Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2016; 22(29): 6690-6705
Published online Aug 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6690
Table 1 Calibration data of the chromatographic methods
CholesterolHypericin
Conc.PA ± SDRT ± SD (min)Conc.PA ± SDRT ± SD (min)
(×10-3 M)(n = 4)(×10-6 M)(n = 4)

2.632715275 ± 53228819.60 ± 0.190.6961398 ± 143129.85 ± 0.14
5.264995700 ± 62243919.83 ± 0.261.33120453 ± 335289.63 ± 0.03
7.891376450 ± 111335719.79 ± 0.142.55782945 ± 907389.41 ± 0.13
10.3124007250 ± 211642019.97± 0.115.010563681 ± 1346929.75 ± 0.11
12.9151245250 ± 266004220.03 ± 0.1210.020814150 ± 2263689.61 ± 0.07
Table 2 System suitability
System suitability parametersCholesterolHypericin
Theoretical plates (N)77005500
Asymmetry factor (As)1.020.75
Tailing factor (TF)1.000.61
Table 3 Results of the intra-day precision studies
CholesterolHypericin
Conc.RSD-PARSD-RTConc.RSD-PARSD-RT
(×10-3 M)(×10-6 M)

2.61.6%0.9%0.6%1.5%1.4%
5.20.9%1.3%1.3%1.1%0.3%
7.81.2%0.7%2.5%1.6%1.4%
10.31.7%0.5%5.0%1.3%1.1%
12.91.7%0.6%10.0%1.1%0.7%
Table 4 Results of the recovery studies
CompoundLabelled amountAdded amountFound amountRecoveryRSD
Cholesterol1.0 mg0.80 mg0.79 mg99.8%1.6%
1.00 mg1.00 mg100.0%1.1%
1.20 mg1.19 mg99.6%1.2%
Hypericin0.0025 μg0.0020 μg0.0029 μg108.8%0.4%
0.0025 μg0.0026 μg101.7%0.1%
0.0030 μg0.0032 μg103.6%1.6%
Table 5 Linearity of the high performance liquid chromatography methods for cholesterol and hypericin
CompoundLRSlopeSD (LR)R2LOD (M)LOQ (M)
Cholesteroly = 1 × 107 x + 3 × 1061171247920558810.9980.58 × 10-31.76 × 10-3
Hypericiny = 2 × 106x + 2 × 10520662974334800.9980.69 × 10-62.1 × 10-6
Table 6 Results of the analysis of cholesterol, mixed and pigment stones
Type of stonesCholesterol
HypericinP value
Conc. (× 10-3 M)PercentageConc. (× 10-6 M)
IPA/DMSO extractsin stoneIPA/DMSO extracts
Cholesterol7.68 ± 0.2583%-86%2.01 ± 0.38
Mixed6.65 ± 0.1271%-75%0.50 ± 0.190.011
Pigment0.08 ± 0.021%-3%0.23 ± 0.06