Belopolsky Y, Puli SR. Water-jet vs traditional triangular tip knife in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal dysmotility: A systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14(10): 608-615 [PMID: 36303808 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.608]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yuliya Belopolsky, MD, Academic Fellow, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, United States. yuliya.belopolsky@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Systematic Reviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2022; 14(10): 608-615 Published online Oct 16, 2022. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.608
Water-jet vs traditional triangular tip knife in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal dysmotility: A systemic review and meta-analysis
Yuliya Belopolsky, Srinivas R Puli
Yuliya Belopolsky, Srinivas R Puli, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, United States
Author contributions: Belopolsky Y and Puli SR contributed equally and substantially to the conception and design of the work, analysis, acquisition, interpretation of data for the work, and drafting the work and revising for important intellectual content; Belopolsky Y and Puli SR agree to be accountable for all aspects of work in ensuring questions related to accuracy and integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; all authors wrote, read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest from any of all authors.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: All authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yuliya Belopolsky, MD, Academic Fellow, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, One Illini Drive, Peoria, IL 61605, United States. yuliya.belopolsky@yahoo.com
Received: April 6, 2022 Peer-review started: April 6, 2022 First decision: May 31, 2022 Revised: July 3, 2022 Accepted: September 6, 2022 Article in press: September 6, 2022 Published online: October 16, 2022
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background
This study is the first metanalysis to discover the differences between two main modalities for performing peroral endoscopic myotomy.
Research motivation
This study allows us to continue progressing in terms of instruments as it leads to continued success, but quicker and less adverse outcomes.
Research objectives
To compare two knives, conventional triangular tip as well as water jet integrated triangular tip knives.
Research methods
Clinical trials were examined and put together into metaanalysis.
Research results
This shows that water jet knife is comparable in terms of success to conventional traditional triangular knife with fewer adverse events and faster time.
Research conclusions
This study proposes new availability in instruments to the field of endoscopic myotomy.
Research perspectives
This allows future research to examine additional instruments and how to continue to further clinical success with better outcomes as well as ease for the endoscopist.
