Ko CS, Choi NR, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim MJ, Kim BS. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the modified overlap method and conventional open total gastrectomy: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(18): 2193-2204 [PMID: 34025073 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2193]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Beom Su Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea. bskim0251@naver.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2021; 27(18): 2193-2204 Published online May 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i18.2193
Table 1 Patient clinical characteristics
Variable
Total set (n = 282)
P value
SD
PSM set (1:1) (n = 122)
P value
SD
TLTG (n = 151)
OTG (n = 131)
TLTG (n = 61)
OTG (n = 61)
Age (yr)
60.74 ± 11.55
59.11 ± 11.02
0.231
0.144
58.30 ± 11.26
58.70 ± 10.65
0.841
0.037
Gender
0.257
0.136
0.847
0.035
Male
94 (62.25)
90 (68.70)
40 (65.57)
41 (67.21)
Female
57 (37.75)
41 (31.30)
21 (34.43)
20 (32.79)
BMI (kg/m²)
24.57 ± 3.25
23.69 ± 3.21
0.023
0.273
24.01 ± 2.98
23.98 ± 2.73
0.957
0.010
ASA score
0.859
0.044
0.885
0.073
I
30 (19.87)
26 (19.85)
13 (21.31)
14 (22.95)
II
114 (75.50)
97 (74.05)
46 (75.41)
44 (72.13)
III
7 (4.64)
8 (6.11)
2 (3.28)
3 (4.92)
Number of comorbidities
0.068
0.222
0.655
0.083
0-2
137 (90.73)
126 (96.18)
59 (75.41)
44 (72.13)
> 2
14 (9.27)
5 (3.82)
2 (3.28)
3 (4.92)
Combined operation
0.176
0.161
> 0.999
0
No
136 (90.07)
111 (84.73)
55 (90.16)
55 (90.16)
Yes
15 (9.93)
20 (15.27)
6 (9.84)
6 (9.84)
History of abdominal surgery
0.061
0.254
0.846
0.103
No
120 (79.47)
102 (77.86)
50 (81.97)
48 (78.69)
Minor surgery
24 (15.89)
14 (10.69)
6 (9.84)
6 (9.84)
Major surgery
7 (4.64)
15 (11.45)
5 (8.20)
7 (11.48)
Tumor size (mm, median)
31 (22, 46)
64 (36, 85)
< 0.001
0.841
39 (27, 62)
50 (28, 68)
0.865
0.028
Pathologic tumor stage
< 0.001
1.012
0.824
0.085
I
109 (72.19)
38 (29.01)
31 (50.82)
33 (54.10)
II
28 (18.54)
41 (31.30)
19 (31.15)
19 (31.15)
III
14 (9.27)
52 (39.69)
11 (18.03)
9 (14.75)
Table 2 Early surgical outcomes and pathologic data in patients undergoing the totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with the modified overlap method and open total gastrectomy
Variable
Total set (n = 282)
P value
PSM set (1:1) (n = 122)
P value
TLTG (n = 151)
OTG (n = 131)
TLTG (n = 61)
OTG (n = 61)
Operative time (min)
147.68 ± 29.64
145.24 ± 35.48
0.282
147.11 ± 25.48
143.46 ± 38.09
0.351
Time to first flatus (d)
3.73 ± 0.90
4.14 ± 0.81
< 0.001
3.62 ± 0.84
4.15 ± 0.87
0.002
Time to soft diet (d)
4.99 ± 3.78
7.24 ± 6.29
< 0.001
4.62 ± 2.67
7.47 ± 7.92
0.001
Perioperative transfusion (n)
< 0.001
0.035
No
145 (96.03)
107 (81.68)
59 (96.72)
52 (85.25)
Yes
6 (3.97)
24 (18.32)
2 (3.28)
9 (14.75)
Hospital day after surgery (d)
9.96 ± 6.36
13.06 ± 11.09
< 0.001
9.62 ± 5.32
13.51 ± 10.67
< 0.001
Pick of pain score (VAS)
4 (3.92)
5 (2.51)
0.494
3 (3.16)
1 (1.05)
0.317
Pain score at postoperative day
3.19 ± 1.04
3.83 ± 1.14
< 0.001
3.23 ± 1.09
4.07 ± 1.35
< 0.001
Pain score at postoperative day 1
2.98 ± 1.07
3.76 ± 1.13
< 0.001
2.97 ± 0.87
3.77 ± 1.07
< 0.001
Pain score at postoperative day 3
2.68 ± 1.17
3.10 ± 1.28
< 0.001
2.75 ± 1.31
3.16 ± 1.27
< 0.001
Pain score at postoperative day 5
1.93 ± 1.13
2.61 ± 1.49
< 0.001
1.82 ± 1.13
2.64 ± 1.21
< 0.001
Administration of analgesics (n)
9.74 ± 8.92
16.22 ± 18.06
< 0.001
10.61 ± 11.07
16.92 ± 13.72
< 0.001
Administration of opioid (n)
2.89 ± 5.49
5.43 ± 11.51
< 0.001
3.21 ± 6.98
4.48 ± 5.15
0.031
Retrieved LN
39.53 ± 15.59
41.03 ± 15.31
0.265
38.67 ± 13.82
38.13 ± 14.52
0.713
Table 3 Postoperative complications
Variable
Total set (n = 282)
P value
PSM set (1:1) (n = 122)
P value
TLTG (n = 151)
OTG (n = 131)
TLTG (n = 61)
OTG (n = 61)
Early complications
No
119 (78.81)
99 (75.57)
0.518
48 (78.69)
43 (70.49)
0.317
Yes
32 (21.19)
32 (24.43)
13 (21.31)
18 (29.51)
Late complications
No
142 (94.04)
125 (95.42)
0.607
56 (91.80)
59 (96.72)
0.257
Yes
9 (5.96)
6 (4.58)
5 (8.20)
2 (3.28)
CDC
0.426
0.564
0-2
138 (91.39)
116 (88.55)
56 (91.80)
54 (88.52)
≥ 3
13 (8.61)
15 (11.45)
5 (8.20)
7 (11.48)
EJ related complications
0.090
0.270
No
148 (98.01)
123 (93.89)
59 (96.72)
56 (91.80)
Yes
3 (1.99)
8 (6.11)
2 (3.28)
5 (8.20)
Table 4 Characteristics of the patients with esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Case
Sex
Age
Primary operation
TNMstage
Early or late
Type of complication
CDC
Treatment
Hospital day
1
F
79
TLTG
III
Early
Bleeding
5
Operation
8
2
M
65
TLTG
II
Early
Leakage
3A
Intervention
20
3
M
74
OTG
I
Early
Leakage
2
Conservative
14
4
M
74
OTG
I
Early
Bleeding
3A
Intervention
72
5
M
60
OTG
I
Early
Leakage
3A
Intervention
48
6
M
66
OTG
I
Early
Leakage
2
Conservative
25
7
M
63
OTG
I
Early
Leakage
3A
Intervention
32
Table 5 Univariate analysis of risk factors for overall early, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, and esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Variables
Early complications
CDC ≥ 3 complications
EJ-related complications
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Type of surgery
0.518
0.428
0.090
TLTG
1
1
1
OTG
1.202 (0.688-2.100)
1.373 (0.628-3.002)
3.209 (0.833–12.356)
Age
0.289
0.051
0.035
< 60
1
1
1
≥ 60
1.358 (0.772-2.390)
2.347 (0.997-5.525)
9.220 (1.164-73.022)
BMI
0.045
0.380
0.402
< 25
1
1
1
≥ 25
1.773 (1.012-3.109)
1.419 (0.649-3.101)
1.678 (0.500-5.633)
ASA score
0.030
0.036
1-2
1
1
3
3.224 (1.122-9.265)
3.682 (1.088-12.456)
Number of comorbidities
0.342
0.752
0-2
1
1
> 2
1.631 (0.594-4.480)
1.406 (0.170-11.599)
Combined operation
0.685
0.381
0.735
No
1
1
1
Yes
0.833 (0.346-2.008)
0.515 (0.117-2.272)
0.697 (0.086-5.618)
History of abdominal surgery
0.130
0.323
No
1
1
1
Yes
1.640 (0.864-3.111)
1.554 (0.648-3.726)
1.408 (0.362-5.478)
0.622
Tumor size
0.521
0.442
0.053
< 5 cm
1
1
1
≥ 5 cm
0.830 (0.470-1.466)
0.521
0.727 (0.323-1.638)
3.786 (0.983-14.585)
Operation time
0.225
0.605
0.805
< 150 min
1
1
1
≥ 150 min
1.414 (0.808-2.477)
1.230 (0.562-2.692)
1.165 (0.347-3.912)
Retrieved lymph node
0.714
0.662
0.246
< 30
1
1
1
≥ 30
0.888 (0.471-1.676)
1.235 (0.480-3.181)
3.416 (0.429-27.170)
Pathologic tumor stage
0.418
0.864
0.875
I
1
1
1
II
0.666 (0.328-1.351)
1.246 (0.497-3.126)
0.701 (0.138-3.568)
III
0.704 (0.346-1.431)
0.950 (0.348-2.592)
1.119 (0.27-4.617)
Table 6 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for early, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 3, and esophagojejunostomy-related complications
Variables
Early complications
CDC ≥ 3 complications
EJ related complications
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Type of surgery
TLTG
1
1
1
OTG
1.275 (0.719-2.262)
0.405
1.431 (0.650-3.153)
0.373
3.546 (0.908-13.854)
0.069
Age
< 60
1
1
≥ 60
2.391 (1.013-5.641)
0.047
9.925 (1.245-79.107)
0.030
BMI
< 25
1
≥ 25
1.824 (1.029-3.234)
0.040
ASA score
1-2
1
3
3.154 (1.084-9.174)
0.035
Citation: Ko CS, Choi NR, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim MJ, Kim BS. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using the modified overlap method and conventional open total gastrectomy: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(18): 2193-2204