Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2017; 23(27): 4879-4891
Published online Jul 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i27.4879
Table 1 Published studies on role of red blood cell distribution width in inflammatory bowel disease
Ref.No. of subjectsStudy periodActivity indexOutcome measuresRDW ValueStatistics
Other laboratory studiesMain findings
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Clarke et al[21], 2008156 CDJanuary 1st 2004 to December 31st 2005Differential diagnosis CD vs UCCD 14.9 UC 14.3P = 0.027RDW value was significantly higher in CD relative to ulcerative colitis patients
128 UC
Cakal et al[23], 200974 UC, 22 CD, and 20 age/sex-matched controlsCDAICRP, ESR, Fibrinogen, PLT, WBC, HbRDW and CRP were the most significant indicators of active UC and active CD, respectively
> 150 = activeActive UC or CDUC 148871
Truelove-Witts scale for UC moderate and severe = activeCD 14.17863
Oustamanolakis et al[28], 201151 CDCDAIAnemia (IDA/ACD)14 (cut off)9381Ferritin, Tsat, sTfRHigh RDW and low RSF values were the best markers for the diagnosis of IDA
49 UC> 150 activeIDARDWR-C, RSF, IRF,
102 age matched controls< 150 inactiveHb, ESR
Simple ClinicalCRP
Colitis Activity Index for UC
Active ≥ 3
Yeşil et al[24], 201156 CDCDAIActive UC/CD14 (cut off )79 (CD)93 (CD)CRP, ESR, PLT, HbRDW was elevated in IBD and markedly increased in active disease. RDW may be a marker of active CD, whereas ESR is for active UC
61 UC> 150 = active17 (UC)84 (UC)
44 age/sex matched controlsTruelove-Witts scale for UC
Song et al[26], 2012101 CDJanuary 2003 and December 2010CDAIActive UC/CD14.1 CD without anemia (cut off)82 (CD)83 (CD)CRP, ESR, PLT, WBC, Hb,RDW was associated with active CD/UC in patients with or without anemia
120 UCremission < 150, mild 150-220, moderate to severe ≥ 220; Mayo score for UC13.8 UC without anemia (cut off )
remission < 3, mild 3-6, moderate to severe ≥ 676 (UC)86 (UC)
Ipek et al[25], 2015206 active UCJanuary 2009 to December 2011Endoscopic Rachmilewitz activity index > 4 = Active UCActive UC 16.8CRP, ESR, PLT, WBC, HbRDW can be used as a marker for disease activity in ulcerative colitis, but not in the non-anemic group
104 remission UCActive UC vs remissionRemission UC 15.5P < 0.001
Oliveira et al[27], 201620 Active CDJanuary 1st and September 30th 2013CDAIRDW association with Active CD16 (Cut off )3088CRP, ESR, PLT, WBC, Hb, MCVRDW was associated with the severity of CD. The RDW cutoff 16% showed possible clinical applicability
99 remission CD≥ 150 = active CD
Table 2 Published studies on role of red blood cell distribution width in liver disorders
Ref.No. of subjectsStudy periodLiver pathologyOutcome measuresRDW value (%)StatisticsOther laboratory studiesMain findings
Lou et al[35], 201216 AHBAugust 1st, 2010AHB, CHB, CHB-severeRDW association with HBV related liver disease states and mortality14.38 ± 1.72 (AHB)P < 0.05ALT, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin, WBC, Hb, MCV, INR, Creatinine, BUN, HBsAg HBeAg, HBcAb IgM, HBV DNARDW is significantly increased in HBV infected patients compared to controls, and RDW is an independent predicting factor for the 3 mo mortality rate in HBV infected patients.
61 CHBAugust 1st, 2011MELD score16.37 ± 2.43 (CHB)P < 0.001
46 CHB-severe18.3 ± 3.11 (CHB-severe)P < 0.001
48 healthy controls13.03 ± 1.33 healthy controls
NASH (Brunt’s criteria)P < 0.01Liver biopsy,Patients with NASH had higher RDW relative to simple steatosis and healthy control groups.
Cengiz et al[32], 201362 NASHJan-10Advanced fibrosis (2-4 points)RDW association with NASH and fibrosisNASH 14.28 ± 0.25P < 0.01Hb, platelets, MPV, WBC, lymphocytes,RDW was higher in patients with advanced fibrosis compared to mild
32 simple steatosisMay-13Mild fibrosis (0-1)Simple steatosis 13.37 ± 0.12ALT, AST, GGT Albumin, BUN, Creatinine, alkaline phosphatase
30 healthy controlsHealthy controls 12.96 ± 0.14
Advanced fibrosis 15.86 ± 0.4
Mild fibrosis 13.63 ± 0.67
Yang et al[38], 20131637 normal controlIndividuals were initially enrolled during 2010NAFLD criteria presence of definite hepatic steatosis on US scan (grade 3), and exclusion of secondary hepatic steatosis.RDW in NAFLD patients12.96 ± 1.08 (control)P = 0.000Total cholesterol, TG, Fasting glucose, HbRDW was increased in NAFLD patients
619 NALFD13.23 ± 1.01 (NAFLD)
Kim et al[55], 201324547 NAFLD patientsIndividuals were enrolled in 2010 (January 1st to December 30th)NAFLD diagnosis by US and questionnaires about alcohol consumption. Degree of liver fibrosis by BARD and FIB-4 scoresRDW and the level of fibrosis in NAFLD12.59±0.62 BARD score (0,1)P < 0.001Hb, MCV, LDL, TG, HDL, HbA1C, high sensitivity CRP, ferritin, PlateletIncreased RDW is independently associated with advanced fibrosis in NAFLD
12.99 ± 0.85 (BARD score 2-4)P < 0.001
12.61±0.77 (FIB-4 score < 1.3)
12.89 ± 0.71(FIB-4 score ≥ 1.3)
Karagoz et al[42], 2014229 biopsy proven naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patientsJanuary 2010 and November 2013Fibrosis in CHB (Ishak score)Relationship of RDW and MPV with the severity of fibrosis in CHB patients12.6 (cut off)91.50%Liver biopsy, WBC, Hb, Ht, platelets, MPV, PDW, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, albumin,RDW and MPV are significantly higher in HBV infected patients with severe fibrosis
Sensitivity
42.50%
Specificity
Huang et al[36], 201469 CHBJanuary 2011 and October 2013HBV related liver cirrhosisCorrelation of RDW with HBV cirrhosis, CHB; Child-Pugh and MELD scores16.07 ± 2.41 (HBV cirrhosis)P < 0.01AST, ALT, total bilirubin, albumin, WBC, Hb, platelets, INR, Creatinine, BUN. HBeAg, HBV DNARDW was elevated in HBV related cirrhosis and CHB relative to control, and was positively correlated with severity of HBV related cirrhosis
61 HBV liver cirrhosisChild-Pugh and MELD scores13.29 ± 1.09 (CHB)
41 controls12.75 ± 0.7 (controls)
Dogan et al[39], 201554 NASHDec-10NASH (NAFLD activity score)Inflammation in NASH13.3 (cut off)79.50%Liver biopsy,RDW is a specific and sensitive method to assess inflammation in NASH patients
39 controlsMar-12Fibrosis, 0 not significant (F0-F1); 1 significant (F2-F4)SensitivityHt, MCV platelets, ALT, AST, GGT LDL, HDL, TG, Fasting glucose, insulin,
Steatosis, 0 mild (grade 1); 1 moderate to severe (grade 2-3)73.30%Alkaline phosphatase
0 lobular inflammation (0-1);Specificity
1 moderate-severe (2-3)
Xu et al[34], 2015446 HBV infected patients who underwent liver biopsyJanuary 2010 and December 2011Liver fibrosis (no significant S0-S2, fibrosis vs advanced, S3-S4)RDW in liver fibrosis and inflammation13.3 (S0-S2)P = 0.01Liver biopsy, AST, ALT, total bilirubin, albumin, WBC, Hb, platelets, MCV, MPV, HBeAg, HBV DNARDW, together with other serum markers, could be useful in predicting liver fibrosis and necroinflammation in HBV infected patients
Inflammation (no significant (G0-G2) vs significant (G3-G4)13.6 (S3-S4)P < 0.001
13.2 (G0-G2)
13.7 (G3-G4)
Wang et al[37], 2016116 CHBJanuary 2010 to January 2015Liver fibrosis and inflammation: absent-mild (S0-S1, G0-G1) vs moderate-severe (S2-S4, G2-G4)RDW association with liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis13.4 (S0-S1)P < 0.001AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, GGT, globulin, total bilirubin, total bilirubin acid, total protein, albumin, WBC, RBC, Hb, MCV, plateletsRDW and globulin could be useful predictors of liver fibrosis and inflammation in chronic hepatitis patients, respectively.
65 PBC14.5 (S2-S4)
37 AIH13.0 (G0-G1)
14.2 (G2-G4)