Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2017; 23(33): 6100-6110
Published online Sep 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i33.6100
Table 1 Relationships between the expression of HOTAIR and clinicopathological characteristics in 65 patients with gastric cancer
CharacteristicExpression of HOTAIR
P value
Low n = 32High n = 33
Sex0.408
Female711
Male2522
Age in yr0.455
≤ 601721
> 601512
Histological grade1.000
Well/moderate1415
Other1818
Tumor invasion depth, T0.018
Tis, T1,T2156
T3 or above1727
Lymph node metastasis, N0.023
N0124
N1 or above2029
TNM stage0.024
I/II2314
III/IV919
Tumor location0.102
Antrum815
Cardia109
Angulus135
Body13
Full stomach01
Laure’s classification0.373
Intestinal1715
Diffuse1217
Mixed31
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical pathological characteristics and overall survival of 65 patients with gastric cancer
FactorUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
HOTAIR expression2.9431.580-5.4830.0011.9981.058-3.7720.033
Tumor invasion depth, T1, T2/above2.6511.316-5.3410.0061.6760.691-4.0670.254
Lymphatic metastasis, absent/present3.4701.459-8.2500.0054.3241.701-10.9930.002
TNM stage, I/II, III/IV4.4942.351-8.592< 0.0013.5981.624-7.9750.002
Histology grade, well, moderate/others0.9670.535-1.7500.913
Age, < 60/> 600.7300.396-1.3440.312
Sex, male/female0.8220.428-1.5810.557
Tumor location0.8390.623-1.1310.250
Lauren’s classification1.2560.757-2.0840.378