Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2019; 11(2): 234-241
Published online Feb 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.234
Acute portal vein thrombosis after liver transplant presenting with subtle ultrasound abnormalities: A case report and literature review
Thomas Couri, Carla Harmath, Talia Baker, Anjana Pillai
Thomas Couri, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
Carla Harmath, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
Talia Baker, Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
Anjana Pillai, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
ORCID number: Thomas Couri (0000-0002-1610-8978); Talia Baker (0000-0002-0561-8497); Anjana Pillai (0000-0001-6783-2109).
Author contributions: Couri T and Pillai A designed the report; Couri T and Harmath C collected the patient’s data; Harmath C, Baker T, and Pillai A provided critical revision of the report; Couri T and Pillai A wrote the report.
Informed consent statement: Consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Thomas Couri, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. thomas.couri@uchospitals.edu
Telephone: +1-773-7021000 Fax: +1-773-7022230
Received: October 7, 2018
Peer-review started: October 7, 2018
First decision: November 15, 2018
Revised: November 27, 2018
Accepted: December 12, 2018
Article in press: December 13, 2018
Published online: February 27, 2019

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver transplantation (LT) is an uncommon complication with potential for significant morbidity and mortality that transplant providers should be cognizant of. Recognizing subtle changes in post-operative ultrasounds that could herald but do not definitively diagnose PVT is paramount.

CASE SUMMARY

A 30-year-old female with a history of alcohol-related cirrhosis presented with painless jaundice and received a deceased donor orthotopic liver transplant. On the first two days post-operatively, her liver Doppler ultrasounds showed a patent portal vein, increased hepatic arterial diastolic flows, and reduced hepatic arterial resistive indices. She was asymptomatic with improving labs. On post-operative day three, her resistive indices declined further, and computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a large extra-hepatic PVT. The patient then underwent emergent percutaneous venography with tissue plasminogen activator administration, angioplasty, and stent placement. Aspirin was started to prevent stent thrombosis. Follow-up ultrasounds showed a patent portal vein and improved hepatic arterial resistive indices. Her graft function improved to normal by discharge. Although decreased hepatic artery resistive indices and increased diastolic flows on ultrasound are often associated with hepatic arterial stenosis post-LT, PVT can also cause these findings.

CONCLUSION

Reduced hepatic arterial resistive indices on ultrasound can signify PVT post-LT, and thrombolysis, angioplasty, and stent placement are efficacious treatments.

Key Words: Portal vein thrombosis, Portal vein stent, Liver transplant, Case report

Core tip: Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver transplant is uncommon but can cause significant morbidity and mortality. PVT can present with subtle ultrasound abnormalities in the hepatic artery, such as decreased resistive indices and increased diastolic flows, in the absence of frank thrombosis in the portal vein. Long term portal vein patency has been seen with percutaneous thrombolysis, angioplasty, and stent placement as treatment.



INTRODUCTION

Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after liver transplantation (LT) is an uncommon yet consequential complication with potential for significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of PVT after LT varies, however most case series report occurrences in 1%-3% of patients[1-4]. Similarly, presentations of this condition vary, with case reports documenting abnormalities in liver function tests to signs of portal hypertension as initial signs of PVT[1,3,4]. While the diagnosis can often be readily made with ultrasound, recognizing subtle changes in routine post-operative ultrasounds that herald but do not definitively diagnose portal venous abnormalities is paramount. Furthermore, no rigorous studies have determined the most optimal treatment for PVT post-LT. We report a case of acute PVT post-LT in a patient who developed subtle vascular changes on serial ultrasounds. The patient required percutaneous thrombolysis, angioplasty, and ultimately stenting of the portal vein, a rarely reported treatment for acute PVT after LT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old woman presented to an outside hospital with painless jaundice. She had no other complaints. Her past medical history was notable for alcohol use disorder. She had no prior surgeries, was not on any medications, had no allergies, and denied cigarette or illegal drug use. She had no family history of liver disease. She was then transferred to our institution for consideration for LT.

At our institution, her vital signs were notable for fever, tachycardia, and hypotension. On physical exam, she appeared diffusely jaundiced and confused. She was oriented to person but not to time or place, and she was noted to have asterixis. Her abdomen was non-tender but distended, and a fluid wave was present. She had scleral icterus, numerous spider angiomata on her chest, and 3+ bilateral lower extremity edema. Her initial laboratories are found in Table 1. She had a MELD-Na score of 44 and a Maddrey’s discriminant function of 105.5. In addition, she had a negative work-up for acute viral hepatitis, Wilson’s disease, and autoimmune hepatitis. She was cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG positive but IgM negative. A liver MRI with and without contrast was notable for a cirrhotic appearing liver without evidence of PVT. She was ultimately diagnosed with alcoholic hepatitis with underlying alcohol cirrhosis.

Table 1 Presenting laboratories.
LaboratoryResult
White blood cell count (cells/mm3)54.5
Hemoglobin (g/dL)7.0
Platelet count (cells/mm3)76
Creatinine (mg/dL)2.3
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)52
Sodium (mmol/L)143
Potassium (mmol/L)4.8
Protein (g/dL)5.0
Albumin (g/dL)3.2
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)30.1
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)215
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)37
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L)178
International normalized ratio2.7

She was evaluated and subsequently listed for LT at our center. On the third day of admission, she received a CMV donor positive deceased donor orthotopic liver transplant. The operation was described as uneventful with no technical complications.

On post-operative day (POD) #1 her clinical condition improved with successful weaning of her vasopressor and ventilator support. Liver doppler ultrasound showed a patent portal vein in the hilar region, with hepatopetal flow, but low velocity at 12 cm/s (normal 16-40 cm/s)[5]. The hepatic arteries were patent, with high diastolic flows and resultant low resistive indices in the right and left hepatic arteries (0.35-0.44, normal 0.55-0.7), shown in Figure 1[5]. Her post-operative laboratories are listed in Table 2.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Liver ultrasound with doppler demonstrating increased diastolic flows (red arrow) and reduced resistive indices (noted to be 0. 44 in the upper right corner, red oval) of the right posterior hepatic artery.
Table 2 Relevant laboratories during the patient’s hospital course.
Labs1 d before LTPOD0POD1POD2POD3POD4POD10POD17
AST (U/L)14216326412474702116
ALT (U/L)33321921621251153017
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL)28.124.66.24.85.04.62.00.9
INR2.62.81.71.61.31.31.11.2
AP (U/L)1331255884116179147128

A follow-up POD #3 liver doppler ultrasound demonstrated a patent main portal vein with appropriate flow direction. The flow velocity was lower than expected at 14 cm/s. The left portal vein demonstrated reversal of flow (hepatofugal) which was new. Hepatic arterial waveforms exhibited increased diastolic flows, and the resistive indices declined further, to 0.38-0.40.

Given the persistency of the abnormal hepatic arterial wave forms and new reversal of flow in the left portal vein, further evaluation of the transplant vasculature was performed with computed tomography (CT) of her abdomen and pelvis with and without contrast. The CT showed unremarkable arterial anatomy and non-opacification of a long extra-hepatic segment of the portal vein, shown in Figure 2, indicating acute PVT.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Contrast enhanced venous phase computed tomography abdomen coronal image with red arrow and bracket showing non-opacification of the portal vein, indicating thrombosis.

The patient then underwent emergent percutaneous venography. Figure 3 shows her pre-intervention venography, notable for PVT. Eight milligrams of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were injected at the thrombus site, angioplasty was performed with a 12 mm x 40 mm balloon, and an uncovered 14 mm x 40 mm stent was deployed in the main portal vein, which successfully eradicated the PVT. In addition, coils were deployed into the inferior mesenteric vein to prevent hepatofugal shunting of blood flow (Figure 4). The patient was also started on aspirin 81 mg once daily to prevent stent thrombosis.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Pre-intervention venography, with the blue arrow denoting the beginning of the patient’s portal vein thrombosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Post-intervention venography, with the red arrow showing recanalization of the portal vein and the uncovered stent, and the blue arrow indicating the coils placed in the inferior mesenteric vein.

This patient’s follow-up ultrasound showed a patent portal vein with visualization of hilar and retropancreatic segments and normalization of the flow and direction of the left portal vein and velocities. The hepatic resistive indices improved significantly. Her graft function improved to normal by time of discharge (Table 2).

MULTIDISCIPLINARY EXPERT CONSULTATION

Interventional radiology, transplant surgery, and hepatology.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Acute PVT.

TREATMENT

Tissue plasminogen activator administration, angioplasty, portal vein stent placement, and aspirin.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Successful eradication of PVT and normal graft function with improved hepatic resistive indices at discharge.

DISCUSSION

Reports of acute PVT post-LT typically state an incidence rate of 1%-3%, however one case series of adult and pediatric patients documented an incidence of 5.7%[2-4]. While PVT in this scenario can present with hepatic enzyme abnormalities, relying on laboratory derangements to screen for PVT in the acute post-operative period is unreliable given that hepatic enzyme laboratories are often abnormal during this time. PVT post-LT can also present with sequelae of portal hypertension, including ascites, variceal formation, and hemorrhage[1]. Graft failure and re-transplantation, although rare, have been reported in cases of acute PVT post-LT[1,2].

Prevalence rates vary for PVT in other populations, with one study reporting a prevalence rate of 1.0% in the general population at time of autopsy, and other studies documenting PVT in 1.0%-26.0% of patients with cirrhosis[6-10]. Risk factors for PVT include hypercoagulable states (such as malignancy or genetic defects), LT, increased portal vein resistance, and decreased portal vein flow[11-17]. PVT can be classified several different ways, including according to the degree of portal vein occlusion, whether it is acute or chronic, its anatomic extent, and whether it is associated with cavernoma formation[18-20].

Because of the potential ramifications of vascular complications post-LT (including both PVT and hepatic artery stenosis or thrombosis), routine serial ultrasounds in the immediate post-operative period are often employed after LT based on surgical practice. The high diastolic flows and low resistive indices seen in the patient’s hepatic arteries were the first clues that portal venous dysfunction may have been present. PVT is a known etiology of decreased hepatic artery resistive index (RI)[21]. Resistive index is the difference between the peak systolic and end diastolic velocities divided by the peak systolic velocity, and low RI is defined as < 0.55[5]. The mechanism of reduced RI in PVT is explained by the disparate dual blood supply to the liver. If thrombosis occurs within the portal vein, the hepatic artery must compensate and supply more blood to the liver; in order to increase perfusion through the hepatic artery, resistance must decrease, which is accomplished by increasing hepatic arterial diastolic flow[5]. The sensitivity and specificity for these findings in PVT are sub-optimal and vary, ranging from 73%-83% and 60%-73%, respectively[22]. While the hepatic arterial abnormalities seen on this patient’s ultrasound can often indicate hepatic artery stenosis, noticeable arterial narrowing was not visualized on the patient’s ultrasounds or CT scan. The sonographic findings were initially presumed to be due to her recent post-operative status and possible arterial anastomotic edema given her clinical improvement and lack of stenoses and/or thromboses seen in the hepatic arteries or portal veins on ultrasound.

Further workup during her first two PODs, such as an angiogram or CT scan, was not performed due to her continued clinical improvement, including improvement of her liver synthetic function as noted in the INR trend on Table 2. CT scan without an angiogram component was ultimately performed because of the newly discovered hepatofugal flow of the left hepatic vein on POD #3 which was concerning for PVT.

While no inherited hypercoagulability testing was done for this patient as her PVT was presumed to be secondary to the hypercoagulable state of surgery and because LT is a known risk factor for PVT, case reports exist documenting PVT in the setting of acute CMV infection in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients, likely due to local inflammation and the development of anti-phospholipid antibodies[23-27]. Although pre-LT testing confirmed that the patient was not actively infected with CMV and had immunity, the donor was CMV IgG positive. Transplant providers should be aware of the association between PVT and CMV, particularly in CMV donor positive/recipient negative patients and in the setting of immunosup-pression.

The sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound diagnosis of PVT are better than the aforementioned secondary hepatic artery findings, with estimates of 80%-100% for both parameters[18]. However, the Doppler exams for this patient were falsely negative for PVT, showing main portal vein patency in the hilar region. This may have been because the entire portal vein is not always visualized on the ultrasound, due to artifact from bowel gas and/or lack of adequate window on immediate postoperative days. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report post-LT that details these ultrasound findings as the presenting signs of acute PVT.

Anticoagulation is generally recommended for patients diagnosed with acute PVT even though there are no randomized controlled trials assessing this intervention. Early anticoagulation has been shown to lead to higher recanalization rates and prevent intestinal infarction compared to no anticoagulation, however it is unknown if these data apply to post-LT patients[28]. Of note, no rigorous studies have assessed the efficacy of thrombolysis, angioplasty, and stent placement in patients with PVT, although rare case reports exist documenting these treatments after liver transplant with long term portal vein patency[1,20,29,30].

CONCLUSION

Acute PVT is a rare and serious complication of LT. While ultrasound has a sensitivity and specificity between 80%-100% for diagnosing PVT, false negative results can occur; subtle findings on ultrasound, however, such as high diastolic flows and low resistive indices, can indicate that PVT may be present. A low threshold to perform more accurate diagnostic imaging should be employed if these ultrasound abnormalities are seen. Thrombolysis, angioplasty, and portal venous stent placement, although rare, have been successfully implemented as treatment for PVT post-LT. The optimal follow-up imaging regimen and anti-platelet or anticoagulation regimen is unknown and warrants further investigation.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B, B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

CARE Checklist (2013): The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2013), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2013).

P- Reviewer: Farshadpour F, Gencdal G, Kim SH, Mukherjee S S- Editor: Ma YJ L- Editor: A E- Editor: Zhang YL

References
1.  Cherukuri R, Haskal ZJ, Naji A, Shaked A. Percutaneous thrombolysis and stent placement for the treatment of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation: long-term follow-up. Transplantation. 1998;65:1124-1126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Itri JN, Heller MT, Tublin ME. Hepatic transplantation: postoperative complications. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:1300-1333.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Wozney P, Zajko AB, Bron KM, Point S, Starzl TE. Vascular complications after liver transplantation: a 5-year experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147:657-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 313]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 201]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Haskal ZJ, Naji A. Treatment of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation with percutaneous thrombolysis and stent placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993;4:789-792.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  McNaughton DA, Abu-Yousef MM. Doppler US of the liver made simple. Radiographics. 2011;31:161-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 9.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Chen H, Turon F, Hernández-Gea V, Fuster J, Garcia-Criado A, Barrufet M, Darnell A, Fondevila C, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Garcia-Pagán JC. Nontumoral portal vein thrombosis in patients awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2016;22:352-365.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Handa P, Crowther M, Douketis JD. Portal vein thrombosis: a clinician-oriented and practical review. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014;20:498-506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Harding DJ, Perera MT, Chen F, Olliff S, Tripathi D. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: Controversies and latest developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:6769-6784.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 9.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Loudin M, Ahn J. Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:579-585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Qi X. Portal Vein Thrombosis: Recent Advance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;906:229-239.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Kinjo N, Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Matsumoto Y, Kamori M, Nagao Y, Hashimoto N, Uehara H, Tomikawa M, Shirabe K, Maehara Y. Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. World J Hepatol. 2014;6:64-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Manzano-Robleda Mdel C, Barranco-Fragoso B, Uribe M, Méndez-Sánchez N. Portal vein thrombosis: what is new? Ann Hepatol. 2015;14:20-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Margini C, Berzigotti A. Portal vein thrombosis: The role of imaging in the clinical setting. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49:113-120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Mantaka A, Augoustaki A, Kouroumalis EA, Samonakis DN. Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic challenges. Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31:315-329.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Parikh S, Shah R, Kapoor P. Portal vein thrombosis. Am J Med. 2010;123:111-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Quarrie R, Stawicki SP. Portal vein thrombosis: What surgeons need to know. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2018;8:73-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Seedial SM, Mouli SK, Desai KR. Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis: Current Trends in Medical and Endovascular Management. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018;35:198-202.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Chawla YK, Bodh V. Portal vein thrombosis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5:22-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Haris M, Thachil J. Portal vein thrombosis - a primer for the general physician. Clin Med (Lond). 2017;17:212-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Basit SA, Stone CD, Gish R. Portal vein thrombosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2015;19:199-221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Hepatic artery resistance changes in portal vein thrombosis. Radiology. 1995;196:95-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Sanyal R, Zarzour JG, Ganeshan DM, Bhargava P, Lall CG, Little MD. Postoperative doppler evaluation of liver transplants. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014;24:360-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Ladd AM, Goyal R, Rosainz L, Baiocco P, DiFabrizio L. Pulmonary embolism and portal vein thrombosis in an immunocompetent adolescent with acute cytomegalovirus hepatitis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;28:496-499.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Wang T, Kuttikat A, Pulsalkar P, Nanguzgambo A, Bhalara S. Cytomegalovirus-associated portal vein thrombosis in an immunocompetent patient: an underestimated complication. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2015;2015:294-296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Puccia F, Lombardo V, Giannitrapani L, Licata A, Mazzola G, Soresi M. Case report: acute portal vein thrombosis associated with acute cytomegalovirus infection in an immunocompetent adult. J Ultrasound. 2017;20:161-165.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Vael A, Degryse H, Bracke P. Acute Cytomegalovirus Infection as a Rare Cause of Portal Vein Thrombosis with Small Bowel Infarction in an Immunocompetent Patient. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017;101:16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Squizzato A, Ageno W, Cattaneo A, Brumana N. A case report and literature review of portal vein thrombosis associated with cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:e13-e16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Primignani M. Portal vein thrombosis, revisited. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:163-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Mancuso A. Management of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: an update. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:739-743.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Sharma AM, Zhu D, Henry Z. Portal vein thrombosis: When to treat and how? Vasc Med. 2016;21:61-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]