Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Sep 8, 2015; 7(19): 2189-2193
Published online Sep 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i19.2189
Herbal medicine-related hepatotoxicity
Evangelos Stournaras, Konstantinos Tziomalos
Evangelos Stournaras, Konstantinos Tziomalos, First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
Author contributions: Stournaras E drafted the paper; Tziomalos K revised the draft critically for important intellectual content.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no conflict of interest to declare.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Konstantinos Tziomalos, MD, PhD, First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, Kiriakidi 1, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece. ktziomalos@yahoo.com
Telephone: +30-2310-994621 Fax: +30-2310-994773
Received: May 15, 2015
Peer-review started: May 15, 2015
First decision: July 15, 2015
Revised: July 22, 2015
Accepted: August 20, 2015
Article in press: August 21, 2015
Published online: September 8, 2015


Herbal medicine products represent a common therapeutic approach in the East and are gaining increasing popularity in Western countries. They are unjustifiably considered to be side-effect free; on the contrary, severe toxicity, including catastrophic hepatic injury has been reported in association with their use. Vigilance is required from both physicians and the general public. Physicians should always suspect herbal medicines when evaluating a patient with unexplained liver injury. Regulation standards for herbal products need to be reconsidered, so that the efficacy and safety of these products have been clearly demonstrated before they enter the markets.

Key Words: Herbal medicines, Liver transplantation, Cholestasis

Core tip: Herbal medicine products represent a common therapeutic approach in the East and are gaining increasing popularity in Western countries. They are unjustifiably considered to be side-effect free; on the contrary, severe toxicity, including catastrophic hepatic injury has been reported in association with their use. Vigilance is required from both physicians and the general public. Physicians should always suspect herbal medicines when evaluating a patient with unexplained liver injury. Regulation standards for herbal products need to be reconsidered, so that the efficacy and safety of these products have been clearly demonstrated before they enter the markets.


The use of herbal products as medications has its origin thousands of years ago and has been documented in historical evidence from many ancient civilisations. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of herbal medicines and herbal dietary supplements in Western societies, mainly for body building, weight loss and maintenance of “good health”. This increased use is supported by a general belief among lay people, that since these products are natural, they are also harmless; this belief is, however, frequently inaccurate and mistaken. Indeed, herbal products have been reported to cause severe side effects. Among these, liver injury, occasionally severe enough to necessitate transplantation or lead to death, has been frequently described.

Herbal medicines represent a lucrative business in both Europe and United States. In 2003, more than $5 billion has been spent on over the counter herbal products in Europe[1]. A survey including 6 countries (United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Italy, Romania, Finland) revealed that 18.8% of 2359 consumers had used plant food supplements at least once[2]. In the United States, 100 million Americans spend $28 billion each year in supplements[3]. Data from National Health and nutrition examination survey reveals that 52% of the general population had consumed supplements between 1990-2000[4]. This tendency towards constant increase in the use of herbal medicines has several explanations. Many people believe that conventional drugs cause severe side effects and are reluctant to use them. On the other hand, many believe that herbal medicines have been used for centuries, are effective, harmless and represent a more “natural” or “physiological” means of managing or preventing diseases. Moreover, marketing regulations for herbal medicine are considerably less strict than for conventional drugs and no safety or efficacy trials are required before these products are being marketed. This leads to an abundance of easily accessible herbal medicine products that are sold over the counter or via the internet. Herbal products in the United States are regulated by the dietary supplement health and education act (DSHEA), introduced in 1994[5]. According to DSHEA, a dietary supplement is a product taken by mouth that contains an ingredient (vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanicals, aminoacid or substances such as enzymes, organ tissues, glandulars and metabolites), intended to supplement the diet[6]. Manufacturers of herbal medicines are not required to get Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval before selling a new product and they are responsible for non-misleading labelling, reporting any side effect and ensuring that their product has not been contaminated or adulterated[3,5]. In European Union, for herbal medical products to be allowed entering markets, they need to have been used medicinally for at least 30 years in general and for at least 15 years in Europe and to have sufficient data that they are not harmful and that their pharmacologic effects are plausible[1].

Herbal medicines are divided into 3 categories. First, there are plant-derived crude products, such as leaves, roots and flowers. Importantly, the exact ingredients and their concentrations in these products are unknown and are subject to harvest conditions, weather, altitude of growth and contamination with pesticides and heavy metals. The second category comprises of botanicals, which have been the cornerstone of pharmaceutical industry growth. Famous paradigms include poppies-derived opioids, china bark from which quinine is extracted and mandrake, the source of atropine[7]. The third category includes all commercially available products marketed under trade names and represents the majority of herbal medicines used in Western societies. Current lenient regulation standards often result in poor quality products; contamination with bacteria or heavy metals such as arsenic has been documented[8,9]. In one case, a weight loss-inducing nutritional supplement contaminated with Bacillus subtilis caused severe hepatotoxicity in 2 patients[9]. Mislabelling is another issue of concern; concentrations of constituents are often inaccurate and may vary from batch to batch. Adulteration with other substances such as steroids, benzodiazepines, sildenafil and others that do not appear on the ingredients list has also been reported[10], and contributes to the emergence of side effects.

Herbal medicine-related hepatotoxicity represents the second most common cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in Western countries. In a prospective study from Iceland that included 96 individuals diagnosed with DILI between 2010 and 2011, 16% of cases were attributable to dietary supplements[11]. In the United States, the drug induced liver injury network, which studies liver toxicity related to the use of conventional medications or herbal supplements, constitutes the largest database of herbal medicines-related hepatotoxicity. Between 2004 and 2013, among 839 patients who had suffered DILI, herbal dietary supplement was identified as the culprit in 130 cases (15.5%)[12,13]. Interestingly, the proportion of DILI caused by herbal medicines increased from 7% to 20% during this time period, reflecting the increasing popularity of these products. Supplements used for body building were the most commonly implicated (45 of 130 cases), followed by weight loss-inducing products. Chinese herbs and supplements for depression, gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual performance enhancement and joint problems were less commonly implicated in DILI. In another recent retrospective cohort study using data from a Northern California health care system between 2004 and 2014, 18.8% of cases of acute liver failure were caused by over-the-counter herbal supplements[14]. In Europe, an earlier study performed between 1994 and 2004 in Spain reported that 9% of 461 cases of DILI were caused by medicinal herbs[15]. Interestingly, herbal products also represent the most common cause of DILI in the East, reflecting their widespread use worldwide. In a prospective Korean nationwide study on DILI, “herbal medications”, “herbal preparations”, “medicinal herbs or plants”, “health foods or dietary supplements” and “folk remedies” were the causative agents of 232 of 371 reported cases of DILI (62.5%)[16].

There are 3 patterns of drug (and herbal dietary supplement)-induced liver injury: hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed. The R-value is a helpful index for distinguishing the type of liver injury at presentation. R-value is defined as patient’s serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/upper limit of normal of ALT divided by patient’s serum alkaline phosphatise (ALP)/upper limit of normal of ALP[17]. When R is ≥ 5, injury is classified as hepatocellular, when R is < 2 as cholestatic, and when R is 2-5 as mixed. With the exception of herbal supplements used for body building, which cause a cholestatic pattern of liver injury, most of the herbal products typically induce hepatocellular damage[12,17].

A large number of herbal medicines have the potential to cause liver injury. Body building products typically cause cholestatic hepatic injury and affected patients are usually young males. Performance enhancing agents are the most commonly implicated agents in the drug induced liver injury network study. Such supplements typically contain steroids, whose hepatotoxicity potential has been well established[13,18]. Greater celandine (chelidonium majus), used for the management of dyspeptic symptoms, and cascara sagrada, a herbal laxative containing anthracene glycoside, are 2 other herbal medicines that have been associated with cholestasis[19,20]. The rising prevalence of obesity in Western societies has led to a flourishing market of weight loss-inducing herbal medicines, which are frequently implicated in cases of hepatotoxicity. Hydroxycut, a multi-ingredient product, marketed as a stimulator of basic metabolism and a lipolytic agent, was eventually recalled from the market by the manufacturer in 2009. Severe hepatocellular injury, leading to liver transplantation and even death, has been associated with this product[21]. OxyELITE Pro has been shown to cause severe or even fatal hepatitis at the recommended dosage, leading the FDA to ban its sales in 2013[22]. Herbalife products, used for a variety of purposes, including weight loss and general well being, have also been linked to severe cases of liver injury[23]. Germander also appears to induce weight loss but also contains diterpenoids that cause hepatocyte apoptosis[24]. Green tea is extracted from Camellia sinensis leaves and is commonly present in weight loss supplements. Although the consumption of average amounts of green tea appears to safe, excessive doses found in dietary supplements have been associated with hepatocellular injury, induced by catechins[25,26]. Extract from comfrey tea (symphytum), used to make tea, induces venoocclusive disease, since it contains pyrrolizidine alkaloids[27]. Kava, extracted from piper methysticum and used for anxiety symptoms and sleep disorders, is particularly popular in the Pacific Ocean islands and has been incriminated in many cases of hepatotoxicity, leading to a ban of kava-containing products import in Europe and United States[28]. Finally, black cohosh (cimicifuga racemosa), used for menopause symptoms and dysmenorrhea, and glucosamine-containing supplements, popular products marketed for joint pain relief, have also been associated with severe hepatotoxicity[29-31].

Establishing a causal relationship between the use of herbal medicines and liver injury is challenging. Even when highly suspected, direct correlation between a single causative agent and hepatotoxicity can be extremely difficult to prove. The variable composition of herbal products (according to weather and harvest conditions), the plethora of (often unlabeled) ingredients and contamination or adulteration may impede diagnostic approach and establishment of causality. Clinical suspicion that a herbal medication may have caused hepatotoxicity is fundamental for diagnosis. Patients tend to underreport consumption of herbal dietary supplements[32], therefore physicians should persistently assess this possibility during history taking. Initiation of the suspected product prior to the manifestation of liver injury is also a major key point for establishing causality. Other non-pharmacological causes of liver injury must also be excluded. These include viral hepatitis (by hepatitis A, B, C or E virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus), autoimmune diseases (autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis) and metabolic and genetic diseases (hemochromatosis, a1-antitrypsin deficiency, wilson’s disease). Alcohol consumption needs to be documented thoroughly, ischemic hepatitis must be ruled out and liver imaging might be helpful for excluding other pathologies[17,33]. None of the currently used causality assessment tools were developed specifically for herbal dietary supplements[17]. The same diagnostic guidelines designed for idiosyncratic DILI apply to herbal products as well. The 2 most commonly used approaches are the roussel uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM) and expert opinion process. The RUCAM calculates a total score assigning points to clinical and biochemical parameters; a higher score indicates increased likelihood of hepatic injury due to a specific medication[34]. The RUCAM can be calculated only for a single drug each time and labelled toxicity is considered; these features are major restrictions in the use of RUCAM for proof of herbal medicine-related liver injury, since herbal preparations include multiple ingredients and hepatotoxicity warnings seldom appear in their labels. Expert opinion is being used by the drug induced liver injury network[35] and it appears to render higher agreement rates[36]. Novel causality assessment tools specific to herbal dietary supplements have been proposed and preliminary results appear promising[37].

In conclusion, herbal medicine products represent a common therapeutic approach in the East and are gaining increasing popularity in Western countries. They are unjustifiably considered to be side-effect free; on the contrary, severe toxicity, including catastrophic hepatic injury has been reported in association with their use. Vigilance is required from both physicians and the general public. Physicians should always suspect herbal medicines when evaluating a patient with unexplained liver injury. Regulation standards for herbal products need to be reconsidered, so that the efficacy and safety of these products have been clearly demonstrated before they enter the markets.


P- Reviewer: Pan JJ, Sergi C, Temel T, Toshikuni N S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

1.  De Smet PA. Herbal medicine in Europe-relaxing regulatory standards. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1176-1178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Garcia-Alvarez A, Egan B, de Klein S, Dima L, Maggi FM, Isoniemi M, Ribas-Barba L, Raats MM, Meissner EM, Badea M. Usage of plant food supplements across six European countries: findings from the PlantLIBRA consumer survey. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Cohen PA. Assessing supplement safety--the FDA’s controversial proposal. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:389-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Radimer K, Bindewald B, Hughes J, Ervin B, Swanson C, Picciano MF. Dietary supplement use by US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:339-349.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  US Food and Drug Administration Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. [accessed 2015 May 10].  Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103s784es/pdf/BILLS-103s784es.pdf.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  US Food and Drug Administration Dietary Supplements. [accessed 2015 May 10].  Available from: http: //www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/QADietarySupplements/ucm191930.htm.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Seeff LB, Bonkovsky HL, Navarro VJ, Wang G. Herbal products and the liver: a review of adverse effects and mechanisms. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:517-532.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Saper RB, Phillips RS, Sehgal A, Khouri N, Davis RB, Paquin J, Thuppil V, Kales SN. Lead, mercury, and arsenic in US- and Indian-manufactured Ayurvedic medicines sold via the Internet. JAMA. 2008;300:915-923.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Stickel F, Droz S, Patsenker E, Bögli-Stuber K, Aebi B, Leib SL. Severe hepatotoxicity following ingestion of Herbalife nutritional supplements contaminated with Bacillus subtilis. J Hepatol. 2009;50:111-117.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Ernst E. Adulteration of Chinese herbal medicines with synthetic drugs: a systematic review. J Intern Med. 2002;252:107-113.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Björnsson ES, Bergmann OM, Björnsson HK, Kvaran RB, Olafsson S. Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1419-1425, 1425.e1-e3; quiz e19-e20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Navarro VJ, Barnhart H, Bonkovsky HL, Davern T, Fontana RJ, Grant L, Reddy KR, Seeff LB, Serrano J, Sherker AH. Liver injury from herbals and dietary supplements in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network. Hepatology. 2014;60:1399-1408.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Rossi S, Navarro VJ. Herbs and liver injury: a clinical perspective. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1069-1076.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Goldberg DS, Forde KA, Carbonari DM, Lewis JD, Leidl KB, Reddy KR, Haynes K, Roy J, Sha D, Marks AR. Population-representative incidence of drug-induced acute liver failure based on an analysis of an integrated health care system. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1353-1361.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Fernández MC, Pelaez G, Pachkoria K, García-Ruiz E, García-Muñoz B, González-Grande R, Pizarro A, Durán JA. Drug-induced liver injury: an analysis of 461 incidences submitted to the Spanish registry over a 10-year period. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:512-521.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Suk KT, Kim DJ, Kim CH, Park SH, Yoon JH, Kim YS, Baik GH, Kim JB, Kweon YO, Kim BI. A prospective nationwide study of drug-induced liver injury in Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1380-1387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Chalasani NP, Hayashi PH, Bonkovsky HL, Navarro VJ, Lee WM, Fontana RJ. ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:950-966; quiz 967.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Timcheh-Hariri A, Balali-Mood M, Aryan E, Sadeghi M, Riahi-Zanjani B. Toxic hepatitis in a group of 20 male body-builders taking dietary supplements. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:3826-3832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Benninger J, Schneider HT, Schuppan D, Kirchner T, Hahn EG. Acute hepatitis induced by greater celandine (Chelidonium majus). Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1234-1237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Nadir A, Reddy D, Van Thiel DH. Cascara sagrada-induced intrahepatic cholestasis causing portal hypertension: case report and review of herbal hepatotoxicity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3634-3637.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Fong TL, Klontz KC, Canas-Coto A, Casper SJ, Durazo FA, Davern TJ, Hayashi P, Lee WM, Seeff LB. Hepatotoxicity due to hydroxycut: a case series. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1561-1566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Roytman MM, Pörzgen P, Lee CL, Huddleston L, Kuo TT, Bryant-Greenwood P, Wong LL, Tsai N. Outbreak of severe hepatitis linked to weight-loss supplement OxyELITE Pro. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1296-1298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Schoepfer AM, Engel A, Fattinger K, Marbet UA, Criblez D, Reichen J, Zimmermann A, Oneta CM. Herbal does not mean innocuous: ten cases of severe hepatotoxicity associated with dietary supplements from Herbalife products. J Hepatol. 2007;47:521-526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Fau D, Lekehal M, Farrell G, Moreau A, Moulis C, Feldmann G, Haouzi D, Pessayre D. Diterpenoids from germander, an herbal medicine, induce apoptosis in isolated rat hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:1334-1346.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Lambert JD, Kennett MJ, Sang S, Reuhl KR, Ju J, Yang CS. Hepatotoxicity of high oral dose (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48:409-416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Mazzanti G, Menniti-Ippolito F, Moro PA, Cassetti F, Raschetti R, Santuccio C, Mastrangelo S. Hepatotoxicity from green tea: a review of the literature and two unpublished cases. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:331-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Weston CF, Cooper BT, Davies JD, Levine DF. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver secondary to ingestion of comfrey. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;295:183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Russmann S, Lauterburg BH, Helbling A. Kava hepatotoxicity. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:68-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Lynch CR, Folkers ME, Hutson WR. Fulminant hepatic failure associated with the use of black cohosh: a case report. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:989-992.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Levitsky J, Alli TA, Wisecarver J, Sorrell MF. Fulminant liver failure associated with the use of black cohosh. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:538-539.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Ebrahim V, Albeldawi M, Chiang DJ. Acute liver injury associated with glucosamine dietary supplement. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:pii: bcr2012007665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Benson JM, Brodie M, Altman DE. Americans’ views on the use and regulation of dietary supplements. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:805-810.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Navarro VJ, Senior JR. Drug-related hepatotoxicity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:731-739.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) in Drug Induced Liver Injury. [Accessed 2015 May 10].  Available from: http://www.livertox.nih.gov/rucam.html.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R, Lee W, Stolz A, Talwalkar J, Reddy KR, Watkins PB, Navarro V, Barnhart H. Features and Outcomes of 899 Patients With Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The DILIN Prospective Study. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1340-1352.e7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Rockey DC, Seeff LB, Rochon J, Freston J, Chalasani N, Bonacini M, Fontana RJ, Hayashi PH. Causality assessment in drug-induced liver injury using a structured expert opinion process: comparison to the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method. Hepatology. 2010;51:2117-2126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Navarro VJ, Barnhart HX, Bonkovsky HL, Reddy KR, Seeff L, Serrano J, Talwalkar J, Vega M, Vuppalanchi R. 1364 Diagnosing Hepatotoxicity Attributable To Herbal & Dietary Supplements (HDS): Test-Retest Reliability of a Novel Causality Assessment Tool. J Hepatol. 2012;56:S536.  [PubMed]  [DOI]