Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2016; 22(27): 6318-6327
Published online Jul 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6318
Table 1 General characteristic of studies included
Ref.Number of subjects with NAFLDAge (mean)Sex (male, %)BMI (mean)Primary measureExercise interventionDietary interventionProgram lengthSession frequency (wk)Exercise session duration (min)
Hallsworth et al[27], 201121AE: 52NRAE: 32.3H-MRSRENo8 wk345-60
C: 62C: 32.3
Sullivan et al[28], 201233E: 49AE: 33AE: 37.1H-MRSAENo16 wk530-60
C: 48C: 17C: 40
Bacchi et al[29], 201340AE: 56AE: 71AE: 30.5H-MRSAE and RENo4 mo360
RE: 56RE: 71RE: 28.8
Eckard et al[33], 201356LFDE: 44LFDE: 50LFDE: 32.7Liver biopsyAEYes6 mo4-720-60
MFDE: 55MFDE: 67MFDE: 40.3
ME: 52ME:67ME: 31.3
C: 51C: 64C: 34.7
Wong et al[12], 2013154AE: 51AE: 52AE: 51H-MRS,AEYes12 mo3-530
C: 26C: 41C: 25.3Fibroscan
Pugh et al[30], 201431AE: 48AE: 54AE: 31H-MRSAENo16 wk330-45
C: 47C: 50C: 30
Cuthbertson et al[31], 201669AE: 50AE: 77AE: 30.6H-MRSAENo16 wk3-530-45
C: 52C: 80C: 29.7
Hallsworth et al[32], 201529AE: 54NRAE: 31H-MRSAENo12 wk330-40
C: 52C: 31
Table 2 Summary of responses in patients receiving exercise only compared to controls
Ref.Number of subjects with NAFLDNumber of subjects who completed the studyExercise groupControl groupPercentage of fat reduction in exercise groupPercentage of fat reduction in control group
Hallsworth et al[27], 2011211911813%3%
Sullivan et al[28], 2012331812610%-8%3
Bacchi et al[29], 2013 (Aerobic)1403114-33%-
Bacchi et al[29], 2013 (Resistance)1403117-26%-
Eckard et al[33], 20132564191121%8%
Pugh et al[30],2014312113833%16%
Cuthbertson et al[31], 20166950302048%9%
Hallsworth et al[32], 20152925141126%-1%3
Table 3 Summary of responses in patients receiving diet and exercise compared to controls
Ref.Number of subjects with NAFLDNumber of subjects who completed the studyDiet and exercise groupControl groupPercentage of fat reduction in exercise groupPercentage of fat reduction in control group
Eckard et al[33], 201315641911278
Eckard et al[33], 2013156411211358
Wong et al[12], 201315414574715517
Table 4 Summary of studies included
Ref.InterventionChanges in fatPhysiologic changesClinical outcomeExercise outcome
Hallsworth et al[27], 2011RE13% relative decrease in IHTG in exercise groupNo significant change in blood lipids or ALTNo effect on body weight, visceral adipose tissue volume or whole body fatRE without weight change is effective in reducing IHTG in people with NAFLD
Approximately 12% increase in insulin sensitivity and increased fat oxidation
Sullivan et al[28], 2012AE10.3% ± 4.6% relative decrease in IHTG in exercise groupPlasma ALT decreased 12.8% + 3.1 in exercise groupBody weight, body fat mass remained sameSmall decrease in IHTG content
Bacchi et al[29], 2013AE and REReduction in IHTG by 35.8% in AE vs 25.9% in REHbA1c, HDL, TG, insulin sensitivity improvedBMI, total body fat mass, VAT, SAT were reducedAbsolute and relative reduction in IHTG in both exercise groups
Eckard et al[33], 2013Diet and AESignificant change was found in pre to post NAFLD activity scoreSignificant decrease in Brunt grade, ALT, ASTNo subgroup achieved a significant weight loss of > 5%Lifestyle modification improved liver histology after 6 mo intervention
Changes in % body fat were minimalWeight loss is not the key to improving liver histology
Wong et al[12], 2013Diet and AE6.7% decrease in IHTG in intervention groupDecrease in Total cholesterol, LDL, ALT and liver stiffnessReduction in body weight 5.6 kg, in BMI and waist circumference64% of patients achieved remission of NAFLD in exercise group
Pugh et al[30], 2014AEIHTG decreased by 33% in exercise group SAT decreased no significant difference in VAT, total abdominal fat and muscle fatFasting glucose decreased No difference in HOMA score, insulin, liver enzymes, lipid profile, adiponectin, and leptinNo weight change Cardiorespiratory fitness improved Waist circumference decreasedimproved endothelial dysfunction in the absence of change in liver fat and visceral fat content exercise training can reduce intrinsic CVD risk in NAFLD
Cuthbertson et al[31], 2016AEIHTG Significantly decreased (19.4%→10.1% in AE, 16%→14.6% in control)No significant change in HOMA, plasma insulin, fetuin, irisin, adiponectinCardiorespiratory fitness improved in exercise groupImprovement in peripheral IR but not in hepatic IR
Hallsworth et al[32], 2015AE27% reduction in IHTG in exercise groupDecrease in ALT and AST Improvement in diastolic functionNo weight change Mean 1.8 kg reduction in fat mass and body fat percentageSignificant reduction in IHTG, liver enzymes and body fat