BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2026; 18(9): 125072
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125072
Figure 1
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of study identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. The search identified 1774 records; 1175 remained after deduplication; 410 were selected for full-text retrieval; 356 full-text reports were assessed; 144 records underwent data extraction; and 128 studies were included in the final descriptive synthesis.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Publication trend of included studies. Annual number of studies included in the final 128-study descriptive synthesis, by publication year.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Country or region distribution of included studies. Leading data-source countries or regions among the 128 included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Indications and therapeutic interventions among included studies. Study-level keyword classification; categories are not mutually exclusive.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Study-level outcome distributions. Endpoint-specific descriptive distributions for technical success, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, and overall complications or adverse events. ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; IQR: Interquartile range.


Write to the Help Desk