Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2017; 23(2): 336-344
Published online Jan 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.336
Table 1 Characteristics of the trials
TrialType of IBSCriteriaSample sizeProbioticProbiotic dosage1ControlDuration of treatmentFollow-up
Pineton de Chambrun et al[10] 2015All typesRome III200Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-38561 capsule (500 mg) of S. cerevisiae/dPlacebo8 wk3 wk
8 × 109 CFU/g
Spiller et al[11] 2015All typesRome III379Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-38562 capsules of 500 mg of S. cerevisiae/dPlacebo12 wk-
8 × 109 CFU/g
Table 2 Patient characteristics for the 2 trials n (%)
Placebo groupActive group
Subjects, n287292
Age (yr), mean ± SD45.3 ± 14.0344.4 ± 14.79
Subject weight (kg), mean ± SD64.6 ± 12.3765.8 ± 13.75
Subject height (cm), mean ± SD164.3 ± 7.75164.9 ± 8.19
Subject BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD23.9 ± 3.9324.1 ± 4.53
Heart rate (bpm), mean ± SD70.2 ± 9.1070.6 ± 9.08
Female244 (85.0)245 (83.9)
Smoker65 (22.6)75 (25.7)
IBS-C134 (46.7)130 (44.5)
IBS-C with an abdominal pain/discomfort score ≥ 2 at baseline111 (38.7)111 (38.0)
IBS-D55 (19.2)56 (19.2)
IBS-M96 (33.4)103 (35.3)