BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2026; 18(11): 126001
Published online Nov 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.126001
Figure 1
Figure 1 Workflow overview of colorectal polyp size measurement via visual assessment, biopsy forceps, and the laser-based measurement system. A: Measurement of a sessile (0-Is) serrated polyp located in the ascending colon; B: Measurement of a 0-Is adenoma located in the rectum. The laser-based measurement images on the right show the two points indicated by the user and the respective 3D Euclidean distance.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Flowchart of patient and polyp selection. ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists score; BBPS: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Bland-Altman plots. A: Size differences (in millimeters) between biopsy forceps and the laser-based measurement system; B: Size differences (in millimeters) between visual assessment and the laser-based measurement system; C: Size differences (in millimeters) between biopsy forceps and visual assessment. Each point in the plots represents one polyp measurement and shows the difference in size (in millimeters) for all 137 polyps. The blue line represents the mean difference in millimeters between two measurement techniques. The red lines indicate the upper and lower limits of agreement, which is the range containing the most size differences between two measurement techniques. BF: Biopsy forceps; VA: Visual assessment.


Write to the Help Desk