Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.124149
Revised: August 4, 2026
Accepted: August 26, 2026
Published online: September 16, 2026
Processing time: 94 Days and 15.6 Hours
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard endoscopic resection technique for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, postoperative bleeding re
A 59-year-old man presented with a large, diffusely infiltrating EGC lesion involving the gastric body, angulus, and antrum. ESD was performed, resulting in a 60 mm × 100 mm resection defect that could not be closed with endoscopic clips or sutures. Tissue adhesive was sprayed onto the defect surface, and the patient received postoperative proton pump inhibitor therapy. No immediate or delayed bleeding was observed during hospitalization or subsequent follow-up. A 4-month follow-up endoscopy revealed a wellhealed scar without evidence of recurrence or delayed bleeding.
Sprayed tissue adhesive safely and effectively aids prevention of post-ESD bleed
Core Tip: Sprayed tissue adhesive effectively prevents post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in massive early gastric cancer with extensive mucosal defects, where clipping is infeasible. It is simple, covers large areas, and may be used as an adjunct or rescue therapy for refractory bleeding.
- Citation: Chen YM, Xu ZL, Wang LS, Zou ZY. Sprayed tissue adhesive prevents post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in massive early gastric cancer: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(9): 124149
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i9/124149.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.124149
Early gastric cancer (EGC) refers to gastric malignancies that are confined to the mucosa or submucosa, irrespective of lymph node metastasis[1,2]. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers the advantage of en-bloc resection and yields histological data to verify curative resection; therefore, it is currently a critical therapeutic modality for these early lesions[3]. Nevertheless, ESD is a technically demanding procedure associated with significant complications, such as hemorrhage and perforation[4]. Hemorrhage during ESD procedures is almost inevitable, particularly in large-size lesions with large mucosal defects[5], wherein conventional modalities such as titanium clips and endoloop ligation have limited efficacy for hemostasis and resection defect closure. Thus, appropriate management of hemostasis during the procedure is essential to guarantee safe ESD performance. Herein, we report a case of spraying tissue adhesive for hemostasis and prevention of delayed bleeding after gastric ESD for a large, widely involved EGC lesion.
A 59-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital with a 2-year history of paroxysmal dull epigastric pain and discomfort, accompanied by occasional acid regurgitation and nausea.
The patient first developed symptoms 2 years ago, characterized by intermittent dull epigastric discomfort, with intermittent acid regurgitation and nausea.
The patient’s past medical history was unremarkable.
There was no family history of malignant tumors.
Physical examination yielded unremarkable findings.
The laboratory findings, including complete blood count, liver function tests, electrolytes, serum creatinine, and co
Abdominal computed tomography did not reveal any abnormalities.
High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the gastric mucosa was confirmed by pathological examination of the ESD specimen, although the preoperative biopsy had suggested low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
After written informed consent was obtained, gastric ESD was performed. Circumferential submucosal dissection was carried out along the marking incision, and the lesion was completely en-bloc resected. The procedure generated a large resection defect measuring 60 mm × 100 mm (Figure 1). Due to the large size of the resection defect, neither the traditional clamps nor nylon endoscopic sutures were suitable for stopping bleeding after heat coagulation treatment. Therefore, endoscopic tissue adhesive was sprayed widely over the defect surface (Video), and we observed effective hemostasis on the surface of the bleeding resection defect (Figure 1). After the ESD procedure was successfully completed, proton pump inhibitor therapy was administered, and no signs of bleeding were observed in the patient during postoperative monitoring.
No early adverse events including bleeding, perforation or infection were observed after endoscopic resection. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (Figure 2). The patient was arranged for gastroscopic surveillance at 4 months. An ESD scar in the gastric body and gastric angulus was observed by the gastroscopy at the end of the fourth month, indicating a well- recovered resection defect without postoperative bleeding (Figure 3).
ESD provides a minimally invasive yet curative treatment for patients with EGC. Previously, many of these patients were treated surgically at substantial cost and with significant risk of gastrointestinal function impairment. En-bloc resection of these early cancers allowed complete diagnosis of the tumor, stratification of the subsequent therapeutic approach, and potential cure[6], making it a preferred treatment option for EGC and promoting innovations in this field. However, ESD procedures are technically demanding, especially for large and deeply invasive lesions[7], and bleeding is one of the most frequent adverse events in ESD, potentially life-threatening. The size of the resection defect positively correlates with the incidence of postoperative bleeding[8,9]. Commonly, consumables such as titanium clips, nylon endoscopic sutures, and hot biopsy forceps are used to prevent postoperative bleeding. However, these methods are only suitable for small resection defects, and not feasible for large-size resection defects. In our case, the tumor lesion invaded the gastric body, angulus, and antrum. And it was impossible to seal the resection defects with titanium clips or nylon endoscopic sutures due to the large size of the resection defect, yet the method of spraying tissue adhesive onto the resection defect surface demonstrated promising results.
Topical hemostatic agents, such as tissue adhesives, hemostatic powders and polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets, com
In theory, the main component of tissue adhesive, butylcyanoacrylate (NBCA), undergoes rapid polymerization and solidifies into a protective membrane upon contact with anions present in blood and tissue fluid covering the resection defect. The meshlike architecture of this membrane impedes the transit of red blood cells and platelets, seals disrupted vasculature, and thus exerts hemostatic action. At the same time, it isolates the resection defect surface from direct contact with digestive fluids such as bile and gastric acid, thereby promoting resection defect healing. NBCA has been widely used for hemostasis in various settings, with previous reports covering portal vein embolization, cerebral vessel embolization, hemorrhagic trauma, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Accumulated data demonstrate that the hemostatic efficacy of NBCA is non-inferior to conventional interventions such as endoscopic clipping[16].
Hemostatic powders are administered using gas-driven delivery. Their application carries risks of barotrauma, catheter looping, and compromised endoscopic visualization. Moreover, contact with mucus often causes powder agglutination and catheter obstruction, disrupting the procedure. In comparison, sprayed tissue adhesive offers simpler handling, eliminates barotrauma risk, and preserves adequate visualization during management[13]. Nonetheless, caution is required to avoid occlusion of the endoscope working channel by tissue adhesive.
PGA sheets are flexible, mesh-forming high-molecular-weight polymers with robust tensile strength. Fibrin glue, a mixture of fibrinogen and thrombin, generates strongly adherent gel upon component mixing, which securely attaches PGA sheets to the mucosal defect. The combination of PGA sheets and fibrin glue provides an important adjunctive measure for preventing postESD perforation and bleeding[14]. From the perspective of procedural convenience, sprayed tissue adhesive is easier to implement than PGA sheet fixation with fibrin glue.
We consider that sprayed tissue adhesive is particularly appropriate for extensive yet superficial mucosal defects where conventional clipping is technically challenging or ineffective, for diffuse oozing over large postESD ulcers, for bleeding originating from irregular mucosal defects, and for hemorrhage refractory to standard hemostatic approaches such as injection therapy, mechanical clipping, or thermal coagulation. However, sprayed tissue adhesive should not be applied as monotherapy in high-risk scenarios: Deep defects with exposed large vessels (visible vessel or spurting bleeding); muscular injury or suspected perforation, which may require additional closure methods such as endoscopic clipping, overthescope clips, or surgical consultation. Overall, we recommend sprayed tissue adhesive as an adjunct or rescue therapy when conventional hemostatic methods are unsuitable or unsuccessful.
| 1. | Vasconcelos AC, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Libânio D. Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer and Pre-Malignant Gastric Lesions. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:3084. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in RCA: 15] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Shimada S, Yabuuchi Y, Kawata N, Maeda Y, Yoshida M, Yamamoto Y, Minamide T, Shigeta K, Takada K, Kishida Y, Ito S, Imai K, Hotta K, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Ono H. Endoscopic causes and characteristics of missed gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;98:735-743.e2. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in RCA: 20] [Article Influence: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 3. | Chua TY, Draganov PV. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer: has the West caught up? Endoscopy. 2023;55:907-908. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Yang CH, Qiu Y, Li X, Shi RH. Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions. J Dig Dis. 2020;21:139-146. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in RCA: 15] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Uedo N, Nimura S, Yahagi N, Iishi H, Oka M, Ajioka Y, Fujimoto K. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition). Dig Endosc. 2021;33:4-20. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 429] [Cited by in RCA: 403] [Article Influence: 80.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 6. | Bourke MJ, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Indications and Application in Western Endoscopy Practice. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1887-1900.e5. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 110] [Cited by in RCA: 101] [Article Influence: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 7. | Esaki M, Ihara E, Gotoda T. Endoscopic instruments and techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;15:1009-1020. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in RCA: 26] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 8. | Hatta W, Tsuji Y, Yoshio T, Kakushima N, Hoteya S, Doyama H, Nagami Y, Hikichi T, Kobayashi M, Morita Y, Sumiyoshi T, Iguchi M, Tomida H, Inoue T, Koike T, Mikami T, Hasatani K, Nishikawa J, Matsumura T, Nebiki H, Nakamatsu D, Ohnita K, Suzuki H, Ueyama H, Hayashi Y, Sugimoto M, Yamaguchi S, Michida T, Yada T, Asahina Y, Narasaka T, Kuribasyashi S, Kiyotoki S, Mabe K, Nakamura T, Nakaya N, Fujishiro M, Masamune A. Prediction model of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: BEST-J score. Gut. 2021;70:476-484. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 134] [Cited by in RCA: 128] [Article Influence: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | James TW, Baron TH. Antithrombotic therapy and gastric EMR or endoscopic submucosal dissection: The bleeding edge? Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:286-288. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Shida T, Takano S, Miyazaki M. Spraying n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) might be a simple and final technique for bleeding gastrointestinal lesions. Endoscopy. 2009;41 Suppl 2:E27-E28. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Prachayakul V, Aswakul P, Kachinthorn U. Spraying N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) as a rescue therapy for gastrointestinal malignant tumor bleeding after failed conventional therapy. Endoscopy. 2011;43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E227-E228. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Walia SS, Sachdeva A, Kim JJ, Portocarrero DJ, Lewis TD, Zhao YS. Cyanoacrylate spray for treatment of difficult-to-control GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:536-539. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in RCA: 14] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Tau JA. Topical hemostatic preventative and therapeutic agents: clinical impact and utility. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025;101:36-44. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Kataoka Y, Tsuji Y, Sakaguchi Y, Minatsuki C, Asada-Hirayama I, Niimi K, Ono S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Fujishiro M, Koike K. Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Risk factors and preventive methods. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:5927-5935. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in CrossRef: 79] [Cited by in RCA: 73] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | Kawata N, Ono H, Takizawa K, Kakushima N, Tanaka M, Igarashi K, Yoshida M, Kishida Y, Iwai T, Ito S, Imai K, Hotta K, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H. Efficacy of polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue for prevention of bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients under continued antithrombotic agents. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:696-702. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in RCA: 46] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (3)] |
| 16. | Chevallier O, Comby PO, Guillen K, Pellegrinelli J, Mouillot T, Falvo N, Bardou M, Midulla M, Aho-Glélé S, Loffroy R. Efficacy, safety and outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021;102:479-487. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in RCA: 56] [Article Influence: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |