Risaliti M, Bartolini I, Campani C, Arena U, Xodo C, Adotti V, Rosi M, Taddei A, Muiesan P, Amedei A, Batignani G, Marra F. Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(29): 3981-3993 [PMID: 36157535 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Fabio Marra, MD, Professor, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, AOU Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50134, Italy. fabio.marra@unifi.it
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2022; 28(29): 3981-3993 Published online Aug 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981
Table 1 Distribution of the factors used in the propensity score matching in the general population (n = 50), n (%)
Resection, n = 25
TACE, n = 25
Total, n = 50
P value
AFP, n (%)
0.243
< 400 ng/mL
20 (90.9)
17 (73.9)
37 (82.2)
> 400 ng/mL
2 (9.1)
6 (26.1)
8 (17.8)
Missing
3
2
5
Cirrhosis, n (%)
0.002
No
9 (36)
0
9 (18)
Yes
16 (64)
25 (100)
41 (82)
Child-Pugh score, n (%)
0.840
A5
12 (48)
10 (40)
22 (44)
A6
9 (36)
11 (44)
20 (40)
B7
4 (16)
4 (16)
8 (16)
MELD
8.4 ± 2.7
9.7 ± 2.2
9 ± 2.5
0.069
Number of lesions
2 (2-10)
4 (2-7)
2.5 (2-10)
0.008
Tumor diameter (mm)
69.5 ± 52.2
41.9 ± 17
55.7 ± 40.9
0.018
Table 2 General baseline characteristics after propensity score matching (n = 30)
Resection, n = 15
TACE, n = 15
Total, n = 30
P value
Age (yr)
68.9 ± 9.2
70.5 ± 9.9
69.7 ± 9.5
0.651
Gender, n (%)
0.651
Male
13 (86.7)
11 (73.3)
24 (80)
Female
2 (13.3)
4 (26.7)
6 (20)
BMI (kg/m2)
26.1 ± 4.3
26.3 ± 7.7
26.2 ± 5.9
0.927
Hepatitis Etiology, n (%)
0.300
Viral
4 (28.6)
9 (60)
13 (44.8)
Alcoholic
0
1 (6.7)
1 (3.5)
Dysmetabolic
3 (21.4)
1 (6.7)
4 (13.8)
Mixed
3 (21.4)
1 (6.7)
4 (13.8)
Other
4 (28.6)
3 (20)
7 (24.1)
Missing
1
-
1
Diabetes, n (%)
0.700
No
9 (60)
11 (73.3)
20 (66.7)
Yes
6 (40)
4 (26.7)
10 (33.3)
Heart disease, n (%)
0.330
No
11 (73.3)
14 (93.3)
25 (83.3)
Yes
4 (26.7)
1 (6.7)
5 (16.7)
Table 3 Liver function test and disease burden after propensity score matching (n = 30)
Resection, n = 15
TACE, n = 15
Total, n = 30
P value
INR
1.2 ± 0.1
1.3 ± 0.3
1.2 ± 0.2
0.185
Bilirubin (mg/dL)
0.75 ± 0.5
1.2 ± 0.6
0.99 ± 0.6
0.026
Platelets (103/μL)
245 ± 118
95 ± 31
163 ± 111
0.003
Creatinine (mg/dL)
1.37 ± 0.8
0.78 ± 0.2
1.08 ± 1.19
0.188
AFP, n (%)
1.000
< 400 ng/mL
13 (86.7)
12 (80)
25 (83.3)
> 400 ng/mL
2 (13.3)
3 (20)
5 (16.7)
Varices, n (%)
0.081
No
8 (80)
4 (36.4)
12 (57.1)
Yes
2 (20)
7 (63.6)
9 (42.9)
Missing
5
4
9
Cirrhosis, n (%)
0.100
No
4 (26.7)
0
4 (13.3)
Yes
11 (73.3)
15 (100)
26 (86.7)
Child-Pugh score, n (%)
0.556
A5
8 (53.3)
5 (33.3)
13 (43.3)
A6
6 (40)
7 (46.7)
13 (43.3)
B7
1 (6.7)
3 (20)
4 (13.4)
MELD score
9.1 ± 3.2
9.9 ± 2.4
9.5 ± 2.8
0.473
Number of lesions
2 (2-5)
3 (2-5)
2 (2-5)
0.101
Diameter (mm)
46.3 ± 3
47 ± 5
46.9 ± 12.9
0.793
Up-to-7 criteria, n (%)
0.456
In
10 (66.7)
8 (53.3)
18 (60)
Out
5 (33.3)
7 (46.7)
12 (40)
ITA.LI.CA classification, n (%)
0.868
B1
10 (66.7)
8 (53.3)
18 (60)
B2
3 (20)
5 (33.3)
8 (26.7)
B3
2 (13.3)
2 (13.3)
4 (13.3)
Table 4 Postoperative morbidity and recurrence status (n = 30)
Resection, n = 15
TACE, n = 15
Total, n = 30
P value
Number of treatments
1 ± 0
2.4 ± 1.1
1.7 ± 1.1
0.001
Complications, n (%)
0.876
No
8 (57.1)
9 (60)
17 (58.6)
Yes
6 (42.9)
6 (40)
12 (41.4)
Missing
1
-
1
Complications, n (%)
0.545
CD 1-2
5 (83.3)
5 (83.3)
10
CD 3-4
1 (16.7)
1 (16.7)
2 (16.7)
Hospital stay (days)
7 ± 3
5 ± 5
6 ± 4.3
0.224
Recurrence, n (%)
0.006
No
7 (46.7)
0
7 (23.3)
Yes
8 (53.3)
15 (100)
23 (76.7)
Citation: Risaliti M, Bartolini I, Campani C, Arena U, Xodo C, Adotti V, Rosi M, Taddei A, Muiesan P, Amedei A, Batignani G, Marra F. Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(29): 3981-3993