Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2023; 15(9): 574-583
Published online Sep 16, 2023. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i9.574
Table 1 Comparison of rate of adverse events, clinical success and technical success between the approaches according to puncture site (transduodenal/transjejunal vs transgastric)

n of studies
Pooled odds ratio (TG vs TD/TJ) or AE (%)
P value
Method 1: Including studies with patients in both arms only
Adverse events61.580.46-5.450.47
Clinical success30.300.06-1.480.14
Technical success30.300.05-1.890.20
Method 2: Including all studies
Adverse events9 vs 1527.5% vs 15.2%(17.1%-41.1%) vs (9.5%-23.6%)0.07
Clinical success6 vs 1383.3% vs 91.7%(71.0%-91.0%) vs (82.4%-96.3%)0.16
Technical success9 vs 1591.3% vs 95.6%(83.6%-95.6%) vs 90.7%-97.7%)0.22