Letters To The Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2015; 7(5): 573-574
Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.573
Unreported complication of Bravo pH capsule dislodged into the pyriform sinus
Akash Kumar, Department of Medicine, the Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, United States
Elisabeth Kramer, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
Sita Chokhavatia, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States
Author contributions: Kumar A and Kramer E were involved in literature review; Chokhavatia S performed the EGD on the patient described in the manuscript; Kumar A, Kramer E and Chokhavatia S were involved in manuscript preparation.
Conflict-of-interest: As stated in the cover letter, we do not have any conflicts of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Akash Kumar, MD, Department of Medicine, the Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1249 Park Avenue, Apt 12H, New York, NY 10029, United States. akash.kumar@mssm.edu
Telephone: +1-914-844-6975
Received: October 8, 2014
Peer-review started: October 8, 2014
First decision: November 14, 2014
Revised: January 3, 2015
Accepted: February 10, 2015
Article in press: February 12, 2015
Published online: May 16, 2015

Abstract

We report an unexpected, previously unreported complication of Bravo pH capsule dislodgement. During Bravo pH testing of a 44-year-old man with gastroesophageal reflux disease, we were unable to endoscopically visualize the capsule attached to the esophageal wall after deployment. After multiple attempts to detect the capsule, it was visualized in the left pyriform sinus. As there was significant risk for pulmonary dislodgement, ENT and pulmonary physicians were immediately consulted to review options for safe removal. Ultimately, ENT successfully retrieved the capsule with a foreign body removal forceps. The Bravo pH test is generally a well-tolerated diagnostic tool used to confirm the presence of abnormal esophageal acid reflux. While few complications have been reported, technical difficulties can occur, including poor data reception, misplacement, and early dislodgement. Rarely, more serious complications can occur, ranging from esophageal wall trauma to capsule aspiration. Gastroenterologists performing this procedure should be aware of the low, but non-trivial, risk of complications.

Key Words: Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Esophageal pH monitoring, Bravo capsule, Dislodgement, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Core tip: We report an unexpected, and so far unreported, complication of a Bravo pH capsule dislodgment. While Bravo probe placement is generally a well-tolerated procedure, dislodgment into the pyriform sinus in this case necessitated immediate action by an interdisciplinary team. Complications of Bravo capsule use range from technical difficulties, such as poor data reception and non-deployment, to more serious events such as esophageal wall trauma and capsule aspiration. Gastroenterologists performing this procedure should be aware of the risk of potential complications.



LETTER TO THE EDITOR

We report an unanticipated, previously undocumented complication of Bravo capsule dislodgement. A forty-five year old patient with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-compliant with medical therapy, presented with increasing cough, hoarseness, and other acid reflux symptoms. To verify presence of acid reflux, he underwent upper endoscopy and Bravo pH testing at our hospital. The gastroesophageal junction (Z line) was visualized at a distance of 40.0 cm from dentition. The Bravo device was deployed at 34.0 cm from dentition (6 cm above the Z line). When the capsule was not endoscopically visualized to be adherent to the esophageal wall, the endoscope was advanced beyond 34.0 cm to assess for possible device movement to the distal esophagus or stomach. When the capsule was not visualized at these locations, the endoscope was withdrawn. When the scope was withdrawn from the upper esophageal sphincter, the device was seen in the left pyriform sinus (Figure 1). The nonadherent capsule likely was either pulled up by the endoscope during withdrawal or coughed up by the patient. ENT and pulmonary physicians were immediately consulted for assistance in ensuring safe removal of the capsule from this precarious location, as there was significant risk for pulmonary dislodgement. After the anesthesiologist performed endotracheal intubation, ENT successfully retrieved the capsule with a foreign body removal forceps without further complications.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Bravo pH capsule in left pyriform sinus.

The Bravo pH test is generally a well-tolerated diagnostic tool that can verify the presence of abnormal esophageal acid reflux and determine if treatment refractory symptoms are due to persistent acid reflux in patients with GERD. As the deployment of the Bravo pH device is typically a innocuous procedure[1], very few complications have been reported. Technical difficulties most commonly include non-deployment, non-attachment, misplacement, premature dislodgement, and insufficient data reception. Infrequently, patients develop significant chest pain after capsule placement[2], necessitating removal. Rarely, more serious complications can occur in less than 2% and include esophageal wall trauma, excessive bleeding, and capsule aspiration[3]. In one reported case, the patient aspirated the capsule into the bronchus immediately after deployment, causing retching, heavy coughing, and desaturation to 74%[4]. After initial pushing into stomach with a transnasal video-endoscope, this capsule was removed with grasping forceps.

Gastroenterologists using the Bravo pH test should be cognizant of the low but non-trivial risk of complications, ranging from technical difficulties to aspiration of a dislodged capsule. Providers can use reports of documented complications to troubleshoot and resolve difficulties that may arise during deployment of Bravo pH capsules.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Amornyotin S, Rabago L S- Editor: Tian YL L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu HL

References
1.  Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, Oberg S. Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety and normal values in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:768-774.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 60]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  de Hoyos A, Esparza EA. Technical problems produced by the Bravo pH test in nonerosive reflux disease patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3183-3186.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  von Renteln D, Kayser T, Riecken B, Caca K. An unusual case of Bravo capsule aspiration. Endoscopy. 2008;40 Suppl 2:E174.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Ho KK, Joyce AM. Complications of capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;17:169-178, viii-ix.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]