Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2016; 22(40): 8991-8998
Published online Oct 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i40.8991
Table 1 Patients’ main clinical characteristics
OP pH-OP pH+
No. of patients1824
Male/female (% of male)8/10 (44%)6/18 (25%)
Mean age (years ± SD)52.52 ± 11.7150.51 ± 14.73
Mean BMI (± SD)24.50 ± 3.7124.32 ± 3.61
Mean RSI score18.0017.80
No. of patients with typical esophageal symptoms8/18 (44.44%)9/24 (37.50%)
Table 2 Esophageal sphincters and strength of contractions
OP pH-OP pH+P value
UES length (cm)4.2 (4.0-4.7)4.3 (4.1-4.8)
UES resting pressure (mmHg)126.0 (96.3-59.7)71.0 (60.8-110.6)< 0.05
PCI (cm•mmHg•s)313.5 (243-489)215.5 (103-290)< 0.05
DCI (cm•mmHg•s)2612 (1121-3195)1540 (951-2921)
LES length (cm)4.65 (3.8-5.1)5.15 (4.1-5.5)
LES resting pressure (mmHg)28.0 (19.8-34.1)26.0 (20.8-30.8)
LES 4s-IRP (mmHg)12.6 (8.0-17.4)14.2 (11.4-19.1)
Table 3 Contraction patterns
OP pH-OP pH+P value
No. of correct swallows184240
No. of peristaltic contractions (without breaks)154/182 (84.61%)144/235 (61.27%)< 0.01
No. of failed contractions2/184 (1.08%)5/240 (2.08%)
No. of peristaltic contractions with small breaks21/182 (11.95%)68/235 (28.93%)< 0.01
No. of peristaltic contractions with large breaks7/182 (3.84%)23/235 (9.78%)< 0.01
No. of premature contractions00
No. of rapid contractions00