Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2017; 23(6): 1030-1037
Published online Feb 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.1030
Table 1 Bowel-cleansing regimens applied in this study
Non-split-dose regimenSplit-dose regimen
Low-residue diet3 d3 d
Type of last mealRice porridgeRice porridge
Time of last mealLunch (12:00 pm)Dinner (6:00 pm)
Bowel cleansing product (day before examination)PEG/AA 1 L + water 0.5 L (6:00 pm-7:30 pm)PEG/AA 1 L + water 0.5 L (9:00 pm-10:30 pm)
PEG/AA 1 L + water 0.5 L (8:30 pm-10:00 pm)
Bowel cleansing product (day of the examination)-PEG/AA 1 L + water 0.5 L (4:00 am-5:30 am)
Table 2 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients n (%)
Non-spilt-dose regimen
Split-dose regimen
P value
n = 189n = 189
Gender0.753
Male111 (58.7)114 (60.3)
Female78 (41.3)75 (39.7)
Age (yr)53.4 ± 10.951.8 ± 9.30.110
Previous examination0.547
Screening43 (22.8)48 (25.4)
Surveillance146 (77.2)141 (74.6)
Bowel movement (wk-1)7.1 ± 3.37.1 ± 3.50.738
Medications for constipation0.869
Yes5 (2.6)4 (2.1)
No169 (89.4)172 (91.0)
Table 3 Difference of bowel preparation score between two groups n (%)
Non-spilt-dose regimen
Split-dose regimen
P value
n = 189n = 189
< 0.001
Adequate
Score 1 (Excellent)7 (3.7)33 (17.5)
Score 2 (Good)47 (24.9)119 (63.0)
Score 3 (Fair)107 (56.6)31 (16.4)
Inadequate
Score 4 (Poor)20 (10.6)5 (2.6)
Score 5 (Inadequate)8 (4.2)1 (0.5)
Table 4 Compliance of bowel preparation according to different preparation regimens
Non-spilt-dose regimen
Split-dose regimen
P value
n = 189n = 189
Low-residue diet0.542
< 3 d54 (28.6%)49 (25.9%)
≥ 3 d134 (70.9%)140 (74.1%)
Type of last meal< 0.001
Rice porridge110 (58.2%)141 (74.6%)
Other low residue diet148 (25.4%)25 (13.2%)
Normal or high residue diet19 (10.1%)4 (2.1%)
Time of last meal< 0.001
As recommended or earlier138 (73.0%)176 (93.1%)
After recommendation50 (26.5%)11 (5.8%)
Dose of PEG/AA intake0.736
2 L185 (97.9%)184 (97.4%)
< 2 L4 (2.1%)5 (2.6%)
Dose of water intake0.081
≥ 1 L185 (97.9%)189 (100%)
< 1 L3 (1.6%)0 (0%)
Table 5 Subjective discomfort of patients according to different preparation regimens n (%)
Non-split-dose regimen
Split-dose regimen
P value
n = 189n = 189
Discomfort score (0-10)15.2 ± 2.74.8 ± 2.80.257
Willingness to repeat same regimen
Yes132 (69.8)133 (70.4)0.243
No47 (24.9)52 (27.5)
Adverse events
Poor taste53 (50.5)74 (54.0)0.585
Nausea/vomiting39 (37.1)53 (38.7)0.806
Bloating38 (36.2)54 (39.4)0.608
Excessive diarrhea27 (25.7)27 (19.7)0.266
Anal pain20 (19.0)14 (10.2)0.050
Abdominal pain/discomfort13 (12.4)20 (14.6)0.618
Dizziness9 (8.6)9 (6.6)0.556
Fecal incontinence8 (7.6)7 (5.1)0.422
Sleep disturbance6 (5.7)56 (40.9)< 0.001
Bulky fluid4 (3.8)0 (0)0.021
Chilling3 (2.9)1 (0.7)0.198
Headache1 (1.0)0 (0)0.252
Table 6 Factors associated with adequate bowel preparation
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)P valueHR (95%CI)P value
Age0.99 (0.97-1.01)0.524
Gender (female)1.26 (0.83-1.91)0.273
Bowel movement (wk-1)1.00 (0.94-1.06)0.989
Low-residue diet (≥ 3 d)1.55 (1.00-2.39)0.0481.49 (0.88-2.53)0.139
Time of last meal13.47 (1.92-6.29)< 0.0011.61 (0.78-3.30)0.195
Type of last meal
Normal or high residue1.00 (reference)1.00 (reference)
Rice porridge only5.09 (1.83-14.12)0.0022.26 (0.70-7.30)0.174
Other low residue22.86 (0.94-8.69)0.0642.53 (0.72-8.93)0.150
Preparation regimen (split-dose)10.63 (6.57-17.19)< 0.00110.89 (6.53-18.17)< 0.001
Intake of PEG/AA (dose)2.08 (0.20-22.06)0.543
Intake of water (dose)0.036 (0.00-12.36)0.265
Table 7 Correlation of bowel cleanliness and interval between finishing bowel preparation and colonoscopy
Bowel preparation scoreInadequatePoorFairGoodExcellentP value
n = 4n = 25n = 138n = 165n = 40
Interval1661.3 ± 91.3667.3 ± 205.6631.0 ± 201.3413.7 ± 210.2364.5 ± 167.8< 0.001
T2aaabbTukeyB