Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2017; 23(40): 7232-7241
Published online Oct 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i40.7232
Table 1 Relationship between microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 expression and perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer
LC3PNI
P valuer
AbsentPresent
Low expression18220.0180.227
High expression1653
Table 2 Relationships of perineural invasion and microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 expression with clinicopathological features
ParameternPNIP valueLC3P value
AbsentPresentLow expressionHigh expression
Age (yr)
≤ 585419350.37323310.206
> 585515401738
Gender
Male6115460.09326350.148
Female4819291434
Tumor location
Head6617490.12928380.124
Body/tail4317261231
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 2186120.838100.455
> 29128633259
Histologic grade
Well or moderate7424500.68523510.077
Poor3510251718
Vascular invasion
Negative8326570.95731520.801
Positive26818917
Lymph node metastasis
Negative3617190.011a18180.043a
Positive7317562251
AJCC stage
I + II6922470.83825440.895
III + IV4012281525
Pancreatitis
Negative3015150.009a12180.659
Positive7919602851
Diabetes
Negative8927620.68433560.862
Positive20713713
CA19-9 level (U/mL)
≤ 373719190.001a13240.808
> 377215572745
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of perineural invasion with clinicopathological features in pancreatic cancer
ParameterEstimate, BStandard errorWald statisticP valueOdds ratio95%CI
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative)1.0680.4994.5810.032a2.9111.094-7.743
CA199 (> 37 U/mL vs ≤ 37 U/mL)1.5080.4939.3680.002a4.5201.720-11.874
Pancreatitis (present vs absent)1.3010.5146.4190.011a3.6731.343-10.049
LC3 (high vs low)1.0320.4914.4060.036a2.8061.071-7.351
Constant-7.2091.79916.05800.001
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 expression with clinicopathological features in pancreatic cancer
ParameterEstimate, BStandard errorWald statisticP valueOdds ratio95%CI
PNI (present vs absent)0.9970.4275.4510.02a2.711.174-6.259
Constant-1.1150.7322.3160.1280.328
Table 5 Univariate analysis of survival in patients who underwent radical surgery
ParameterHazard ratio95%CIP value
PNI (present vs absent)3.7011.539-8.9030.003a
LC3 (high vs low)3.1961.433-7.1260.005a
Sex (male vs female)1.1540.590-2.2600.676
Age (> 58 yr vs ≤ 58 yr)1.1760.621-2.2250.619
Tumor location (body/tail vs head)1.1020.570-2.1310.773
Histologic grade (poorly vs well or moderate)1.2870.636-2.6040.484
Tumor size (> 2 cm vs ≤ 2 cm)0.9400.444-1.9910.871
Vascular invasion (positive vs negative)1.8210.883-3.7550.105
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative)0.8710.449-1.6880.682
AJCC stage (III + IV vs I + II)1.4730.752-2.8890.259
Diabetes (present vs absent)1.1050.522-2.3370.795
Pancreatitis (present vs absent)1.0750.520-2.2220.845
CA19-9 level (> 37 U/mL vs ≤ 37 U/mL)2.6481.286-5.4540.008a
Table 6 Multivariable analysis of survival in patients who underwent radical surgery
ParameterHazard ratio95%CIP value
PNI (present vs absent)2.9621.212-7.2380.017a
LC3 (high vs low)2.4911.107-5.6080.027a