Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2014; 6(12): 860-869
Published online Dec 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i12.860
Occult hepatitis B virus infection
Min-Sun Kwak, Yoon Jun Kim
Min-Sun Kwak, Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Gangnam Healthcare Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 135-984, South Korea
Yoon Jun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-744, South Korea
Author contributions: Kwak MS and Kim YJ designed, performed the research and wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Yoon Jun Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehang-no, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea. yoonjun@snu.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-2-20723081 Fax: +82-2-7436701
Received: August 13, 2014
Revised: September 23, 2014
Accepted: October 28, 2014
Published online: December 27, 2014

Abstract

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) refers to the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of detectable hepatitis B surface antigen. Since OBI was first described in the late 1970s, there has been increasing interest in this topic. The prevalence of OBI varies according to the different endemicity of HBV infection, cohort characteristics, and sensitivity and specificity of the methods used for detection. Although the exact mechanism of OBI has not been proved, intra-hepatic persistence of viral covalently closed circular DNA under the host’s strong immune suppression of HBV replication and gene expression seems to be a cause. OBI has important clinical significance in several conditions. First, OBI can be transmitted through transfusion, organ transplantation including orthotopic liver transplantation, or hemodialysis. Donor screening before blood transfusion, prophylaxis for high-risk organ transplantation recipients, and dialysis-specific infection-control programs should be considered to reduce the risk of transmission. Second, OBI may reactivate and cause acute hepatitis in immunocompromised patients or those receiving chemotherapy. Close HBV DNA monitoring and timely antiviral treatment can prevent HBV reactivation and consequent clinical deterioration. Third, OBI may contribute to the progression of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease including hepatitis C. Finally, OBI seems to be a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma by its direct proto-oncogenic effect and by indirectly causing persistent hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. However, this needs further investigation. We review published reports in the literature to gain an overview of the status of OBI and emphasize the clinical importance of OBI.

Key Words: Occult hepatitis B virus infection, Transmission, Reactivation, Chronic liver disease, Hepatocellular carcinoma

Core tip: Occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) is defined by the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA without detectable hepatitis B surface antigen. The prevalence of OBI varies according to the different endemicity of HBV infection, cohort characteristics, and detection methods. Increasing research on OBI has been conducted with respect to the following: (1) transmission through transfusion, organ transplantation, or hemodialysis; (2) reactivation in an immunosuppression state; (3) contribution to the progression of chronic liver disease; and (4) increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Further studies are needed to establish its clinical significance and management.


Citation: Kwak MS, Kim YJ. Occult hepatitis B virus infection. World J Hepatol 2014; 6(12): 860-869
INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important global public issue. Approximately 2 billion people have serologic markers of HBV worldwide, 360 million of whom have chronic HBV infection. The natural course of HBV infection is determined by the interactions between the host and the virus. Chronic HBV infection is characterized by persistent HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity and viremia. In the past, clearance of HBsAg expression in patients with chronic hepatitis B was considered as disease remission and disappearance of viral DNA[1]. However, the “occult” or “silent” form of HBV infection was first reported in the late 1970s in blood donors with anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc) antibody without HBsAg who transmitted hepatitis B[1,2]. The meaning of this clinical entity was reviewed in 1998 by a panel of European and US scientists as a part of the serological pattern “anti-HBc” alone, although the term occult was not used at that time[3]. Increasing data showed persistent low levels of HBV DNA in serum and liver tissues after HBsAg clearance was observed during acute self-limited or chronic HBV infection. Demonstration of this clinical entity has brought about the concept of “occult” or “silent” HBV infection, indicating the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of detectable HBsAg[3,4]. Owing to the development of highly sensitive molecular biology techniques, the clinical and virologic features of occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) have been revealed, and its clinical significance has been highlighted recently[5-7]. In this paper, we reviewed the status of OBI with respect to its definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, and mechanism. We also focused on the clinical importance of OBI by focusing on 4 processes: transmission, reactivation, contribution to the progression of hepatic fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurrence, based on results of available reports.

DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION

Several definitions of OBI have been suggested. In the 2008 international workshop held in Italy, OBI was defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the liver (with or without HBV DNA in serum) without HBsAg as determined by using the currently available assays[8]. Serum HBV DNA can be either detectable or undetectable, and when detectable, the level of HBV DNA is usually very low (< 200 IU/mL). When serum HBV DNA levels are comparable to those usually detected in cases of overt HBV infection, “false OBI” should be considered. False OBI is usually due to rare infection with S gene escape mutants, which produce a modified HBsAg that is not recognized by routinely used detection assays[9,10]. Defining OBI according to the presence of liver HBV DNA expression is the most accurate because HBV DNA in the liver can be detected even when HBV cannot be detected in serum[11]. However, obtaining hepatic HBV DNA is difficult in clinical practice, and assays for the detection of HBV DNA in liver tissue have not been well standardized[7].

Detection assays for HBV DNA in serum have been used with sufficient sensitivity; therefore, OBI is often defined as the presence of serum HBV DNA without detectable HBsAg in clinical practice and in many studies[7,8,12]. Bréchot et al[9] proposed to define occult HBV infection as the detection of HBV DNA by using PCR or other amplification assays in HBsAg-negative individuals. Allain[13] also defined OBI as the presence of HBV DNA without detectable HBsAg, with or without anti-HBc or anti-HBs antibody outside the pre-seroconversion window period. This definition of OBI according to the presence of serum HBV DNA is most commonly used in clinical practice.

OBI has also been defined as a serological condition characterized by the presence of isolated hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) in the absence of HBsAg and anti-HBs antibody[3,14]. Detection of anti-HBc antibody, a surrogate marker of OBI, is useful when an HBV DNA test is not available or when intermittent viremia is suspected[8,15]. However, when OBI is defined according to the presence of anti-HBc antibody alone, false anti-HBc positivity and negativity in the detection of OBI should be considered. Not all anti-HBc-positive subjects are HBV DNA-positive. In addition, the absence of anti-HBc antibody does not exclude seronegative OBI. As mentioned earlier, the definition of OBI slightly differs between studies; thus, cautious interpretation should be exercised when comparing study results about OBI.

OBI can be classified into 2 groups, seropositive OBI [anti-HBc and/or anti-hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) positive] and seronegative OBI (anti-HBc and anti-HBs negative), on the basis of the HBV antibody profile. Seropositive-OBI develops when serum test results for HBsAg become negative after acute hepatitis or when HBsAg is cleared during the course of chronic hepatitis B. In fact, annual HBsAg seroclearance rates are reported to be 0.50%-2.26% per year in chronic hepatitis B patients, and persistent HBV DNA in the liver was detected in some of these patients[16,17]. Seronegative-OBI is caused by primary occult of anti-HBs or anti-HBc from the beginning of the infection because of the mutation or due to progressive loss of anti-HBs[8,18]. Most OBIs are seropositive OBIs, but > 20% of patients with OBI are seronegative for OBI, representing a population negative for all serum markers of HBV infection[19].

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The prevalence of OBI is reported to range from 1% to 95% worldwide. These prevalence rates are influenced by several factors as follows: (1) geographic differences (endemicity); (2) different patient characteristics, including the presence of comorbid diseases such as chronic hepatitis C; and (3) and the different diagnostic techniques used, which have different sensitivity[8,20,21].

The prevalence of OBI differs according to the endemicity of HBV infection. OBI was reported at a higher rate in an HBV endemic area such as East Asia where 41%-90% of the population had prior exposure to HBV, and less frequently in the low endemic areas such as North America, where only 5%-20% of the population had previous exposure[22]. Several studies on blood donors with similar cohorts have reported a 0.1%-1.05% prevalence of OBI in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donors from North America, 0%-1.59% in donors from Europe, and up to 6% in donors from an endemic area[5,23,24].

The prevalence of OBI differs according to the cohort characteristics. OBI is more commonly noted in patients at high risk for parenterally transmitted infections such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection or immunosuppression condition such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection[25]. In particular, OBI prevalence is high in patients with HCV infection, with HBV DNA detected in approximately 33% of patients with HBsAg-negative HCV infection in Italy and > 50% patients in East Asian countries[19,26,27]. OBI prevalence was also high in patients with other chronic liver diseases at 20%-30%[25,28], in hemophilia patients in Japan at 51%[29], and in intravenous drug users at 45%[30]. Among HIV-infected patients in Turkey, 19.1% of subjects had isolated anti-HBc (considered a marker of OBI) compared to only 2.4% in blood-donor controls[31]. The effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy, clusters of differentiation (CD)4 cell count, and HIV RNA load on OBI prevalence is still controversial[24,32,33].

The prevalence of OBI also differs according to the sensitivity of HBV DNA or HBsAg testing. There are various amplification methods for detecting HBV DNA, and the HBV genome target sites are also different. Some commercial assays are more sensitive than others at detecting HBsAg mutants. The type of sample used (liver or serum) or number of samplings can also have some effect on the diagnosis of OBI. Indeed, as serum HBV DNA levels seem to fluctuate in OBI, serial sample is more useful to identify OBI[21].

Since the study population differs significantly based on the above-mentioned factors, prevalence was hard to compare directly among studies. Therefore, caution should be exercised when interpreting the prevalence of OBI in different studies.

MECHANISM

Some researchers insist the lower sensitivity of the HBsAg immunoassay compared to that of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of HBV DNA is responsible for development of OBI. However, this difference in the assay sensitivity cannot explain the characteristic lower replication rate of HBV observed in OBI. The precise underlying mechanisms of OBI are not well understood, which could be multifactorial. Both host and viral factors seem to have roles in suppressing viral replication and infection control[5,19].

Host factors

OBI is characterized a low rate of HBV replication in vivo; however, occult HBV strains are replication-competent in vitro. This suggests that host, rather than viral, factors are more responsible for OBI[34]. Similarly, many clinical observations indicate that OBI reactivation sometimes occurs under immunosuppressive conditions, such as during cancer chemotherapy treatment, HIV infection, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[25,35]. This can be explained by a break in the balance between the host’s immune system and the virus that occurs during occult infection caused by change in immune system function, resulting in reactivation of OBI. These findings strongly indicate the critical role of the host’s immune system in development of OBI.

Other in vitro studies showed vigorous antiviral T-cell responses several years after clinical recovery from acute hepatitis B. This suggests persistent synthesis of minute undetectable amounts of virus by HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) or other viral transcripts in OBI, maintaining the HBV-specific memory T-cell response[36]. Therefore, these findings also indirectly emphasize the role of the host immune system in the development and maintenance of OBI[25,37,38].

In addition to memory T-cell immune reaction, innate immune system or cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ also have been reported to be associated with OBI[39,40]. Furthermore, epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation of the HBV genome and posttranslational modification of histones, has been reported to be related to the OBI[41].

Viral factors

Although there is no sufficient evidence, viral factors also seem to have some effect on development of OBI. Several possible mechanisms explaining the low viral replication rate in OBI have been demonstrated. Mutations of the X region of HBV reduce the ability of the X protein to transactivate host cellular proteins that are essential for viral replication, which led to the suppression of replication and expression of HBV DNA, and resulted in negative seropositivity for HBsAg[42]. Escape mutation of the S region was another possible viral factor associated with OBI, which also decreases reactivity in HBsAg detection assays[43]. In addition, a large number of mutations were reported which can reduce HBsAg expression, decrease immune recognition of the virus, and impair HBV packaging. However, cautious interpretation is necessary, as most of these studies lacked a control group or mutations appeared not only in patients with OBI but also those with overt HBV infections. Further studies should be conducted[44].

DIAGNOSIS

Several methods using liver tissue, DNA extracts from liver or blood, or other serologic markers such as anti-HBc IgG have been used to diagnose OBI. The gold standard for OBI diagnosis is the detection of HBV DNA in the DNA extraction from the liver, as cccDNA persists in the hepatocytes and HBV DNA is sometimes detected in the liver in the absence of HBV DNA in the serum. However, obtaining liver tissue is an invasive procedure; therefore, obtaining hepatic HBV DNA is difficult in clinical practice. In addition, real-time PCR-based assays for serum (or plasma) HBV DNA detection have been used with sufficient sensitivity to detect OBI in many cases; hence, serum HBV DNA assays are widely used to diagnose OBI[8].

DNA should be extracted from samples using the most efficient procedure. A higher rate of HBV DNA detection has been obtained with snap-frozen liver tissue than with paraffin-embedded liver tissue. When a blood sample is used, at least 1 mL of serum should be collected to improve the sensitivity of the test. DNA extracts should be amplified by highly sensitive nested PCR or by a real-time PCR technique that can detect fewer than 10 copies of HBV DNA using the oligonucleotide primers specific for different HBV genomic regions and complementary to highly conserved nucleotide sequences. Appropriate negative and positive controls should be included in each PCR experiment. In addition, periodic testing for HBV DNA will improve diagnosis of OBI especially in high-risk patients, as intermittent viremia can occur in occult HBV infection[8,18,21,22,45].

When highly sensitive HBV DNA testing cannot be performed, anti-HBc could be used as a possible surrogate marker for identifying potential seropositive OBI in cases of blood and organ donation or those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. In this case, seronegative OBI or false-negative anti-HBc in an immunocompromised host should also be considered[45].

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Transmission of OBI

Transfusion: Although the risk of HBV transmission through blood transfusion has decreased owing to the development of sensitive and specific diagnostic assays, transfusional transmission of HBV still occurs. Transmission of HBV by transfusion occurs in 3 situations: (1) blood from a donor with OBI; (2) blood from patients in the infectious window period of HBV infection; or (3) blood from a donor infected with S-escape mutant HBV infection not detected by the routinely used diagnostic HBsAg assay. The prevalence of OBI in blood donors is variable depending on the geographic area, and is higher in HBV endemic areas[46]. In an Australian study analyzing 2673521 blood donors, the incidence of OBI was approximately 5.55 per 100000 donors compared to the 1.06 per 100000 donors with an acute serologic window period infections[47]. In China, the pooled prevalence of OBI among donors was 0.094%[48]. In Europe, OBIs are detected in 1:2000 to 1:20000 samples donated[45,49-52].

The infectivity of OBI by transfusion is determined not only by the viral load or the volume of plasma but also by the HBV serological status (anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs). The risk of HBV transmission may depend on the presence of anti-HBsAb. Among occult HBV-infected donors, those with high anti-HBs levels (recovered) are unlikely to transmit the infection, whereas those without anti-HBs (anti-HBc only) may transmit the infection[53,54]. However, the infectivity of anti-HBs-containing blood components in immunodeficient or immunosuppressed recipients has not been systematically explored. Considering that immunocompromised hosts represent a substantial proportion of transfusion recipients, caution should be exercised when anti-HBc-positive blood is transfused to immunocompromised recipients, even when anti-HBs positive[45,54].

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for donor screening detects HBV infection in the window period (before the appearance of HBsAg) as well as OBI, indicating the presence of HBV DNA in the absence of HBsAg. Therefore, the introduction of NAT has further decreased the risk of HBV transmission through blood transfusion. However, cost effectiveness and availability of NAT should be considered before clinical application. Where HBV DNA testing is not available, such as in developing countries, testing for anti-HBc is strongly recommended[8,45,55].

Organ transplantation: OBI in a transplantation donor is important because there is a risk of HBV transmission from an OBI-seropositive donor, and severe HBV reactivation can occur in some of these cases during immunosuppression. As the hepatocytes are the reservoir of HBV cccDNA, the rate of transmission is higher in orthotopic liver transplantation compared to other organ transplantations such as kidney, bone marrow, and heart[25,56]. The transmission of HBV infection from HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive (considered OBI) donors to recipients were reported at a rate of 17%-94%[57-59]. Because of this high risk of transmission, prophylaxis is recommended to prevent HBV reactivation. Although not directly compared in randomized controlled trials, the combination of antiviral and hepatitis B immunoglobulin seems to be superior to treatment with antiviral or hepatitis B immunoglobulin monotherapies as prophylaxis. Lamivudine is the most widely used antiviral, and studies using newer antivirals such as entecavir, adefovir, and tenofovir are few[57]. It is uncertain whether OBI is transmitted from HBV-seronegative donors.

OBI in liver transplant recipients is also important. The etiology of de novo HBV infection after liver transplantation was traced to OBI in both donors and recipients[60].

Hemodialysis: Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of parenterally transmitted infections because they are in an immunosuppressed state and exposed to invasive procedures, share the same dialysis machine, and receive more transfusions than the general population. The relatively low acceptance and response rates to the HBV vaccine among dialysis patients also likely contributes to OBI transmission in hemodialysis patients[55,61]. The prevalence of OBI in hemodialysis patients varies from 0% to 54% according to the diagnostic techniques or HBV endemicity[62,63], and several studies suggest that OBI could be a source of viral spread both to other patients and staff within the hemodialysis units[61,62]. Therefore, patients and staff need HBV vaccine boosts to maintain levels of protective antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). Strict dialysis-specific infection-control programs, including avoidance of dialyzer reuse and use of dedicated dialysis rooms and machines, should be implemented. Staff for infected patients should be educated on preventive method to limit HBV transmission within dialysis units. Furthermore, regular screening for HBV DNA with sensitive PCR-based assays in all dialysis patients should be considered, and more attention should be given to patients who receive immunosuppressant drugs after renal transplantation[62,64].

Pregnancy and OBI transmission: Kwon et al[65] studied the possibility of transmission of OBI to the fetus in 202 healthy pregnant women. Among these, six (3%) women were OBI positive. When cord blood of 4 of these 6 women was evaluated for HBV DNA, all were HBV-DNA negative. This result suggests that vertical transmission through the cord blood is negligible, but this needs to be investigated further[65].

Reactivation

HBV reactivation after systemic chemotherapy was first reported in the mid 1970’s, and thereafter, HBV reactivation has been reported not only in HBsAg-positive patients but also in OBI patients[35,66]. Although, reactivation in OBI occurs more rarely than in HBsAg positive patients, HBV reactivation is quite a frequent event in immunocompromised OBI patients when including not only symptomatic hepatitis but also HBsAg re-seroconversion in the reactivation of OBI[66-68]. This finding is clinically important because it can be associated with liver dysfunction, sometimes causing life-threatening fulminant hepatic failure, and often requires interruption of chemotherapy[20,69]. The underlying mechanism of reactivation is thought that chemotherapy induced immunosuppressive state triggers rapid viral replication because of the loss of the immunological control. After immune system reconstitution, cytotoxic T-cell-mediated hepatocyte injury may occur, leading to the development of hepatic inflammation and concomitant hepatic necrosis.

Hematological malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, liver transplantation from anti-HBc positive donors, and treatment with anti-CD20 (rituximab) seem to be the factors associated with the highest risk of OBI reactivation[25,70-73]. Other immunosuppressive conditions, including HIV infection, kidney or bone marrow transplantation, systemic chemotherapy, and rheumatologic diseases or inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological agents or high-dose steroids for prolonged treatment, also have been reported as possible causes of viral reactivation in OBI patients[37].

While prophylactic antiviral treatment to prevent reactivation is well established in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapies, its use in OBI patients is debatable[25,70]. In highly endemic areas, 20% of cancer patients have been reported to be HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc positive[74]; thus, prophylactic antiviral use for all OBI patients is unlikely to be cost-effective[68]. On the contrary, delayed treatment with an antiviral may be fatal, and frequent monitoring for reactivation in OBI patients is sometimes difficult. Therefore, use of antivirals is recommended for OBI patients with highest risk of reactivation (previously suggested) regardless of HBV DNA presence and when HBV DNA monitoring is unavailable in routine practice[70,73,75,76]. HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc-positive patients with undetectable or low levels of HBV DNA without highest risk of reactivation should be carefully monitored using alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA levels, with adequate intervals before and during immunosuppressive treatments, and also for several months after stopping treatment. In this case, antiviral treatment should be started as soon as HBV reactivation is detected, before ALT level elevation, since the objective of this strict surveillance is to identify HBV reactivation early before liver injury to prevent acute hepatitis[68,75]. Among antivirals, lamivudine seems to be effective in patients with no or very low serum HBV DNA levels[77]. More potent nucleoside analogues should be chosen when reactivation is confirmed or lamivudine resistance is suggested[73]. Currently, there is no consensus about the optimal duration of preventive antiviral therapy[78]. However, several reports suggest the start of prophylaxis 1-2 wk before the start of immunosuppressive therapy and prolonged antiviral therapy at least 6-12 mo after completion of chemo- or immunotherapy to prevent delayed reactivation of HBV[79,80]. However, further studies should be performed to determine the optimal duration of treatment.

Progression of chronic liver disease

It has been shown that HBV genomes may persist for a long time in the liver, inducing mild necro-inflammation in patients after complete clinical recovery from acute self-limited hepatitis B[81]. An in vivo study of a woodchuck model showed similar results; animals that recovered from acute woodchuck hepatitis virus (the rodent HBV-like hepadnavirus) showed lifelong existence of viruses replicating at low levels, inducing mild persistent liver necroinflammation[82]. These results suggest the role of OBI in the progression of chronic liver disease, and there has been much interest in the clinical impact of OBI, both as a mono-infection and as co-infection with HCV, on the course of chronic liver disease.

As HBV and HCV share the same transmission route, OBI is highly prevalent in patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis. Thus, many cross-sectional studies investigated the influence of OBI on the outcome of chronic hepatitis C. Previous studies showed OBI as a risk factor for more severe liver disease[26,83]; however, the cross-sectional nature of most of these studies could have biased patient selection. A recent longitudinal Italian cohort study by Squadrito et al[84] showed that among chronic hepatitis C patients, patients with OBI had higher risk of progression to cirrhosis, development of HCC, and increased risk of liver-related death compared to OBI-negative patients[84]. Other studies additionally showed the association of ALT level flares with detection of HBV DNA in HCV-OBI co-infected patients, indicating that transient HBV reactivation might be involved in liver injury in these patients[85,86]. A recent meta-analysis of both OBI mono-infection and co-infection with HCV showed that OBI is associated with chronic liver disease, with an overall 8.9-fold increased risk compared to individuals without OBI. Subgroup analysis comparing HCV-positive and -negative subjects showed that HCV-positive as well as HCV-negative patients (cryptogenic liver disease) had increased risk for chronic liver disease[87].

Conclusively, when OBI is present with HCV or with other chronic liver diseases, hepatic inflammation induced by a mild immune response to OBI may accelerate liver injury. In most healthy subjects under immune control, it is not determined yet whether OBI can cause clinically relevant hepatic damage[70,88].

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence

HBV infection is known to be one of the most important risk factors in the development of HCC. Although the mechanism by which HBV infection causes HCC is not completely known, HBV causes HCC both indirectly and directly. HBV infection causes hepatic inflammation, regeneration, and fibrosis associated with cirrhosis, which indirectly contribute to HCC development. In a direct pathway, HBV integrates into the host genomes, produces proteins with pro-oncogenic activities, such as X protein and mutant preS-S proteins, and causes genetic and epigenetic alterations that may directly induce hepatocyte transformation[89,90].

Considering that OBI is characterized by intrahepatic persistence of viral cccDNA, OBI can be a risk factor for HCC development in a similar way. In epidemiologic studies, a significantly higher prevalence of OBI was observed in HCV-positive HCC patients than in HCV-positive populations without HCC. Similar results were reported in the HCV-negative patients with cryptogenic liver disease or alcoholic liver disease[37,91-94]. An in vivo experimental study also demonstrated that woodchucks, after serological recovery from acute woodchuck hepatitis virus infections, are at high risk of developing HCC even after apparent clearance of the virus[95]. In prospective studies, the cumulative probability of developing HCC was significantly higher among patients with OBI than among HBV DNA-negative patients, both in the presence[96-99] or absence of HCV infection[100]. In addition, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated that OBI increases the risk of HCC in both HCV and non-HCV infected patients[101].

Although these results support the idea that OBI is a risk factor for HCC, caution should be exercised during interpretation[102]. First, as most of the study subjects had chronic liver disease of various etiologies, these results indicate OBI as a co-carcinogen of HCC in addition to other suggested carcinogens such as previous HBV infection, HCV, or alcohol. The role of OBI per se in the occurrence of HCC should be further investigated. Second, further studies should be performed to confirm the role of OBI in cryptogenic liver disease. Previous studies have considered heterogeneous definitions of cryptogenic liver disease and non-B non-C liver diseases, (e.g., not differentiating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sometimes including alcohol or autoimmune liver disease in cryptogenic liver disease); therefore, it is difficult to interpret the results. Third, several other studies did not find an association between OBI and HCC, and ethnic and epidemiologic differences should be considered in the interpretation of the results[103].

CONCLUSION

OBI, defined as the presence of HBV DNA without detectable HBsAg, has recently gained increasing attention. Although the exact mechanism of OBI has not been determined, OBI can be transmitted, cause reactivation of HBV, and contribute to the development of progressive liver disease and HCC. Thus, physicians should focus on the appropriate management of these patients, and further studies to clarify the clinical significance of OBI are needed.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Abraham P, Komatsu H S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

References
1.  Hoofnagle JH, Seeff LB, Bales ZB, Zimmerman HJ. Type B hepatitis after transfusion with blood containing antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:1379-1383.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
2.  Tabor E, Hoofnagle JH, Smallwood LA, Drucker JA, Pineda-Tamondong GC, Ni LY, Greenwalt TJ, Barker LF, Gerety RJ. Studies of donors who transmit posttransfusion hepatitis. Transfusion. 1979;19:725-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
3.  Grob P, Jilg W, Bornhak H, Gerken G, Gerlich W, Günther S, Hess G, Hüdig H, Kitchen A, Margolis H. Serological pattern “anti-HBc alone”: report on a workshop. J Med Virol. 2000;62:450-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Hu KQ. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and its clinical implications. J Viral Hepat. 2002;9:243-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
5.  Said ZN. An overview of occult hepatitis B virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1927-1938.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Gerlich WH, Bremer C, Saniewski M, Schüttler CG, Wend UC, Willems WR, Glebe D. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: detection and significance. Dig Dis. 2010;28:116-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
7.  Hollinger FB, Sood G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: a covert operation. J Viral Hepat. 2010;17:1-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
8.  Raimondo G, Allain JP, Brunetto MR, Buendia MA, Chen DS, Colombo M, Craxì A, Donato F, Ferrari C, Gaeta GB. Statements from the Taormina expert meeting on occult hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2008;49:652-657.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
9.  Bréchot C, Thiers V, Kremsdorf D, Nalpas B, Pol S, Paterlini-Bréchot P. Persistent hepatitis B virus infection in subjects without hepatitis B surface antigen: clinically significant or purely “occult”? Hepatology. 2001;34:194-203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
10.  Weber B. Diagnostic impact of the genetic variability of the hepatitis B virus surface antigen gene. J Med Virol. 2006;78 Suppl 1:S59-S65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
11.  Ocana S, Casas ML, Buhigas I, Lledo JL. Diagnostic strategy for occult hepatitis B virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1553-1557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
12.  Cheng HR, Kao JH, Wu HL, Chen TC, Tseng TC, Liu CH, Su TH, Chen PJ, Chen DS, Liu CJ. Clinical and virological features of occult hepatitis B in patients with HBsAg seroclearance post-treatment or spontaneously. Liver Int. 2014;34:e71-e79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
13.  Allain JP. Occult hepatitis B virus infection. Transfus Clin Biol. 2004;11:18-25.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
14.  Weber B, Melchior W, Gehrke R, Doerr HW, Berger A, Rabenau H. Hepatitis B virus markers in anti-HBc only positive individuals. J Med Virol. 2001;64:312-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
15.  Urbani S, Fagnoni F, Missale G, Franchini M. The role of anti-core antibody response in the detection of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:23-29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
16.  Loriot MA, Marcellin P, Walker F, Boyer N, Degott C, Randrianatoavina I, Benhamou JP, Erlinger S. Persistence of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum and liver from patients with chronic hepatitis B after loss of HBsAg. J Hepatol. 1997;27:251-258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
17.  Kwak MS, Cho EJ, Jang ES, Lee JH, Yu SJ, Kim YJ, Yoon JH, Lee HS. Predictors of HBsAg seroclearance in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. Digestion. 2011;84 Suppl 1:23-28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
18.  Kim YS. [Definition, diagnosis, and prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013;62:143-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
19.  Torbenson M, Thomas DL. Occult hepatitis B. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:479-486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
20.  Schmeltzer P, Sherman KE. Occult hepatitis B: clinical implications and treatment decisions. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3328-3335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
21.  Samal J, Kandpal M, Vivekanandan P. Molecular mechanisms underlying occult hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:142-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
22.  Conjeevaram HS, Lok AS. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: a hidden menace? Hepatology. 2001;34:204-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
23.  Hollinger FB. Hepatitis B virus infection and transfusion medicine: science and the occult. Transfusion. 2008;48:1001-1026.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
24.  Gutiérrez-García ML, Fernandez-Rodriguez CM, Lledo-Navarro JL, Buhigas-Garcia I. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1538-1542.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
25.  Raimondo G, Caccamo G, Filomia R, Pollicino T. Occult HBV infection. Semin Immunopathol. 2013;35:39-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
26.  Cacciola I, Pollicino T, Squadrito G, Cerenzia G, Orlando ME, Raimondo G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:22-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
27.  Fukuda R, Ishimura N, Niigaki M, Hamamoto S, Satoh S, Tanaka S, Kushiyama Y, Uchida Y, Ihihara S, Akagi S. Serologically silent hepatitis B virus coinfection in patients with hepatitis C virus-associated chronic liver disease: clinical and virological significance. J Med Virol. 1999;58:201-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
28.  Chemin I, Zoulim F, Merle P, Arkhis A, Chevallier M, Kay A, Cova L, Chevallier P, Mandrand B, Trépo C. High incidence of hepatitis B infections among chronic hepatitis cases of unknown aetiology. J Hepatol. 2001;34:447-454.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
29.  Toyoda H, Hayashi K, Murakami Y, Honda T, Katano Y, Nakano I, Goto H, Kumada T, Takamatsu J. Prevalence and clinical implications of occult hepatitis B viral infection in hemophilia patients in Japan. J Med Virol. 2004;73:195-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
30.  Torbenson M, Kannangai R, Astemborski J, Strathdee SA, Vlahov D, Thomas DL. High prevalence of occult hepatitis B in Baltimore injection drug users. Hepatology. 2004;39:51-57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
31.  Karaosmanoglu HK, Aydin OA, Nazlican O. Isolated anti-HBc among HIV-infected patients in Istanbul, Turkey. HIV Clin Trials. 2013;14:17-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
32.  Núñez M, Ríos P, Pérez-Olmeda M, Soriano V. Lack of ‘occult’ hepatitis B virus infection in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2002;16:2099-2101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
33.  Sagnelli E, Pisaturo M, Martini S, Filippini P, Sagnelli C, Coppola N. Clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection in immunosuppressed patients. World J Hepatol. 2014;6:384-393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
34.  Pollicino T, Raffa G, Costantino L, Lisa A, Campello C, Squadrito G, Levrero M, Raimondo G. Molecular and functional analysis of occult hepatitis B virus isolates from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2007;45:277-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
35.  Wands JR, Chura CM, Roll FJ, Maddrey WC. Serial studies of hepatitis-associated antigen and antibody in patients receiving antitumor chemotherapy for myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders. Gastroenterology. 1975;68:105-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
36.  Mason AL, Xu L, Guo L, Kuhns M, Perrillo RP. Molecular basis for persistent hepatitis B virus infection in the liver after clearance of serum hepatitis B surface antigen. Hepatology. 1998;27:1736-1742.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
37.  Raimondo G, Pollicino T, Cacciola I, Squadrito G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2007;46:160-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
38.  Penna A, Artini M, Cavalli A, Levrero M, Bertoletti A, Pilli M, Chisari FV, Rehermann B, Del Prete G, Fiaccadori F. Long-lasting memory T cell responses following self-limited acute hepatitis B. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:1185-1194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
39.  Martin CM, Welge JA, Shire NJ, Shata MT, Sherman KE, Blackard JT. Cytokine expression during chronic versus occult hepatitis B virus infection in HIV co-infected individuals. Cytokine. 2009;47:194-198.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
40.  Guidotti LG, Chisari FV. Noncytolytic control of viral infections by the innate and adaptive immune response. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:65-91.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
41.  Kaur P, Paliwal A, Durantel D, Hainaut P, Scoazec JY, Zoulim F, Chemin I, Herceg Z. DNA methylation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and occult HBV infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:700-704.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
42.  Uchida T, Saitoh T, Shinzawa H. Mutations of the X region of hepatitis B virus and their clinical implications. Pathol Int. 1997;47:183-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
43.  El Chaar M, Candotti D, Crowther RA, Allain JP. Impact of hepatitis B virus surface protein mutations on the diagnosis of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2010;52:1600-1610.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
44.  Besharat S, Katoonizadeh A, Moradi A. Potential mutations associated with occult hepatitis B virus status. Hepat Mon. 2014;14:e15275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
45.  Raimondo G, Pollicino T, Romanò L, Zanetti AR. A 2010 update on occult hepatitis B infection. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2010;58:254-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
46.  Liu CJ, Lo SC, Kao JH, Tseng PT, Lai MY, Ni YH, Yeh SH, Chen PJ, Chen DS. Transmission of occult hepatitis B virus by transfusion to adult and pediatric recipients in Taiwan. J Hepatol. 2006;44:39-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
47.  Kiely P, Margaritis AR, Seed CR, Yang H. Hepatitis B virus nucleic acid amplification testing of Australian blood donors highlights the complexity of confirming occult hepatitis B virus infection. Transfusion. 2014;54:2084-2091.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
48.  Liu GC, Sui GY, Liu GY, Zheng Y, Deng Y, Gao YY, Wang L. A Bayesian meta-analysis on prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among Chinese volunteer blood donors. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
49.  Velati C, Romanò L, Fomiatti L, Baruffi L, Zanetti AR. Impact of nucleic acid testing for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus on the safety of blood supply in Italy: a 6-year survey. Transfusion. 2008;48:2205-2213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
50.  Brojer E, Grabarczyk P, Liszewski G, Mikulska M, Allain JP, Letowska M. Characterization of HBV DNA+/HBsAg- blood donors in Poland identified by triplex NAT. Hepatology. 2006;44:1666-1674.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
51.  Candotti D, Grabarczyk P, Ghiazza P, Roig R, Casamitjana N, Iudicone P, Schmidt M, Bird A, Crookes R, Brojer E. Characterization of occult hepatitis B virus from blood donors carrying genotype A2 or genotype D strains. J Hepatol. 2008;49:537-547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
52.  Allain JP, Belkhiri D, Vermeulen M, Crookes R, Cable R, Amiri A, Reddy R, Bird A, Candotti D. Characterization of occult hepatitis B virus strains in South African blood donors. Hepatology. 2009;49:1868-1876.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
53.  Allain JP, Reesink HW, Lucey C. A European perspective on the management of donors and units testing positive for hepatitis B virus DNA. Transfusion. 2006;46:1256-1258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
54.  Candotti D, Allain JP. Transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2009;51:798-809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
55.  Song SH, Hwang SG. [Occult hepatitis B virus infection: transmission and reactivation]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013;62:148-153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
56.  Mahboobi N, Tabatabaei SV, Blum HE, Alavian SM. Renal grafts from anti-hepatitis B core-positive donors: a quantitative review of the literature. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14:445-451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
57.  Samuel D, Forns X, Berenguer M, Trautwein C, Burroughs A, Rizzetto M, Trepo C. Report of the monothematic EASL conference on liver transplantation for viral hepatitis (Paris, France, January 12-14, 2006). J Hepatol. 2006;45:127-143.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
58.  Chazouillères O, Mamish D, Kim M, Carey K, Ferrell L, Roberts JP, Ascher NL, Wright TL. “Occult” hepatitis B virus as source of infection in liver transplant recipients. Lancet. 1994;343:142-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
59.  Dickson RC, Everhart JE, Lake JR, Wei Y, Seaberg EC, Wiesner RH, Zetterman RK, Pruett TL, Ishitani MB, Hoofnagle JH. Transmission of hepatitis B by transplantation of livers from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:1668-1674.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
60.  Roche B, Samuel D, Gigou M, Feray C, Virot V, Schmets L, David MF, Arulnaden JL, Bismuth A, Reynes M. De novo and apparent de novo hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 1997;26:517-526.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
61.  Motta JS, Mello FC, Lago BV, Perez RM, Gomes SA, Figueiredo FF. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and lamivudine-resistant mutations in isolates from renal patients undergoing hemodialysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:101-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
62.  Minuk GY, Sun DF, Greenberg R, Zhang M, Hawkins K, Uhanova J, Gutkin A, Bernstein K, Giulivi A, Osiowy C. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in a North American adult hemodialysis patient population. Hepatology. 2004;40:1072-1077.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
63.  Yoo JH, Hwang SG, Yang DH, Son MS, Kwon CI, Ko KH, Hong SP, Park PW, Rim KS. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013;61:209-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
64.  Hepatitis surveillance report no 41. Hepatitis-control measures for hepatitis B in dialysis centers. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC; 1977;12-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
65.  Kwon CI, Hwang SG, Shin SJ, Chang SW, Kim SY, Ko KH, Hong SP, Park PW, Rim KS, Kang MS. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in pregnant woman and its clinical implication. Liver Int. 2008;28:667-674.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
66.  Kusumoto S, Tanaka Y, Mizokami M, Ueda R. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus following systemic chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma. Int J Hematol. 2009;90:13-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
67.  Onozawa M, Hashino S, Izumiyama K, Kahata K, Chuma M, Mori A, Kondo T, Toyoshima N, Ota S, Kobayashi S. Progressive disappearance of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibody and reverse seroconversion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with previous hepatitis B virus infection. Transplantation. 2005;79:616-619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
68.  Yeo W, Johnson PJ. Diagnosis, prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during anticancer therapy. Hepatology. 2006;43:209-220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
69.  Coppola N, Tonziello G, Pisaturo M, Messina V, Guastafierro S, Fiore M, Iodice V, Sagnelli C, Stanzione M, Capoluongo N. Reactivation of overt and occult hepatitis B infection in various immunosuppressive settings. J Med Virol. 2011;83:1909-1916.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
70.  Squadrito G, Spinella R, Raimondo G. The clinical significance of occult HBV infection. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27:15-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
71.  Pei SN, Chen CH, Lee CM, Wang MC, Ma MC, Hu TH, Kuo CY. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus following rituximab-based regimens: a serious complication in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients. Ann Hematol. 2010;89:255-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
72.  Yeo W, Chan TC, Leung NW, Lam WY, Mo FK, Chu MT, Chan HL, Hui EP, Lei KI, Mok TS. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in lymphoma patients with prior resolved hepatitis B undergoing anticancer therapy with or without rituximab. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:605-611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
73.  Raimondo G, Filomia R, Maimone S. Therapy of occult hepatitis B virus infection and prevention of reactivation. Intervirology. 2014;57:189-195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
74.  Liang RH, Lok AS, Lai CL, Chan TK, Todd D, Chiu EK. Hepatitis B infection in patients with lymphomas. Hematol Oncol. 1990;8:261-270.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
75.  European Association For The Study Of The Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50:227-242.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
76.  Barclay S, Pol S, Mutimer D, Benhamou Y, Mills PR, Hayes PC, Cameron S, Carman W. The management of chronic hepatitis B in the immunocompromised patient: recommendations from a single topic meeting. J Clin Virol. 2008;41:243-254.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
77.  Chen FW, Coyle L, Jones BE, Pattullo V. Entecavir versus lamivudine for hepatitis B prophylaxis in patients with haematological disease. Liver Int. 2013;33:1203-1210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
78.  Shouval D, Shibolet O. Immunosuppression and HBV reactivation. Semin Liver Dis. 2013;33:167-177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
79.  Hui CK, Cheung WW, Au WY, Lie AK, Zhang HY, Yueng YH, Wong BC, Leung N, Kwong YL, Liang R. Hepatitis B reactivation after withdrawal of pre-emptive lamivudine in patients with haematological malignancy on completion of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Gut. 2005;54:1597-1603.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
80.  Dai MS, Chao TY, Kao WY, Shyu RY, Liu TM. Delayed hepatitis B virus reactivation after cessation of preemptive lamivudine in lymphoma patients treated with rituximab plus CHOP. Ann Hematol. 2004;83:769-774.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
81.  Yuki N, Nagaoka T, Yamashiro M, Mochizuki K, Kaneko A, Yamamoto K, Omura M, Hikiji K, Kato M. Long-term histologic and virologic outcomes of acute self-limited hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2003;37:1172-1179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
82.  Mulrooney-Cousins PM, Michalak TI. Persistent occult hepatitis B virus infection: experimental findings and clinical implications. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:5682-5686.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
83.  Sagnelli E, Coppola N, Scolastico C, Mogavero AR, Filippini P, Piccinino F. HCV genotype and “silent” HBV coinfection: two main risk factors for a more severe liver disease. J Med Virol. 2001;64:350-355.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
84.  Squadrito G, Cacciola I, Alibrandi A, Pollicino T, Raimondo G. Impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection on the outcome of chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2013;59:696-700.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
85.  Selim HS, Abou-Donia HA, Taha HA, El Azab GI, Bakry AF. Role of occult hepatitis B virus in chronic hepatitis C patients with flare of liver enzymes. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22:187-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
86.  Kannangai R, Vivekanandan P, Netski D, Mehta S, Kirk GD, Thomas DL, Torbenson M. Liver enzyme flares and occult hepatitis B in persons with chronic hepatitis C infection. J Clin Virol. 2007;39:101-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
87.  Covolo L, Pollicino T, Raimondo G, Donato F. Occult hepatitis B virus and the risk for chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:238-244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
88.  Raimondo G, Pollicino T, Squadrito G. What is the clinical impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection? Lancet. 2005;365:638-640.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
89.  Pollicino T, Saitta C, Raimondo G. Hepatocellular carcinoma: the point of view of the hepatitis B virus. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:1122-1132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
90.  Di Bisceglie AM. Hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49:S56-S60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
91.  Yotsuyanagi H, Hashidume K, Suzuki M, Maeyama S, Takayama T, Uchikoshi T. Role of hepatitis B virus in hepatocarcinogenesis in alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:181S-185S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
92.  Uetake S, Yamauchi M, Itoh S, Kawashima O, Takeda K, Ohata M. Analysis of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HBs antigen- and anti-HCV antibody-negative alcoholic cirrhosis: clinical significance of prior hepatitis B virus infection. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27:47S-51S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
93.  Sheu JC, Huang GT, Shih LN, Lee WC, Chou HC, Wang JT, Lee PH, Lai MY, Wang CY, Yang PM. Hepatitis C and B viruses in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:1322-1327.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
94.  Huang X, Hollinger FB. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. J Viral Hepat. 2014;21:153-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
95.  Korba BE, Wells FV, Baldwin B, Cote PJ, Tennant BC, Popper H, Gerin JL. Hepatocellular carcinoma in woodchuck hepatitis virus-infected woodchucks: presence of viral DNA in tumor tissue from chronic carriers and animals serologically recovered from acute infections. Hepatology. 1989;9:461-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
96.  Squadrito G, Pollicino T, Cacciola I, Caccamo G, Villari D, La Masa T, Restuccia T, Cucinotta E, Scisca C, Magazzu D. Occult hepatitis B virus infection is associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C patients. Cancer. 2006;106:1326-1330.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
97.  Miura Y, Shibuya A, Adachi S, Takeuchi A, Tsuchihashi T, Nakazawa T, Saigenji K. Occult hepatitis B virus infection as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C in whom viral eradication fails. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:546-556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
98.  Matsuoka S, Nirei K, Tamura A, Nakamura H, Matsumura H, Oshiro S, Arakawa Y, Yamagami H, Tanaka N, Moriyama M. Influence of occult hepatitis B virus coinfection on the incidence of fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C. Intervirology. 2008;51:352-361.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
99.  Obika M, Shinji T, Fujioka S, Terada R, Ryuko H, Lwin AA, Shiraha H, Koide N. Hepatitis B virus DNA in liver tissue and risk for hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease. A prospective study. Intervirology. 2008;51:59-68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
100.  Ikeda K, Kobayashi M, Someya T, Saitoh S, Hosaka T, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Arase Y, Kumada H. Occult hepatitis B virus infection increases hepatocellular carcinogenesis by eight times in patients with non-B, non-C liver cirrhosis: a cohort study. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16:437-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
101.  Shi Y, Wu YH, Wu W, Zhang WJ, Yang J, Chen Z. Association between occult hepatitis B infection and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2012;32:231-240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
102.  Lee JJ, Kwon OS. [Occult hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma]. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2013;62:160-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
103.  Lok AS, Everhart JE, Di Bisceglie AM, Kim HY, Hussain M, Morgan TR. Occult and previous hepatitis B virus infection are not associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in United States patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2011;54:434-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]