Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2017; 23(47): 8405-8414
Published online Dec 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405
Table 1 Characteristics of patients n (%)
CharacteristicsValue
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range)69.1 ± 11.8 (22-92)
Gender: M/F111/197 (36/64)
Smoker21 (6.8)
Alcohol35 (11.4)
Cirrhosis20 (6.5)
Anticoagulation36 (11.7)
Indication
Iron-deficiency anemia103 (33.4)
Polyp follow-up68 (22.1)
Dyspepsia/ GERD51 (16.6)
Upper hemorrhage33 (10.7)
Pernicious anemia7 (2.3)
Dysphagia6 (1.9)
FAP4 (1.3)
Others36 (11.7)
ASA
I34 (10.4)
II202 (62)
III88 (27)
IV2 (0.6)
Table 2 Characteristics of polyps (the biggest in case of multiple polyps) n (%)
CharacteristicsValue
Paris classification of polyps
0- Is152 (49.4)
0-Ip156 (50.6)
Size (mm), mean ± SD (range)15 ± 8.9 mm (5-60)
Size
5 mm17 (5.5)
6-10 mm109 (35.4)
11-20 mm132 (42.9)
> 20 mm47 (15.3)
Location
Fundus50 (16.2)
Body112 (36.4)
Incisura5 (1.6)
Antrum119 (38.6)
Pylorus8 (2.6)
Duodenum14 (4.5)
Physician expertise
Staff268 (87)
Fellow40 (13)
Polyp histology
Hyperplastic224 (72.7)
Adenoma29 (9.4)
Fundic glands hyperplasia25 (8.1)
Adenocarcinoma8 (2.6)
Inflammatory fibroid7 (2.3)
Neuroendocrine tumor5 (1.6)
Others17 (2.3)
No retrieved2 (0.6)
Table 3 Endoscopy and polypectomy technical details
Characteristicsn (%)
Sedation302 (98.1)
University Hospital251 (81.5)
Endoscopist Staff268 (87)
Number of polyps resected
1205 (66.6)
255 (17.9)
320 (6.5)
48 (2.6)
57 (2.3)
> 513 (4.2)
Cautery settings
Endocut236 (76.6)
Hemorrhage prophylaxis219 (71.1)
One technique149 (68)
Two or more70 (32)
Prophylactic technique
Injection alone119 (54.3)
Clips16 (7.3)
Clips + injection60 (27.4)
Endoloop9 (4.1)
Endoloop + injection5 (2.3)
APC5 (2.3)
APC + injection2 (0.9)
APC+ clips + injection3 (1.4)
Table 4 Type and severity of adverse events according to ASGE lexicon
Unexpected events
Time of presentationSeverity (intraprocedural hemorrhage)Admission or prolongation of hospitalizationRepeat endoscopyAEs
ASGE lexicon
Typen = 45n = 9Severity
Hemorrhage30Intraprocedural, n = 26Grade 1, n =11Yes, n = 2No2Mild
Grade 3, n =14
Grade 4, n =1
3 d, n = 1NoYes1Moderate
7 d, n = 2YesYes2Moderate (1)
Severe (1)
30 d, n = 1YesYes1Moderate
Abdominal pain1024 hNoNo
Respiratory desaturation2IntraproceduralNoNo
Pneumothorax1IntraproceduralYesNo1Moderate
SBP17 dYesNo1Severe
Esophageal laceration1IntraproceduralYesNo1Mild
Table 5 Univariate analysis of bleeding risk factors n (%)
Bleeding, n = 30No bleeding, n = 278P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD69.5 ± 1069.1 ± 120.137
Gender0.634
Male12 (40)99 (35.6)
Female18 (60)179 (64.4)
Anticoagulation10.217
Yes14 (46.7)98 (35.2)
No16 (53.3)180 (64.7)
ASA0.515
I, II20 (66.7)201 (72.3)
III, IV10 (33.3)77 (27.7)
Paris classification of polyps1
0-Ip17 (56.7)135 (48.6)0.399
0-Is13 (43.3)143 (51.4)
Polyp size1< 0.036
≤ 10 mm7 (23)120 (43.2)
> 10 mm23 (77)158 (56.8)
Location0.557
Stomach28 (93.3)266 (95.7)
Duodenum2 (6.7)12 (4.3)
Polyp histology10.092
Hyperplastic18 (60)206 (74.4)
Others12 (40)72 (25.6)
Polyp with dysplasia0.053
Yes8 (26.7)36 (13.4)
No22 (73.3)232 (86.6)
Physician expertise1< 0.026
Staff30 (100)238 (85.6)
Fellow0 (0)40 (14.4)
University hospital0.207
Yes27 (90)224 (80.6)
No3 (10)54 (19.4)
Number of polyps resected0.989
One20 (66.7)185 (66.5)
More than one10 (33.3)93 (33.4)
Use of endocut10.068
Yes27 (90)209 (75.2)
No3 (10)69 (24.8)
Hemorrhage prophylaxis10.479
Yes23 (76.7)196 (70.5)
No7 (23.3)82 (29.5)

  • Citation: Córdova H, Argüello L, Loras C, Naranjo Rodríguez A, Riu Pons F, Gornals JB, Nicolás-Pérez D, Andújar Murcia X, Hernández L, Santolaria S, Leal C, Pons C, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, García-Bosch O, Papo Berger M, Ulla Rocha JL, Sánchez-Montes C, Fernández-Esparrach G. Rate of adverse events of gastroduodenal snare polypectomy for non-flat polyp is low: A prospective and multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(47): 8405-8414
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i47/8405.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8405