Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2016; 22(48): 10625-10630
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10625
Table 1 Patient characteristics and indications for single-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy
CESBEBoth (CE prior to SBE)P value (CE vs SBE)
No. of patients40135347
Age (yr)49.4 ± 16.042.1 ± 15.845.3 ± 15.1< 0.01
Mean (range)(13-85)(11-84)(15-77)
Male/female248/153235/11838/90.177
Main indications, n (%)
OGIB207 (51.6)80 (22.7)30 (63.8)
Abdominal pain133 (31.2)184 (52.1)11 (23.4)
Diarrhea30 (7.5)52 (14.7)1 (2.1)
Other31 (7.7)37 (10.5)5 (10.6)
Table 2 Comparison of findings between single-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy n (%)
FindingsCE (n = 401)SBE (n = 353)
Overall detection rate231 (57.6)246 (69.7)
Superficial ulcer and erosion98 (42.4)111 (45.1)
Angiodysplasia67 (29.0)21 (8.5)
Mass24 (10.4)26 (10.6)
Crohn’s disease26 (11.3)86 (35.0)
Parasites13 (5.6)1 (0.4)
Diverticulum6 (2.6)3 (1.2)
Bleeding5 (2.2)0
Table 3 Subgroup analysis of the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy or single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or non-bleeding patients
Diagnostic yield (%)
P value
OGIBNon-bleeding
CE70.543.8< 0.01
SBE72.568.90.534
Table 4 Identification of positive findings on prior capsule endoscopy or single-balloon enteroscopy
FindingsCE: negative diagnosis
CE: definite diagnosis
CE: definite diagnosis
SBE: definite diagnosisSBE: definite diagnosisSBE: negative diagnosis
Angiodysplasia9
Erosion and superficial ulcer218
Mass31
Crohn’s disease112
Parasites1