Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2020; 26(36): 5437-5449
Published online Sep 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5437
Table 1 Baseline characteristics comparing the standard infusion (n = 169) and rapid infusion (n = 129) cohorts
VariableStandard, n (%)Rapid, n (%)P value
Male sex (%)76 (45.0)55 (42.6)0.72
Age (yr) (median, range)39 (20-88)42 (18-86)0.86
Low BMI (< 22 kg/m2)17 (10.1)13 (10.1)0.84
High BMI (> 30 kg/m2)28 (16.6)31 (24.0)0.14
Current smoker28 (16.6)26 (20.2)0.45
Disease duration (yr) (median, range)7 (0-49)5 (0-36)0.78
Disease type
CD126 (74.6)114 (88.4)< 0.01
UC43 (25.4)14 (10.9)< 0.01
Indeterminate0 (0.0)1 (0.8)0.43
Extra-intestinal manifestation(s) documented46 (27.2)29 (22.5)0.42
Psychiatric comorbidity documented24 (14.2)45 (34.9)< 0.01
Concomitant medications
Corticosteroid11 (6.5)11 (8.5)0.51
Immunomodulator114 (67.5)104 (80.6)0.01
Thiopurine91 (79.8)70 (67.3)0.04
Thiopurine ADR32 (35.2)32 (45.7)0.20
Methotrexate23 (20.2)34 (32.7)0.04
Methotrexate ADR12 (52.2)10 (29.4)0.10
Prior biologic21 (12.4)20 (15.5)0.40
Other anti-TNF18 (85.7)18 (90.0)1.00
Table 2 Infusion reactions per cohort, type and severity
Standard cohort, n (%)
Rapid cohort, n (%)
2214 infusions/169 patients1461 infusions/129 patients
Mild reaction1
RR per infusion0.8%0.7%
RR per patient10.7%7.8%
Severe reaction1
RR per infusion0.2%0.00%
RR per patients3.0%0.00%
Total ADRs to infliximab23 (%)8 (%)
Mild ADRs1 (by subtype)16 (69.6)8 (100.0)
Serum sickness1 (4.3)1 (25.0)
Skin rash (including psoriasis/lupus)6 (26.1)4 (50.0)
Facial flushing1 (4.3)0 (0.0)
Hypoxia0 (0.0)2 (25.0)
Nausea2 (8.7)1 (12.5)
Pruritis2 (8.7)0 (0.0)
Arthralgia1 (4.3)0 (0.0)
Other (unspecified)3 (13.0)0 (0.0)
Severe ADRs1 (by subtype)7 (30.4)0 (0.0)
Anaphylactic (incl. angioedema)4 (17.4)0 (0.0)
Dyspnoea1 (4.3)0 (0.0)
Hypotension1 (4.3)0 (0.0)
Chest pain1 (4.3)0 (0.0)
Other (unspecified)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Retrial outcomes2
Returned to rapidNA7
Returned to acceleratedNA1
Returned to standard150
ADR(s) occurred on retrial30
Table 3 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses depicting factors potentially associated with increased likelihood of infliximab infusion reaction/s with a rapid infusion protocol in this cohort (n = 129)
VariableUnivariable odds ratio (95%CI)P valueMultivariable odds ratio (95%CI)P value
Lower BMI (< 22 kg/m2)2.0 (0.7, 6.0)0.155.3 (1.3, 21.6)0.02
Presence of ≥ 1 extra intestinal manifestation4.0 (1.4, 11.8)0.018.8 (2.3, 33.5)< 0.01
Disease duration ≥ 3 yr4.8 (1.1, 20.5)0.016.1 (1.1, 35.1)0.04
Previous infliximab exposure (≥ 1 dose)5.8 (1.2, 27.2)0.02
Previous other biologic exposure (any other agent)18.6 (1.6, 218.0)0.0334.9 (2.1, 576.7)0.01
Previous break off infliximab (≥ 3 m)5.1 (1.3, 19.4)0.034.8 (0.8, 28.4)0.08
Concurrent immunomodulator (any)0.1 (0.01, 1.1)0.06
Concurrent thiopurine0.3 (0.1, 1.001)0.06
Previous adverse drug reaction (any)2.2 (0.7, 6.7)0.12
Known psychiatric comorbidity2.4 (0.8, 6.7)0.10
Pre-medication used0.5 (0.3, 1.00)0.08
Table 4 Characteristics of home-based vs infusion centre-based rapid protocol groups
VariableHome based rapid infusion group, n (%)Infusion centre based rapid infusion group, n (%)P value
Total patients/infusions32 / 40597/1067-
Male (%)18 (56.2)37 (38.1)0.10
Age (median, range)36 (18, 79)42(16, 86)0.05
BMI > 307 (21.9)24 (24.7)0.82
Smoker6 (18.8)20 (20.6)1.00
Disease type
CD26 (81.2)88 (90.7)0.20
UC6 (18.8)8 (8.2)0.11
Indeterminate0 (0)1 (1.0)1.00
Extra-intestinal manifestations9 (28.1)20 (20.6)0.46
Psychiatric co-morbidity10 (31.2)35 (36.1)0.67
ADRs (any severity)0 (0.0%)8 (8.2)0.20