BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2026; 32(40): 120622
Published online Oct 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120622
Table 1 Endoscopic techniques for esophageal diverticulum: Technical essentials, indications, advantages and drawbacks
Technique name
Core technology
Best indications
Advantages
Limitations/common complications
FESDUses flexible endoscope and electrocautery or laser to cut the diverticular septumZenker's diverticulum and Killian-Jamieson diverticulum, especially for relieving symptoms requiring repeated surgery and recurrent Zenker's diverticulum after open surgeryNo need for anesthesia, minimal traumaRelatively high recurrence rate compared to open surgery
POEMEstablishes a submucosal tunnel and cuts the muscle layerZenker's diverticulum (Z-POEM), especially in patients with esophageal motility disordersSignificant relief of dysphagia symptoms, short hospital stay, quick postoperative recovery, preferred method for elderly and frail patientsHigh incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis, especially in patients with hiatal hernia
ESADUses endoscopy and a special stapler to complete cutting and suturing in one stepZenker's diverticulum, may also be suitable for esophageal diverticulum combined with superficial esophageal cancerFast operation, relatively low early systemic inflammatory response compared to laser groupHigher recurrence risk compared to laser group
ELDUses CO2/Holmium laser for precise vaporization and cutting of the septumZenker's diverticulum, especially recurrent, fibrotic, or anatomically complex casesExcellent surgical field, short operation time, good intraoperative hemostasis, allows for greater reduction of the diverticulum, high cutting precision, low risk of damage to deeper fascial layers, high patient comfort during surgery, improved postoperative quality of life, suitable for most revision casesPossibly higher long-term recurrence rate


Write to the Help Desk