Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Jul 26, 2013; 5(3): 61-67
Published online Jul 26, 2013. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v5.i3.61
Perspectives of gene combinations in phenotype presentation
Shihori Tanabe
Shihori Tanabe, Division of Safety Information on Drug, Food and Chemicals, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan
Author contributions: Tanabe S solely contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Shihori Tanabe, PhD, Division of Safety Information on Drug, Food and Chemicals, National Institute of Health Sciences, 1-18-1, Kami-yoga, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan. stanabe@nihs.go.jp
Telephone: +81-3-37001141 Fax: +81-3-37076950
Received: February 28, 2013
Revised: May 22, 2013
Accepted: June 8, 2013
Published online: July 26, 2013

Abstract

Cells exhibit a variety of phenotypes in different stages and diseases. Although several markers for cellular phenotypes have been identified, gene combinations denoting cellular phenotypes have not been completely elucidated. Recent advances in gene analysis have revealed that various gene expression patterns are observed in each cell species and status. In this review, the perspectives of gene combinations in cellular phenotype presentation are discussed. Gene expression profiles change during cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and cell death. In addition, epigenetic regulation increases the complexity of the gene expression profile. The role of gene combinations and panels of gene combinations in each cellular condition are also discussed.

Key Words: Gene combination, Cellular phenotype, Stem cell, Cancer stem cell, Gene expression

Core tip: This article discusses the effects of gene combination on cellular phenotype, demonstrating different capacities for proliferation and differentiation. Recent advances in genome technology have revealed that each cell type exhibits different gene expression patterns, suggesting that the combination of genes might represent different cellular features or phenotypes. Because cellular diversity is derived from the regulation of gene expression, it is important to investigate the genes in various cells, including differences between cell types or the processes of cell development. Moreover, because stem cells are used as therapeutics, these gene combinations should be evaluated for the assembly of cells in medicinal use.



INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in genome technology have revealed several perspectives associated with gene regulatory networks[1]. Databases, such as encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE), use chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing to describe human transcription factors associated with cell type differences[1]. Recently, stem cells, such as induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, have been developed for medical application. For safe application, researchers must address concerns about the ability of stem cells to switch the cellular phenotype to cancer or other cellular phenotypes different from those originally expected. There are also arguments concerning the immunogenicity of iPS cells[2-4]. Thus, the clarification of stem cell characteristics is required for the safe application of iPS cells. There is little evidence indicating that mutations do not frequently occur during reprogramming[5]. In this review, gene combinations associated with cellular phenotype, particularly in stem cells, are discussed to address the possibility of the detection of cell features using gene combinations to facilitate the safe application of stem cells without tumorigenesis. From the viewpoint of the risk of tumorigenesis associated with stem cells and the origin of cancer, genes regulated in cancer stem cells are also discussed.

VARIETY OF GENE REGULATION
Genes involved in self-renewal and pluripotency

Cell self renewal is defined as cellular duplication, whereas pluripotency is defined as differentiation into any cell type, including their own, a process in which genes, such as Pou5f1 (also known as Oct4 or Oct3/4), Sox2, Klf4, or Nanog, play an important role. A previous study indicated that combination of Oct4, Sall4, and Nanog is involved in transport, metabolism, and development in mouse embryos[6]. Pou5f1 (Oct4) is a key factor in the maintenance of embryonic stem cells. In addition to Pou5f1 (Oct4), several gene combinations and coordinated network gene regulation are essential to stem cell development. DNA methyltransferase 3B (Dnmt3b) has also been implicated as a developmental stage determinant working in conjunction with other pluripotency factors[6].

Cell cycle control and long-term self-renewal have been linked, and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (P21) (Cdkn1a) has been shown to regulate Sox2 gene expression and adult neural stem cell expansion[7]. The combination of p21, Sox2, and p53 is important for the regulation of neural stem cells, during which p21 binds to Sox2 enhancers and negatively regulates the gene expression of Sox2, and increased expression of Sox2 in p21-null neural stem cells induces p53-dependent growth arrest[7]. Reprogramming clonally expanded antigen-specific CD8+ T cells obtained from an human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patient to pluripotency using the gene combination of POU5F1 (OCT3/4), SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC resulted in the expression of the pluripotency markers SSEA-4, Tra-1-60, and Tra-1-81, and the re-differentiation of these cells into CD8+ T cells resulted in T-cell functionality and antigen specificity, as observed in the original cytotoxic T lymphocyte clone[8]. A study demonstrated that lactic acid bacteria-incorporated human dermal fibroblast cell clusters were positive for the multipotency markers NANOG, POU5F1 (OCT3/4), SOX2, and SSEA-4, and these cells were converted into multipotent cells that differentiate into multiple lineages[9]. Interestingly, not all pluripotent markers were expressed in the lactic acid bacteria-incorporated cells[9]. A minimum gene combination might be sufficient for the acquisition of multipotency. A recent report has revealed that protein kinase C, located downstream of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), regulates the self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells[10].

Genes involved in proliferation

The tumor suppressor p53 is associated with metabolism and senescence[11]. p53 suppresses the gene expression of the tricarboxylic acid cycle-associated malic enzymes, including NADP+-dependent, cytosolic malic enzyme 1 (ME1) and ME2, leading to the regulation of cell metabolism and proliferation[11]. The combination of p53 and malic enzymes has been implicated in cellular senescence. Another finding demonstrated that the fifth component (CSN5) of the mammalian COP9 signalosome complex binds to CDK2 and controls senescence via cytoplasmic cyclin E[12].

Genes involved in differentiation and stem cell activity

The combination of force and the scleraxis (SCX) gene promotes the commitment of mesenchymal stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells to tenocytes[13].

The differentiation of T cells is regulated through various genes, including the regulation of Th17 cell differentiation through sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 4 (S1PR4), an endothelial differentiation, G-protein-coupled (EDG) receptor[14]. Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase 2 (GDE2) induces spinal motor neuron differentiation[15]. GDE2 also inactivates the Notch activator RECK (reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs) through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor cleavage and inhibits the Notch pathway, which promotes neurogenesis[15]. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 has been implicated in the regulation of cellular processes, such as T cell differentiation[16]. Moreover, the regulation of CD8 T cell memory through p27Kip1 has also been proposed[16].

WNT signaling is one of the major signaling pathways involved in the regulation of bone homeostasis[17]. WNT-β-catenin signaling is essential for the commitment of bone marrow-derived cells to the osteoblast lineage, and this signal inhibits adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation[17]. Molecules, such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5), frizzled (FZD), adenomatous polyposis (APC), and GSK-3β, are involved in WNT signaling[17].

The endodermal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells is regulated through interactions between integrin receptors and extracellular matrix proteins[18]. In addition to growth factors, such as FGF, TGF-β, and WNT, extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin (FN) and vitronectin (VTN), are involved in the differentiation of the embryonic stem cell population[18]. The combination of extracellular matrix proteins and integrins might affect the phenotype of stem cells during development.

It has recently been shown that fatty acid synthase (Fasn) is involved in the proliferative activities of adult neural stem and progenitor cells[19]. Fasn is a key enzyme involved in de novo lipogenesis, and the deletion of Fasn in mouse neural stem and progenitor cells impairs adult neurogenesis[19]. A recent study has revealed that Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration[20].

MOLECULES AND GENES INVOLVED IN STEM AND iPS CELL DEVELOPMENT
Molecules and genes involved in stem cell development

Various sources of autologous stem cells are used for the application of cell-based therapies. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiate into various cells, such as osteogenic cells, adipocytes, and chondrocytes. The markers commonly expressed in human adult MSCs include alanyl (membrane) aminopeptidase (ANPEP, CD13), integrin, beta 1 (fibronectin receptor, beta polypeptide, antigen CD29 includes MDF2, MSK12) (ITGB1, CD29), CD44 molecule (Indian blood group) (CD44), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1, CD54), 5’-nucleotidase, ecto (CD73) (NT5E), Thy-1 cell surface antigen (THY1, CD90), endoglin (ENG, CD105), activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM, CD166), and HLA-DR[21]. Proteins, such as CD34 molecule or vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1, CD106), are either positive or negative markers in MSCs depending on the conditions[21,22]. The combination patterns of these molecules might be different in each MSC phenotype, reflecting the cell source or developmental stage. The gene expression profile and differentiation or proliferation capacity is altered at each stage of MSC culture[23]. The gene expression of EPH receptor A5 (EPHA5) and nephroblastoma overexpressed gene (NOV) is upregulated, whereas the expression of necdin homolog (mouse) (NDN) and runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) is downregulated during late-stage MSC culture compared with early-stage culture[23]. The MSCs in different environments might exhibit unique phenotype, as demonstrated through the capacity of these cells for differentiation or proliferation.

The leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) is a Wnt target gene and a stem cell marker for the small intestine, colon, stomach, and hair follicles[24]. The regeneration of Lgr5+ liver stem cells is mediated through Wnt signaling[24]. LGR5 might become a good marker for self-renewing stem cells in combination with Wnt signaling pathway genes.

High-throughput screening of small molecules that inhibit human pluripotent stem cells has identified 15 compounds that specifically inhibit stem cell development[25]. This approach contributes to the safe application of stem cells in cell therapy, as undifferentiated cells have a risk of forming tumors, and these molecules might play a role in the safety of cell therapy in regenerative medicine.

Genes involved in iPS cell development

Recent advances in technology have been developed to investigate iPS cells. A study showed that iPS cells successfully differentiate into the intermediate mesoderm[26], and pluripotent stem cells can be transformed into Odd-skipped related 1 (OSR1)-expressing intermediate mesoderm[26]. These OSR1-positive intermediate mesoderm cells form nephrogenic tissue cells[26]. Marker genes are typically used to detect stem cell properties for the characterization of pluripotent stem cells[27]. Alkaline phosphatase (AP), Pou5f1 (Oct4), Nanog, Sox2, Tra-1-60, Tra-1-81, SSEA3, and SSEA4 are markers for the undifferentiated state of human embryonic stem cells[27].

iPS cells are reprogrammed through four factors [Pou5f1 (Oct3/4), Sox2, Klf4, Myc (c-Myc)][28-30]. A recent study has shown that the absence of Cdkn1b (p27) enables cellular reprogramming through only two factors, Oct4 and Klf4[31]. Considering that CDKN1B is a tumor suppressor, and that the absence of Cdkn1b increases Sox2 expression, reprogramming might be associated with proliferation, and the presence of factors associated with cancer progression or the absence of factors associated with cancer repression are important for inducing the reprogramming of iPS cells. Recent studies have revealed that the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) agonist metformin (Imidodicarbonimidic diamide, N,N-dimethyl-) regulates the expression of cancer stem cell-specific genes and inhibits the tumorigenicity of iPS cells[32]. This effect is mediated through the metformin-induced death of cancer stem cells[33,34].

An association between threonine and S-adenosylmethionine metabolism has been demonstrated in pluripotent stem cells, resulting in the regulation of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation[35]. Upon the epithelial differentiation of iPS cells from fibroblasts obtained from ectodermal dysplasia-related patients with mutations in the DNA-binding domain of the p63 gene, APR-246 (PRIMA-1MET), a small compound that restores the function of mutant P53 in human tumor cells, rescues the differentiation potential of these cells[36,37]. Recent studies using patient-specific iPS cells have shown that the induction of adult-like metabolic energetics from peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) activation is involved in the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy[38]. In this model, gene mutations in plakophilin-2 (PKP2) are important factors for the regulation of plakoglobin nuclear translocation and β-catenin activity[38]. A mathematical model for tumor evolution has revealed that somatic mutations in the cancers of self-renewing tissues exist before tumor initiation, which might provide an interesting interpretation of the relationship between stem cells and cancer initiation[39].

MicroRNA involvement in cell development

It has been recently shown that microRNAs play important roles in cell development. For example, the correlation between microRNA expression profiles and cancer survival has been investigated[40]. The involvement of the miR-200/ZEB2 pathway in Oct4/Sox2-induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and iPS cell generation has also been shown[41].

MOLECULES AND GENES INVOLVED IN CANCER DEVELOPMENT
Genes involved in cancer development

MDM2 oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (MDM2) and Mdm4 p53 binding protein homolog (mouse) (MDM4) (MDMX) proteins are deregulated in human cancers and induce cancer progression through inhibition of the tumor suppressor p53 (encoded by TP53)[42]. The Mdm2−/− or Mdmx−/− mice are embryonically lethal, whereas conditional knockout mice exhibit apoptosis in the central nervous system, intestine, or heart. MDM2 overexpression induces carcinoma; however, the expression of MDM2 does not accelerate the onset of cancer progression in transformation-related protein 53 (Trp53)-null mice[42]. The combination of MDM2, MDMX, and p53 signaling is one of the important pathways for cancer development. Wnt and β-catenin signaling is activated in cancer cells[43]. EMT and Hedgehog signaling is also important for cancer cell phenotypes, such as differentiation states or malignancies[44-46]. Notch signaling is also involved in cancer, and Notch signaling genes have been associated with cancer patient survival rates[47]. Cyclin plays important role in cell proliferation and cancer development[48-52], and cyclin D1 expression might also be involved in cell growth in gastric cancer[53]. The reduced expression of claudin in breast cancer mediates the development of cyclin D1low/ID1high tumors[54]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) also plays an important role in cancer[55]. Thus, the origin of cancer from stem cells suggests the importance of investigating molecules expressed in stem cells in cancer.

Genes involved in cancer stem cells

Several studies have been conducted to identify cancer-associated genes, and evaluations of sets of cancer-associated genes have revealed a variety of biological functions for these genes[56]. Cancer genes have been analyzed from several viewpoints, such as common Pfam domain analysis in Cancer Gene Census, which demonstrated that the protein kinase domain is the most common cancer gene-encoding Pfam domain (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/Census/analysis.shtml). This annotation scheme and the cancer gene assessment project showed that transcription factors and regulators are the largest functional classes[56]. Many genes involved in stem cell development are classified as transcription factors, and the genes activated in cancer stem cells might be included in these Cancer Gene Census analyses. Many studies have been conducted to reveal the origin of cancer cells[57]. It has been shown that SmoM2, KRas, or p53 is involved in epithelial skin cancer[57]. Intestinal stem cells expressing Bmi1 stabilize β-catenin expression and form intestinal adenomas, whereas APC deletion in transit-amplifying cells induces microadenomas[57]. Cancer stem cell markers include CD44, EpCAM, EZ112, Notch-1, Nanog, and Oct4[58]. Recent studies have shown that the dual expression of Lgr5 and Dclk1 is observed in cancer stem cells[59,60]. The Jun dimerization protein 2 (Jdp2) regulates the Trp53 promoter and negatively regulates Trp53 expression[61]. As previously demonstrated, the loss of Trp53 promotes tumorigenesis, and common insertion sites were identified in Trp53+/+, Trp53+/−, and Trp53−/− mice[61]. Tumors retaining a wild-type copy of Trp53 exhibit common insertion sites in several genes, including Jdp2[61]. Tumor growth is not always defined through the expression of a single common cancer stem cell marker, highlighting the importance of gene combinations in clarifying cancer stem cell phenotypes. These insights were derived from a study indicating that cells do not express previously identified CSC markers in each cancer (CD34 for acute myeloid leukemia, CD44 for breast cancer, CD133 for glioblastoma and colon cancer, CD271 for melanoma) and have the capacity for tumorigenesis[62].

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one of the important factors in cancer metastasis[63]. Recent studies have shown a close association between the origin of cancer stem cells and EMT[64,65]. The induction of EMT through Twist, Snail, and TGF-β exhibits a similar phenotype as cancer stem cells, and EMT and cancer stem cell signatures share the same cell population in nonresponders[66]. Factors promoting EMT in complex with Smad, include Snail1, Zeb1, Zeb2, Lef1/TCF, β-catenin, AP-1, SP1, and HMGA2[66]. The homeobox factor PRRX1 is an EMT inducer and a biomarker associated with patient survival and the lack of metastasis[67]. The upregulation of Prrx1 is required for the initiation of metastasis, whereas the downregulation of Prrx1 is important for secondary tumor colonization[67]. Another study indicated that the substitution of Twist1 is essential for tumor metastases[68]. Twist1 expression induces EMT, and the downregulation of Twist1 might be important for secondary tumor formation by circulating cells[68]. Twist signaling associates EMT with stemness[69-71]. Twist1 interacts with Bmi1, a member of polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1), which maintains chromatin silencing[72,73]. BMI1 is involved in the self-renewal of neuronal, hematopoietic, and intestinal cells through the repression of the INK4A-ARF locus[72,73]. During EMT, various networks are regulated, including the interaction of SNAI with the CDH1 promoter (which encodes E-cadherin)[74]. SNAI2, ZEB1 and ZEB2, E47, KLF8, and Brachyury are involved in EMT, which represses E-cadherin and other junction proteins, such as claudins and desmosomes[74]. Moreover, TWIST1, forkhead box protein C2 (FOXC2), goosecoid, E2-2 (TCF4), homeobox protein SLX1, and paired mesoderm homeobox protein 1 (PRRX1) are also involved in EMT, characterized by reduced E-cadherin expression and increased vimentin expression[74].

CONCLUSION

In summary, gene combinations are useful for distinguishing cell populations or evaluating cellular characteristics. The cellular phenotype is regulated through genes and epigenetic modifications. A deep understanding of cellular features is important for the safe medicinal application of cells, including pluripotent stem cells. A panel of gene combinations to evaluate and predict precise cell phenotypes is essential for the future development of the cell field. Thus, systems or databases to provide the context of the panel of gene combinations might be of great value for the appropriate assessment of these cells.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank the members of the National Institute of Health Sciences for helpful discussions.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer Kiselev SL S- Editor Zhai HH L- Editor A E- Editor Lu YJ

References
1.  Gerstein MB, Kundaje A, Hariharan M, Landt SG, Yan KK, Cheng C, Mu XJ, Khurana E, Rozowsky J, Alexander R. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature. 2012;489:91-100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1073]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 563]  [Article Influence: 119.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Araki R, Uda M, Hoki Y, Sunayama M, Nakamura M, Ando S, Sugiura M, Ideno H, Shimada A, Nifuji A. Negligible immunogenicity of terminally differentiated cells derived from induced pluripotent or embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2013;494:100-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 353]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 235]  [Article Influence: 44.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Zhao T, Zhang ZN, Rong Z, Xu Y. Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;474:212-215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 962]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 641]  [Article Influence: 96.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Okita K, Nagata N, Yamanaka S. Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ Res. 2011;109:720-721.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Abyzov A, Mariani J, Palejev D, Zhang Y, Haney MS, Tomasini L, Ferrandino AF, Rosenberg Belmaker LA, Szekely A, Wilson M. Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2012;492:438-442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 287]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 31.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Tan MH, Au KF, Leong DE, Foygel K, Wong WH, Yao MW. An Oct4-Sall4-Nanog network controls developmental progression in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:632.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Marqués-Torrejón MÁ, Porlan E, Banito A, Gómez-Ibarlucea E, Lopez-Contreras AJ, Fernández-Capetillo O, Vidal A, Gil J, Torres J, Fariñas I. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 controls adult neural stem cell expansion by regulating Sox2 gene expression. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:88-100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Nishimura T, Kaneko S, Kawana-Tachikawa A, Tajima Y, Goto H, Zhu D, Nakayama-Hosoya K, Iriguchi S, Uemura Y, Shimizu T. Generation of rejuvenated antigen-specific T cells by reprogramming to pluripotency and redifferentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:114-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 217]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 136]  [Article Influence: 27.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ohta K, Kawano R, Ito N. Lactic acid bacteria convert human fibroblasts to multipotent cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51866.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kinehara M, Kawamura S, Tateyama D, Suga M, Matsumura H, Mimura S, Hirayama N, Hirata M, Uchio-Yamada K, Kohara A. Protein kinase C regulates human pluripotent stem cell self-renewal. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Jiang P, Du W, Mancuso A, Wellen KE, Yang X. Reciprocal regulation of p53 and malic enzymes modulates metabolism and senescence. Nature. 2013;493:689-693.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 275]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 34.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Yoshida A, Yoneda-Kato N, Kato JY. CSN5 specifically interacts with CDK2 and controls senescence in a cytoplasmic cyclin E-mediated manner. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1054.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chen X, Yin Z, Chen JL, Shen WL, Liu HH, Tang QM, Fang Z, Lu LR, Ji J, Ouyang HW. Force and scleraxis synergistically promote the commitment of human ES cells derived MSCs to tenocytes. Sci Rep. 2012;2:977.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Schulze T, Golfier S, Tabeling C, Räbel K, Gräler MH, Witzenrath M, Lipp M. Sphingosine-1-phospate receptor 4 (S1P₄) deficiency profoundly affects dendritic cell function and TH17-cell differentiation in a murine model. FASEB J. 2011;25:4024-4036.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Park S, Lee C, Sabharwal P, Zhang M, Meyers CL, Sockanathan S. GDE2 promotes neurogenesis by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor cleavage of RECK. Science. 2013;339:324-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Jatzek A, Marie Tejera M, Plisch EH, Fero ML, Suresh M. T-cell intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of p27Kip1 in the regulation of CD8 T-cell memory. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91:120-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat Med. 2013;19:179-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1158]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 642]  [Article Influence: 144.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Brafman DA, Phung C, Kumar N, Willert K. Regulation of endodermal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells through integrin-ECM interactions. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:369-381.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Knobloch M, Braun SM, Zurkirchen L, von Schoultz C, Zamboni N, Araúzo-Bravo MJ, Kovacs WJ, Karalay O, Suter U, Machado RA. Metabolic control of adult neural stem cell activity by Fasn-dependent lipogenesis. Nature. 2013;493:226-230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 288]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 193]  [Article Influence: 32.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Mizutari K, Fujioka M, Hosoya M, Bramhall N, Okano HJ, Okano H, Edge AS. Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma. Neuron. 2013;77:58-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 232]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 144]  [Article Influence: 29.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  P M, S H, R M, M G, W S K. Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell surface characterization - a systematic review of the literature. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:253-260.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 12.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14528]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10546]  [Article Influence: 660.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Tanabe S, Sato Y, Suzuki T, Suzuki K, Nagao T, Yamaguchi T. Gene expression profiling of human mesenchymal stem cells for identification of novel markers in early- and late-stage cell culture. J Biochem. 2008;144:399-408.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Huch M, Dorrell C, Boj SF, van Es JH, Li VS, van de Wetering M, Sato T, Hamer K, Sasaki N, Finegold MJ. In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration. Nature. 2013;494:247-250.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 831]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 591]  [Article Influence: 103.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Ben-David U, Gan QF, Golan-Lev T, Arora P, Yanuka O, Oren YS, Leikin-Frenkel A, Graf M, Garippa R, Boehringer M. Selective elimination of human pluripotent stem cells by an oleate synthesis inhibitor discovered in a high-throughput screen. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:167-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 207]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 147]  [Article Influence: 25.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Mae S, Shono A, Shiota F, Yasuno T, Kajiwara M, Gotoda-Nishimura N, Arai S, Sato-Otubo A, Toyoda T, Takahashi K. Monitoring and robust induction of nephrogenic intermediate mesoderm from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 210]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 26.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Martí M, Mulero L, Pardo C, Morera C, Carrió M, Laricchia-Robbio L, Esteban CR, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Characterization of pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:223-253.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663-676.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16346]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9721]  [Article Influence: 1089.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2007;448:313-317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3163]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2073]  [Article Influence: 225.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861-872.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13095]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8131]  [Article Influence: 1007.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Li H, Collado M, Villasante A, Matheu A, Lynch CJ, Cañamero M, Rizzoti K, Carneiro C, Martínez G, Vidal A. p27(Kip1) directly represses Sox2 during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:845-852.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Vazquez-Martin A, Cufi S, Lopez-Bonet E, Corominas-Faja B, Oliveras-Ferraros C, Martin-Castillo B, Menendez JA. Metformin limits the tumourigenicity of iPS cells without affecting their pluripotency. Sci Rep. 2012;2:964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Song CW, Lee H, Dings RP, Williams B, Powers J, Santos TD, Choi BH, Park HJ. Metformin kills and radiosensitizes cancer cells and preferentially kills cancer stem cells. Sci Rep. 2012;2:362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 180]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 20.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Tsichlis PN, Struhl K. Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7507-7511.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 760]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 373]  [Article Influence: 63.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Shyh-Chang N, Locasale JW, Lyssiotis CA, Zheng Y, Teo RY, Ratanasirintrawoot S, Zhang J, Onder T, Unternaehrer JJ, Zhu H. Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation. Science. 2013;339:222-226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 392]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 249]  [Article Influence: 43.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Shalom-Feuerstein R, Serror L, Aberdam E, Müller FJ, van Bokhoven H, Wiman KG, Zhou H, Aberdam D, Petit I. Impaired epithelial differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from ectodermal dysplasia-related patients is rescued by the small compound APR-246/PRIMA-1MET. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2152-2156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Bykov VJ, Issaeva N, Shilov A, Hultcrantz M, Pugacheva E, Chumakov P, Bergman J, Wiman KG, Selivanova G. Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound. Nat Med. 2002;8:282-288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 660]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 479]  [Article Influence: 34.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Kim C, Wong J, Wen J, Wang S, Wang C, Spiering S, Kan NG, Forcales S, Puri PL, Leone TC. Studying arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with patient-specific iPSCs. Nature. 2013;494:105-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 346]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 227]  [Article Influence: 43.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B, Parmigiani G. Half or more of the somatic mutations in cancers of self-renewing tissues originate prior to tumor initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1999-2004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 271]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 151]  [Article Influence: 33.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Antonov AV, Knight RA, Melino G, Barlev NA, Tsvetkov PO. MIRUMIR: an online tool to test microRNAs as biomarkers to predict survival in cancer using multiple clinical data sets. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 6.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Wang G, Guo X, Hong W, Liu Q, Wei T, Lu C, Gao L, Ye D, Zhou Y, Chen J. Critical regulation of miR-200/ZEB2 pathway in Oct4/Sox2-induced mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2858-2863.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Wade M, Li YC, Wahl GM. MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:83-96.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 704]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 405]  [Article Influence: 88.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Nishimura K, Semba S, Aoyagi K, Sasaki H, Yokozaki H. Mesenchymal stem cells provide an advantageous tumor microenvironment for the restoration of cancer stem cells. Pathobiology. 2012;79:290-306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Aoyagi K, Minashi K, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Nishimura T, Hokamura N, Ashida A, Daiko H, Ochiai A, Muto M. Artificially induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in surgical subjects: its implications in clinical and basic cancer research. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Isohata N, Aoyagi K, Mabuchi T, Daiko H, Fukaya M, Ohta H, Ogawa K, Yoshida T, Sasaki H. Hedgehog and epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling in normal and malignant epithelial cells of the esophagus. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1212-1221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Ohta H, Aoyagi K, Fukaya M, Danjoh I, Ohta A, Isohata N, Saeki N, Taniguchi H, Sakamoto H, Shimoda T. Cross talk between hedgehog and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways in gastric pit cells and in diffuse-type gastric cancers. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:389-398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Han ME, Oh SO. Gastric stem cells and gastric cancer stem cells. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46:8-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Gao LL, Li FR, Jiao P, Yang MF, Zhou XJ, Si YH, Jiang WJ, Zheng TT. Paris chinensis dioscin induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4389-4395.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Jiang CG, Lv L, Liu FR, Wang ZN, Liu FN, Li YS, Wang CY, Zhang HY, Sun Z, Xu HM. Downregulation of connective tissue growth factor inhibits the growth and invasion of gastric cancer cells and attenuates peritoneal dissemination. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Tashiro E, Tsuchiya A, Imoto M. Functions of cyclin D1 as an oncogene and regulation of cyclin D1 expression. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:629-635.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 167]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Taghiyev AF, Rokhlin OW, Glover RB. Caspase-2-Based Regulation of the Androgen Receptor and Cell Cycle in the Prostate Cancer Cell Line LNCaP. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:745-752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Blain SW. Switching cyclin D-Cdk4 kinase activity on and off. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:892-898.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Hayakawa Y, Hirata Y, Sakitani K, Nakagawa H, Nakata W, Kinoshita H, Takahashi R, Takeda K, Ichijo H, Maeda S. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1 inhibitor as a potent therapeutic drug for the treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:2181-2185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Tobin NP, Sims AH, Lundgren KL, Lehn S, Landberg G. Cyclin D1, Id1 and EMT in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Ramachandran L, Manu KA, Shanmugam MK, Li F, Siveen KS, Vali S, Kapoor S, Abbasi T, Surana R, Smoot DT. Isorhamnetin inhibits proliferation and invasion and induces apoptosis through the modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation pathway in gastric cancer. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:38028-38040.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Patel MN, Halling-Brown MD, Tym JE, Workman P, Al-Lazikani B. Objective assessment of cancer genes for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:35-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 10.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Blanpain C. Tracing the cellular origin of cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:126-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 184]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 23.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Bao B, Wang Z, Ali S, Ahmad A, Azmi AS, Sarkar SH, Banerjee S, Kong D, Li Y, Thakur S. Metformin inhibits cell proliferation, migration and invasion by attenuating CSC function mediated by deregulating miRNAs in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012;5:355-364.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 235]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 23.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Metcalfe C, de Sauvage FJ. A tumor-specific stem cell. Nat Genet. 2013;45:7-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Nakanishi Y, Seno H, Fukuoka A, Ueo T, Yamaga Y, Maruno T, Nakanishi N, Kanda K, Komekado H, Kawada M. Dclk1 distinguishes between tumor and normal stem cells in the intestine. Nat Genet. 2013;45:98-103.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 238]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 185]  [Article Influence: 26.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  van der Weyden L, Rust AG, McIntyre RE, Robles-Espinoza CD, del Castillo Velasco-Herrera M, Strogantsev R, Ferguson-Smith AC, McCarthy S, Keane TM, Arends MJ. Jdp2 downregulates Trp53 transcription to promote leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity. Oncogene. 2013;32:397-402.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Huang SD, Yuan Y, Tang H, Liu XH, Fu CG, Cheng HZ, Bi JW, Yu YW, Gong DJ, Zhang W. Tumor cells positive and negative for the common cancer stem cell markers are capable of initiating tumor growth and generating both progenies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54579.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  van Denderen BJ, Thompson EW. Cancer: The to and fro of tumour spread. Nature. 2013;493:487-488.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Kong D, Li Y, Wang Z, Sarkar FH. Cancer Stem Cells and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-Phenotypic Cells: Are They Cousins or Twins? Cancers (Basel). 2011;3:716-729.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 207]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 160]  [Article Influence: 25.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Zavadil J. A spotlight on regulatory networks connecting EMT and cancer stem cells. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:2927.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Fuxe J, Vincent T, Garcia de Herreros A. Transcriptional crosstalk between TGF-β and stem cell pathways in tumor cell invasion: role of EMT promoting Smad complexes. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:2363-2374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 221]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 182]  [Article Influence: 20.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Ocaña OH, Córcoles R, Fabra A, Moreno-Bueno G, Acloque H, Vega S, Barrallo-Gimeno A, Cano A, Nieto MA. Metastatic colonization requires the repression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition inducer Prrx1. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:709-724.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 603]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 448]  [Article Influence: 67.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Tsai JH, Donaher JL, Murphy DA, Chau S, Yang J. Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:725-736.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 667]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 506]  [Article Influence: 74.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Martin A, Cano A. Tumorigenesis: Twist1 links EMT to self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:924-925.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Phinney DG. Twist, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and stem cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29:3-4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Battula VL, Evans KW, Hollier BG, Shi Y, Marini FC, Ayyanan A, Wang RY, Brisken C, Guerra R, Andreeff M. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-derived cells exhibit multilineage differentiation potential similar to mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1435-1445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 171]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128]  [Article Influence: 17.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Yang MH, Hsu DS, Wang HW, Wang HJ, Lan HY, Yang WH, Huang CH, Kao SY, Tzeng CH, Tai SK. Bmi1 is essential in Twist1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:982-992.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 463]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 347]  [Article Influence: 42.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Valk-Lingbeek ME, Bruggeman SW, van Lohuizen M. Stem cells and cancer; the polycomb connection. Cell. 2004;118:409-418.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 513]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 427]  [Article Influence: 30.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  De Craene B, Berx G. Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:97-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1460]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1054]  [Article Influence: 182.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]