Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2020; 26(36): 5437-5449
Published online Sep 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5437
Transitioning patients with inflammatory bowel disease from hospital-based to rapid home-based infliximab: A stepwise, safety and patient-orientated process towards sustainability
Anuj Bohra, Qurat-Al-Ain Rizvi, Charlotte Yuen Yu Keung, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R van Langenberg
Anuj Bohra, Qurat-Al-Ain Rizvi, Charlotte Yuen Yu Keung, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R van Langenberg, Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia
Anuj Bohra, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R van Langenberg, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia
Author contributions: Bohra A performed the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, statistical analysis and drafting of manuscript; Rizvi QAA designed the patient questionnaires and performed acquisition of data; Keung CYY performed the acquisition of data; Vasudevan A provided critical revision of the manuscript; van Langenberg DR designed the study concept, performed analysis of data and critical revision of the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Eastern Health as audit activity and the committee provided a waiver for informed consent. Reference number: LR 64/2017.
Informed consent statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Eastern Health as audit activity and the committee provided a waiver for informed consent. Reference number: LR 64/2017.
Conflict-of-interest statement: None declared.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Anuj Bohra, BMed, Doctor, Research Fellow, Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, 3 West, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia. anujbohra@hotmail.com
Received: May 28, 2020
Peer-review started: May 28, 2020
First decision: July 25, 2020
Revised: August 10, 2020
Accepted: September 5, 2020
Article in press: September 5, 2020
Published online: September 28, 2020
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Infliximab and other intravenous biologic infusions are increasingly used for chronic disorders like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Rapid infliximab and home-based infusions are attractive solutions to address resource and capacity issues for infusion centres, yet infliximab infusion reactions reportedly occur in up to 25% of patients with IBD, even at the manufacturers’ recommended infusion duration of 2 h.

AIM

To evaluate the safety, cost and patient satisfaction of transitioning from hospital-based, standard 2 h to rapid home-based, 30-min infliximab infusions.

METHODS

All patients receiving rapid infliximab infusions for IBD between 2014 to 2017 (39 mo) were compared with those who received standard two-hour IFX infusions between 2005-2013 (96 mo) at a single IBD centre. Data (per-infusion and per-individual) including adverse drug reactions (ADR), duration (based on needle-departure time) and other clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistical regression analysis assessed factors potentially associated with increased risk of ADRs to rapid infusions. The primary outcome was the safety [as per relative risk (RR) of ADR] of (1) rapid 30 m infusions (both hospital- and home-based) vs standard 2 h infliximab infusions. Also, relative cost per infusion and patient satisfaction and productivity were evaluated in rapid infusion recipients who transitioned to home-based infusions.

RESULTS

Of 129 patients who received 1461 rapid IFX infusions (2014-2017) were compared with 169 patients who received 2214 standard IFX infusions (2005-2013). Within the rapid cohort, 55 (42.6%) were males, median age 42 years (range 18, 86), 114 (84%) had Crohn’s disease (CD) with a median disease duration 5 years (0, 36). Median needle to departure time was higher in the standard than the rapid protocol group, 108 (70, 253) vs 50 (33, 90) min, P < 0.001), with a per infusion cost of $AUD 107.50 vs $49.77, respectively (both P < 0.001). There was no difference in median infusion duration or costs between rapid home vs hospital-based infusions (P = 0.21). 8 patients in the rapid infliximab cohort had an ADR compared with 23 standard infliximab recipients (RR 0.55% vs 1.04% respectively), hence a higher likelihood of ADR with standard compared to rapid infusions [RR 3.0, 95%CI (1.2, 7.7), P = 0.02]. No ADRs were observed in 405 rapid home-based infusions. A lower body mass index (< 22 kg/m2), presence of one or more extra intestinal manifestations, longer disease duration (> 3 years) and previous exposure to another biologic were each independently associated with a higher likelihood of reaction (s) to rapid infusions. All (100%) survey respondents preferred the rapid vs standard infusions, however within rapid infusion recipients, 61.3% found home based infusions more inconvenient than hospital-based infusions despite a median of 0 h per week missed from paid work and no self-reported loss of work productivity.

CONCLUSION

Transitioning to rapid infliximab infusions appears very safe with significant cost benefit, patient satisfaction and avails the provision of safe, efficient, home-based infliximab infusions by IBD centres worldwide.

Keywords: Inflammatory bowel disease, Infliximab, Safety, Cost, Therapy, Drug reaction

Core Tip: Home-based infliximab infusions are a potential avenue to address overburdened infusion centres, yet enhance patient convenience. However, this depends on more rapid infusions, minimal risk of reactions and at no increased cost. This study provides a safety-centric, how-to guide for transitioning from standard 2-h hospital-based to rapid 30-min home-based infliximab infusions. An additional layer of safety is provided by careful patient selection; this study found that lower body mass index (< 22 kg/m2), presence of extraintestinal manifestation (s), longer disease duration (> 3 years) and previous biologic exposure were associated with an increased likelihood of reaction (s) to rapid maintenance infliximab infusions.