Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1627-1636
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627
Table 1 Patient characteristics and endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography related data n (%) (n = 244)
CharacteristicsValue
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range)70.8 ± 10.2 (44-95)
Sex
Male130 (53.3)
Female114 (46.7)
Aspirin3 (1.2)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), pre-procedure, mean ± SD (range)7.09 ± 6.45 (0.2-28.9)
Normal53 (21.7)
Elevated191 (78.3)
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure14 (5.7)
Cholangitis, pre-procedure68 (27.9)
Diagnosis
Cholangiocarcinoma118 (48.4)
Hilar75 (63.6)
Distal43 (36.4)
Pancreatic cancer79 (32.4)
Head68 (86.1)
Body/Tail11 (13.9)
Gallbladder cancer21 (8.6)
Ampullary cancer18 (7.4)
Hepatocellular carcinoma3 (1.2)
Others5 (2.0)
Pancreatic duct invasion
Yes85 (34.8)
No159 (65.2)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes170 (69.7)
No73 (29.9)
Pancreatic duct injection
0187 (76.6)
1-224 (9.8)
333 (13.5)
ERPD4 (1.6)
Stent success rate244 (100)
Number of initially inserted SEMS
1230 (94.3)
214 (5.7)
Stent type
Uncovered190 (77.9)
Covered54 (22.1)
Post-ERCP complication
Present9 (3.7)
Absent'234 (95.9)
Post-ERCP complication type
Pancreatitis7 (2.9)
Mild / moderate6 (2.5)/1 (0.4)
Bleeding, mild2 (0.8)
Perforation0 (0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia30 (12.3)
Stent complication
None199 (81.6)
Stent occlusion44 (18.0)
Stent migration1 (0.4)
Patency
No further procedure199 (81.6)
ERBD restent1 (0.4)
SEMS restent32 (13.1)
PTBD12 (4.9)
Table 2 Characteristics and complications according to the cancer type n (%)
Cholangiocarcinoman = 118Pancreatic cancern = 79non-pancreaticobiliary cancern = 47P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD73.5 ± 9.467.8 ± 10.469.3 ± 10.30.002
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure6 (5.1)3 (3.8)5 (10.6)0.273
Cholangitis, pre-procedure28 (23.7)19 (24.1)21 (44.7)0.021
Pancreatic duct invasion< 0.001
Yes12 (10.2)64 (81.0)9 (19.1)
No106 (89.8)15 (19.0)38 (80.9)
Lymph node metastasis0.345
Yes77 (65.3)58 (73.4)35 (74.5)
No41 (34.7)21 (26.6)12 (25.5)
Pancreatic duct injection0.606
092 (78.0)59 (74.7)36 (76.6)
1-28 (6.8)9 (11.4)7 (14.9)
318 (15.3)11 (13.9)4 (8.5)
Number of initially inserted SEMS0.004
1106 (89.8)79 (100.0)45 (95.7)
212 (10.2)0 (0.0)2 (4.3)
Post-ERCP complication0.696
Present5 (4.2)2 (2.5)2 (4.3)
Absent113 (95.8)77 (97.5)45 (95.7)
Post-ERCP complication type0.914
Pancreatitis4 (3.4)1 (1.3)2 (4.3)0.681
Mild/moderate3 (2.5)/1 (0.8)1 (1.3)/0 (0)2 (4.3)/0 (0)
Bleeding, mild1 (0.8)1 (1.3)0 (0)
Perforation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia13 (11.0)9 (11.4)8 (17.0)
Stent complication0.539
None90 (76.3)70 (88.6)39 (83.0)
Stent occlusion27 (22.9)9 (11.4)8 (17.0)
Stent migration1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)
Patency0.161
No further procedure90 (76.3)70 (88.6)39 (83)
ERBD restent1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)
SEMS restent20 (16.9)9 (11.4)3 (6.4)
PTBD7 (5.9)0 (0)5 (10.6)
Table 3 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to location of cholangiocarcinoma n (%)
Hilarn = 75Distaln = 43P value
Post-ERCP complication type0.717
Pancreatitis3 (4.0)1 (2.3)
Mild/moderate2 (2.7)/1 (1.3)1 (2.3)/0 (0)
Bleeding, mild1 (1.3)0 (0.0)
Perforation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia7 (9.3)5 (11.6)
Stent complication0.756
None57 (76.0)33 (76.7)1.000
Stent occlusion17 (22.7)10 (23.3)
Stent migration1 (1.3)0 (0.0)
Table 4 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to location of pancreatic cancer
Headn = 68Body/tailn = 11P value
Post-ERCP complication type1.000
Pancreatitis1 (1.5)0 (0.0)
Mild/moderate1 (1.5)0 (0.0)
Bleeding, mild1 (1.5)0 (0.0)
Perforation1 (1.5)0 (0.0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia8 (11.8)2 (18.2)0.624
Stent complication1.000
None60 (88.2)10 (90.9)
Stent occlusion8 (11.8)1 (9.1)
Stent migration0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Table 5 Rates of complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy according to stent type
Uncoveredn = 190Coveredn = 54P value
Normal181 (95.3)49 (90.7)
Abnormal9 (4.7)5 (9.3)
Post-ERCP complication1.000
Present7 (3.7)2 (3.7)
Absent'183 (96.3)52 (96.3)
Post-ERCP complication type0.838
Pancreatitis5 (2.6)2 (3.7)
Mild / moderate4 (2.1) / 1 (0.5)2 (3.7) / 0 (0)
Bleeding, mild2 (1.1)0 (0)
Perforation0 (0)0 (0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia25 (13.2)5 (9.3)0.638
Stent complication0.758
None156 (82.1)43 (79.6)
Stent occlusion33 (17.4)11 (20.4)
Stent migration1 (0.5)0 (0)
Patency0.012
No further procedure156 (82.1)43 (79.6)
ERBD restent1 (0.5)0 (0)
SEMS restent28 (14.7)4 (7.4)
PTBD5 (2.6)7 (13)
Table 6 Characteristics according to complications on biliary stenting with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy n (%)
No complicationn = 235Complicationn = 9P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range)70.61 ± 10.3375.27 ± 5.550.993
Gender1.000
Male126 (53.6)5 (55.5)
Female109 (46.6)4 (44.5)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), pre-procedure, mean ± SD7.00 ± 6.468.38 ± 6.540.362
Normal52 (22.2)1 (11.1)0.453
Elevated183 (77.8)8 (88.9)
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure13 (5.5)1 (11.1)0.485
Cholangitis, pre-procedure64 (27.2)4 (44.4)0.472
Diagnosis0.748
Cholangiocarcinoma112 (47.6)6 (66.7)
Hilar71 (30.2)4 (44.4)
Distal41 (17.4)2 (22.2)
Pancreatic cancer77 (32.8)2 (22.2)
Head66 (28.1)2 (22.2)
Body/tail11 (4.7)0 (0.0)
Gallbladder cancer20 (8.5)1 (11.1)
Ampullary cancer18 (7.7)0 (0.0)
Hepatocellular carcinoma3 (1.3)0 (0.0)
Others5 (2.1)0 (0.0)
Pancreatic duct invasion0.324
Yes80 (34.0)5 (55.6)
No155 (66.0)4 (44.4)
Lymph node metastasis0.176
Yes166 (70.6)5 (55.6)
No69 (29.4)4 (44.4)
Pancreatic duct injection0.662
0181 (77.0)6 (66.7)
1-223 (9.8)1 (11.1)
331 (13.2)2 (22.2)
Number of inserted SEMS0.031
1224 (95.3)7 (77.8)
211 (4.7)2 (22.2)
Stent type1.000
Uncovered183 (77.9)7 (77.8)
Covered52 (22.1)2 (22.2)
Stent complication1.000
Stent occlusion42 (17.9)2 (22.2)
Stent migration1 (0.4)0 (0.0)
Patency0.512
No further procedure192 (81.7)7 (77.8)
ERBD restent1 (0.4)0 (0.0)
SEMS restent31 (13.2)1 (11.1)
PTBD11 (4.7)1 (11.1)