Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Mar 26, 2015; 7(2): 281-299
Published online Mar 26, 2015. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i2.281
Evaluating alternative stem cell hypotheses for adult corneal epithelial maintenance
John D West, Natalie J Dorà, J Martin Collinson
John D West, Natalie J Dorà, Genes and Development Group, Centre for Integrative Physiology, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XD Edinburgh, United Kingdom
J Martin Collinson, Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Author contributions: West JD drafted and designed the manuscript; Dorà NJ performed research; West JD and Dorà NJ prepared the figures; West JD, Dorà NJ and Collinson JM wrote, critically revised and approved the manuscript.
Supported by Grants from the Wellcome Trust, No. 088876/Z/09/Z; and the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, No. BB/J015172/1 and No. BB/J015237/1.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: John D West, University Reader, Genes and Development Group, Centre for Integrative Physiology, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, EH8 9XD Edinburgh, United Kingdom. john.west@ed.ac.uk
Telephone: +44-131-6503112 Fax:+44-131-6511706
Received: July 29, 2014
Peer-review started: July 29, 2014
First decision: September 4, 2014
Revised: September 26, 2014
Accepted: October 14, 2014
Article in press: October 16, 2014
Published online: March 26, 2015
Abstract

In this review we evaluate evidence for three different hypotheses that explain how the corneal epithelium is maintained. The limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) hypothesis is most widely accepted. This proposes that stem cells in the basal layer of the limbal epithelium, at the periphery of the cornea, maintain themselves and also produce transient (or transit) amplifying cells (TACs). TACs then move centripetally to the centre of the cornea in the basal layer of the corneal epithelium and also replenish cells in the overlying suprabasal layers. The LESCs maintain the corneal epithelium during normal homeostasis and become more active to repair significant wounds. Second, the corneal epithelial stem cell (CESC) hypothesis postulates that, during normal homeostasis, stem cells distributed throughout the basal corneal epithelium, maintain the tissue. According to this hypothesis, LESCs are present in the limbus but are only active during wound healing. We also consider a third possibility, that the corneal epithelium is maintained during normal homeostasis by proliferation of basal corneal epithelial cells without any input from stem cells. After reviewing the published evidence, we conclude that the LESC and CESC hypotheses are consistent with more of the evidence than the third hypothesis, so we do not consider this further. The LESC and CESC hypotheses each have difficulty accounting for one main type of evidence so we evaluate the two key lines of evidence that discriminate between them. Finally, we discuss how lineage-tracing experiments have begun to resolve the debate in favour of the LESC hypothesis. Nevertheless, it also seems likely that some basal corneal epithelial cells can act as long-term progenitors if limbal stem cell function is compromised. Thus, this aspect of the CESC hypothesis may have a lasting impact on our understanding of corneal epithelial maintenance, even if it is eventually shown that stem cells are restricted to the limbus as proposed by the LESC hypothesis.

Keywords: Eye, Cornea, Corneal epithelium, Limbal epithelium, Stem cell, Lineage tracing

Core tip: This review article evaluates the evidence for different hypotheses that have been proposed to explain how the corneal epithelium is maintained. It identifies core observations in favour of the conventional limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) hypothesis and an alternative corneal epithelial stem cell hypothesis and describes how lineage-tracing experiments are helping to reconcile the two sets of conflicting evidence in favour of the LESC hypothesis.