Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2017; 23(31): 5787-5797
Published online Aug 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5787
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the cohort
Characteristicn (%)
Age (yr)
≤ 6533 (48.5)
> 6535 (51.5)
Gender
Female39 (57.4)
Male29 (42.6)
Cholecystolithiasis
Yes41 (60.3)
No27 (39.7)
Diabetes
Yes17 (25.0)
No51 (75.0)
Fever
Yes9 (13.2)
No59 (86.8)
Jaundice
Yes15 (22.1)
No53 (77.9)
ALT
Normal53 (77.9)
Elevated15 (22.1)
AST
Normal50 (75.8)
Elevated16 (24.2)
TBil
Normal49 (72.1)
Elevated19 (27.9)
DBil
Normal50 (73.5)
Elevated18 (26.5)
GGT
Normal43 (69.4)
Elevated19 (30.6)
ALP
Normal45 (72.6)
Elevated17 (27.4)
CEA
Normal42 (72.4)
Elevated16 (27.6)
CA 19-9
Normal26 (44.1)
Elevated33 (55.9)
Surgical type
Curative35 (51.5)
Noncurative33 (48.5)
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 343 (63.2)
> 325 (36.8)
Differentiation
Lowly-undifferentiated15 (22.1)
Moderately-well53 (77.9)
T stage
Tis1 (1.5)
T13 (4.4)
T229 (42.6)
T335 (51.5)
N stage
N038 (55.9)
N122 (32.4)
N28 (11.7)
M stage
M060 (88.2%)
M18 (11.8%)
TNM stage
I4 (5.9)
II24 (35.3)
IIIA9 (13.2)
IIIB17 (25.0)
IVA0 (0)
IVB14 (20.6)
Table 2 Threonine and tyrosine kinase staining results in tumor and normal tissues
LocalizationPositive cell rate (%)n (%)
Median (range)
Tumor tissuesNormal tissuesTumor tissuesNormal tissues
Cytoplasmic staining
Negative--00
Positive100 (10-100)99 (40-100)68 (100)68 (100)
1+55 (10-100)85 (18-100)41 (60.3)14 (20.6)
2+90 (5-100)100 (80-100)49 (72.1)54 (79.4)
3+20901 (1.5)1 (1.5)
Nuclear staining
Negative--8 (11.8)2 (2.9)
Positive15 (1-98)60 (1-90)60 (88.2)66 (97.1)
1+15 (1-85)60 (1-90)57 (83.8)59 (86.8)
2+45 (5-98)90 (60-90)8 (11.8)7 (10.3)
3+--00
Table 3 H-score values in tumor and normal tissues
GroupnLocalizationMinimumMaximumMedian
Tumor68Nucleus019612.5
68Cytoplasm10220170
Normal68Nucleus018060
68Cytoplasm40270190
Table 4 Various comparisons in tumor and normal tissues for threonine and tyrosine kinase expression
GroupnMinimumMaximumMedianMean rankP value
Comparison between nucleus and cytoplasm in normal tissues
Nucleus6801806039.65<0.0011
Cytoplasm684027019097.35
Comparison between nucleus and cytoplasm in tumor tissues
Nucleus68019612.538.98<0.0011
Cytoplasm681022017098.02
Comparison between tumor and normal tissues in nucleus
Tumor68019612.549.54<0.0011
Normal6801806087.46
Comparison between tumor and normal tissues in cytoplasm
Tumor681022017061.190.0261
Normal684027019075.81
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses for gallbladder cancer
χ2P valueOR (95%CI)
Univariate
Age2.2210.136
Gender0.1670.683
Cholecystolithiasis0.3460.558
Diabetes0.1650.685
Fever0.0010.989
Jaundice15.1100.0241
ALT17.7810.0051
AST15.7080.0171
TBil0.2410.516
DBil16.6450.0101
GGT0.8990.343
ALP14.0990.0431
CEA3.1370.077
CA 19-9112.385< 0.0011
Surgical type120.715< 0.0011
Tumor size0.0990.754
Differentiation112.385< 0.0011
T stage121.594< 0.0011
N stage119.887< 0.0011
M stage129.503< 0.0011
TNM stage133.062< 0.0011
TTK121.226< 0.0011
Multivariate
Surgery type10.00114.250 (1.867-9.674)
T stage10.01312.927 (1.258-6.808)
TTK10.00110.076 (0.024-0.241)
Table 6 Correlations between TTK expression and clinicopathological parameters
ParameterTTK expression
χ2P-value
Low expressionHigh expression
Age (yr)
≤ 6516170.0590.808
> 651817
Gender
Female20190.2770.598
Male1316
CEA
Normal20223.5120.061
Elevated124
CA 19-91
Normal10165.7560.0161
Elevated2310
Tumor size
≤ 322210.0630.801
> 31213
Differentiation1
Lowly-undifferentiated1144.1910.0411
Moderately-well2330
T stage1
1 + 282517.015< 0.0011
3269
Nodal involvement1
Negative122611.691< 0.0011
Positive228
Metastasis1
M027335.1000.0241
M171
TNM stage 1
I + II52319.671< 0.0011
III + IV2911