Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2018; 24(9): 1046-1055
Published online Mar 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1046
Table 1 Baseline characteristics n (%)
ParameterPGA + stent group (n = 34)Stent group (n = 32)P value
Patients characteristic
Age (yr)62.74 ± 8.3859.91 ± 8.800.186
Gender (Male/Female)22/1218/140.482
Tumor lesion feature
Location0.145
Upper third0 (0)0 (0)
Middle third12 (35)17 (53)
Lower third22 (65)15 (47)
Tissue depth0.331
M120 (59)15 (47)
M214 (41)17 (53)
Longitudinal length (cm)5.97 ± 2.686.06 ± 2.120.878
Circumferential range0.684
3/412 (35)14 (44)
4/58 (24)8 (25)
1/114 (41)10 (31)
Table 2 Comparison of esophageal stricture features in polyglycolic acid + stent and stent groups
ParameterPGA + stent group (n = 7)Stent group (n = 15)P value
Length (cm)0.97 + 0.591.47 + 0.590.080
Diameter (cm)0.37 + 0.170.51 + 0.140.061
Location (distance from the incisors, cm)31.71 + 3.2029.07 + 5.200.232
Balloon dilatation times4 (2-5)6 (1-14)0.007
Table 3 Comparison of tumor lesion features in patients with esophageal stricture n (%)
ParameterPGA + stent group (n = 7)Stent group (n = 15)P value
Location0.899
Upper third0 (0)0 (0)
Middle third4 (57)9 (60)
Lower third3 (43)6 (40)
Tissue depth0.823
M12 (29)5 (33)
M25 (71)10 (67)
Longitudinal length (cm)7.71 + 3.506.60 + 2.100.360
Circumferential range0.181
3/40 (0)4 (27)
4/51 (14)4 (27)
1/16 (86)7 (47)
Table 4 Logistic analysis of factors affecting esophageal stricture occurrence
ParameterUnivariate logistic regression
Multivariate logistic regression
P valueOR95%CI
P valueOR95%CI
LowerHigherLowerHigher
PGA + stent (vs stent alone)0.0270.2940.0990.8680.0260.1970.0470.820
Age ≥ 62 yr0.2981.7330.6154.887----
Location - middle third (vs lower third)0.0832.5280.8867.2140.0345.1481.13523.344
Longitudinal length ≥ 6 cm0.0592.7790.9638.0190.0923.8260.80118.270
Circumferential range = 1/1 (vs others)0.0084.3331.45712.8880.0285.1131.19421.892
Tissue depth M2 (vs M1)0.0173.7501.26411.1230.0693.2840.91211.822