write to the Help Desk