Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2016; 22(33): 7579-7586
Published online Sep 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i33.7579
Table 1 Comparison of biochemical indexes between drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients
TP (g/L)ALB (g/L)AST (U/L)ALT (U/L)ALP (U/L)GGT (U/L)TBIL (μmol/L)DBIL (μmol/L)IBIL (μmol/L)
DILI (n = 124)66.2 ± 7.238.8 ± 5.6391.0 (148.0-731.0)503.0 (263-904)179.0 (121.0-294.0)200 (108.0-373.0)31.5 (14.88-109.2)49.3 (15.9-139.6)16.0 (10.6-37.2)
PBC (n = 116)74.9 ± 9.437.6 ± 5.9113.5 (74.8-190.5)113.0 (69.0-193.3)264.0 (166.3-443.3)311.5 (148.0-660.3)78.6 (25.2-189.0)16.3 (5.78-60.6)10.9 (7.38-21.6)
Table 2 Comparison of immunoglobulins between untyped drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients
IgG (g/L)IgM (g/L)IgA (g/L)
DILI (n = 124)13.1 ± 3.71.4 ± 0.82.6 ± 1.2
PBC (n = 116)18.8 ± 7.74.4 ± 2.93.4 ± 1.5
Table 3 Comparison of autoantibodies between untyped drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients n (%)
ANAAMASMAAMA-M2AMA-M4AMA-M9
DILI (n = 124)55 (44.3)4 (3.22)4 (3.22)3 (2.42)1 (0.80)3 (2.42)
PBC (n = 116)98 (84.4)98 (84.4)2 (3.45)98 (84.4)34 (29.3)19 (16.3)
χ241.761161.9320.554165.59839.09114.027
P value< 0.0001< 0.00010.685< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
Table 4 Comparison of antinuclear antibody at different titers between untyped drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients n (%)
1:1001:3201:10001:32001:10000
DILI (n = 124)43 (34.6)9 (7.25)2 (1.61)1 (0.80)0
PBC (n = 116)20 (17.2)27 (23.2)30 (25.8)19 (16.3)2 (1.72)
χ29.41212.06030.49819.0272.156
P value0.00020.001< 0.0001< 0.00010.233
Table 5 Comparison of biochemical indexes between typed drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients (median)
TP (g/L)ALB (g/L)AST (U/L)ALT (U/L)ALP (U/L)GGT (U/L)TBIL (μmol/L)DBIL (μmol/L)IBIL (μmol/L)
Hepatocellular type DILI (n = 90)66.8 ± 8.0a39.2 ± 6.2442.5 (174.3-941.5)a574.0 (205.6-1263.3)ace145.5 (86.3-217.5)ace179.0 (87.0-366.1)a74.30 (32.4-160.7)46.2 (17.8-96.6)16.2 (11.4-19.5)
Cholestatic type DILI (n = 20)63.7 ± 7.2a39.1 ± 5.8135.0 (82.6-185.8)154.0 (49.2-253.8)320.6 (196.6-454.2)208.50 (110.5-426.8)126.90 (55.3-266.7)99.0 (38.8-214.3)26.2 (13.3-35.2)
Mixed type DILI (n = 14)70.8 ± 8.637.6 ± 4.4654.1 (317.2-1389.1)ac844.0 (551.8-1945.8)ac328.75 (258.4-477.2)260.50 (142.8-418.5)111.10 (41.3-234.9)a95.2 (56.7-266.8)a21.9 (14.6-33.2)a
PBC (n = 116)74.9 ± 9.437.6 ± 6.0113.5 (74.8-190.5)113.0(69.0-193.3)264.0 (166.3-443.3)311.5 (148.0-660.3)78.6 (25.2-189.0)16.3 (5.8-60.6)10.9 (7.4-21.6)
Table 6 Comparison of immunoglobulins between typed drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients (median)
IgG (g/L)IgM (g/L)IgA (g/L)
Hepatocellular type DILI (n = 90)12.6 ± 5.2a1.1 ± 0.5a2.3 ± 1.0a
Cholestatic type DILI (n = 20)13.2 ± 5.7a1.3 ± 0.6a2.3 ± 1.2
Mixed type DILI (n = 14)11.9 ± 4.7a1.1 ± 0.6a2.1 ± 1.4
PBC (n = 116)18.8 ± 7.74.4 ± 2.93.4 ± 1.5
Table 7 Comparison of autoantibodies between typed drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients n (%)
AutoantibodiesANAAMASMAAMA-M2AMA-M4AMA-M9
Hepatocellular type DILI (n = 90)43 (47.7)a41 (45.5)a2 (2.22)a2 (2.22)2 (2.22)a0a1 (1.11)a
Cholestatic type DILI (n = 20)10 (50.0)a8 (40.0)a2 (10.0)a1 (5.00)1 (5.00)a0a1 (5.00)
Mixed type DILI (n = 14)6 (42.8)a6 (42.8)a0a1 (7.14)0a1 (7.14)1 (7.14)
PBC (n = 116)106 (91.3)98 (84.4)98 (84.4)2 (1.72)98 (84.4)34 (29.3)19 (16.3)
Table 8 Comparison of ANA at different titers between typed drug-induced liver injury and primary biliary cirrhosis patients n (%)
1:1001:3201:10001:32001:10000
Hepatocellular type DILI (n = 90)34 (37.7)a7 (7.77)a1 (1.11)a0a0
Cholestatic type DILI (n = 20)5 (25.0)2 (10.0)a0a1 (5.00)0
Mixed type DILI (n = 14)4 (28.5)1 (7.14)1 (7.14)0 (0.00)0
PBC (n = 116)20 (17.2)27 (23.2)30 (25.8)19 (16.3)2 (1.72)