Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2018; 24(12): 1332-1342
Published online Mar 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
pCCA (n = 34)dCCA (n = 40)
Age (yr), median (range)71.5 (44-82)72.5 (39-85)
Gender
Male236
Female1134
Preoperative biliary drainage
Yes3338
No12
Procedure
PD138
HH271
PD + HH50
Bile duct resection01
Others10
Total number of duct margins for frozen section5545
Number of duct margins for frozen section
11535
2175
320
pT
pT1/pT22720
pT3/pT4619
Unknown11
Table 2 Histopathological results of the biliary duct margins
Negative (%)Borderline (%)Positive (%)Total (%)P value
Margin level
Total layer
FSD41 (41.0)39 (39.0)20 (20.0)100 (100)0.039
PSD56 (56.0)23 (23.0)21 (21.0)100 (100)
Epithelial layer
FSD44 (44.0)41 (41.0)15 (15.0)100 (100)0.078
PSD59 (59.0)27 (27.0)14 (14.0)100 (100)
Subepithelial layer
FSD87 (87.0)1 (1.0)12 (11.0)100 (100)0.560
PSD86 (86.0)0 (0.0)14 (14.0)100 (100)
Patient level
Total layer
FSD26 (35.1)31 (41.9)17 (23.0)74 (100)0.134
PSD36 (48.7)20 (27.0)18 (24.3)74 (100)
Table 3 Concordance rate between frozen section diagnosis and permanent section diagnosis
Concordance rate (%)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Positive-predictive value (%)Negative-predictive value (%)
Original diagnostic results
Total layer68.085.766.190.090.2
Epithelial layer69.078.664.673.386.4
Subepithelial layer98.085.7100.0100.098.9
Revised diagnostic results
Total layer95.085.797.590.097.5
Epithelial layer93.070.095.673.396.5
Subepithelial layer98.085.7100.0100.098.9
Table 4 Extent of the remaining epithelium and diagnostic results of the bile duct margin
Extent of the remaining epitheliumNegative (%)Borderline (%)Positive (%)Total (%)
FSD
E1 (0%-24%)22 (66.6)9 (27.3)2 (6.1)33 (100)
E2 (25%-49%)8 (38.1)11 (52.4)2 (9.5)21 (100)
E3 (50%-100%)14 (30.4)21 (45.7)11 (23.9)46 (100)
PSD
E1 (0%-24%)22 (68.7)7 (21.9)3 (9.4)32 (100)
E2 (25%-49%)9 (42.9)9 (42.9)3 (14.3)21 (100)
E3 (50%-100%)28 (59.6)11 (23.4)8 (17.0)47 (100)
Table 5 Diagnostic discordance between frozen section diagnosis and permanent section diagnosis
Diagnostic discordance
Total (%)
Yes (%)No (%)
Epithelial layer31 (31.0)69 (69.0)100 (100)
pCCA21 (38.2)34 (61.8)55 (100)
dCCA10 (22.2)35 (77.8)45 (100)
Subepithelial layer2 (2.0)98 (98.0)100 (100)
pCCA1 (1.8)54 (98.2)55 (100)
dCCA1 (2.2)44 (97.8)45 (100)
Total layer28 (28.0)72 (72.0)100 (100)
pCCA18 (32.7)37 (67.3)55 (100)
dCCA10 (22.2)35 (77.8)45 (100)
Table 6 Details of diagnostic discordance between frozen section diagnosis and permanent section diagnosis
Epithelial layer (pCCA:dCCA)Subepithelial layer (pCCA:dCCA)
From negative to borderline4 (2:2)0 (0:0)
From negative to positive1 (0:1)1 (1:0)
From borderline to negative20 (13:7)0 (0:0)
From borderline to positive2 (2:0)1 (0:1)
From positive to borderline4 (4:0)0 (0:0)
Total31 (21:10)2 (1:1)
Table 7 Local recurrence-free survival rates of patients according to the status of the bile duct margin evaluated by frozen section diagnosis
Duration (yr)NegativeBorderlinePositive
Total layer
Number of cases263117
10.9160.9180.518
30.7690.7250.194
50.7690.7250.194
1Epithelial layer
Number of cases26306
10.9160.9150.333
30.7690.7220.000
50.7690.7220.000
Table 8 Local recurrence-free survival rates of patients according to the status of the bile duct margin evaluated by permanent section diagnosis
Duration (yr)NegativeBorderlinePositive
Total layer
Number of cases362018
10.9400.8620.667
30.7100.7900.356
50.710NDND
1Epithelial layer
Number of cases36206
10.9400.8620.333
30.7100.7900.167
50.710NDND